Why is my 401k manager recommending me to save more?How much should I be contributing to my 401k given my employer's contribution?Employer overpaid 401k - what's my liability?401k Catch up Provision - Limits on timing?How much more can I contribute to my 401(k) this year after I made some Roth IRA, Roth 401k, and 401k contributions?Self employed 401k and traditional IRAMaximize my 401K and IRA, or save more for home downpayment?401k rollover and vested balanceWhat happens to the company match for a 401k over-contribution?Should I pay more into company pension, or is there a better way to save?401k employer vs personal limits
Meaning of the word "good" in context
Why doesn't SpaceX land boosters in Africa?
Why do some PCBs have exposed plated perimeters?
Why should I allow multiple IPs on a website for a single session?
Why is exile often an intermediate step?
Why is my 401k manager recommending me to save more?
What does 'in attendance' mean on an England death certificate?
How far can gerrymandering go?
Why did the Apple //e make a hideous noise if you inserted the disk upside down?
Does friction always oppose motion?
Fast method to cut/shred glue stick into small pieces
Customs and immigration on a USA-UK-Sweden flight itinerary
Having to constantly redo everything because I don't know how to do it
How does the 'five minute adventuring day' affect class balance?
Does it make sense to (partially) create a conlang that you don't intend to actually use in the story?
Why do movie directors use brown tint on Mexico cities?
Is leaving out prefixes like "rauf", "rüber", "rein" when describing movement considered a big mistake in spoken German?
What was the point of separating stdout and stderr?
Robots in a spaceship
Is it OK to throw pebbles and stones in streams, waterfalls, ponds, etc.?
How did they film the Invisible Man being invisible in 1933?
How do I present a future free of gender stereotypes without being jarring or overpowering the narrative?
Does "boire un jus" tend to mean "coffee" or "juice of fruit"?
Could you fall off a planet if it was being accelerated by engines?
Why is my 401k manager recommending me to save more?
How much should I be contributing to my 401k given my employer's contribution?Employer overpaid 401k - what's my liability?401k Catch up Provision - Limits on timing?How much more can I contribute to my 401(k) this year after I made some Roth IRA, Roth 401k, and 401k contributions?Self employed 401k and traditional IRAMaximize my 401K and IRA, or save more for home downpayment?401k rollover and vested balanceWhat happens to the company match for a 401k over-contribution?Should I pay more into company pension, or is there a better way to save?401k employer vs personal limits
I am currently contributing enough to hit the limit (~$18000) per year and get a match of 100% for 4% of it.
My 401k provider (Fidelity) just sent me a quarterly progress email and suggests that I save more. Say 15%. If I do so, I'll cross the 401k limit.
Should I just ignore that recommendation or is there something else I could/should do?
EDIT: I looked at the email again. For the sake of posterity, it does look like they were referring to retirement election (which has 2 sections - Employee Deferral and Roth Deferral). Employee Deferral has the percentages that I am contributing towards 401k.
Exact text of that snippet of the email: Saving for your future? Check. Contributing the suggested 15%† or more? Not quite—but you're so close! Get there in less than 60 seconds. <Button that says "Yes, Crush it!">
united-states 401k contribution excess-contribution fidelity
|
show 5 more comments
I am currently contributing enough to hit the limit (~$18000) per year and get a match of 100% for 4% of it.
My 401k provider (Fidelity) just sent me a quarterly progress email and suggests that I save more. Say 15%. If I do so, I'll cross the 401k limit.
Should I just ignore that recommendation or is there something else I could/should do?
EDIT: I looked at the email again. For the sake of posterity, it does look like they were referring to retirement election (which has 2 sections - Employee Deferral and Roth Deferral). Employee Deferral has the percentages that I am contributing towards 401k.
Exact text of that snippet of the email: Saving for your future? Check. Contributing the suggested 15%† or more? Not quite—but you're so close! Get there in less than 60 seconds. <Button that says "Yes, Crush it!">
united-states 401k contribution excess-contribution fidelity
2
The limit for 2019 is $19,000.
– yoozer8
9 hours ago
3
Because they have a vested interest in you giving them more money.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
3
You certainly should not contribute more than the limit, if your provider would even let you. Their emails are just standard marketing nonsense.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
4
It's not redundant at all. 100% match of 4% and 50% match of 8% are not the same thing.
– quid
8 hours ago
1
It is not poorly phrased. There are partial matches and even those can actually have different limits. For ex, there could also be100% match for the first 3% and 75% match for the next 3% and 50% match for 2%
.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
I am currently contributing enough to hit the limit (~$18000) per year and get a match of 100% for 4% of it.
My 401k provider (Fidelity) just sent me a quarterly progress email and suggests that I save more. Say 15%. If I do so, I'll cross the 401k limit.
Should I just ignore that recommendation or is there something else I could/should do?
EDIT: I looked at the email again. For the sake of posterity, it does look like they were referring to retirement election (which has 2 sections - Employee Deferral and Roth Deferral). Employee Deferral has the percentages that I am contributing towards 401k.
Exact text of that snippet of the email: Saving for your future? Check. Contributing the suggested 15%† or more? Not quite—but you're so close! Get there in less than 60 seconds. <Button that says "Yes, Crush it!">
united-states 401k contribution excess-contribution fidelity
I am currently contributing enough to hit the limit (~$18000) per year and get a match of 100% for 4% of it.
My 401k provider (Fidelity) just sent me a quarterly progress email and suggests that I save more. Say 15%. If I do so, I'll cross the 401k limit.
Should I just ignore that recommendation or is there something else I could/should do?
EDIT: I looked at the email again. For the sake of posterity, it does look like they were referring to retirement election (which has 2 sections - Employee Deferral and Roth Deferral). Employee Deferral has the percentages that I am contributing towards 401k.
Exact text of that snippet of the email: Saving for your future? Check. Contributing the suggested 15%† or more? Not quite—but you're so close! Get there in less than 60 seconds. <Button that says "Yes, Crush it!">
united-states 401k contribution excess-contribution fidelity
united-states 401k contribution excess-contribution fidelity
edited 7 hours ago
perennial_noob
asked 9 hours ago
perennial_noobperennial_noob
1,1792 gold badges6 silver badges28 bronze badges
1,1792 gold badges6 silver badges28 bronze badges
2
The limit for 2019 is $19,000.
– yoozer8
9 hours ago
3
Because they have a vested interest in you giving them more money.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
3
You certainly should not contribute more than the limit, if your provider would even let you. Their emails are just standard marketing nonsense.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
4
It's not redundant at all. 100% match of 4% and 50% match of 8% are not the same thing.
– quid
8 hours ago
1
It is not poorly phrased. There are partial matches and even those can actually have different limits. For ex, there could also be100% match for the first 3% and 75% match for the next 3% and 50% match for 2%
.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
2
The limit for 2019 is $19,000.
– yoozer8
9 hours ago
3
Because they have a vested interest in you giving them more money.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
3
You certainly should not contribute more than the limit, if your provider would even let you. Their emails are just standard marketing nonsense.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
4
It's not redundant at all. 100% match of 4% and 50% match of 8% are not the same thing.
– quid
8 hours ago
1
It is not poorly phrased. There are partial matches and even those can actually have different limits. For ex, there could also be100% match for the first 3% and 75% match for the next 3% and 50% match for 2%
.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
2
2
The limit for 2019 is $19,000.
– yoozer8
9 hours ago
The limit for 2019 is $19,000.
– yoozer8
9 hours ago
3
3
Because they have a vested interest in you giving them more money.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
Because they have a vested interest in you giving them more money.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
3
3
You certainly should not contribute more than the limit, if your provider would even let you. Their emails are just standard marketing nonsense.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
You certainly should not contribute more than the limit, if your provider would even let you. Their emails are just standard marketing nonsense.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
4
4
It's not redundant at all. 100% match of 4% and 50% match of 8% are not the same thing.
– quid
8 hours ago
It's not redundant at all. 100% match of 4% and 50% match of 8% are not the same thing.
– quid
8 hours ago
1
1
It is not poorly phrased. There are partial matches and even those can actually have different limits. For ex, there could also be
100% match for the first 3% and 75% match for the next 3% and 50% match for 2%
.– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
It is not poorly phrased. There are partial matches and even those can actually have different limits. For ex, there could also be
100% match for the first 3% and 75% match for the next 3% and 50% match for 2%
.– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
No one at fidelity told you to save more. Some poorly coded notification system suggested you save a higher percentage of your income with no consideration that your current election is taking you within spitting distance of the maximum.
It's probably important to remember that the custodian is just a vendor of the company you work for. You're entering a payroll deduction rate, the vendor then tells your employer, your employer then adjusts payroll. Generally speaking the payroll deduction process will max you then stop contributing unless you've given them specific instructions to the contrary.
You shouldn't assume that's the case, but fidelity isn't directly reaching in to your paychecks, your company is sending them the contributions and an allocation statement and generally goes out of its way to avoid overfunding.
Yeah if that is the case I'd be super annoyed. It is not only impersonal but also has a risk of someone who may not be careful to accidentally click through and set it to 15% (like they 'recommend'). I am also thinking they are generally meaning 401k and Roth...? I edited my post for the sake of posterity.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
1
You, personally, don't have a relationship with your 401(k) custodian. You have an employer, your employer has a 401(k) plan and generally outsources the custodial, administrative, and reporting efforts; in your case that's been outsourced to Fidelity. You don't have an individual 401(k) account at Fidelity, or anything like that. It's not like your Netflix subscription where you're authorizing someone to deduct something from your checking account. I hope that's helpful.
– quid
6 hours ago
@quid: Actually you do have an individual 401k account at whatever provider. You can log in, check balances, even withdraw money if you meet the criteria. What you can't do (AFAIK) is contribute your own money - the contributions go through the employer.
– jamesqf
56 mins ago
add a comment |
You didn't mention how old you are, which may be a factor, but as you observe you are already contributing the maximum you can to a 401(k) (or at least close to it).
Most retirement systems have some sort of "retirement calculator" that look at your current savings rate, time to retirement, other retirement assets, and cost of living to determine if you are saving enough to retire by your target age. It either has some default values, or you've put in some values that indicate that your current saving rate will not be enough to meet your retirement goals (e.g. you want to retire in 2 years and make $1 million per year for 30 years in retirement).
Take a closer look at the data they are using, adjust it to your current goals (including other retirement assets) and see if it still suggests you save more.
If you still don't have enough to meet the goals you set, then you can make adjustments. Yes, there is a limit to how much you can contribute to a 401(k) pre-tax, but there are other ways to save for retirement. You can look at Roth IRAs, or non-tax-advantaged accounts to increase your retirement savings.
Also note that if you can contribute to a Roth 401(k), then the after-tax future value of your retirement will be higher since the contribution limit is the same, but the earnings are tax-free at retirement.
This must be it. To answer your question, I am 34 and contributing close to the limits and getting the full match from the employer. Perhaps the email is hinting at saving more (not necessarily 401k as you pointed out). I edited my question to include the email snippet.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
add a comment |
It is virtually certain that the reason your investment manager is encouraging you to invest more is because he will make more money if you do. He may have targets to meet and your additional investment would help him reach them.
That is not to say his advice is necessarily bad, but we would need a lot more information to be able to pass an opinion on that.
"Invest more" does not necessarily mean "put more in your 401K". He may be suggesting other accounts.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110650%2fwhy-is-my-401k-manager-recommending-me-to-save-more%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No one at fidelity told you to save more. Some poorly coded notification system suggested you save a higher percentage of your income with no consideration that your current election is taking you within spitting distance of the maximum.
It's probably important to remember that the custodian is just a vendor of the company you work for. You're entering a payroll deduction rate, the vendor then tells your employer, your employer then adjusts payroll. Generally speaking the payroll deduction process will max you then stop contributing unless you've given them specific instructions to the contrary.
You shouldn't assume that's the case, but fidelity isn't directly reaching in to your paychecks, your company is sending them the contributions and an allocation statement and generally goes out of its way to avoid overfunding.
Yeah if that is the case I'd be super annoyed. It is not only impersonal but also has a risk of someone who may not be careful to accidentally click through and set it to 15% (like they 'recommend'). I am also thinking they are generally meaning 401k and Roth...? I edited my post for the sake of posterity.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
1
You, personally, don't have a relationship with your 401(k) custodian. You have an employer, your employer has a 401(k) plan and generally outsources the custodial, administrative, and reporting efforts; in your case that's been outsourced to Fidelity. You don't have an individual 401(k) account at Fidelity, or anything like that. It's not like your Netflix subscription where you're authorizing someone to deduct something from your checking account. I hope that's helpful.
– quid
6 hours ago
@quid: Actually you do have an individual 401k account at whatever provider. You can log in, check balances, even withdraw money if you meet the criteria. What you can't do (AFAIK) is contribute your own money - the contributions go through the employer.
– jamesqf
56 mins ago
add a comment |
No one at fidelity told you to save more. Some poorly coded notification system suggested you save a higher percentage of your income with no consideration that your current election is taking you within spitting distance of the maximum.
It's probably important to remember that the custodian is just a vendor of the company you work for. You're entering a payroll deduction rate, the vendor then tells your employer, your employer then adjusts payroll. Generally speaking the payroll deduction process will max you then stop contributing unless you've given them specific instructions to the contrary.
You shouldn't assume that's the case, but fidelity isn't directly reaching in to your paychecks, your company is sending them the contributions and an allocation statement and generally goes out of its way to avoid overfunding.
Yeah if that is the case I'd be super annoyed. It is not only impersonal but also has a risk of someone who may not be careful to accidentally click through and set it to 15% (like they 'recommend'). I am also thinking they are generally meaning 401k and Roth...? I edited my post for the sake of posterity.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
1
You, personally, don't have a relationship with your 401(k) custodian. You have an employer, your employer has a 401(k) plan and generally outsources the custodial, administrative, and reporting efforts; in your case that's been outsourced to Fidelity. You don't have an individual 401(k) account at Fidelity, or anything like that. It's not like your Netflix subscription where you're authorizing someone to deduct something from your checking account. I hope that's helpful.
– quid
6 hours ago
@quid: Actually you do have an individual 401k account at whatever provider. You can log in, check balances, even withdraw money if you meet the criteria. What you can't do (AFAIK) is contribute your own money - the contributions go through the employer.
– jamesqf
56 mins ago
add a comment |
No one at fidelity told you to save more. Some poorly coded notification system suggested you save a higher percentage of your income with no consideration that your current election is taking you within spitting distance of the maximum.
It's probably important to remember that the custodian is just a vendor of the company you work for. You're entering a payroll deduction rate, the vendor then tells your employer, your employer then adjusts payroll. Generally speaking the payroll deduction process will max you then stop contributing unless you've given them specific instructions to the contrary.
You shouldn't assume that's the case, but fidelity isn't directly reaching in to your paychecks, your company is sending them the contributions and an allocation statement and generally goes out of its way to avoid overfunding.
No one at fidelity told you to save more. Some poorly coded notification system suggested you save a higher percentage of your income with no consideration that your current election is taking you within spitting distance of the maximum.
It's probably important to remember that the custodian is just a vendor of the company you work for. You're entering a payroll deduction rate, the vendor then tells your employer, your employer then adjusts payroll. Generally speaking the payroll deduction process will max you then stop contributing unless you've given them specific instructions to the contrary.
You shouldn't assume that's the case, but fidelity isn't directly reaching in to your paychecks, your company is sending them the contributions and an allocation statement and generally goes out of its way to avoid overfunding.
edited 5 hours ago
0xFEE1DEAD
1,7627 silver badges14 bronze badges
1,7627 silver badges14 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
quidquid
41.3k8 gold badges81 silver badges134 bronze badges
41.3k8 gold badges81 silver badges134 bronze badges
Yeah if that is the case I'd be super annoyed. It is not only impersonal but also has a risk of someone who may not be careful to accidentally click through and set it to 15% (like they 'recommend'). I am also thinking they are generally meaning 401k and Roth...? I edited my post for the sake of posterity.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
1
You, personally, don't have a relationship with your 401(k) custodian. You have an employer, your employer has a 401(k) plan and generally outsources the custodial, administrative, and reporting efforts; in your case that's been outsourced to Fidelity. You don't have an individual 401(k) account at Fidelity, or anything like that. It's not like your Netflix subscription where you're authorizing someone to deduct something from your checking account. I hope that's helpful.
– quid
6 hours ago
@quid: Actually you do have an individual 401k account at whatever provider. You can log in, check balances, even withdraw money if you meet the criteria. What you can't do (AFAIK) is contribute your own money - the contributions go through the employer.
– jamesqf
56 mins ago
add a comment |
Yeah if that is the case I'd be super annoyed. It is not only impersonal but also has a risk of someone who may not be careful to accidentally click through and set it to 15% (like they 'recommend'). I am also thinking they are generally meaning 401k and Roth...? I edited my post for the sake of posterity.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
1
You, personally, don't have a relationship with your 401(k) custodian. You have an employer, your employer has a 401(k) plan and generally outsources the custodial, administrative, and reporting efforts; in your case that's been outsourced to Fidelity. You don't have an individual 401(k) account at Fidelity, or anything like that. It's not like your Netflix subscription where you're authorizing someone to deduct something from your checking account. I hope that's helpful.
– quid
6 hours ago
@quid: Actually you do have an individual 401k account at whatever provider. You can log in, check balances, even withdraw money if you meet the criteria. What you can't do (AFAIK) is contribute your own money - the contributions go through the employer.
– jamesqf
56 mins ago
Yeah if that is the case I'd be super annoyed. It is not only impersonal but also has a risk of someone who may not be careful to accidentally click through and set it to 15% (like they 'recommend'). I am also thinking they are generally meaning 401k and Roth...? I edited my post for the sake of posterity.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
Yeah if that is the case I'd be super annoyed. It is not only impersonal but also has a risk of someone who may not be careful to accidentally click through and set it to 15% (like they 'recommend'). I am also thinking they are generally meaning 401k and Roth...? I edited my post for the sake of posterity.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
1
1
You, personally, don't have a relationship with your 401(k) custodian. You have an employer, your employer has a 401(k) plan and generally outsources the custodial, administrative, and reporting efforts; in your case that's been outsourced to Fidelity. You don't have an individual 401(k) account at Fidelity, or anything like that. It's not like your Netflix subscription where you're authorizing someone to deduct something from your checking account. I hope that's helpful.
– quid
6 hours ago
You, personally, don't have a relationship with your 401(k) custodian. You have an employer, your employer has a 401(k) plan and generally outsources the custodial, administrative, and reporting efforts; in your case that's been outsourced to Fidelity. You don't have an individual 401(k) account at Fidelity, or anything like that. It's not like your Netflix subscription where you're authorizing someone to deduct something from your checking account. I hope that's helpful.
– quid
6 hours ago
@quid: Actually you do have an individual 401k account at whatever provider. You can log in, check balances, even withdraw money if you meet the criteria. What you can't do (AFAIK) is contribute your own money - the contributions go through the employer.
– jamesqf
56 mins ago
@quid: Actually you do have an individual 401k account at whatever provider. You can log in, check balances, even withdraw money if you meet the criteria. What you can't do (AFAIK) is contribute your own money - the contributions go through the employer.
– jamesqf
56 mins ago
add a comment |
You didn't mention how old you are, which may be a factor, but as you observe you are already contributing the maximum you can to a 401(k) (or at least close to it).
Most retirement systems have some sort of "retirement calculator" that look at your current savings rate, time to retirement, other retirement assets, and cost of living to determine if you are saving enough to retire by your target age. It either has some default values, or you've put in some values that indicate that your current saving rate will not be enough to meet your retirement goals (e.g. you want to retire in 2 years and make $1 million per year for 30 years in retirement).
Take a closer look at the data they are using, adjust it to your current goals (including other retirement assets) and see if it still suggests you save more.
If you still don't have enough to meet the goals you set, then you can make adjustments. Yes, there is a limit to how much you can contribute to a 401(k) pre-tax, but there are other ways to save for retirement. You can look at Roth IRAs, or non-tax-advantaged accounts to increase your retirement savings.
Also note that if you can contribute to a Roth 401(k), then the after-tax future value of your retirement will be higher since the contribution limit is the same, but the earnings are tax-free at retirement.
This must be it. To answer your question, I am 34 and contributing close to the limits and getting the full match from the employer. Perhaps the email is hinting at saving more (not necessarily 401k as you pointed out). I edited my question to include the email snippet.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You didn't mention how old you are, which may be a factor, but as you observe you are already contributing the maximum you can to a 401(k) (or at least close to it).
Most retirement systems have some sort of "retirement calculator" that look at your current savings rate, time to retirement, other retirement assets, and cost of living to determine if you are saving enough to retire by your target age. It either has some default values, or you've put in some values that indicate that your current saving rate will not be enough to meet your retirement goals (e.g. you want to retire in 2 years and make $1 million per year for 30 years in retirement).
Take a closer look at the data they are using, adjust it to your current goals (including other retirement assets) and see if it still suggests you save more.
If you still don't have enough to meet the goals you set, then you can make adjustments. Yes, there is a limit to how much you can contribute to a 401(k) pre-tax, but there are other ways to save for retirement. You can look at Roth IRAs, or non-tax-advantaged accounts to increase your retirement savings.
Also note that if you can contribute to a Roth 401(k), then the after-tax future value of your retirement will be higher since the contribution limit is the same, but the earnings are tax-free at retirement.
This must be it. To answer your question, I am 34 and contributing close to the limits and getting the full match from the employer. Perhaps the email is hinting at saving more (not necessarily 401k as you pointed out). I edited my question to include the email snippet.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You didn't mention how old you are, which may be a factor, but as you observe you are already contributing the maximum you can to a 401(k) (or at least close to it).
Most retirement systems have some sort of "retirement calculator" that look at your current savings rate, time to retirement, other retirement assets, and cost of living to determine if you are saving enough to retire by your target age. It either has some default values, or you've put in some values that indicate that your current saving rate will not be enough to meet your retirement goals (e.g. you want to retire in 2 years and make $1 million per year for 30 years in retirement).
Take a closer look at the data they are using, adjust it to your current goals (including other retirement assets) and see if it still suggests you save more.
If you still don't have enough to meet the goals you set, then you can make adjustments. Yes, there is a limit to how much you can contribute to a 401(k) pre-tax, but there are other ways to save for retirement. You can look at Roth IRAs, or non-tax-advantaged accounts to increase your retirement savings.
Also note that if you can contribute to a Roth 401(k), then the after-tax future value of your retirement will be higher since the contribution limit is the same, but the earnings are tax-free at retirement.
You didn't mention how old you are, which may be a factor, but as you observe you are already contributing the maximum you can to a 401(k) (or at least close to it).
Most retirement systems have some sort of "retirement calculator" that look at your current savings rate, time to retirement, other retirement assets, and cost of living to determine if you are saving enough to retire by your target age. It either has some default values, or you've put in some values that indicate that your current saving rate will not be enough to meet your retirement goals (e.g. you want to retire in 2 years and make $1 million per year for 30 years in retirement).
Take a closer look at the data they are using, adjust it to your current goals (including other retirement assets) and see if it still suggests you save more.
If you still don't have enough to meet the goals you set, then you can make adjustments. Yes, there is a limit to how much you can contribute to a 401(k) pre-tax, but there are other ways to save for retirement. You can look at Roth IRAs, or non-tax-advantaged accounts to increase your retirement savings.
Also note that if you can contribute to a Roth 401(k), then the after-tax future value of your retirement will be higher since the contribution limit is the same, but the earnings are tax-free at retirement.
answered 8 hours ago
D StanleyD Stanley
60.6k10 gold badges176 silver badges181 bronze badges
60.6k10 gold badges176 silver badges181 bronze badges
This must be it. To answer your question, I am 34 and contributing close to the limits and getting the full match from the employer. Perhaps the email is hinting at saving more (not necessarily 401k as you pointed out). I edited my question to include the email snippet.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
add a comment |
This must be it. To answer your question, I am 34 and contributing close to the limits and getting the full match from the employer. Perhaps the email is hinting at saving more (not necessarily 401k as you pointed out). I edited my question to include the email snippet.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
This must be it. To answer your question, I am 34 and contributing close to the limits and getting the full match from the employer. Perhaps the email is hinting at saving more (not necessarily 401k as you pointed out). I edited my question to include the email snippet.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
This must be it. To answer your question, I am 34 and contributing close to the limits and getting the full match from the employer. Perhaps the email is hinting at saving more (not necessarily 401k as you pointed out). I edited my question to include the email snippet.
– perennial_noob
7 hours ago
add a comment |
It is virtually certain that the reason your investment manager is encouraging you to invest more is because he will make more money if you do. He may have targets to meet and your additional investment would help him reach them.
That is not to say his advice is necessarily bad, but we would need a lot more information to be able to pass an opinion on that.
"Invest more" does not necessarily mean "put more in your 401K". He may be suggesting other accounts.
add a comment |
It is virtually certain that the reason your investment manager is encouraging you to invest more is because he will make more money if you do. He may have targets to meet and your additional investment would help him reach them.
That is not to say his advice is necessarily bad, but we would need a lot more information to be able to pass an opinion on that.
"Invest more" does not necessarily mean "put more in your 401K". He may be suggesting other accounts.
add a comment |
It is virtually certain that the reason your investment manager is encouraging you to invest more is because he will make more money if you do. He may have targets to meet and your additional investment would help him reach them.
That is not to say his advice is necessarily bad, but we would need a lot more information to be able to pass an opinion on that.
"Invest more" does not necessarily mean "put more in your 401K". He may be suggesting other accounts.
It is virtually certain that the reason your investment manager is encouraging you to invest more is because he will make more money if you do. He may have targets to meet and your additional investment would help him reach them.
That is not to say his advice is necessarily bad, but we would need a lot more information to be able to pass an opinion on that.
"Invest more" does not necessarily mean "put more in your 401K". He may be suggesting other accounts.
answered 8 hours ago
DJClayworthDJClayworth
18.7k5 gold badges57 silver badges81 bronze badges
18.7k5 gold badges57 silver badges81 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110650%2fwhy-is-my-401k-manager-recommending-me-to-save-more%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
The limit for 2019 is $19,000.
– yoozer8
9 hours ago
3
Because they have a vested interest in you giving them more money.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
3
You certainly should not contribute more than the limit, if your provider would even let you. Their emails are just standard marketing nonsense.
– Kevin
8 hours ago
4
It's not redundant at all. 100% match of 4% and 50% match of 8% are not the same thing.
– quid
8 hours ago
1
It is not poorly phrased. There are partial matches and even those can actually have different limits. For ex, there could also be
100% match for the first 3% and 75% match for the next 3% and 50% match for 2%
.– perennial_noob
7 hours ago