Is it bad to describe a character long after their introduction?Is it better to describe the main character's physical appearance early on in the story?How to describe a diverse set of characters without falling into purple prose or exoticism?How to refer to clothes without modern words ? (e.g: t-shirt)How do I know who's my protagonist? EARLY in writing process (maybe complicated, maybe not)Why introduce new physical appearance details late in the narrative?Would it be possible to create a character without substantial motivation?How Much Focus to Give a Supporting Character?Is it important to describe every character of the storyline?When is a lack of long, sophisticated words to describe an otherwise simple concept bad?Describing a person. What needs to be mentioned?

How well known and how commonly used was Huffman coding in 1979?

How exactly is a normal force exerted, at the molecular level?

SPI Waveform on Raspberry Pi Not clean and I'm wondering why

Why is Madam Hooch not a professor?

Reverse of diffraction

How hard is it to sell a home which is currently mortgaged?

How can I bypass the confirmation for granting permissions to files or folders?

What shortcut does ⌦ symbol in Camunda macOS app indicate and how to invoke it?

Compute unstable integral with high precision

If a high rpm motor is run at lower rpm, will it produce more torque?

Procedurally generate regions on island

Does anycast addressing add additional latency in any way?

Why does the numerical solution of an ODE move away from an unstable equilibrium?

Alphabet completion rate

Generate and graph the Recamán Sequence

How fast can a ship with rotating habitats be accelerated?

How do I find and plot the intersection of these three surfaces?

A player is constantly pestering me about rules, what do I do as a DM?

“Transitive verb” + interrupter+ “object”?

Analog is Obtuse!

How to write or read powers (math) by words?

Was touching your nose a greeting in second millenium Mesopotamia?

Should I tell my insurance company I have an unsecured loan for my new car?

How come I was asked by a CBP officer why I was in the US when leaving?



Is it bad to describe a character long after their introduction?


Is it better to describe the main character's physical appearance early on in the story?How to describe a diverse set of characters without falling into purple prose or exoticism?How to refer to clothes without modern words ? (e.g: t-shirt)How do I know who's my protagonist? EARLY in writing process (maybe complicated, maybe not)Why introduce new physical appearance details late in the narrative?Would it be possible to create a character without substantial motivation?How Much Focus to Give a Supporting Character?Is it important to describe every character of the storyline?When is a lack of long, sophisticated words to describe an otherwise simple concept bad?Describing a person. What needs to be mentioned?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I have a tendency to forget to describe character's appearance. But I always describe them, though often a little while after their introduction. So, how long after someone's introduction is "acceptable" to describe them? In my case, (the case that prompted me to ask this question), the character is described in the same chapter, 866 words later. A little less words if you count from when his name is revealed.



Is this too long? And this is quite mild. Some of my character get no physical descriptions, until potentially many chapters later, when their appearance becomes relevant to the plot or narrative.



But I have been told how important giving characters a face is. Without it, they're just grey silhouettes in the readers' minds. And though I believe other things like personality, plot importance and symbolism should carry characters, instead of appearance, perhaps the physical description is vital for the existence of the character.










share|improve this question




























    4















    I have a tendency to forget to describe character's appearance. But I always describe them, though often a little while after their introduction. So, how long after someone's introduction is "acceptable" to describe them? In my case, (the case that prompted me to ask this question), the character is described in the same chapter, 866 words later. A little less words if you count from when his name is revealed.



    Is this too long? And this is quite mild. Some of my character get no physical descriptions, until potentially many chapters later, when their appearance becomes relevant to the plot or narrative.



    But I have been told how important giving characters a face is. Without it, they're just grey silhouettes in the readers' minds. And though I believe other things like personality, plot importance and symbolism should carry characters, instead of appearance, perhaps the physical description is vital for the existence of the character.










    share|improve this question
























      4












      4








      4








      I have a tendency to forget to describe character's appearance. But I always describe them, though often a little while after their introduction. So, how long after someone's introduction is "acceptable" to describe them? In my case, (the case that prompted me to ask this question), the character is described in the same chapter, 866 words later. A little less words if you count from when his name is revealed.



      Is this too long? And this is quite mild. Some of my character get no physical descriptions, until potentially many chapters later, when their appearance becomes relevant to the plot or narrative.



      But I have been told how important giving characters a face is. Without it, they're just grey silhouettes in the readers' minds. And though I believe other things like personality, plot importance and symbolism should carry characters, instead of appearance, perhaps the physical description is vital for the existence of the character.










      share|improve this question














      I have a tendency to forget to describe character's appearance. But I always describe them, though often a little while after their introduction. So, how long after someone's introduction is "acceptable" to describe them? In my case, (the case that prompted me to ask this question), the character is described in the same chapter, 866 words later. A little less words if you count from when his name is revealed.



      Is this too long? And this is quite mild. Some of my character get no physical descriptions, until potentially many chapters later, when their appearance becomes relevant to the plot or narrative.



      But I have been told how important giving characters a face is. Without it, they're just grey silhouettes in the readers' minds. And though I believe other things like personality, plot importance and symbolism should carry characters, instead of appearance, perhaps the physical description is vital for the existence of the character.







      characters character-development description






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      A. KvåleA. Kvåle

      1,1887 silver badges25 bronze badges




      1,1887 silver badges25 bronze badges




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Personally the dissonance whenever I have imagined a character for hours and maybe thought about their stories throughout some days because I can't read a book straight in one go is the biggest problem. It's very irritating because some part of me wants to scratch all that I have thought about through the time and rebuild it to have the same image as the author, or at least something roughly close, and another part just wants to continue with the image I had in my mind because I am used to it and probably have come to like it with regards to the story.



          This is not just happening with their general appearance, but also with other characteristics. As someone who is right-handed it can be irritating to follow a character's story for hours and in a critical moment their "strong hand" is bound or something like that and instead they use their right hand - I thought right was the strong hand. It's a bias, I know, but I will imagine every character to be right-handed by default unless explicitly told that they are left-handed. And if it becomes important which hand is doing what it will be irritating.



          If it gets important you should mention it at an early point in time when a "viewer" would have realised it. There is no point in talking about the hands if you are only concentrating on the feet in a scene. But you can just use a calm scene to showcase this by making a generic allusion to the character using their left hand for something like holding their coffee cup.



          It's the same with their clothing, general appearance, mannerisms, ... You don't have to scream in the face of your reader that the girl's hair is 76 centimetres long at the longest point and has a mahagoni colour when seen through the light of two of the three suns of your fictional planet around noon, but only if it's still a bit wet from the shower because otherwise it would be brighter - just say that she has long, brown hair. And once someone in your book wants to talk more specific about the colour, like when they are comparing the hair colour of two characters, you can get more specific. But if you never mention that she has really long hair and that will be relevant, for example in a fight scene, your readers might be confused if they imagined someone with short hair.



          Giving some rough details when everything is new and filling out the details throughout the book is always a good way to keep your readers attention and not get derailed, but still making sure that they understand what is going on.



          People think in the form of pictures. They will picture the scene you describe. Everything you don't describe will get filled in by them so that they can still have a picture. The longer you wait to "fix" things in the picture the more pictures will have accrued that need to be "fixed". The appearance of humans is incredibly important for us humans to determine whether we like or dislike someone, which is probably why your beta readers or other feedback-giving people told you that you need to give your characters a "face". If you don't give them a face and clothes and a general appearance your readers will do it for you to the best of their abilities. But the characters that are acting are always in the middle of the picture. If you haven't described them it will feel like you have "forgotten" something that now needs to be filled explicitly.



          As long as nothing important happens in a chapter it would be okay to leave the generic description for the end of the chapter. Most of the time a very rough description will happen when a character first appears, but there are all sorts of reasons why you might delay the description. Wearing a helmet, darkness, other things that are more important, such as death traps, ... Anything that makes your character later say something like "Now that I could have a good look at him/her/ ... I realize that [whatever you want to say to describe them]."



          Waiting multiple chapters is too long most of the time. At least for the generic rough description. It's not a problem to wait with the detailed description for a few chapters though.



          All of this obviously depends a lot on the story. If the appearance is important the moment the character appears it needs to be told. If it's not possible and relevant to describe you should not waste too much time while other things are obviously more important right now.






          share|improve this answer























          • Jesus, people are quick to accept answers today! This is the second time an answer was accepted while I was writing one myself. :D (Good answer though - I'll +1 as soon as I am allowed to vote again.)

            – PoorYorick
            8 hours ago


















          3














          Yes, it is bad. Your description should come pretty early on. Consider the mental image readers have of a scene - in the moment that a character appears visibly, they will imagine the character in some way. (Obviously, if the character is introduced as a shadowy figure at first, you only have to describe them once they come into the light and the protagonists can clearly see them.)



          If you don't have a narrative reason to postpone the description, then describe the character directly. Or not at all - not every character needs a detailed description. Ideally, the things you mention should be important, maybe even relevant to the plot. Character descriptions are often way too detailed.






          share|improve this answer























          • Good answer, deservant of an accept too. I like the fact that you mentioned that character descriptions are often way too detailed. This might just be for me, but I personally don't care what characters look like, and I'll probably just imagine them as a bundle of their personality traits that I've picked up. Though, then again, I have a hard time imagining characters anyway, I probably have aphantasia.

            – A. Kvåle
            8 hours ago


















          2














          I'd say the issue is that if you are in a character's viewpoint and they meet a new person, they will likely have some response to that new person straight away. That should be mentioned in the moment.




          He smelled like old garlic and fish, and I took a step back.




          or...




          She wore a bowtie and suspenders. I wanted that sort of moxie, the self confidence to cross dress in some little way, say 'up yours' to anyone I happened to pass on the street.




          or...




          This kid--my god this kid looked completely hopped up on... something.
          His eyes were glazed over and he smelled like he might have soiled
          himself. i looked up at his mom, but she seemed just like any other soccer
          mom.




          ^Those are the sorts of things that a character would notice, and they not think them later, at the end of the scene, but instead right away. I think some reaction (which provides description) should happen right away, and it should be the response from your viewpoint character that tells us more about her/him.






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "166"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46174%2fis-it-bad-to-describe-a-character-long-after-their-introduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            Personally the dissonance whenever I have imagined a character for hours and maybe thought about their stories throughout some days because I can't read a book straight in one go is the biggest problem. It's very irritating because some part of me wants to scratch all that I have thought about through the time and rebuild it to have the same image as the author, or at least something roughly close, and another part just wants to continue with the image I had in my mind because I am used to it and probably have come to like it with regards to the story.



            This is not just happening with their general appearance, but also with other characteristics. As someone who is right-handed it can be irritating to follow a character's story for hours and in a critical moment their "strong hand" is bound or something like that and instead they use their right hand - I thought right was the strong hand. It's a bias, I know, but I will imagine every character to be right-handed by default unless explicitly told that they are left-handed. And if it becomes important which hand is doing what it will be irritating.



            If it gets important you should mention it at an early point in time when a "viewer" would have realised it. There is no point in talking about the hands if you are only concentrating on the feet in a scene. But you can just use a calm scene to showcase this by making a generic allusion to the character using their left hand for something like holding their coffee cup.



            It's the same with their clothing, general appearance, mannerisms, ... You don't have to scream in the face of your reader that the girl's hair is 76 centimetres long at the longest point and has a mahagoni colour when seen through the light of two of the three suns of your fictional planet around noon, but only if it's still a bit wet from the shower because otherwise it would be brighter - just say that she has long, brown hair. And once someone in your book wants to talk more specific about the colour, like when they are comparing the hair colour of two characters, you can get more specific. But if you never mention that she has really long hair and that will be relevant, for example in a fight scene, your readers might be confused if they imagined someone with short hair.



            Giving some rough details when everything is new and filling out the details throughout the book is always a good way to keep your readers attention and not get derailed, but still making sure that they understand what is going on.



            People think in the form of pictures. They will picture the scene you describe. Everything you don't describe will get filled in by them so that they can still have a picture. The longer you wait to "fix" things in the picture the more pictures will have accrued that need to be "fixed". The appearance of humans is incredibly important for us humans to determine whether we like or dislike someone, which is probably why your beta readers or other feedback-giving people told you that you need to give your characters a "face". If you don't give them a face and clothes and a general appearance your readers will do it for you to the best of their abilities. But the characters that are acting are always in the middle of the picture. If you haven't described them it will feel like you have "forgotten" something that now needs to be filled explicitly.



            As long as nothing important happens in a chapter it would be okay to leave the generic description for the end of the chapter. Most of the time a very rough description will happen when a character first appears, but there are all sorts of reasons why you might delay the description. Wearing a helmet, darkness, other things that are more important, such as death traps, ... Anything that makes your character later say something like "Now that I could have a good look at him/her/ ... I realize that [whatever you want to say to describe them]."



            Waiting multiple chapters is too long most of the time. At least for the generic rough description. It's not a problem to wait with the detailed description for a few chapters though.



            All of this obviously depends a lot on the story. If the appearance is important the moment the character appears it needs to be told. If it's not possible and relevant to describe you should not waste too much time while other things are obviously more important right now.






            share|improve this answer























            • Jesus, people are quick to accept answers today! This is the second time an answer was accepted while I was writing one myself. :D (Good answer though - I'll +1 as soon as I am allowed to vote again.)

              – PoorYorick
              8 hours ago















            3














            Personally the dissonance whenever I have imagined a character for hours and maybe thought about their stories throughout some days because I can't read a book straight in one go is the biggest problem. It's very irritating because some part of me wants to scratch all that I have thought about through the time and rebuild it to have the same image as the author, or at least something roughly close, and another part just wants to continue with the image I had in my mind because I am used to it and probably have come to like it with regards to the story.



            This is not just happening with their general appearance, but also with other characteristics. As someone who is right-handed it can be irritating to follow a character's story for hours and in a critical moment their "strong hand" is bound or something like that and instead they use their right hand - I thought right was the strong hand. It's a bias, I know, but I will imagine every character to be right-handed by default unless explicitly told that they are left-handed. And if it becomes important which hand is doing what it will be irritating.



            If it gets important you should mention it at an early point in time when a "viewer" would have realised it. There is no point in talking about the hands if you are only concentrating on the feet in a scene. But you can just use a calm scene to showcase this by making a generic allusion to the character using their left hand for something like holding their coffee cup.



            It's the same with their clothing, general appearance, mannerisms, ... You don't have to scream in the face of your reader that the girl's hair is 76 centimetres long at the longest point and has a mahagoni colour when seen through the light of two of the three suns of your fictional planet around noon, but only if it's still a bit wet from the shower because otherwise it would be brighter - just say that she has long, brown hair. And once someone in your book wants to talk more specific about the colour, like when they are comparing the hair colour of two characters, you can get more specific. But if you never mention that she has really long hair and that will be relevant, for example in a fight scene, your readers might be confused if they imagined someone with short hair.



            Giving some rough details when everything is new and filling out the details throughout the book is always a good way to keep your readers attention and not get derailed, but still making sure that they understand what is going on.



            People think in the form of pictures. They will picture the scene you describe. Everything you don't describe will get filled in by them so that they can still have a picture. The longer you wait to "fix" things in the picture the more pictures will have accrued that need to be "fixed". The appearance of humans is incredibly important for us humans to determine whether we like or dislike someone, which is probably why your beta readers or other feedback-giving people told you that you need to give your characters a "face". If you don't give them a face and clothes and a general appearance your readers will do it for you to the best of their abilities. But the characters that are acting are always in the middle of the picture. If you haven't described them it will feel like you have "forgotten" something that now needs to be filled explicitly.



            As long as nothing important happens in a chapter it would be okay to leave the generic description for the end of the chapter. Most of the time a very rough description will happen when a character first appears, but there are all sorts of reasons why you might delay the description. Wearing a helmet, darkness, other things that are more important, such as death traps, ... Anything that makes your character later say something like "Now that I could have a good look at him/her/ ... I realize that [whatever you want to say to describe them]."



            Waiting multiple chapters is too long most of the time. At least for the generic rough description. It's not a problem to wait with the detailed description for a few chapters though.



            All of this obviously depends a lot on the story. If the appearance is important the moment the character appears it needs to be told. If it's not possible and relevant to describe you should not waste too much time while other things are obviously more important right now.






            share|improve this answer























            • Jesus, people are quick to accept answers today! This is the second time an answer was accepted while I was writing one myself. :D (Good answer though - I'll +1 as soon as I am allowed to vote again.)

              – PoorYorick
              8 hours ago













            3












            3








            3







            Personally the dissonance whenever I have imagined a character for hours and maybe thought about their stories throughout some days because I can't read a book straight in one go is the biggest problem. It's very irritating because some part of me wants to scratch all that I have thought about through the time and rebuild it to have the same image as the author, or at least something roughly close, and another part just wants to continue with the image I had in my mind because I am used to it and probably have come to like it with regards to the story.



            This is not just happening with their general appearance, but also with other characteristics. As someone who is right-handed it can be irritating to follow a character's story for hours and in a critical moment their "strong hand" is bound or something like that and instead they use their right hand - I thought right was the strong hand. It's a bias, I know, but I will imagine every character to be right-handed by default unless explicitly told that they are left-handed. And if it becomes important which hand is doing what it will be irritating.



            If it gets important you should mention it at an early point in time when a "viewer" would have realised it. There is no point in talking about the hands if you are only concentrating on the feet in a scene. But you can just use a calm scene to showcase this by making a generic allusion to the character using their left hand for something like holding their coffee cup.



            It's the same with their clothing, general appearance, mannerisms, ... You don't have to scream in the face of your reader that the girl's hair is 76 centimetres long at the longest point and has a mahagoni colour when seen through the light of two of the three suns of your fictional planet around noon, but only if it's still a bit wet from the shower because otherwise it would be brighter - just say that she has long, brown hair. And once someone in your book wants to talk more specific about the colour, like when they are comparing the hair colour of two characters, you can get more specific. But if you never mention that she has really long hair and that will be relevant, for example in a fight scene, your readers might be confused if they imagined someone with short hair.



            Giving some rough details when everything is new and filling out the details throughout the book is always a good way to keep your readers attention and not get derailed, but still making sure that they understand what is going on.



            People think in the form of pictures. They will picture the scene you describe. Everything you don't describe will get filled in by them so that they can still have a picture. The longer you wait to "fix" things in the picture the more pictures will have accrued that need to be "fixed". The appearance of humans is incredibly important for us humans to determine whether we like or dislike someone, which is probably why your beta readers or other feedback-giving people told you that you need to give your characters a "face". If you don't give them a face and clothes and a general appearance your readers will do it for you to the best of their abilities. But the characters that are acting are always in the middle of the picture. If you haven't described them it will feel like you have "forgotten" something that now needs to be filled explicitly.



            As long as nothing important happens in a chapter it would be okay to leave the generic description for the end of the chapter. Most of the time a very rough description will happen when a character first appears, but there are all sorts of reasons why you might delay the description. Wearing a helmet, darkness, other things that are more important, such as death traps, ... Anything that makes your character later say something like "Now that I could have a good look at him/her/ ... I realize that [whatever you want to say to describe them]."



            Waiting multiple chapters is too long most of the time. At least for the generic rough description. It's not a problem to wait with the detailed description for a few chapters though.



            All of this obviously depends a lot on the story. If the appearance is important the moment the character appears it needs to be told. If it's not possible and relevant to describe you should not waste too much time while other things are obviously more important right now.






            share|improve this answer













            Personally the dissonance whenever I have imagined a character for hours and maybe thought about their stories throughout some days because I can't read a book straight in one go is the biggest problem. It's very irritating because some part of me wants to scratch all that I have thought about through the time and rebuild it to have the same image as the author, or at least something roughly close, and another part just wants to continue with the image I had in my mind because I am used to it and probably have come to like it with regards to the story.



            This is not just happening with their general appearance, but also with other characteristics. As someone who is right-handed it can be irritating to follow a character's story for hours and in a critical moment their "strong hand" is bound or something like that and instead they use their right hand - I thought right was the strong hand. It's a bias, I know, but I will imagine every character to be right-handed by default unless explicitly told that they are left-handed. And if it becomes important which hand is doing what it will be irritating.



            If it gets important you should mention it at an early point in time when a "viewer" would have realised it. There is no point in talking about the hands if you are only concentrating on the feet in a scene. But you can just use a calm scene to showcase this by making a generic allusion to the character using their left hand for something like holding their coffee cup.



            It's the same with their clothing, general appearance, mannerisms, ... You don't have to scream in the face of your reader that the girl's hair is 76 centimetres long at the longest point and has a mahagoni colour when seen through the light of two of the three suns of your fictional planet around noon, but only if it's still a bit wet from the shower because otherwise it would be brighter - just say that she has long, brown hair. And once someone in your book wants to talk more specific about the colour, like when they are comparing the hair colour of two characters, you can get more specific. But if you never mention that she has really long hair and that will be relevant, for example in a fight scene, your readers might be confused if they imagined someone with short hair.



            Giving some rough details when everything is new and filling out the details throughout the book is always a good way to keep your readers attention and not get derailed, but still making sure that they understand what is going on.



            People think in the form of pictures. They will picture the scene you describe. Everything you don't describe will get filled in by them so that they can still have a picture. The longer you wait to "fix" things in the picture the more pictures will have accrued that need to be "fixed". The appearance of humans is incredibly important for us humans to determine whether we like or dislike someone, which is probably why your beta readers or other feedback-giving people told you that you need to give your characters a "face". If you don't give them a face and clothes and a general appearance your readers will do it for you to the best of their abilities. But the characters that are acting are always in the middle of the picture. If you haven't described them it will feel like you have "forgotten" something that now needs to be filled explicitly.



            As long as nothing important happens in a chapter it would be okay to leave the generic description for the end of the chapter. Most of the time a very rough description will happen when a character first appears, but there are all sorts of reasons why you might delay the description. Wearing a helmet, darkness, other things that are more important, such as death traps, ... Anything that makes your character later say something like "Now that I could have a good look at him/her/ ... I realize that [whatever you want to say to describe them]."



            Waiting multiple chapters is too long most of the time. At least for the generic rough description. It's not a problem to wait with the detailed description for a few chapters though.



            All of this obviously depends a lot on the story. If the appearance is important the moment the character appears it needs to be told. If it's not possible and relevant to describe you should not waste too much time while other things are obviously more important right now.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            SecespitusSecespitus

            5,2643 gold badges33 silver badges81 bronze badges




            5,2643 gold badges33 silver badges81 bronze badges












            • Jesus, people are quick to accept answers today! This is the second time an answer was accepted while I was writing one myself. :D (Good answer though - I'll +1 as soon as I am allowed to vote again.)

              – PoorYorick
              8 hours ago

















            • Jesus, people are quick to accept answers today! This is the second time an answer was accepted while I was writing one myself. :D (Good answer though - I'll +1 as soon as I am allowed to vote again.)

              – PoorYorick
              8 hours ago
















            Jesus, people are quick to accept answers today! This is the second time an answer was accepted while I was writing one myself. :D (Good answer though - I'll +1 as soon as I am allowed to vote again.)

            – PoorYorick
            8 hours ago





            Jesus, people are quick to accept answers today! This is the second time an answer was accepted while I was writing one myself. :D (Good answer though - I'll +1 as soon as I am allowed to vote again.)

            – PoorYorick
            8 hours ago













            3














            Yes, it is bad. Your description should come pretty early on. Consider the mental image readers have of a scene - in the moment that a character appears visibly, they will imagine the character in some way. (Obviously, if the character is introduced as a shadowy figure at first, you only have to describe them once they come into the light and the protagonists can clearly see them.)



            If you don't have a narrative reason to postpone the description, then describe the character directly. Or not at all - not every character needs a detailed description. Ideally, the things you mention should be important, maybe even relevant to the plot. Character descriptions are often way too detailed.






            share|improve this answer























            • Good answer, deservant of an accept too. I like the fact that you mentioned that character descriptions are often way too detailed. This might just be for me, but I personally don't care what characters look like, and I'll probably just imagine them as a bundle of their personality traits that I've picked up. Though, then again, I have a hard time imagining characters anyway, I probably have aphantasia.

              – A. Kvåle
              8 hours ago















            3














            Yes, it is bad. Your description should come pretty early on. Consider the mental image readers have of a scene - in the moment that a character appears visibly, they will imagine the character in some way. (Obviously, if the character is introduced as a shadowy figure at first, you only have to describe them once they come into the light and the protagonists can clearly see them.)



            If you don't have a narrative reason to postpone the description, then describe the character directly. Or not at all - not every character needs a detailed description. Ideally, the things you mention should be important, maybe even relevant to the plot. Character descriptions are often way too detailed.






            share|improve this answer























            • Good answer, deservant of an accept too. I like the fact that you mentioned that character descriptions are often way too detailed. This might just be for me, but I personally don't care what characters look like, and I'll probably just imagine them as a bundle of their personality traits that I've picked up. Though, then again, I have a hard time imagining characters anyway, I probably have aphantasia.

              – A. Kvåle
              8 hours ago













            3












            3








            3







            Yes, it is bad. Your description should come pretty early on. Consider the mental image readers have of a scene - in the moment that a character appears visibly, they will imagine the character in some way. (Obviously, if the character is introduced as a shadowy figure at first, you only have to describe them once they come into the light and the protagonists can clearly see them.)



            If you don't have a narrative reason to postpone the description, then describe the character directly. Or not at all - not every character needs a detailed description. Ideally, the things you mention should be important, maybe even relevant to the plot. Character descriptions are often way too detailed.






            share|improve this answer













            Yes, it is bad. Your description should come pretty early on. Consider the mental image readers have of a scene - in the moment that a character appears visibly, they will imagine the character in some way. (Obviously, if the character is introduced as a shadowy figure at first, you only have to describe them once they come into the light and the protagonists can clearly see them.)



            If you don't have a narrative reason to postpone the description, then describe the character directly. Or not at all - not every character needs a detailed description. Ideally, the things you mention should be important, maybe even relevant to the plot. Character descriptions are often way too detailed.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            PoorYorickPoorYorick

            2,1834 silver badges29 bronze badges




            2,1834 silver badges29 bronze badges












            • Good answer, deservant of an accept too. I like the fact that you mentioned that character descriptions are often way too detailed. This might just be for me, but I personally don't care what characters look like, and I'll probably just imagine them as a bundle of their personality traits that I've picked up. Though, then again, I have a hard time imagining characters anyway, I probably have aphantasia.

              – A. Kvåle
              8 hours ago

















            • Good answer, deservant of an accept too. I like the fact that you mentioned that character descriptions are often way too detailed. This might just be for me, but I personally don't care what characters look like, and I'll probably just imagine them as a bundle of their personality traits that I've picked up. Though, then again, I have a hard time imagining characters anyway, I probably have aphantasia.

              – A. Kvåle
              8 hours ago
















            Good answer, deservant of an accept too. I like the fact that you mentioned that character descriptions are often way too detailed. This might just be for me, but I personally don't care what characters look like, and I'll probably just imagine them as a bundle of their personality traits that I've picked up. Though, then again, I have a hard time imagining characters anyway, I probably have aphantasia.

            – A. Kvåle
            8 hours ago





            Good answer, deservant of an accept too. I like the fact that you mentioned that character descriptions are often way too detailed. This might just be for me, but I personally don't care what characters look like, and I'll probably just imagine them as a bundle of their personality traits that I've picked up. Though, then again, I have a hard time imagining characters anyway, I probably have aphantasia.

            – A. Kvåle
            8 hours ago











            2














            I'd say the issue is that if you are in a character's viewpoint and they meet a new person, they will likely have some response to that new person straight away. That should be mentioned in the moment.




            He smelled like old garlic and fish, and I took a step back.




            or...




            She wore a bowtie and suspenders. I wanted that sort of moxie, the self confidence to cross dress in some little way, say 'up yours' to anyone I happened to pass on the street.




            or...




            This kid--my god this kid looked completely hopped up on... something.
            His eyes were glazed over and he smelled like he might have soiled
            himself. i looked up at his mom, but she seemed just like any other soccer
            mom.




            ^Those are the sorts of things that a character would notice, and they not think them later, at the end of the scene, but instead right away. I think some reaction (which provides description) should happen right away, and it should be the response from your viewpoint character that tells us more about her/him.






            share|improve this answer



























              2














              I'd say the issue is that if you are in a character's viewpoint and they meet a new person, they will likely have some response to that new person straight away. That should be mentioned in the moment.




              He smelled like old garlic and fish, and I took a step back.




              or...




              She wore a bowtie and suspenders. I wanted that sort of moxie, the self confidence to cross dress in some little way, say 'up yours' to anyone I happened to pass on the street.




              or...




              This kid--my god this kid looked completely hopped up on... something.
              His eyes were glazed over and he smelled like he might have soiled
              himself. i looked up at his mom, but she seemed just like any other soccer
              mom.




              ^Those are the sorts of things that a character would notice, and they not think them later, at the end of the scene, but instead right away. I think some reaction (which provides description) should happen right away, and it should be the response from your viewpoint character that tells us more about her/him.






              share|improve this answer

























                2












                2








                2







                I'd say the issue is that if you are in a character's viewpoint and they meet a new person, they will likely have some response to that new person straight away. That should be mentioned in the moment.




                He smelled like old garlic and fish, and I took a step back.




                or...




                She wore a bowtie and suspenders. I wanted that sort of moxie, the self confidence to cross dress in some little way, say 'up yours' to anyone I happened to pass on the street.




                or...




                This kid--my god this kid looked completely hopped up on... something.
                His eyes were glazed over and he smelled like he might have soiled
                himself. i looked up at his mom, but she seemed just like any other soccer
                mom.




                ^Those are the sorts of things that a character would notice, and they not think them later, at the end of the scene, but instead right away. I think some reaction (which provides description) should happen right away, and it should be the response from your viewpoint character that tells us more about her/him.






                share|improve this answer













                I'd say the issue is that if you are in a character's viewpoint and they meet a new person, they will likely have some response to that new person straight away. That should be mentioned in the moment.




                He smelled like old garlic and fish, and I took a step back.




                or...




                She wore a bowtie and suspenders. I wanted that sort of moxie, the self confidence to cross dress in some little way, say 'up yours' to anyone I happened to pass on the street.




                or...




                This kid--my god this kid looked completely hopped up on... something.
                His eyes were glazed over and he smelled like he might have soiled
                himself. i looked up at his mom, but she seemed just like any other soccer
                mom.




                ^Those are the sorts of things that a character would notice, and they not think them later, at the end of the scene, but instead right away. I think some reaction (which provides description) should happen right away, and it should be the response from your viewpoint character that tells us more about her/him.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 8 hours ago









                DPTDPT

                18.4k2 gold badges36 silver badges98 bronze badges




                18.4k2 gold badges36 silver badges98 bronze badges



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46174%2fis-it-bad-to-describe-a-character-long-after-their-introduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її