Removing Doubles Destroy TopologyTopology modelingTips for proper topologyProblem with bad topologyTopology question regarding vehicleTopology: Sphere to planeWhat is the function of “removing doubles UV”Remove doubles isn't removing overlapping verticesTopology improvements?'Remove Doubles' is removing vertices that don't overlap. Whats wrong?Removing Doubles Ruins Mesh of My Character
What to call a small, open stone or cement reservoir that supplies fresh water from a spring or other natural source?
Way of refund if scammed?
Farthing / Riding
Requirement for splicing neutrals in a switch
Does the fact that we can only measure the two-way speed of light undermine the axiom of invariance?
Will this series of events work to drown the Tarrasque?
How to prove the emptiness of intersection of two context free languages is undecidable?
Is my company merging branches wrong?
Keeping the dodos out of the field
How does the +1 Keen Composite Longbow (+2 Str) work?
Existence of a model of ZFC in which the natural numbers are really the natural numbers
How can I prevent Bash expansion from passing files starting with "-" as argument?
Why use nominative in Coniugatio periphrastica passiva?
List of lists elementwise greater/smaller than
How can I use 400 ASA film in a Leica IIIf, which does not have options higher than 100?
Can dirty bird feeders make birds sick?
Eigenvalues of the Laplace-Beltrami operator on a compact Riemannnian manifold
Do seaplanes need to get clearance for takeoff?
Bash - Execute two commands and get exit status 1 if first fails
Removing Doubles Destroy Topology
Don't understand notation of morphisms in Monoid definition
Is it wise to pay off mortgage with 401k?
Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"
Does a windmilling propeller create more drag than a stopped propeller in an engine out scenario?
Removing Doubles Destroy Topology
Topology modelingTips for proper topologyProblem with bad topologyTopology question regarding vehicleTopology: Sphere to planeWhat is the function of “removing doubles UV”Remove doubles isn't removing overlapping verticesTopology improvements?'Remove Doubles' is removing vertices that don't overlap. Whats wrong?Removing Doubles Ruins Mesh of My Character
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
$endgroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
modeling topology
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
asked 3 hours ago
AceryLAceryL
254
254
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "502"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140917%2fremoving-doubles-destroy-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
$endgroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
answered 3 hours ago
sac396sac396
885
885
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Blender Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140917%2fremoving-doubles-destroy-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
