Could the Missouri River be running while Lake Michigan was frozen several meters deep?

If a problem only occurs randomly once in every N times on average, how many tests do I have to perform to be certain that it's now fixed?

Could a guilty Boris Johnson be used to cancel Brexit?

How to split a string in two substrings of same length using bash?

Why was it possible to cause an Apple //e to shut down with SHIFT and paddle button 2?

How can Iron Man's suit withstand this?

How to make thick Asian sauces?

How to detach yourself from a character you're going to kill?

Is having a hidden directory under /etc safe?

Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality

The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general public

What does War Machine's "Canopy! Canopy!" line mean in "Avengers: Endgame"?

Setting extra bits in a bool makes it true and false at the same time

Pros and cons of writing a book review?

Strange math syntax in old basic listing

Will TSA allow me to carry a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device?

Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?

Unconventional Opposites

Do marked cards or loaded dice have any mechanical benefit?

NTP rollover-safe design with ESP8266 (Curiosity)

Why is Colorado so different politically from nearby states?

Unorthodox way of solving Einstein field equations

Chopin: marche funèbre bar 15 impossible place

GFCI Outlet in Bathroom, Lights not working

Restoring order in a deck of playing cards (II)



Could the Missouri River be running while Lake Michigan was frozen several meters deep?














4












$begingroup$


During an ice age, would it be possible for a great lake to be frozen while a relatively nearby river was still running? To help illustrate my point:



Would it be possible for Lake Michigan (or parts of it) to be frozen up to ten meters deep? All the while the Missouri River was still running around Kansas City? Or would all surrounding bodies of water necessarily be frozen solid?



Are such varying temperatures and conditions feasible in any way? What should be taken into account?



Edit 1: Rephrased.



Edit 2: While the question's technically answered, further insight is much appreciated.



Edit 3: Clarification.










share|improve this question









New contributor



McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All you need a new Glacial Maximum.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you count the Missouri as running if it is not frozen solid? Or does only open water = running?
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk, Perhaps my question was a bit backwards. I was wondering if all surrounding waters would be frozen solid under such conditions. Or if some close bodies of water could still be (partially) liquid or in motion. To answer your question: Yes. Not frozen soild = running.
    $endgroup$
    – McMurphy
    6 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


During an ice age, would it be possible for a great lake to be frozen while a relatively nearby river was still running? To help illustrate my point:



Would it be possible for Lake Michigan (or parts of it) to be frozen up to ten meters deep? All the while the Missouri River was still running around Kansas City? Or would all surrounding bodies of water necessarily be frozen solid?



Are such varying temperatures and conditions feasible in any way? What should be taken into account?



Edit 1: Rephrased.



Edit 2: While the question's technically answered, further insight is much appreciated.



Edit 3: Clarification.










share|improve this question









New contributor



McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All you need a new Glacial Maximum.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you count the Missouri as running if it is not frozen solid? Or does only open water = running?
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk, Perhaps my question was a bit backwards. I was wondering if all surrounding waters would be frozen solid under such conditions. Or if some close bodies of water could still be (partially) liquid or in motion. To answer your question: Yes. Not frozen soild = running.
    $endgroup$
    – McMurphy
    6 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


During an ice age, would it be possible for a great lake to be frozen while a relatively nearby river was still running? To help illustrate my point:



Would it be possible for Lake Michigan (or parts of it) to be frozen up to ten meters deep? All the while the Missouri River was still running around Kansas City? Or would all surrounding bodies of water necessarily be frozen solid?



Are such varying temperatures and conditions feasible in any way? What should be taken into account?



Edit 1: Rephrased.



Edit 2: While the question's technically answered, further insight is much appreciated.



Edit 3: Clarification.










share|improve this question









New contributor



McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




During an ice age, would it be possible for a great lake to be frozen while a relatively nearby river was still running? To help illustrate my point:



Would it be possible for Lake Michigan (or parts of it) to be frozen up to ten meters deep? All the while the Missouri River was still running around Kansas City? Or would all surrounding bodies of water necessarily be frozen solid?



Are such varying temperatures and conditions feasible in any way? What should be taken into account?



Edit 1: Rephrased.



Edit 2: While the question's technically answered, further insight is much appreciated.



Edit 3: Clarification.







reality-check physics climate geography ice






share|improve this question









New contributor



McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago







McMurphy













New contributor



McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









McMurphyMcMurphy

235




235




New contributor



McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




McMurphy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All you need a new Glacial Maximum.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you count the Missouri as running if it is not frozen solid? Or does only open water = running?
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk, Perhaps my question was a bit backwards. I was wondering if all surrounding waters would be frozen solid under such conditions. Or if some close bodies of water could still be (partially) liquid or in motion. To answer your question: Yes. Not frozen soild = running.
    $endgroup$
    – McMurphy
    6 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All you need a new Glacial Maximum.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Do you count the Missouri as running if it is not frozen solid? Or does only open water = running?
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Willk, Perhaps my question was a bit backwards. I was wondering if all surrounding waters would be frozen solid under such conditions. Or if some close bodies of water could still be (partially) liquid or in motion. To answer your question: Yes. Not frozen soild = running.
    $endgroup$
    – McMurphy
    6 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
All you need a new Glacial Maximum.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
All you need a new Glacial Maximum.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Do you count the Missouri as running if it is not frozen solid? Or does only open water = running?
$endgroup$
– Willk
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Do you count the Missouri as running if it is not frozen solid? Or does only open water = running?
$endgroup$
– Willk
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Willk, Perhaps my question was a bit backwards. I was wondering if all surrounding waters would be frozen solid under such conditions. Or if some close bodies of water could still be (partially) liquid or in motion. To answer your question: Yes. Not frozen soild = running.
$endgroup$
– McMurphy
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Willk, Perhaps my question was a bit backwards. I was wondering if all surrounding waters would be frozen solid under such conditions. Or if some close bodies of water could still be (partially) liquid or in motion. To answer your question: Yes. Not frozen soild = running.
$endgroup$
– McMurphy
6 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Sure, and it did. While there was no Lake Michigan during the Last Glacial Maximum, the Laurentide Ice Sheet was up to a 1500 meters or more thick around the Chicago area, while it never reached as far south as Kansas City, which means rivers would be running during the summer. A sufficiently large river could run al year (albeit frozen over).






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$

    I think I can realistically say that the Glacial Ice was, in fact far far deeper that a handful of meters. Most estimates range from the mile-thick to only a couple of thousand meters. In most cases, it is considered that the Missouri river's current location is a direct result of the glaciers depositing earth, rocks, etc at the terminal edge. Prior to the Ice Ages, it is thought that there simply were no 'great lakes', they were scraped from the earth by ice over long periods of time.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      You have your measurements backwards. A couple of thousand meters is more than a mile.
      $endgroup$
      – Keith Morrison
      6 hours ago


















    3












    $begingroup$

    It sort of depends. Rivers rarely (if ever) have a single source for their headwaters. Rivers are a collection of hundreds of smaller tributaries.



    Sealing a single source, even a major one in ice would certainly reduce the flow of water downstream, but unless you remove the majority it will still flow to some degree.



    So the real question I think we need to ask is, what all is frozen? Once you define that I think you will be able to answer it yourself.



    A few things to consider:



    • Is the glacial area spreading or retreating?

      • If it is expanding you can expect the flow of the river to continue to dwindle

      • If it is retreating (end of the ice age) you'd likely see larger flows.

      • If its just sort of stable the edges of the glaciers will melt, providing a regular flow, probably heavier in the summer months and lower in the winter months...possibly turning off completely in the winter.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      McMurphy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148084%2fcould-the-missouri-river-be-running-while-lake-michigan-was-frozen-several-meter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Sure, and it did. While there was no Lake Michigan during the Last Glacial Maximum, the Laurentide Ice Sheet was up to a 1500 meters or more thick around the Chicago area, while it never reached as far south as Kansas City, which means rivers would be running during the summer. A sufficiently large river could run al year (albeit frozen over).






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        4












        $begingroup$

        Sure, and it did. While there was no Lake Michigan during the Last Glacial Maximum, the Laurentide Ice Sheet was up to a 1500 meters or more thick around the Chicago area, while it never reached as far south as Kansas City, which means rivers would be running during the summer. A sufficiently large river could run al year (albeit frozen over).






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Sure, and it did. While there was no Lake Michigan during the Last Glacial Maximum, the Laurentide Ice Sheet was up to a 1500 meters or more thick around the Chicago area, while it never reached as far south as Kansas City, which means rivers would be running during the summer. A sufficiently large river could run al year (albeit frozen over).






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Sure, and it did. While there was no Lake Michigan during the Last Glacial Maximum, the Laurentide Ice Sheet was up to a 1500 meters or more thick around the Chicago area, while it never reached as far south as Kansas City, which means rivers would be running during the summer. A sufficiently large river could run al year (albeit frozen over).







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Keith MorrisonKeith Morrison

          8,10511631




          8,10511631





















              5












              $begingroup$

              I think I can realistically say that the Glacial Ice was, in fact far far deeper that a handful of meters. Most estimates range from the mile-thick to only a couple of thousand meters. In most cases, it is considered that the Missouri river's current location is a direct result of the glaciers depositing earth, rocks, etc at the terminal edge. Prior to the Ice Ages, it is thought that there simply were no 'great lakes', they were scraped from the earth by ice over long periods of time.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                You have your measurements backwards. A couple of thousand meters is more than a mile.
                $endgroup$
                – Keith Morrison
                6 hours ago















              5












              $begingroup$

              I think I can realistically say that the Glacial Ice was, in fact far far deeper that a handful of meters. Most estimates range from the mile-thick to only a couple of thousand meters. In most cases, it is considered that the Missouri river's current location is a direct result of the glaciers depositing earth, rocks, etc at the terminal edge. Prior to the Ice Ages, it is thought that there simply were no 'great lakes', they were scraped from the earth by ice over long periods of time.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                You have your measurements backwards. A couple of thousand meters is more than a mile.
                $endgroup$
                – Keith Morrison
                6 hours ago













              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              I think I can realistically say that the Glacial Ice was, in fact far far deeper that a handful of meters. Most estimates range from the mile-thick to only a couple of thousand meters. In most cases, it is considered that the Missouri river's current location is a direct result of the glaciers depositing earth, rocks, etc at the terminal edge. Prior to the Ice Ages, it is thought that there simply were no 'great lakes', they were scraped from the earth by ice over long periods of time.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              I think I can realistically say that the Glacial Ice was, in fact far far deeper that a handful of meters. Most estimates range from the mile-thick to only a couple of thousand meters. In most cases, it is considered that the Missouri river's current location is a direct result of the glaciers depositing earth, rocks, etc at the terminal edge. Prior to the Ice Ages, it is thought that there simply were no 'great lakes', they were scraped from the earth by ice over long periods of time.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 8 hours ago









              JoeJoe

              2,797618




              2,797618











              • $begingroup$
                You have your measurements backwards. A couple of thousand meters is more than a mile.
                $endgroup$
                – Keith Morrison
                6 hours ago
















              • $begingroup$
                You have your measurements backwards. A couple of thousand meters is more than a mile.
                $endgroup$
                – Keith Morrison
                6 hours ago















              $begingroup$
              You have your measurements backwards. A couple of thousand meters is more than a mile.
              $endgroup$
              – Keith Morrison
              6 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              You have your measurements backwards. A couple of thousand meters is more than a mile.
              $endgroup$
              – Keith Morrison
              6 hours ago











              3












              $begingroup$

              It sort of depends. Rivers rarely (if ever) have a single source for their headwaters. Rivers are a collection of hundreds of smaller tributaries.



              Sealing a single source, even a major one in ice would certainly reduce the flow of water downstream, but unless you remove the majority it will still flow to some degree.



              So the real question I think we need to ask is, what all is frozen? Once you define that I think you will be able to answer it yourself.



              A few things to consider:



              • Is the glacial area spreading or retreating?

                • If it is expanding you can expect the flow of the river to continue to dwindle

                • If it is retreating (end of the ice age) you'd likely see larger flows.

                • If its just sort of stable the edges of the glaciers will melt, providing a regular flow, probably heavier in the summer months and lower in the winter months...possibly turning off completely in the winter.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                It sort of depends. Rivers rarely (if ever) have a single source for their headwaters. Rivers are a collection of hundreds of smaller tributaries.



                Sealing a single source, even a major one in ice would certainly reduce the flow of water downstream, but unless you remove the majority it will still flow to some degree.



                So the real question I think we need to ask is, what all is frozen? Once you define that I think you will be able to answer it yourself.



                A few things to consider:



                • Is the glacial area spreading or retreating?

                  • If it is expanding you can expect the flow of the river to continue to dwindle

                  • If it is retreating (end of the ice age) you'd likely see larger flows.

                  • If its just sort of stable the edges of the glaciers will melt, providing a regular flow, probably heavier in the summer months and lower in the winter months...possibly turning off completely in the winter.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  It sort of depends. Rivers rarely (if ever) have a single source for their headwaters. Rivers are a collection of hundreds of smaller tributaries.



                  Sealing a single source, even a major one in ice would certainly reduce the flow of water downstream, but unless you remove the majority it will still flow to some degree.



                  So the real question I think we need to ask is, what all is frozen? Once you define that I think you will be able to answer it yourself.



                  A few things to consider:



                  • Is the glacial area spreading or retreating?

                    • If it is expanding you can expect the flow of the river to continue to dwindle

                    • If it is retreating (end of the ice age) you'd likely see larger flows.

                    • If its just sort of stable the edges of the glaciers will melt, providing a regular flow, probably heavier in the summer months and lower in the winter months...possibly turning off completely in the winter.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  It sort of depends. Rivers rarely (if ever) have a single source for their headwaters. Rivers are a collection of hundreds of smaller tributaries.



                  Sealing a single source, even a major one in ice would certainly reduce the flow of water downstream, but unless you remove the majority it will still flow to some degree.



                  So the real question I think we need to ask is, what all is frozen? Once you define that I think you will be able to answer it yourself.



                  A few things to consider:



                  • Is the glacial area spreading or retreating?

                    • If it is expanding you can expect the flow of the river to continue to dwindle

                    • If it is retreating (end of the ice age) you'd likely see larger flows.

                    • If its just sort of stable the edges of the glaciers will melt, providing a regular flow, probably heavier in the summer months and lower in the winter months...possibly turning off completely in the winter.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 7 hours ago









                  JamesJames

                  25.3k1196183




                  25.3k1196183




















                      McMurphy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      McMurphy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      McMurphy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      McMurphy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148084%2fcould-the-missouri-river-be-running-while-lake-michigan-was-frozen-several-meter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單