Build a trail cartHow to build a sauna?build 6x6 single post from 2x4s for swingset?How to build a sturdy forest road gate out of roundwood?
When did stoichiometry begin to be taught in U.S. high schools?
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Binary Numbers Magic Trick
Confused by notation of atomic number Z and mass number A on periodic table of elements
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
When to use 1/Ka vs Kb
Where did the extra Pym particles come from in Endgame?
What is the range of this combined function?
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
I listed a wrong degree date on my background check. What will happen?
Lock in SQL Server and Oracle
Need help understanding harmonic series and intervals
Does jamais mean always or never in this context?
Find the coordinate of two line segments that are perpendicular
In gnome-terminal only 2 out of 3 zoom keys work
Modify locally tikzset
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
How does a Swashbuckler rogue "fight with two weapons while safely darting away"?
Toggle Overlays shortcut?
Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?
Does the EU Common Fisheries Policy cover British Overseas Territories?
TikZ how to make supply and demand arrows for nodes?
Weird result in complex limit
Is creating your own "experiment" considered cheating during a physics exam?
Build a trail cart
How to build a sauna?build 6x6 single post from 2x4s for swingset?How to build a sturdy forest road gate out of roundwood?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I want to build a cart for carrying camping equipment and supplies as a potential alternative to a backpack. Pulling a cart with the backpack in it should be easier than carrying it on my back, at least for a flat and even surface. Whether the trails I will be traveling are flat and even enough I don't yet know. The cart would need to support a weight of 25 lbs. and be roughly 18" wide by 30" high. I'd attach a strap to it and wrap the strap around my waist. I would attach the pack to the cart with string or a bungee cord.
I was going to build the cart out of schedule 80 PVC pipe and then attach wheels to it, for example https://wheeleez.com/product/wz1-wak-38tt/ (these are bigger and heavier than I want, this is just for illustration). This might be better: https://www.northerntool.com/shop/tools/product_200660524_200660524. Bigger wheels will roll better and will surmount rocks more easily; the tradeoff is the extra weight.
Two questions:
- What would be an ideal PVC pipe diameter?
- What would be an ideal wheel diameter and material?
outdoor pull
New contributor
add a comment |
I want to build a cart for carrying camping equipment and supplies as a potential alternative to a backpack. Pulling a cart with the backpack in it should be easier than carrying it on my back, at least for a flat and even surface. Whether the trails I will be traveling are flat and even enough I don't yet know. The cart would need to support a weight of 25 lbs. and be roughly 18" wide by 30" high. I'd attach a strap to it and wrap the strap around my waist. I would attach the pack to the cart with string or a bungee cord.
I was going to build the cart out of schedule 80 PVC pipe and then attach wheels to it, for example https://wheeleez.com/product/wz1-wak-38tt/ (these are bigger and heavier than I want, this is just for illustration). This might be better: https://www.northerntool.com/shop/tools/product_200660524_200660524. Bigger wheels will roll better and will surmount rocks more easily; the tradeoff is the extra weight.
Two questions:
- What would be an ideal PVC pipe diameter?
- What would be an ideal wheel diameter and material?
outdoor pull
New contributor
Unless you plan to only use this one or two times, in mild weather and in placid terrain, PVC is a poor choice. It has too much flex, a poor strength to weight ratio, and susceptibility to temperatures, UV, and fatigue failure. Use steel allows or aluminum alloys, the former is easier for novices to fab with. 20" wheels should suffice. If a ready made hiking cart is not to your taste, you might consider using or modifying a (jogging) baby stroller.
– Brock Adams
4 hours ago
1
Along the lines of @Brock Adams suggestion a bicycle trailer used for towing children are light weight and robust. They are also readily available on the used market as children quickly out grow them.
– mikes
4 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. I did not know that about PVC, thank you. I modified a bicycle trailer for hauling groceries, but it's not suitable for trails because it is too wide.
– jsf80238
2 hours ago
See this : engineering.stackexchange.com/q/15931/10902
– Solar Mike
14 mins ago
add a comment |
I want to build a cart for carrying camping equipment and supplies as a potential alternative to a backpack. Pulling a cart with the backpack in it should be easier than carrying it on my back, at least for a flat and even surface. Whether the trails I will be traveling are flat and even enough I don't yet know. The cart would need to support a weight of 25 lbs. and be roughly 18" wide by 30" high. I'd attach a strap to it and wrap the strap around my waist. I would attach the pack to the cart with string or a bungee cord.
I was going to build the cart out of schedule 80 PVC pipe and then attach wheels to it, for example https://wheeleez.com/product/wz1-wak-38tt/ (these are bigger and heavier than I want, this is just for illustration). This might be better: https://www.northerntool.com/shop/tools/product_200660524_200660524. Bigger wheels will roll better and will surmount rocks more easily; the tradeoff is the extra weight.
Two questions:
- What would be an ideal PVC pipe diameter?
- What would be an ideal wheel diameter and material?
outdoor pull
New contributor
I want to build a cart for carrying camping equipment and supplies as a potential alternative to a backpack. Pulling a cart with the backpack in it should be easier than carrying it on my back, at least for a flat and even surface. Whether the trails I will be traveling are flat and even enough I don't yet know. The cart would need to support a weight of 25 lbs. and be roughly 18" wide by 30" high. I'd attach a strap to it and wrap the strap around my waist. I would attach the pack to the cart with string or a bungee cord.
I was going to build the cart out of schedule 80 PVC pipe and then attach wheels to it, for example https://wheeleez.com/product/wz1-wak-38tt/ (these are bigger and heavier than I want, this is just for illustration). This might be better: https://www.northerntool.com/shop/tools/product_200660524_200660524. Bigger wheels will roll better and will surmount rocks more easily; the tradeoff is the extra weight.
Two questions:
- What would be an ideal PVC pipe diameter?
- What would be an ideal wheel diameter and material?
outdoor pull
outdoor pull
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
jsf80238jsf80238
1213
1213
New contributor
New contributor
Unless you plan to only use this one or two times, in mild weather and in placid terrain, PVC is a poor choice. It has too much flex, a poor strength to weight ratio, and susceptibility to temperatures, UV, and fatigue failure. Use steel allows or aluminum alloys, the former is easier for novices to fab with. 20" wheels should suffice. If a ready made hiking cart is not to your taste, you might consider using or modifying a (jogging) baby stroller.
– Brock Adams
4 hours ago
1
Along the lines of @Brock Adams suggestion a bicycle trailer used for towing children are light weight and robust. They are also readily available on the used market as children quickly out grow them.
– mikes
4 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. I did not know that about PVC, thank you. I modified a bicycle trailer for hauling groceries, but it's not suitable for trails because it is too wide.
– jsf80238
2 hours ago
See this : engineering.stackexchange.com/q/15931/10902
– Solar Mike
14 mins ago
add a comment |
Unless you plan to only use this one or two times, in mild weather and in placid terrain, PVC is a poor choice. It has too much flex, a poor strength to weight ratio, and susceptibility to temperatures, UV, and fatigue failure. Use steel allows or aluminum alloys, the former is easier for novices to fab with. 20" wheels should suffice. If a ready made hiking cart is not to your taste, you might consider using or modifying a (jogging) baby stroller.
– Brock Adams
4 hours ago
1
Along the lines of @Brock Adams suggestion a bicycle trailer used for towing children are light weight and robust. They are also readily available on the used market as children quickly out grow them.
– mikes
4 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. I did not know that about PVC, thank you. I modified a bicycle trailer for hauling groceries, but it's not suitable for trails because it is too wide.
– jsf80238
2 hours ago
See this : engineering.stackexchange.com/q/15931/10902
– Solar Mike
14 mins ago
Unless you plan to only use this one or two times, in mild weather and in placid terrain, PVC is a poor choice. It has too much flex, a poor strength to weight ratio, and susceptibility to temperatures, UV, and fatigue failure. Use steel allows or aluminum alloys, the former is easier for novices to fab with. 20" wheels should suffice. If a ready made hiking cart is not to your taste, you might consider using or modifying a (jogging) baby stroller.
– Brock Adams
4 hours ago
Unless you plan to only use this one or two times, in mild weather and in placid terrain, PVC is a poor choice. It has too much flex, a poor strength to weight ratio, and susceptibility to temperatures, UV, and fatigue failure. Use steel allows or aluminum alloys, the former is easier for novices to fab with. 20" wheels should suffice. If a ready made hiking cart is not to your taste, you might consider using or modifying a (jogging) baby stroller.
– Brock Adams
4 hours ago
1
1
Along the lines of @Brock Adams suggestion a bicycle trailer used for towing children are light weight and robust. They are also readily available on the used market as children quickly out grow them.
– mikes
4 hours ago
Along the lines of @Brock Adams suggestion a bicycle trailer used for towing children are light weight and robust. They are also readily available on the used market as children quickly out grow them.
– mikes
4 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. I did not know that about PVC, thank you. I modified a bicycle trailer for hauling groceries, but it's not suitable for trails because it is too wide.
– jsf80238
2 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. I did not know that about PVC, thank you. I modified a bicycle trailer for hauling groceries, but it's not suitable for trails because it is too wide.
– jsf80238
2 hours ago
See this : engineering.stackexchange.com/q/15931/10902
– Solar Mike
14 mins ago
See this : engineering.stackexchange.com/q/15931/10902
– Solar Mike
14 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Sorry for the long post. I've sort of documented my train of thought.
Let me put the end at the beginning:
Bottom line
- Aluminum or steel. Diameter depends on wall thickness. With good bracing .5 inch or .75 inch outer diameter will work for 25 pounds.
- Closed cell solid rubber tires, caster in the front fixed in the rear, I'd go for at least 6 inches in diameter.
I'm a big fan of building stuff from PVC but I agree with Brock. PVC will not last.
Aluminum is lighter than steel but a little more expensive. It will lend itself to a bolt together construction.
Steel is easier to wield or braze but can also be bolted together.
It's best to see what's out there for sale. Looking around can give ideas for what to build and how much I should spend on my own build vs buying something.
I checked Amazon and found a few, here is one example. Not as a recommendation but as an example this one came up. It has 120 pound capacity, folds up, and weighs 26.5 pounds. It costs $110.00.
This example had a much smaller and wider wheel than I expected. The wheels get positive reviews.
The terrain you are on will make a huge difference and require larger wheels. Hard rubber tires will transfer every shock into the wagon. Tires with a little give would be better. It's hard to tell without a better description or seeing it in person but something like this might be good. It's a 6.25 inch wheel, and you'll want caster wheels on the front
Pneumatic tires would work but then you have to worry about flats.
Maybe something like this on the rear - it's a closed cell solid tire that's suppose to ride like a pneumatic tire.
The problem is that by the time you get four wheels you will have spent almost $100.00, that's pretty close to the cost of a factory built version.
Also, these wheels are heavy, the back wheels are 3 pounds each and the fronts are over 5 pounds each. The heavier your cart the more you have to push up a hill and hold back going down a hill.
I'm thinking I would only want two wheels, at the back end. The front end would be attached to my waist via a strap. I don't think the wheels would need any give ... I'm not concerned with the "comfort" of my equipment.
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'd look at a standard, two-wheel, LARGE (bicycle sized) wheel garden cart, or possibly a wheelbarrow form, again with a LARGE, bicycle, wheel.) Bicycle wheels are a common, well developed, strong, lightweight wheel with many options for tires and sizes.
The single-wheel advantage becomes blatantly obvious the first time you hit a side-hill and your multi-wheel cart decides to roll over sideways. A wheelbarrow with one wheel is only sensitive to side-hill when you set it down on its two legs. I would NOT suggest using a standard wheelbarrow as seen today.
This is an illustration of a wood-framed (and probably wheeled, but swap that for a bicycle wheel) "bare-bones" form from this translated article (I was just looking for a good, basic, not too modern wheelbarrow illustration. I haven't read the article in any detail):
https://spot.colorado.edu/~richtea/prints.html
How much load you have to lift at the handles varies as you move the load more over the wheel, while how stable it is varies with how low you can get it. If you can arrange your "pack" as two "panniers" you can get it right over the wheel while keeping it low, by having it to the sides of the wheel. You still have to push or pull the weight, but you don't have to lift it. Still, on many of my local trails, you'd likely come to regret having to get it over rocks & trees (even with a large wheel) but your local trails may be more developed or involve fewer stair-stepped steep sections. It could also skid sideways on wet rock.
You could pick up a pre-owned bicycle for not much or free and adapt from there. You might want to retain the brake for downhills.
My first thought is that such a design would tip over too easily, but perhaps not. Perhaps attaching each pole to each hip would be sufficient. (nods head)
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
Given your load is proposed to be ~25 lbs, I doubt it would be a major issue. I work with some folks who like "two-wheel" wheelbarrows, and those are FAR more prone to tipping over on any side slope, which is why I prefer the single-wheel version. Where flat enough, the garden-cart setup is good as it distributes the load over the axle, but where not flat enough, that's either a rollover or having to take tiny loads to not roll over.
– Ecnerwal
55 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "73"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
jsf80238 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f163941%2fbuild-a-trail-cart%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sorry for the long post. I've sort of documented my train of thought.
Let me put the end at the beginning:
Bottom line
- Aluminum or steel. Diameter depends on wall thickness. With good bracing .5 inch or .75 inch outer diameter will work for 25 pounds.
- Closed cell solid rubber tires, caster in the front fixed in the rear, I'd go for at least 6 inches in diameter.
I'm a big fan of building stuff from PVC but I agree with Brock. PVC will not last.
Aluminum is lighter than steel but a little more expensive. It will lend itself to a bolt together construction.
Steel is easier to wield or braze but can also be bolted together.
It's best to see what's out there for sale. Looking around can give ideas for what to build and how much I should spend on my own build vs buying something.
I checked Amazon and found a few, here is one example. Not as a recommendation but as an example this one came up. It has 120 pound capacity, folds up, and weighs 26.5 pounds. It costs $110.00.
This example had a much smaller and wider wheel than I expected. The wheels get positive reviews.
The terrain you are on will make a huge difference and require larger wheels. Hard rubber tires will transfer every shock into the wagon. Tires with a little give would be better. It's hard to tell without a better description or seeing it in person but something like this might be good. It's a 6.25 inch wheel, and you'll want caster wheels on the front
Pneumatic tires would work but then you have to worry about flats.
Maybe something like this on the rear - it's a closed cell solid tire that's suppose to ride like a pneumatic tire.
The problem is that by the time you get four wheels you will have spent almost $100.00, that's pretty close to the cost of a factory built version.
Also, these wheels are heavy, the back wheels are 3 pounds each and the fronts are over 5 pounds each. The heavier your cart the more you have to push up a hill and hold back going down a hill.
I'm thinking I would only want two wheels, at the back end. The front end would be attached to my waist via a strap. I don't think the wheels would need any give ... I'm not concerned with the "comfort" of my equipment.
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Sorry for the long post. I've sort of documented my train of thought.
Let me put the end at the beginning:
Bottom line
- Aluminum or steel. Diameter depends on wall thickness. With good bracing .5 inch or .75 inch outer diameter will work for 25 pounds.
- Closed cell solid rubber tires, caster in the front fixed in the rear, I'd go for at least 6 inches in diameter.
I'm a big fan of building stuff from PVC but I agree with Brock. PVC will not last.
Aluminum is lighter than steel but a little more expensive. It will lend itself to a bolt together construction.
Steel is easier to wield or braze but can also be bolted together.
It's best to see what's out there for sale. Looking around can give ideas for what to build and how much I should spend on my own build vs buying something.
I checked Amazon and found a few, here is one example. Not as a recommendation but as an example this one came up. It has 120 pound capacity, folds up, and weighs 26.5 pounds. It costs $110.00.
This example had a much smaller and wider wheel than I expected. The wheels get positive reviews.
The terrain you are on will make a huge difference and require larger wheels. Hard rubber tires will transfer every shock into the wagon. Tires with a little give would be better. It's hard to tell without a better description or seeing it in person but something like this might be good. It's a 6.25 inch wheel, and you'll want caster wheels on the front
Pneumatic tires would work but then you have to worry about flats.
Maybe something like this on the rear - it's a closed cell solid tire that's suppose to ride like a pneumatic tire.
The problem is that by the time you get four wheels you will have spent almost $100.00, that's pretty close to the cost of a factory built version.
Also, these wheels are heavy, the back wheels are 3 pounds each and the fronts are over 5 pounds each. The heavier your cart the more you have to push up a hill and hold back going down a hill.
I'm thinking I would only want two wheels, at the back end. The front end would be attached to my waist via a strap. I don't think the wheels would need any give ... I'm not concerned with the "comfort" of my equipment.
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Sorry for the long post. I've sort of documented my train of thought.
Let me put the end at the beginning:
Bottom line
- Aluminum or steel. Diameter depends on wall thickness. With good bracing .5 inch or .75 inch outer diameter will work for 25 pounds.
- Closed cell solid rubber tires, caster in the front fixed in the rear, I'd go for at least 6 inches in diameter.
I'm a big fan of building stuff from PVC but I agree with Brock. PVC will not last.
Aluminum is lighter than steel but a little more expensive. It will lend itself to a bolt together construction.
Steel is easier to wield or braze but can also be bolted together.
It's best to see what's out there for sale. Looking around can give ideas for what to build and how much I should spend on my own build vs buying something.
I checked Amazon and found a few, here is one example. Not as a recommendation but as an example this one came up. It has 120 pound capacity, folds up, and weighs 26.5 pounds. It costs $110.00.
This example had a much smaller and wider wheel than I expected. The wheels get positive reviews.
The terrain you are on will make a huge difference and require larger wheels. Hard rubber tires will transfer every shock into the wagon. Tires with a little give would be better. It's hard to tell without a better description or seeing it in person but something like this might be good. It's a 6.25 inch wheel, and you'll want caster wheels on the front
Pneumatic tires would work but then you have to worry about flats.
Maybe something like this on the rear - it's a closed cell solid tire that's suppose to ride like a pneumatic tire.
The problem is that by the time you get four wheels you will have spent almost $100.00, that's pretty close to the cost of a factory built version.
Also, these wheels are heavy, the back wheels are 3 pounds each and the fronts are over 5 pounds each. The heavier your cart the more you have to push up a hill and hold back going down a hill.
Sorry for the long post. I've sort of documented my train of thought.
Let me put the end at the beginning:
Bottom line
- Aluminum or steel. Diameter depends on wall thickness. With good bracing .5 inch or .75 inch outer diameter will work for 25 pounds.
- Closed cell solid rubber tires, caster in the front fixed in the rear, I'd go for at least 6 inches in diameter.
I'm a big fan of building stuff from PVC but I agree with Brock. PVC will not last.
Aluminum is lighter than steel but a little more expensive. It will lend itself to a bolt together construction.
Steel is easier to wield or braze but can also be bolted together.
It's best to see what's out there for sale. Looking around can give ideas for what to build and how much I should spend on my own build vs buying something.
I checked Amazon and found a few, here is one example. Not as a recommendation but as an example this one came up. It has 120 pound capacity, folds up, and weighs 26.5 pounds. It costs $110.00.
This example had a much smaller and wider wheel than I expected. The wheels get positive reviews.
The terrain you are on will make a huge difference and require larger wheels. Hard rubber tires will transfer every shock into the wagon. Tires with a little give would be better. It's hard to tell without a better description or seeing it in person but something like this might be good. It's a 6.25 inch wheel, and you'll want caster wheels on the front
Pneumatic tires would work but then you have to worry about flats.
Maybe something like this on the rear - it's a closed cell solid tire that's suppose to ride like a pneumatic tire.
The problem is that by the time you get four wheels you will have spent almost $100.00, that's pretty close to the cost of a factory built version.
Also, these wheels are heavy, the back wheels are 3 pounds each and the fronts are over 5 pounds each. The heavier your cart the more you have to push up a hill and hold back going down a hill.
answered 2 hours ago
David DDavid D
2014
2014
I'm thinking I would only want two wheels, at the back end. The front end would be attached to my waist via a strap. I don't think the wheels would need any give ... I'm not concerned with the "comfort" of my equipment.
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm thinking I would only want two wheels, at the back end. The front end would be attached to my waist via a strap. I don't think the wheels would need any give ... I'm not concerned with the "comfort" of my equipment.
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
I'm thinking I would only want two wheels, at the back end. The front end would be attached to my waist via a strap. I don't think the wheels would need any give ... I'm not concerned with the "comfort" of my equipment.
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
I'm thinking I would only want two wheels, at the back end. The front end would be attached to my waist via a strap. I don't think the wheels would need any give ... I'm not concerned with the "comfort" of my equipment.
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'd look at a standard, two-wheel, LARGE (bicycle sized) wheel garden cart, or possibly a wheelbarrow form, again with a LARGE, bicycle, wheel.) Bicycle wheels are a common, well developed, strong, lightweight wheel with many options for tires and sizes.
The single-wheel advantage becomes blatantly obvious the first time you hit a side-hill and your multi-wheel cart decides to roll over sideways. A wheelbarrow with one wheel is only sensitive to side-hill when you set it down on its two legs. I would NOT suggest using a standard wheelbarrow as seen today.
This is an illustration of a wood-framed (and probably wheeled, but swap that for a bicycle wheel) "bare-bones" form from this translated article (I was just looking for a good, basic, not too modern wheelbarrow illustration. I haven't read the article in any detail):
https://spot.colorado.edu/~richtea/prints.html
How much load you have to lift at the handles varies as you move the load more over the wheel, while how stable it is varies with how low you can get it. If you can arrange your "pack" as two "panniers" you can get it right over the wheel while keeping it low, by having it to the sides of the wheel. You still have to push or pull the weight, but you don't have to lift it. Still, on many of my local trails, you'd likely come to regret having to get it over rocks & trees (even with a large wheel) but your local trails may be more developed or involve fewer stair-stepped steep sections. It could also skid sideways on wet rock.
You could pick up a pre-owned bicycle for not much or free and adapt from there. You might want to retain the brake for downhills.
My first thought is that such a design would tip over too easily, but perhaps not. Perhaps attaching each pole to each hip would be sufficient. (nods head)
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
Given your load is proposed to be ~25 lbs, I doubt it would be a major issue. I work with some folks who like "two-wheel" wheelbarrows, and those are FAR more prone to tipping over on any side slope, which is why I prefer the single-wheel version. Where flat enough, the garden-cart setup is good as it distributes the load over the axle, but where not flat enough, that's either a rollover or having to take tiny loads to not roll over.
– Ecnerwal
55 mins ago
add a comment |
I'd look at a standard, two-wheel, LARGE (bicycle sized) wheel garden cart, or possibly a wheelbarrow form, again with a LARGE, bicycle, wheel.) Bicycle wheels are a common, well developed, strong, lightweight wheel with many options for tires and sizes.
The single-wheel advantage becomes blatantly obvious the first time you hit a side-hill and your multi-wheel cart decides to roll over sideways. A wheelbarrow with one wheel is only sensitive to side-hill when you set it down on its two legs. I would NOT suggest using a standard wheelbarrow as seen today.
This is an illustration of a wood-framed (and probably wheeled, but swap that for a bicycle wheel) "bare-bones" form from this translated article (I was just looking for a good, basic, not too modern wheelbarrow illustration. I haven't read the article in any detail):
https://spot.colorado.edu/~richtea/prints.html
How much load you have to lift at the handles varies as you move the load more over the wheel, while how stable it is varies with how low you can get it. If you can arrange your "pack" as two "panniers" you can get it right over the wheel while keeping it low, by having it to the sides of the wheel. You still have to push or pull the weight, but you don't have to lift it. Still, on many of my local trails, you'd likely come to regret having to get it over rocks & trees (even with a large wheel) but your local trails may be more developed or involve fewer stair-stepped steep sections. It could also skid sideways on wet rock.
You could pick up a pre-owned bicycle for not much or free and adapt from there. You might want to retain the brake for downhills.
My first thought is that such a design would tip over too easily, but perhaps not. Perhaps attaching each pole to each hip would be sufficient. (nods head)
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
Given your load is proposed to be ~25 lbs, I doubt it would be a major issue. I work with some folks who like "two-wheel" wheelbarrows, and those are FAR more prone to tipping over on any side slope, which is why I prefer the single-wheel version. Where flat enough, the garden-cart setup is good as it distributes the load over the axle, but where not flat enough, that's either a rollover or having to take tiny loads to not roll over.
– Ecnerwal
55 mins ago
add a comment |
I'd look at a standard, two-wheel, LARGE (bicycle sized) wheel garden cart, or possibly a wheelbarrow form, again with a LARGE, bicycle, wheel.) Bicycle wheels are a common, well developed, strong, lightweight wheel with many options for tires and sizes.
The single-wheel advantage becomes blatantly obvious the first time you hit a side-hill and your multi-wheel cart decides to roll over sideways. A wheelbarrow with one wheel is only sensitive to side-hill when you set it down on its two legs. I would NOT suggest using a standard wheelbarrow as seen today.
This is an illustration of a wood-framed (and probably wheeled, but swap that for a bicycle wheel) "bare-bones" form from this translated article (I was just looking for a good, basic, not too modern wheelbarrow illustration. I haven't read the article in any detail):
https://spot.colorado.edu/~richtea/prints.html
How much load you have to lift at the handles varies as you move the load more over the wheel, while how stable it is varies with how low you can get it. If you can arrange your "pack" as two "panniers" you can get it right over the wheel while keeping it low, by having it to the sides of the wheel. You still have to push or pull the weight, but you don't have to lift it. Still, on many of my local trails, you'd likely come to regret having to get it over rocks & trees (even with a large wheel) but your local trails may be more developed or involve fewer stair-stepped steep sections. It could also skid sideways on wet rock.
You could pick up a pre-owned bicycle for not much or free and adapt from there. You might want to retain the brake for downhills.
I'd look at a standard, two-wheel, LARGE (bicycle sized) wheel garden cart, or possibly a wheelbarrow form, again with a LARGE, bicycle, wheel.) Bicycle wheels are a common, well developed, strong, lightweight wheel with many options for tires and sizes.
The single-wheel advantage becomes blatantly obvious the first time you hit a side-hill and your multi-wheel cart decides to roll over sideways. A wheelbarrow with one wheel is only sensitive to side-hill when you set it down on its two legs. I would NOT suggest using a standard wheelbarrow as seen today.
This is an illustration of a wood-framed (and probably wheeled, but swap that for a bicycle wheel) "bare-bones" form from this translated article (I was just looking for a good, basic, not too modern wheelbarrow illustration. I haven't read the article in any detail):
https://spot.colorado.edu/~richtea/prints.html
How much load you have to lift at the handles varies as you move the load more over the wheel, while how stable it is varies with how low you can get it. If you can arrange your "pack" as two "panniers" you can get it right over the wheel while keeping it low, by having it to the sides of the wheel. You still have to push or pull the weight, but you don't have to lift it. Still, on many of my local trails, you'd likely come to regret having to get it over rocks & trees (even with a large wheel) but your local trails may be more developed or involve fewer stair-stepped steep sections. It could also skid sideways on wet rock.
You could pick up a pre-owned bicycle for not much or free and adapt from there. You might want to retain the brake for downhills.
answered 1 hour ago
EcnerwalEcnerwal
56.2k23994
56.2k23994
My first thought is that such a design would tip over too easily, but perhaps not. Perhaps attaching each pole to each hip would be sufficient. (nods head)
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
Given your load is proposed to be ~25 lbs, I doubt it would be a major issue. I work with some folks who like "two-wheel" wheelbarrows, and those are FAR more prone to tipping over on any side slope, which is why I prefer the single-wheel version. Where flat enough, the garden-cart setup is good as it distributes the load over the axle, but where not flat enough, that's either a rollover or having to take tiny loads to not roll over.
– Ecnerwal
55 mins ago
add a comment |
My first thought is that such a design would tip over too easily, but perhaps not. Perhaps attaching each pole to each hip would be sufficient. (nods head)
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
Given your load is proposed to be ~25 lbs, I doubt it would be a major issue. I work with some folks who like "two-wheel" wheelbarrows, and those are FAR more prone to tipping over on any side slope, which is why I prefer the single-wheel version. Where flat enough, the garden-cart setup is good as it distributes the load over the axle, but where not flat enough, that's either a rollover or having to take tiny loads to not roll over.
– Ecnerwal
55 mins ago
My first thought is that such a design would tip over too easily, but perhaps not. Perhaps attaching each pole to each hip would be sufficient. (nods head)
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
My first thought is that such a design would tip over too easily, but perhaps not. Perhaps attaching each pole to each hip would be sufficient. (nods head)
– jsf80238
1 hour ago
Given your load is proposed to be ~25 lbs, I doubt it would be a major issue. I work with some folks who like "two-wheel" wheelbarrows, and those are FAR more prone to tipping over on any side slope, which is why I prefer the single-wheel version. Where flat enough, the garden-cart setup is good as it distributes the load over the axle, but where not flat enough, that's either a rollover or having to take tiny loads to not roll over.
– Ecnerwal
55 mins ago
Given your load is proposed to be ~25 lbs, I doubt it would be a major issue. I work with some folks who like "two-wheel" wheelbarrows, and those are FAR more prone to tipping over on any side slope, which is why I prefer the single-wheel version. Where flat enough, the garden-cart setup is good as it distributes the load over the axle, but where not flat enough, that's either a rollover or having to take tiny loads to not roll over.
– Ecnerwal
55 mins ago
add a comment |
jsf80238 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jsf80238 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jsf80238 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
jsf80238 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f163941%2fbuild-a-trail-cart%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Unless you plan to only use this one or two times, in mild weather and in placid terrain, PVC is a poor choice. It has too much flex, a poor strength to weight ratio, and susceptibility to temperatures, UV, and fatigue failure. Use steel allows or aluminum alloys, the former is easier for novices to fab with. 20" wheels should suffice. If a ready made hiking cart is not to your taste, you might consider using or modifying a (jogging) baby stroller.
– Brock Adams
4 hours ago
1
Along the lines of @Brock Adams suggestion a bicycle trailer used for towing children are light weight and robust. They are also readily available on the used market as children quickly out grow them.
– mikes
4 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. I did not know that about PVC, thank you. I modified a bicycle trailer for hauling groceries, but it's not suitable for trails because it is too wide.
– jsf80238
2 hours ago
See this : engineering.stackexchange.com/q/15931/10902
– Solar Mike
14 mins ago