how to set the columns in pandasHow to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I check whether a file exists without exceptions?Selecting multiple columns in a pandas dataframeRenaming columns in pandasAdding new column to existing DataFrame in Python pandasDelete column from pandas DataFrame“Large data” work flows using pandasHow to iterate over rows in a DataFrame in Pandas?Select rows from a DataFrame based on values in a column in pandasGet list from pandas DataFrame column headers

Hiding a solar system in a nebula

What does "another" mean in this case?

Where is read command?

How exactly do you calculate matrix f(m) when m is a matrix, f a polynomial?

Blood-based alcohol for vampires?

Why would a propellor have blades of different lengths?

How can I get a file's size with C++17?

Should I hide my travel history to the UK when I apply for an Australian visa?

Versicle and response symbols

What is the difference between a historical drama and a period drama?

Is there ever a reason not to use Java 8's parallelSort?

Can I deep fry food in butter instead of vegetable oil?

Show that there are infinitely more problems than we will ever be able to compute

How frequently do Russian people still refer to others by their patronymic (отчество)?

When do I make my first save against the Web spell?

Why is quantum gravity non-renormalizable?

Cannot update a field to a Lookup, MasterDetail, or Hierarchy from something else (44:13)

What does the ash content of broken wheat really mean?

Term for a character that only exists to be talked to

My mother co-signed for my car. Can she take it away from me if I am the one making car payments?

Bypass with wrong cvv of debit card and getting OTP

Story about two rival crews terraforming a planet

Isn't "Dave's protocol" good if only the database, and not the code, is leaked?

Recolour existing plots



how to set the columns in pandas


How to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How do I check whether a file exists without exceptions?Selecting multiple columns in a pandas dataframeRenaming columns in pandasAdding new column to existing DataFrame in Python pandasDelete column from pandas DataFrame“Large data” work flows using pandasHow to iterate over rows in a DataFrame in Pandas?Select rows from a DataFrame based on values in a column in pandasGet list from pandas DataFrame column headers






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















here is my dataframe -:



 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19
Saturday 2540.0 2441.0 3832.0 4093.0 1455.0 2552.0
Sunday 1313.0 1891.0 2968.0 2260.0 1454.0 1798.0
Monday 1360.0 1558.0 2967.0 2156.0 1564.0 1752.0
Tuesday 1089.0 2105.0 2476.0 1577.0 1744.0 1457.0
Wednesday 1329.0 1658.0 2073.0 2403.0 1231.0 874.0
Thursday 798.0 1195.0 2183.0 1287.0 1460.0 1269.0


i have tried some pandas ops but i am not able to do that



this is what i want to do



 items
Saturday 2540.0
Sunday 1313.0
Monday 1360.0
Tuesday 1089.0
Wednesday 1329.0
Thursday 798.0
Saturday 2441.0
Sunday 1891.0
Monday 1558.0
Tuesday 2105.0
Wednesday 1658.0
Thursday 1195.0 ............ and so on


i want to set those rows into rows in downside



how to do that?



thanks in advance










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    Try: df.reset_index().melt() by index

    – political scientist
    8 hours ago


















8















here is my dataframe -:



 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19
Saturday 2540.0 2441.0 3832.0 4093.0 1455.0 2552.0
Sunday 1313.0 1891.0 2968.0 2260.0 1454.0 1798.0
Monday 1360.0 1558.0 2967.0 2156.0 1564.0 1752.0
Tuesday 1089.0 2105.0 2476.0 1577.0 1744.0 1457.0
Wednesday 1329.0 1658.0 2073.0 2403.0 1231.0 874.0
Thursday 798.0 1195.0 2183.0 1287.0 1460.0 1269.0


i have tried some pandas ops but i am not able to do that



this is what i want to do



 items
Saturday 2540.0
Sunday 1313.0
Monday 1360.0
Tuesday 1089.0
Wednesday 1329.0
Thursday 798.0
Saturday 2441.0
Sunday 1891.0
Monday 1558.0
Tuesday 2105.0
Wednesday 1658.0
Thursday 1195.0 ............ and so on


i want to set those rows into rows in downside



how to do that?



thanks in advance










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    Try: df.reset_index().melt() by index

    – political scientist
    8 hours ago














8












8








8


2






here is my dataframe -:



 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19
Saturday 2540.0 2441.0 3832.0 4093.0 1455.0 2552.0
Sunday 1313.0 1891.0 2968.0 2260.0 1454.0 1798.0
Monday 1360.0 1558.0 2967.0 2156.0 1564.0 1752.0
Tuesday 1089.0 2105.0 2476.0 1577.0 1744.0 1457.0
Wednesday 1329.0 1658.0 2073.0 2403.0 1231.0 874.0
Thursday 798.0 1195.0 2183.0 1287.0 1460.0 1269.0


i have tried some pandas ops but i am not able to do that



this is what i want to do



 items
Saturday 2540.0
Sunday 1313.0
Monday 1360.0
Tuesday 1089.0
Wednesday 1329.0
Thursday 798.0
Saturday 2441.0
Sunday 1891.0
Monday 1558.0
Tuesday 2105.0
Wednesday 1658.0
Thursday 1195.0 ............ and so on


i want to set those rows into rows in downside



how to do that?



thanks in advance










share|improve this question














here is my dataframe -:



 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19
Saturday 2540.0 2441.0 3832.0 4093.0 1455.0 2552.0
Sunday 1313.0 1891.0 2968.0 2260.0 1454.0 1798.0
Monday 1360.0 1558.0 2967.0 2156.0 1564.0 1752.0
Tuesday 1089.0 2105.0 2476.0 1577.0 1744.0 1457.0
Wednesday 1329.0 1658.0 2073.0 2403.0 1231.0 874.0
Thursday 798.0 1195.0 2183.0 1287.0 1460.0 1269.0


i have tried some pandas ops but i am not able to do that



this is what i want to do



 items
Saturday 2540.0
Sunday 1313.0
Monday 1360.0
Tuesday 1089.0
Wednesday 1329.0
Thursday 798.0
Saturday 2441.0
Sunday 1891.0
Monday 1558.0
Tuesday 2105.0
Wednesday 1658.0
Thursday 1195.0 ............ and so on


i want to set those rows into rows in downside



how to do that?



thanks in advance







python pandas dataframe






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









jonyjony

505 bronze badges




505 bronze badges







  • 2





    Try: df.reset_index().melt() by index

    – political scientist
    8 hours ago













  • 2





    Try: df.reset_index().melt() by index

    – political scientist
    8 hours ago








2




2





Try: df.reset_index().melt() by index

– political scientist
8 hours ago






Try: df.reset_index().melt() by index

– political scientist
8 hours ago













3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='index').drop('variable',1)


Output:



 index value
0 Saturday 2540.0
1 Sunday 1313.0
2 Monday 1360.0
3 Tuesday 1089.0
4 Wednesday 1329.0
5 Thursday 798.0
6 Saturday 2441.0
7 Sunday 1891.0
8 Monday 1558.0
9 Tuesday 2105.0
10 Wednesday 1658.0
11 Thursday 1195.0
12 Saturday 3832.0
13 Sunday 2968.0
14 Monday 2967.0
15 Tuesday 2476.0
16 Wednesday 2073.0
17 Thursday 2183.0
18 Saturday 4093.0
19 Sunday 2260.0
20 Monday 2156.0
21 Tuesday 1577.0
22 Wednesday 2403.0
23 Thursday 1287.0
24 Saturday 1455.0
25 Sunday 1454.0
26 Monday 1564.0
27 Tuesday 1744.0
28 Wednesday 1231.0
29 Thursday 1460.0
30 Saturday 2552.0
31 Sunday 1798.0
32 Monday 1752.0
33 Tuesday 1457.0
34 Wednesday 874.0
35 Thursday 1269.0


Note: just noted a commented suggesting to do the same thing, I will delete my post if requested :)






share|improve this answer






























    6














    Create it with numpy by reshaping the data.



    import pandas as pd
    import numpy as np

    pd.DataFrame(df.to_numpy().flatten('F'),
    index=np.tile(df.index, df.shape[1]),
    columns=['items'])


    Output:



     items
    Saturday 2540.0
    Sunday 1313.0
    Monday 1360.0
    Tuesday 1089.0
    Wednesday 1329.0
    Thursday 798.0
    Saturday 2441.0
    ...
    Sunday 1798.0
    Monday 1752.0
    Tuesday 1457.0
    Wednesday 874.0
    Thursday 1269.0





    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      My answer was virtually identical to this. a = df.to_numpy(); pd.DataFrame(np.reshape(a, (-1, 1), 'F'), np.resize(df.index, a.size), ['items'])

      – piRSquared
      8 hours ago











    • @piRSquared my answer was faster than the accepted answer and matches the output requested exactly, while the accepted answer does not. Mine was also first posted. Sometimes things just don't make sense do they :P.

      – d_kennetz
      7 hours ago











    • @piRSquared want me to add yours to this solution? (or feel free to edit yourself :D)

      – ALollz
      5 hours ago






    • 1





      Minor fix: the argument to np.tile should be df.shape[1] instead of df.shape[0], which only happens to work on this example data because it is square!

      – Peter Leimbigler
      3 hours ago


















    3














    You can do:



    df = df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')


    It is interesting that this method got overlooked even though it is the fastest:



    import time
    start = time.time()
    df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')
    end = time.time()
    print("time taken ".format(end-start))


    yields: time taken 0.006181955337524414



    while this:



    start = time.time()
    df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='days').drop('variable',1)
    end = time.time()
    print("time taken ".format(end-start))


    yields: time taken 0.010072708129882812



    Any my output format matches OP's requested exactly.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Interesting: why does this work? I would expect df.stack().sort_index(level=1) to lexicographically sort the strings Dec-18, Jan-19, etc., but in fact they get sorted in date order, even if they're strings and not datetime objects. df.stack().index.get_level_values(1).sort_values() lexsorts.

      – Peter Leimbigler
      8 hours ago












    • @PeterLeimbigler it is sorting based on the order of the columns, not datetime or string. If jan-19 was the first column that would've been sorted first. try it using this setup: df = pd.DataFrame('days': ['Saturday', 'Sunday', 'Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday'], 'Dec-18': [400,300,200,100,1000,1200], 'Jan-19': [500, 300, 200, 800, 900, 1000]) then: df = df.set_index('days') then: df.stack().sort_index(level=1) Then go back and change the order of the columns and see what appears first.

      – d_kennetz
      7 hours ago












    • Thanks for the explanation! This is unexpected behaviour to me. From my testing, it appears that if you stack a DataFrame's columns into a MultiIndex and the result is a Series, then the index remembers the order of the columns, and sorts according to that order. But if the .stack() returns a DataFrame (or if you convert to DataFrame using .stack().to_frame()), the index no longer remembers the order of the original columns.

      – Peter Leimbigler
      7 hours ago






    • 2





      @d_kennetz sometimes they do not. I usually think of answers as general ideas. I judge them accordingly. I give credit for ingenuity and presentation/explanation. I like to see the output from proposed solutions because all to often answers provide a solution that doesn't produce correct output. This doesn't show the results. Also, most of the time, DataFrames aren't big enough for performance to matter. OP goes with what is most understandable to them. Keep up the good fight and answer questions that are beneficial long term. (-:

      – piRSquared
      7 hours ago











    • Also, use df.unstack().reset_index(0, drop=True).to_frame('items'). By unstack-ing rather than stack-ing, you save yourself from the sorting shenanigans.

      – piRSquared
      7 hours ago













    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56841907%2fhow-to-set-the-columns-in-pandas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='index').drop('variable',1)


    Output:



     index value
    0 Saturday 2540.0
    1 Sunday 1313.0
    2 Monday 1360.0
    3 Tuesday 1089.0
    4 Wednesday 1329.0
    5 Thursday 798.0
    6 Saturday 2441.0
    7 Sunday 1891.0
    8 Monday 1558.0
    9 Tuesday 2105.0
    10 Wednesday 1658.0
    11 Thursday 1195.0
    12 Saturday 3832.0
    13 Sunday 2968.0
    14 Monday 2967.0
    15 Tuesday 2476.0
    16 Wednesday 2073.0
    17 Thursday 2183.0
    18 Saturday 4093.0
    19 Sunday 2260.0
    20 Monday 2156.0
    21 Tuesday 1577.0
    22 Wednesday 2403.0
    23 Thursday 1287.0
    24 Saturday 1455.0
    25 Sunday 1454.0
    26 Monday 1564.0
    27 Tuesday 1744.0
    28 Wednesday 1231.0
    29 Thursday 1460.0
    30 Saturday 2552.0
    31 Sunday 1798.0
    32 Monday 1752.0
    33 Tuesday 1457.0
    34 Wednesday 874.0
    35 Thursday 1269.0


    Note: just noted a commented suggesting to do the same thing, I will delete my post if requested :)






    share|improve this answer



























      6














      df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='index').drop('variable',1)


      Output:



       index value
      0 Saturday 2540.0
      1 Sunday 1313.0
      2 Monday 1360.0
      3 Tuesday 1089.0
      4 Wednesday 1329.0
      5 Thursday 798.0
      6 Saturday 2441.0
      7 Sunday 1891.0
      8 Monday 1558.0
      9 Tuesday 2105.0
      10 Wednesday 1658.0
      11 Thursday 1195.0
      12 Saturday 3832.0
      13 Sunday 2968.0
      14 Monday 2967.0
      15 Tuesday 2476.0
      16 Wednesday 2073.0
      17 Thursday 2183.0
      18 Saturday 4093.0
      19 Sunday 2260.0
      20 Monday 2156.0
      21 Tuesday 1577.0
      22 Wednesday 2403.0
      23 Thursday 1287.0
      24 Saturday 1455.0
      25 Sunday 1454.0
      26 Monday 1564.0
      27 Tuesday 1744.0
      28 Wednesday 1231.0
      29 Thursday 1460.0
      30 Saturday 2552.0
      31 Sunday 1798.0
      32 Monday 1752.0
      33 Tuesday 1457.0
      34 Wednesday 874.0
      35 Thursday 1269.0


      Note: just noted a commented suggesting to do the same thing, I will delete my post if requested :)






      share|improve this answer

























        6












        6








        6







        df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='index').drop('variable',1)


        Output:



         index value
        0 Saturday 2540.0
        1 Sunday 1313.0
        2 Monday 1360.0
        3 Tuesday 1089.0
        4 Wednesday 1329.0
        5 Thursday 798.0
        6 Saturday 2441.0
        7 Sunday 1891.0
        8 Monday 1558.0
        9 Tuesday 2105.0
        10 Wednesday 1658.0
        11 Thursday 1195.0
        12 Saturday 3832.0
        13 Sunday 2968.0
        14 Monday 2967.0
        15 Tuesday 2476.0
        16 Wednesday 2073.0
        17 Thursday 2183.0
        18 Saturday 4093.0
        19 Sunday 2260.0
        20 Monday 2156.0
        21 Tuesday 1577.0
        22 Wednesday 2403.0
        23 Thursday 1287.0
        24 Saturday 1455.0
        25 Sunday 1454.0
        26 Monday 1564.0
        27 Tuesday 1744.0
        28 Wednesday 1231.0
        29 Thursday 1460.0
        30 Saturday 2552.0
        31 Sunday 1798.0
        32 Monday 1752.0
        33 Tuesday 1457.0
        34 Wednesday 874.0
        35 Thursday 1269.0


        Note: just noted a commented suggesting to do the same thing, I will delete my post if requested :)






        share|improve this answer













        df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='index').drop('variable',1)


        Output:



         index value
        0 Saturday 2540.0
        1 Sunday 1313.0
        2 Monday 1360.0
        3 Tuesday 1089.0
        4 Wednesday 1329.0
        5 Thursday 798.0
        6 Saturday 2441.0
        7 Sunday 1891.0
        8 Monday 1558.0
        9 Tuesday 2105.0
        10 Wednesday 1658.0
        11 Thursday 1195.0
        12 Saturday 3832.0
        13 Sunday 2968.0
        14 Monday 2967.0
        15 Tuesday 2476.0
        16 Wednesday 2073.0
        17 Thursday 2183.0
        18 Saturday 4093.0
        19 Sunday 2260.0
        20 Monday 2156.0
        21 Tuesday 1577.0
        22 Wednesday 2403.0
        23 Thursday 1287.0
        24 Saturday 1455.0
        25 Sunday 1454.0
        26 Monday 1564.0
        27 Tuesday 1744.0
        28 Wednesday 1231.0
        29 Thursday 1460.0
        30 Saturday 2552.0
        31 Sunday 1798.0
        32 Monday 1752.0
        33 Tuesday 1457.0
        34 Wednesday 874.0
        35 Thursday 1269.0


        Note: just noted a commented suggesting to do the same thing, I will delete my post if requested :)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        YucaYuca

        3,8032 gold badges10 silver badges27 bronze badges




        3,8032 gold badges10 silver badges27 bronze badges























            6














            Create it with numpy by reshaping the data.



            import pandas as pd
            import numpy as np

            pd.DataFrame(df.to_numpy().flatten('F'),
            index=np.tile(df.index, df.shape[1]),
            columns=['items'])


            Output:



             items
            Saturday 2540.0
            Sunday 1313.0
            Monday 1360.0
            Tuesday 1089.0
            Wednesday 1329.0
            Thursday 798.0
            Saturday 2441.0
            ...
            Sunday 1798.0
            Monday 1752.0
            Tuesday 1457.0
            Wednesday 874.0
            Thursday 1269.0





            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              My answer was virtually identical to this. a = df.to_numpy(); pd.DataFrame(np.reshape(a, (-1, 1), 'F'), np.resize(df.index, a.size), ['items'])

              – piRSquared
              8 hours ago











            • @piRSquared my answer was faster than the accepted answer and matches the output requested exactly, while the accepted answer does not. Mine was also first posted. Sometimes things just don't make sense do they :P.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago











            • @piRSquared want me to add yours to this solution? (or feel free to edit yourself :D)

              – ALollz
              5 hours ago






            • 1





              Minor fix: the argument to np.tile should be df.shape[1] instead of df.shape[0], which only happens to work on this example data because it is square!

              – Peter Leimbigler
              3 hours ago















            6














            Create it with numpy by reshaping the data.



            import pandas as pd
            import numpy as np

            pd.DataFrame(df.to_numpy().flatten('F'),
            index=np.tile(df.index, df.shape[1]),
            columns=['items'])


            Output:



             items
            Saturday 2540.0
            Sunday 1313.0
            Monday 1360.0
            Tuesday 1089.0
            Wednesday 1329.0
            Thursday 798.0
            Saturday 2441.0
            ...
            Sunday 1798.0
            Monday 1752.0
            Tuesday 1457.0
            Wednesday 874.0
            Thursday 1269.0





            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              My answer was virtually identical to this. a = df.to_numpy(); pd.DataFrame(np.reshape(a, (-1, 1), 'F'), np.resize(df.index, a.size), ['items'])

              – piRSquared
              8 hours ago











            • @piRSquared my answer was faster than the accepted answer and matches the output requested exactly, while the accepted answer does not. Mine was also first posted. Sometimes things just don't make sense do they :P.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago











            • @piRSquared want me to add yours to this solution? (or feel free to edit yourself :D)

              – ALollz
              5 hours ago






            • 1





              Minor fix: the argument to np.tile should be df.shape[1] instead of df.shape[0], which only happens to work on this example data because it is square!

              – Peter Leimbigler
              3 hours ago













            6












            6








            6







            Create it with numpy by reshaping the data.



            import pandas as pd
            import numpy as np

            pd.DataFrame(df.to_numpy().flatten('F'),
            index=np.tile(df.index, df.shape[1]),
            columns=['items'])


            Output:



             items
            Saturday 2540.0
            Sunday 1313.0
            Monday 1360.0
            Tuesday 1089.0
            Wednesday 1329.0
            Thursday 798.0
            Saturday 2441.0
            ...
            Sunday 1798.0
            Monday 1752.0
            Tuesday 1457.0
            Wednesday 874.0
            Thursday 1269.0





            share|improve this answer















            Create it with numpy by reshaping the data.



            import pandas as pd
            import numpy as np

            pd.DataFrame(df.to_numpy().flatten('F'),
            index=np.tile(df.index, df.shape[1]),
            columns=['items'])


            Output:



             items
            Saturday 2540.0
            Sunday 1313.0
            Monday 1360.0
            Tuesday 1089.0
            Wednesday 1329.0
            Thursday 798.0
            Saturday 2441.0
            ...
            Sunday 1798.0
            Monday 1752.0
            Tuesday 1457.0
            Wednesday 874.0
            Thursday 1269.0






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            ALollzALollz

            19.8k5 gold badges18 silver badges40 bronze badges




            19.8k5 gold badges18 silver badges40 bronze badges







            • 1





              My answer was virtually identical to this. a = df.to_numpy(); pd.DataFrame(np.reshape(a, (-1, 1), 'F'), np.resize(df.index, a.size), ['items'])

              – piRSquared
              8 hours ago











            • @piRSquared my answer was faster than the accepted answer and matches the output requested exactly, while the accepted answer does not. Mine was also first posted. Sometimes things just don't make sense do they :P.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago











            • @piRSquared want me to add yours to this solution? (or feel free to edit yourself :D)

              – ALollz
              5 hours ago






            • 1





              Minor fix: the argument to np.tile should be df.shape[1] instead of df.shape[0], which only happens to work on this example data because it is square!

              – Peter Leimbigler
              3 hours ago












            • 1





              My answer was virtually identical to this. a = df.to_numpy(); pd.DataFrame(np.reshape(a, (-1, 1), 'F'), np.resize(df.index, a.size), ['items'])

              – piRSquared
              8 hours ago











            • @piRSquared my answer was faster than the accepted answer and matches the output requested exactly, while the accepted answer does not. Mine was also first posted. Sometimes things just don't make sense do they :P.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago











            • @piRSquared want me to add yours to this solution? (or feel free to edit yourself :D)

              – ALollz
              5 hours ago






            • 1





              Minor fix: the argument to np.tile should be df.shape[1] instead of df.shape[0], which only happens to work on this example data because it is square!

              – Peter Leimbigler
              3 hours ago







            1




            1





            My answer was virtually identical to this. a = df.to_numpy(); pd.DataFrame(np.reshape(a, (-1, 1), 'F'), np.resize(df.index, a.size), ['items'])

            – piRSquared
            8 hours ago





            My answer was virtually identical to this. a = df.to_numpy(); pd.DataFrame(np.reshape(a, (-1, 1), 'F'), np.resize(df.index, a.size), ['items'])

            – piRSquared
            8 hours ago













            @piRSquared my answer was faster than the accepted answer and matches the output requested exactly, while the accepted answer does not. Mine was also first posted. Sometimes things just don't make sense do they :P.

            – d_kennetz
            7 hours ago





            @piRSquared my answer was faster than the accepted answer and matches the output requested exactly, while the accepted answer does not. Mine was also first posted. Sometimes things just don't make sense do they :P.

            – d_kennetz
            7 hours ago













            @piRSquared want me to add yours to this solution? (or feel free to edit yourself :D)

            – ALollz
            5 hours ago





            @piRSquared want me to add yours to this solution? (or feel free to edit yourself :D)

            – ALollz
            5 hours ago




            1




            1





            Minor fix: the argument to np.tile should be df.shape[1] instead of df.shape[0], which only happens to work on this example data because it is square!

            – Peter Leimbigler
            3 hours ago





            Minor fix: the argument to np.tile should be df.shape[1] instead of df.shape[0], which only happens to work on this example data because it is square!

            – Peter Leimbigler
            3 hours ago











            3














            You can do:



            df = df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')


            It is interesting that this method got overlooked even though it is the fastest:



            import time
            start = time.time()
            df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.006181955337524414



            while this:



            start = time.time()
            df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='days').drop('variable',1)
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.010072708129882812



            Any my output format matches OP's requested exactly.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Interesting: why does this work? I would expect df.stack().sort_index(level=1) to lexicographically sort the strings Dec-18, Jan-19, etc., but in fact they get sorted in date order, even if they're strings and not datetime objects. df.stack().index.get_level_values(1).sort_values() lexsorts.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              8 hours ago












            • @PeterLeimbigler it is sorting based on the order of the columns, not datetime or string. If jan-19 was the first column that would've been sorted first. try it using this setup: df = pd.DataFrame('days': ['Saturday', 'Sunday', 'Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday'], 'Dec-18': [400,300,200,100,1000,1200], 'Jan-19': [500, 300, 200, 800, 900, 1000]) then: df = df.set_index('days') then: df.stack().sort_index(level=1) Then go back and change the order of the columns and see what appears first.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago












            • Thanks for the explanation! This is unexpected behaviour to me. From my testing, it appears that if you stack a DataFrame's columns into a MultiIndex and the result is a Series, then the index remembers the order of the columns, and sorts according to that order. But if the .stack() returns a DataFrame (or if you convert to DataFrame using .stack().to_frame()), the index no longer remembers the order of the original columns.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @d_kennetz sometimes they do not. I usually think of answers as general ideas. I judge them accordingly. I give credit for ingenuity and presentation/explanation. I like to see the output from proposed solutions because all to often answers provide a solution that doesn't produce correct output. This doesn't show the results. Also, most of the time, DataFrames aren't big enough for performance to matter. OP goes with what is most understandable to them. Keep up the good fight and answer questions that are beneficial long term. (-:

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago











            • Also, use df.unstack().reset_index(0, drop=True).to_frame('items'). By unstack-ing rather than stack-ing, you save yourself from the sorting shenanigans.

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago















            3














            You can do:



            df = df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')


            It is interesting that this method got overlooked even though it is the fastest:



            import time
            start = time.time()
            df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.006181955337524414



            while this:



            start = time.time()
            df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='days').drop('variable',1)
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.010072708129882812



            Any my output format matches OP's requested exactly.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Interesting: why does this work? I would expect df.stack().sort_index(level=1) to lexicographically sort the strings Dec-18, Jan-19, etc., but in fact they get sorted in date order, even if they're strings and not datetime objects. df.stack().index.get_level_values(1).sort_values() lexsorts.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              8 hours ago












            • @PeterLeimbigler it is sorting based on the order of the columns, not datetime or string. If jan-19 was the first column that would've been sorted first. try it using this setup: df = pd.DataFrame('days': ['Saturday', 'Sunday', 'Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday'], 'Dec-18': [400,300,200,100,1000,1200], 'Jan-19': [500, 300, 200, 800, 900, 1000]) then: df = df.set_index('days') then: df.stack().sort_index(level=1) Then go back and change the order of the columns and see what appears first.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago












            • Thanks for the explanation! This is unexpected behaviour to me. From my testing, it appears that if you stack a DataFrame's columns into a MultiIndex and the result is a Series, then the index remembers the order of the columns, and sorts according to that order. But if the .stack() returns a DataFrame (or if you convert to DataFrame using .stack().to_frame()), the index no longer remembers the order of the original columns.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @d_kennetz sometimes they do not. I usually think of answers as general ideas. I judge them accordingly. I give credit for ingenuity and presentation/explanation. I like to see the output from proposed solutions because all to often answers provide a solution that doesn't produce correct output. This doesn't show the results. Also, most of the time, DataFrames aren't big enough for performance to matter. OP goes with what is most understandable to them. Keep up the good fight and answer questions that are beneficial long term. (-:

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago











            • Also, use df.unstack().reset_index(0, drop=True).to_frame('items'). By unstack-ing rather than stack-ing, you save yourself from the sorting shenanigans.

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago













            3












            3








            3







            You can do:



            df = df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')


            It is interesting that this method got overlooked even though it is the fastest:



            import time
            start = time.time()
            df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.006181955337524414



            while this:



            start = time.time()
            df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='days').drop('variable',1)
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.010072708129882812



            Any my output format matches OP's requested exactly.






            share|improve this answer















            You can do:



            df = df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')


            It is interesting that this method got overlooked even though it is the fastest:



            import time
            start = time.time()
            df.stack().sort_index(level=1).reset_index(level = 1, drop=True).to_frame('items')
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.006181955337524414



            while this:



            start = time.time()
            df.reset_index().melt(id_vars='days').drop('variable',1)
            end = time.time()
            print("time taken ".format(end-start))


            yields: time taken 0.010072708129882812



            Any my output format matches OP's requested exactly.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 7 hours ago

























            answered 8 hours ago









            d_kennetzd_kennetz

            2,8014 gold badges9 silver badges28 bronze badges




            2,8014 gold badges9 silver badges28 bronze badges












            • Interesting: why does this work? I would expect df.stack().sort_index(level=1) to lexicographically sort the strings Dec-18, Jan-19, etc., but in fact they get sorted in date order, even if they're strings and not datetime objects. df.stack().index.get_level_values(1).sort_values() lexsorts.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              8 hours ago












            • @PeterLeimbigler it is sorting based on the order of the columns, not datetime or string. If jan-19 was the first column that would've been sorted first. try it using this setup: df = pd.DataFrame('days': ['Saturday', 'Sunday', 'Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday'], 'Dec-18': [400,300,200,100,1000,1200], 'Jan-19': [500, 300, 200, 800, 900, 1000]) then: df = df.set_index('days') then: df.stack().sort_index(level=1) Then go back and change the order of the columns and see what appears first.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago












            • Thanks for the explanation! This is unexpected behaviour to me. From my testing, it appears that if you stack a DataFrame's columns into a MultiIndex and the result is a Series, then the index remembers the order of the columns, and sorts according to that order. But if the .stack() returns a DataFrame (or if you convert to DataFrame using .stack().to_frame()), the index no longer remembers the order of the original columns.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @d_kennetz sometimes they do not. I usually think of answers as general ideas. I judge them accordingly. I give credit for ingenuity and presentation/explanation. I like to see the output from proposed solutions because all to often answers provide a solution that doesn't produce correct output. This doesn't show the results. Also, most of the time, DataFrames aren't big enough for performance to matter. OP goes with what is most understandable to them. Keep up the good fight and answer questions that are beneficial long term. (-:

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago











            • Also, use df.unstack().reset_index(0, drop=True).to_frame('items'). By unstack-ing rather than stack-ing, you save yourself from the sorting shenanigans.

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago

















            • Interesting: why does this work? I would expect df.stack().sort_index(level=1) to lexicographically sort the strings Dec-18, Jan-19, etc., but in fact they get sorted in date order, even if they're strings and not datetime objects. df.stack().index.get_level_values(1).sort_values() lexsorts.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              8 hours ago












            • @PeterLeimbigler it is sorting based on the order of the columns, not datetime or string. If jan-19 was the first column that would've been sorted first. try it using this setup: df = pd.DataFrame('days': ['Saturday', 'Sunday', 'Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday'], 'Dec-18': [400,300,200,100,1000,1200], 'Jan-19': [500, 300, 200, 800, 900, 1000]) then: df = df.set_index('days') then: df.stack().sort_index(level=1) Then go back and change the order of the columns and see what appears first.

              – d_kennetz
              7 hours ago












            • Thanks for the explanation! This is unexpected behaviour to me. From my testing, it appears that if you stack a DataFrame's columns into a MultiIndex and the result is a Series, then the index remembers the order of the columns, and sorts according to that order. But if the .stack() returns a DataFrame (or if you convert to DataFrame using .stack().to_frame()), the index no longer remembers the order of the original columns.

              – Peter Leimbigler
              7 hours ago






            • 2





              @d_kennetz sometimes they do not. I usually think of answers as general ideas. I judge them accordingly. I give credit for ingenuity and presentation/explanation. I like to see the output from proposed solutions because all to often answers provide a solution that doesn't produce correct output. This doesn't show the results. Also, most of the time, DataFrames aren't big enough for performance to matter. OP goes with what is most understandable to them. Keep up the good fight and answer questions that are beneficial long term. (-:

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago











            • Also, use df.unstack().reset_index(0, drop=True).to_frame('items'). By unstack-ing rather than stack-ing, you save yourself from the sorting shenanigans.

              – piRSquared
              7 hours ago
















            Interesting: why does this work? I would expect df.stack().sort_index(level=1) to lexicographically sort the strings Dec-18, Jan-19, etc., but in fact they get sorted in date order, even if they're strings and not datetime objects. df.stack().index.get_level_values(1).sort_values() lexsorts.

            – Peter Leimbigler
            8 hours ago






            Interesting: why does this work? I would expect df.stack().sort_index(level=1) to lexicographically sort the strings Dec-18, Jan-19, etc., but in fact they get sorted in date order, even if they're strings and not datetime objects. df.stack().index.get_level_values(1).sort_values() lexsorts.

            – Peter Leimbigler
            8 hours ago














            @PeterLeimbigler it is sorting based on the order of the columns, not datetime or string. If jan-19 was the first column that would've been sorted first. try it using this setup: df = pd.DataFrame('days': ['Saturday', 'Sunday', 'Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday'], 'Dec-18': [400,300,200,100,1000,1200], 'Jan-19': [500, 300, 200, 800, 900, 1000]) then: df = df.set_index('days') then: df.stack().sort_index(level=1) Then go back and change the order of the columns and see what appears first.

            – d_kennetz
            7 hours ago






            @PeterLeimbigler it is sorting based on the order of the columns, not datetime or string. If jan-19 was the first column that would've been sorted first. try it using this setup: df = pd.DataFrame('days': ['Saturday', 'Sunday', 'Monday', 'Tuesday', 'Wednesday', 'Thursday'], 'Dec-18': [400,300,200,100,1000,1200], 'Jan-19': [500, 300, 200, 800, 900, 1000]) then: df = df.set_index('days') then: df.stack().sort_index(level=1) Then go back and change the order of the columns and see what appears first.

            – d_kennetz
            7 hours ago














            Thanks for the explanation! This is unexpected behaviour to me. From my testing, it appears that if you stack a DataFrame's columns into a MultiIndex and the result is a Series, then the index remembers the order of the columns, and sorts according to that order. But if the .stack() returns a DataFrame (or if you convert to DataFrame using .stack().to_frame()), the index no longer remembers the order of the original columns.

            – Peter Leimbigler
            7 hours ago





            Thanks for the explanation! This is unexpected behaviour to me. From my testing, it appears that if you stack a DataFrame's columns into a MultiIndex and the result is a Series, then the index remembers the order of the columns, and sorts according to that order. But if the .stack() returns a DataFrame (or if you convert to DataFrame using .stack().to_frame()), the index no longer remembers the order of the original columns.

            – Peter Leimbigler
            7 hours ago




            2




            2





            @d_kennetz sometimes they do not. I usually think of answers as general ideas. I judge them accordingly. I give credit for ingenuity and presentation/explanation. I like to see the output from proposed solutions because all to often answers provide a solution that doesn't produce correct output. This doesn't show the results. Also, most of the time, DataFrames aren't big enough for performance to matter. OP goes with what is most understandable to them. Keep up the good fight and answer questions that are beneficial long term. (-:

            – piRSquared
            7 hours ago





            @d_kennetz sometimes they do not. I usually think of answers as general ideas. I judge them accordingly. I give credit for ingenuity and presentation/explanation. I like to see the output from proposed solutions because all to often answers provide a solution that doesn't produce correct output. This doesn't show the results. Also, most of the time, DataFrames aren't big enough for performance to matter. OP goes with what is most understandable to them. Keep up the good fight and answer questions that are beneficial long term. (-:

            – piRSquared
            7 hours ago













            Also, use df.unstack().reset_index(0, drop=True).to_frame('items'). By unstack-ing rather than stack-ing, you save yourself from the sorting shenanigans.

            – piRSquared
            7 hours ago





            Also, use df.unstack().reset_index(0, drop=True).to_frame('items'). By unstack-ing rather than stack-ing, you save yourself from the sorting shenanigans.

            – piRSquared
            7 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56841907%2fhow-to-set-the-columns-in-pandas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її