How did שְׁלֹמֹה (shlomo) become Solomon?What is this phenomenon called, and is it the only occurrence?Meaning of sufformative versus suffixConcerning Semitic Pronunciation of Pharyngeal LettersIrregular penultimate stress in English words from classical sourcesHow a portmanteau of God's name would be formedHow and why did so many French letters become silent?Why is it believed the West Germanic /i/ became /aɪ/ in some cases?Why did some Hebrew words beginning with Yod become transliterated into Latin as “hi?”Is wikipedia wrong when it speaks of the hebrew shwa not being pronounced ə?Did Classical Hebrew and/or Aramaic have allophonic continuant length?

administrative duties kill the research spirit?

Will greasing clutch parts make it softer

Sum of Max terms maximization

What is the meaning of "stock" dilution on the Massive Dev Chart website?

Phrase origin: "You ain't got to go home but you got to get out of here."

A grammar issue?

Why would a propellor have blades of different lengths?

If a creature is blocking and it has vigilance does it still tap?

Show that there are infinitely more problems than we will ever be able to compute

Was Wolfgang Unzicker the last Amateur GM?

Go function to test whether a file exists

What is the difference between figures illustration and images?

How to create a 2D table with varying step?

How can solar sailed ships be protected from space debris?

Should I cheat if the majority does it?

How come having a Deathly Hallow is not a big deal?

Pandas merge and fillna

Versicle and response symbols

Who pays for increased security measures on flights to the US?

Do I need to be legally qualified to install a Hive smart thermostat?

How might boat designs change in order to allow them to be pulled by dragons?

Which high-degree derivatives play an essential role?

Where is read command?

Why is quantum gravity non-renormalizable?



How did שְׁלֹמֹה (shlomo) become Solomon?


What is this phenomenon called, and is it the only occurrence?Meaning of sufformative versus suffixConcerning Semitic Pronunciation of Pharyngeal LettersIrregular penultimate stress in English words from classical sourcesHow a portmanteau of God's name would be formedHow and why did so many French letters become silent?Why is it believed the West Germanic /i/ became /aɪ/ in some cases?Why did some Hebrew words beginning with Yod become transliterated into Latin as “hi?”Is wikipedia wrong when it speaks of the hebrew shwa not being pronounced ə?Did Classical Hebrew and/or Aramaic have allophonic continuant length?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















According to Wiktionary, שלמה (pronounced /ʃloˈmo/ in Modern Hebrew) is the Hebrew version of Solomon. The pronunciation seems to follow reasonably well from the spelling, and as far as I can tell, it was spelled the same way in Biblical Hebrew.



The descendants look quite a bit different from the Hebrew pronunciation:



Ancient Greek: Σολομών (Solomṓn), Σαλομών (Salomṓn), Σαλωμών (Salōmṓn), Σολομῶν (Solomôn), Σολωμών (Solōmṓn)
→ Gothic: 𐍃𐌰𐌿𐌻𐌰𐌿𐌼𐍉𐌽 (saulaumōn)
Greek: Σολομών (Solomón)
→ Latin: Solomon
→ English: Solomon
Classical Syriac: ܫܠܝܡܘܢ‎ (šlemūn)
Arabic: سليمان‎ (Sulaymān)
→ English: Suleiman
→ Turkish: Süleyman


It seems reasonable to me that the /ʃ/ shifted to a /s/, and most of the languages added a vowel between the /s/ and the /l/, and that Syriac and Arabic changed the vowels.



However, I don't understand where the /n/ at the end came from. I'm not aware of any other Biblical names that ended in an open vowel in Hebrew and shifted toward having an n.










share|improve this question




























    1















    According to Wiktionary, שלמה (pronounced /ʃloˈmo/ in Modern Hebrew) is the Hebrew version of Solomon. The pronunciation seems to follow reasonably well from the spelling, and as far as I can tell, it was spelled the same way in Biblical Hebrew.



    The descendants look quite a bit different from the Hebrew pronunciation:



    Ancient Greek: Σολομών (Solomṓn), Σαλομών (Salomṓn), Σαλωμών (Salōmṓn), Σολομῶν (Solomôn), Σολωμών (Solōmṓn)
    → Gothic: 𐍃𐌰𐌿𐌻𐌰𐌿𐌼𐍉𐌽 (saulaumōn)
    Greek: Σολομών (Solomón)
    → Latin: Solomon
    → English: Solomon
    Classical Syriac: ܫܠܝܡܘܢ‎ (šlemūn)
    Arabic: سليمان‎ (Sulaymān)
    → English: Suleiman
    → Turkish: Süleyman


    It seems reasonable to me that the /ʃ/ shifted to a /s/, and most of the languages added a vowel between the /s/ and the /l/, and that Syriac and Arabic changed the vowels.



    However, I don't understand where the /n/ at the end came from. I'm not aware of any other Biblical names that ended in an open vowel in Hebrew and shifted toward having an n.










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      According to Wiktionary, שלמה (pronounced /ʃloˈmo/ in Modern Hebrew) is the Hebrew version of Solomon. The pronunciation seems to follow reasonably well from the spelling, and as far as I can tell, it was spelled the same way in Biblical Hebrew.



      The descendants look quite a bit different from the Hebrew pronunciation:



      Ancient Greek: Σολομών (Solomṓn), Σαλομών (Salomṓn), Σαλωμών (Salōmṓn), Σολομῶν (Solomôn), Σολωμών (Solōmṓn)
      → Gothic: 𐍃𐌰𐌿𐌻𐌰𐌿𐌼𐍉𐌽 (saulaumōn)
      Greek: Σολομών (Solomón)
      → Latin: Solomon
      → English: Solomon
      Classical Syriac: ܫܠܝܡܘܢ‎ (šlemūn)
      Arabic: سليمان‎ (Sulaymān)
      → English: Suleiman
      → Turkish: Süleyman


      It seems reasonable to me that the /ʃ/ shifted to a /s/, and most of the languages added a vowel between the /s/ and the /l/, and that Syriac and Arabic changed the vowels.



      However, I don't understand where the /n/ at the end came from. I'm not aware of any other Biblical names that ended in an open vowel in Hebrew and shifted toward having an n.










      share|improve this question














      According to Wiktionary, שלמה (pronounced /ʃloˈmo/ in Modern Hebrew) is the Hebrew version of Solomon. The pronunciation seems to follow reasonably well from the spelling, and as far as I can tell, it was spelled the same way in Biblical Hebrew.



      The descendants look quite a bit different from the Hebrew pronunciation:



      Ancient Greek: Σολομών (Solomṓn), Σαλομών (Salomṓn), Σαλωμών (Salōmṓn), Σολομῶν (Solomôn), Σολωμών (Solōmṓn)
      → Gothic: 𐍃𐌰𐌿𐌻𐌰𐌿𐌼𐍉𐌽 (saulaumōn)
      Greek: Σολομών (Solomón)
      → Latin: Solomon
      → English: Solomon
      Classical Syriac: ܫܠܝܡܘܢ‎ (šlemūn)
      Arabic: سليمان‎ (Sulaymān)
      → English: Suleiman
      → Turkish: Süleyman


      It seems reasonable to me that the /ʃ/ shifted to a /s/, and most of the languages added a vowel between the /s/ and the /l/, and that Syriac and Arabic changed the vowels.



      However, I don't understand where the /n/ at the end came from. I'm not aware of any other Biblical names that ended in an open vowel in Hebrew and shifted toward having an n.







      pronunciation hebrew






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 9 hours ago









      MiClMiCl

      1163 bronze badges




      1163 bronze badges




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          For the vowels, pay close attention to the nəquddoth (vowel dots)! Between the shin and the lamedh is a shəwa mark; sometimes this indicates an extra-short vowel, sometimes no vowel at all. But historically, shəwa was always pronounced (shəwa na) if it came after the first consonant in the word. So at the time of the Septuagint, the name was pronounced something like Shəlōmō.



          When the Greeks tried to transcribe this word for the LXX, they ran into some difficulties. Ancient Greek didn't have [ʃ], only [s]. So they wrote the first letter as a plain sigma ("s").



          Similarly, Ancient Greek didn't have any extra-short vowels corresponding to shəwa na, so they made do with the letters they had: in this case, it was sometimes transcribed with a short alpha ("a"), sometimes with an omicron ("o"). You'll also sometimes see shəwa transcribed with epsilon ("e"), depending on the word; this is closer to the modern pronunciation.



          Finally, in Ancient Greek, it was extremely rare for names to end in . It was much more common for them to end in -ōn (Glaucōn, Cleōn, Zēnōn). So the Greeks stuck a nu ("n") on the end to make the name look more like a name. This is also why English "Moses" ends in "s" when the Hebrew Mōshe (מֹשֶׁה) doesn't: is a feminine ending in Greek, not a masculine one, so the translators changed it to the very common and masculine -ēs (Achillēs, Sōcratēs, Diogēnēs), and this version persisted.



          One might expect the Romans to then remove this -n again, since the same "type" of name in Latin ended in plain -o (Cicero, Scipio, Piso). But the Latin Vulgate is generally more faithful to the Greek than the Hebrew, especially where names are concerned, so "Solomon" persisted.



          P.S. Chromium fails beautifully when it tries to render the question title…
          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























          • Do you think the Classical Syriac version ending in -n was influenced by the Greek, or was because of a native Syriac process?

            – MiCl
            4 hours ago











          • @MiCl I unfortunately speak no Syriac, but I'm guessing it was a separate process.

            – Draconis
            2 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "312"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31847%2fhow-did-%25d7%25a9%25d6%25b0%25d7%2581%25d7%259c%25d6%25b9%25d7%259e%25d6%25b9%25d7%2594-shlomo-become-solomon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7














          For the vowels, pay close attention to the nəquddoth (vowel dots)! Between the shin and the lamedh is a shəwa mark; sometimes this indicates an extra-short vowel, sometimes no vowel at all. But historically, shəwa was always pronounced (shəwa na) if it came after the first consonant in the word. So at the time of the Septuagint, the name was pronounced something like Shəlōmō.



          When the Greeks tried to transcribe this word for the LXX, they ran into some difficulties. Ancient Greek didn't have [ʃ], only [s]. So they wrote the first letter as a plain sigma ("s").



          Similarly, Ancient Greek didn't have any extra-short vowels corresponding to shəwa na, so they made do with the letters they had: in this case, it was sometimes transcribed with a short alpha ("a"), sometimes with an omicron ("o"). You'll also sometimes see shəwa transcribed with epsilon ("e"), depending on the word; this is closer to the modern pronunciation.



          Finally, in Ancient Greek, it was extremely rare for names to end in . It was much more common for them to end in -ōn (Glaucōn, Cleōn, Zēnōn). So the Greeks stuck a nu ("n") on the end to make the name look more like a name. This is also why English "Moses" ends in "s" when the Hebrew Mōshe (מֹשֶׁה) doesn't: is a feminine ending in Greek, not a masculine one, so the translators changed it to the very common and masculine -ēs (Achillēs, Sōcratēs, Diogēnēs), and this version persisted.



          One might expect the Romans to then remove this -n again, since the same "type" of name in Latin ended in plain -o (Cicero, Scipio, Piso). But the Latin Vulgate is generally more faithful to the Greek than the Hebrew, especially where names are concerned, so "Solomon" persisted.



          P.S. Chromium fails beautifully when it tries to render the question title…
          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























          • Do you think the Classical Syriac version ending in -n was influenced by the Greek, or was because of a native Syriac process?

            – MiCl
            4 hours ago











          • @MiCl I unfortunately speak no Syriac, but I'm guessing it was a separate process.

            – Draconis
            2 hours ago















          7














          For the vowels, pay close attention to the nəquddoth (vowel dots)! Between the shin and the lamedh is a shəwa mark; sometimes this indicates an extra-short vowel, sometimes no vowel at all. But historically, shəwa was always pronounced (shəwa na) if it came after the first consonant in the word. So at the time of the Septuagint, the name was pronounced something like Shəlōmō.



          When the Greeks tried to transcribe this word for the LXX, they ran into some difficulties. Ancient Greek didn't have [ʃ], only [s]. So they wrote the first letter as a plain sigma ("s").



          Similarly, Ancient Greek didn't have any extra-short vowels corresponding to shəwa na, so they made do with the letters they had: in this case, it was sometimes transcribed with a short alpha ("a"), sometimes with an omicron ("o"). You'll also sometimes see shəwa transcribed with epsilon ("e"), depending on the word; this is closer to the modern pronunciation.



          Finally, in Ancient Greek, it was extremely rare for names to end in . It was much more common for them to end in -ōn (Glaucōn, Cleōn, Zēnōn). So the Greeks stuck a nu ("n") on the end to make the name look more like a name. This is also why English "Moses" ends in "s" when the Hebrew Mōshe (מֹשֶׁה) doesn't: is a feminine ending in Greek, not a masculine one, so the translators changed it to the very common and masculine -ēs (Achillēs, Sōcratēs, Diogēnēs), and this version persisted.



          One might expect the Romans to then remove this -n again, since the same "type" of name in Latin ended in plain -o (Cicero, Scipio, Piso). But the Latin Vulgate is generally more faithful to the Greek than the Hebrew, especially where names are concerned, so "Solomon" persisted.



          P.S. Chromium fails beautifully when it tries to render the question title…
          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























          • Do you think the Classical Syriac version ending in -n was influenced by the Greek, or was because of a native Syriac process?

            – MiCl
            4 hours ago











          • @MiCl I unfortunately speak no Syriac, but I'm guessing it was a separate process.

            – Draconis
            2 hours ago













          7












          7








          7







          For the vowels, pay close attention to the nəquddoth (vowel dots)! Between the shin and the lamedh is a shəwa mark; sometimes this indicates an extra-short vowel, sometimes no vowel at all. But historically, shəwa was always pronounced (shəwa na) if it came after the first consonant in the word. So at the time of the Septuagint, the name was pronounced something like Shəlōmō.



          When the Greeks tried to transcribe this word for the LXX, they ran into some difficulties. Ancient Greek didn't have [ʃ], only [s]. So they wrote the first letter as a plain sigma ("s").



          Similarly, Ancient Greek didn't have any extra-short vowels corresponding to shəwa na, so they made do with the letters they had: in this case, it was sometimes transcribed with a short alpha ("a"), sometimes with an omicron ("o"). You'll also sometimes see shəwa transcribed with epsilon ("e"), depending on the word; this is closer to the modern pronunciation.



          Finally, in Ancient Greek, it was extremely rare for names to end in . It was much more common for them to end in -ōn (Glaucōn, Cleōn, Zēnōn). So the Greeks stuck a nu ("n") on the end to make the name look more like a name. This is also why English "Moses" ends in "s" when the Hebrew Mōshe (מֹשֶׁה) doesn't: is a feminine ending in Greek, not a masculine one, so the translators changed it to the very common and masculine -ēs (Achillēs, Sōcratēs, Diogēnēs), and this version persisted.



          One might expect the Romans to then remove this -n again, since the same "type" of name in Latin ended in plain -o (Cicero, Scipio, Piso). But the Latin Vulgate is generally more faithful to the Greek than the Hebrew, especially where names are concerned, so "Solomon" persisted.



          P.S. Chromium fails beautifully when it tries to render the question title…
          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          For the vowels, pay close attention to the nəquddoth (vowel dots)! Between the shin and the lamedh is a shəwa mark; sometimes this indicates an extra-short vowel, sometimes no vowel at all. But historically, shəwa was always pronounced (shəwa na) if it came after the first consonant in the word. So at the time of the Septuagint, the name was pronounced something like Shəlōmō.



          When the Greeks tried to transcribe this word for the LXX, they ran into some difficulties. Ancient Greek didn't have [ʃ], only [s]. So they wrote the first letter as a plain sigma ("s").



          Similarly, Ancient Greek didn't have any extra-short vowels corresponding to shəwa na, so they made do with the letters they had: in this case, it was sometimes transcribed with a short alpha ("a"), sometimes with an omicron ("o"). You'll also sometimes see shəwa transcribed with epsilon ("e"), depending on the word; this is closer to the modern pronunciation.



          Finally, in Ancient Greek, it was extremely rare for names to end in . It was much more common for them to end in -ōn (Glaucōn, Cleōn, Zēnōn). So the Greeks stuck a nu ("n") on the end to make the name look more like a name. This is also why English "Moses" ends in "s" when the Hebrew Mōshe (מֹשֶׁה) doesn't: is a feminine ending in Greek, not a masculine one, so the translators changed it to the very common and masculine -ēs (Achillēs, Sōcratēs, Diogēnēs), and this version persisted.



          One might expect the Romans to then remove this -n again, since the same "type" of name in Latin ended in plain -o (Cicero, Scipio, Piso). But the Latin Vulgate is generally more faithful to the Greek than the Hebrew, especially where names are concerned, so "Solomon" persisted.



          P.S. Chromium fails beautifully when it tries to render the question title…
          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 8 hours ago

























          answered 8 hours ago









          DraconisDraconis

          16.5k1 gold badge24 silver badges67 bronze badges




          16.5k1 gold badge24 silver badges67 bronze badges












          • Do you think the Classical Syriac version ending in -n was influenced by the Greek, or was because of a native Syriac process?

            – MiCl
            4 hours ago











          • @MiCl I unfortunately speak no Syriac, but I'm guessing it was a separate process.

            – Draconis
            2 hours ago

















          • Do you think the Classical Syriac version ending in -n was influenced by the Greek, or was because of a native Syriac process?

            – MiCl
            4 hours ago











          • @MiCl I unfortunately speak no Syriac, but I'm guessing it was a separate process.

            – Draconis
            2 hours ago
















          Do you think the Classical Syriac version ending in -n was influenced by the Greek, or was because of a native Syriac process?

          – MiCl
          4 hours ago





          Do you think the Classical Syriac version ending in -n was influenced by the Greek, or was because of a native Syriac process?

          – MiCl
          4 hours ago













          @MiCl I unfortunately speak no Syriac, but I'm guessing it was a separate process.

          – Draconis
          2 hours ago





          @MiCl I unfortunately speak no Syriac, but I'm guessing it was a separate process.

          – Draconis
          2 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Linguistics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flinguistics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31847%2fhow-did-%25d7%25a9%25d6%25b0%25d7%2581%25d7%259c%25d6%25b9%25d7%259e%25d6%25b9%25d7%2594-shlomo-become-solomon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її