Would you use a proportion to solve this problem?Very simple - Volume of ParallelepipedHow to minimize the surface area taken by a cylinder?Finding the volume of the region bounded by $z=sqrtfracx^24+y^2$and $x+4z=a$. Cylindrical coordinates.How should this volume be calculated? It's the volume within a cylinder minus two cones and another cylinder.AP Calc AB Problem - Finding volumeSomeone please help me out with a simple geometry question about the size and volume of the earth?Volume of solid $y = x−4x^2$ revolved about y-axis using shell approach.Maximise right circular cone volume with fixed surface area using inequalitesRatio of surface area of two prisms given only volume of those prisms?

Multiple stock symbols for same company with in USA

Does these arithmetic means on Pythagorean triangles converge?

Disrespectful employee going above my head and telling me what to do. I am his manager

What kind of screwdriver can unscrew this?

My professor says my digit summing code is flawed. Is he right?

How much income am I getting by renting my house?

Can the Speaker of the House of Commons return to politics once their tenure as Speaker is over (UK)

Numbering like equations for regular text

How to respond when insulted by a grad student in a different department?

Is It Possible to Make a Virus That Acts as an Anti-virus?

How did Ron get five hundred Chocolate Frog cards?

How to handle shared mortgage payment if one person can't pay their share?

Does Windows 10 Fast Startup feature drain battery while laptop is turned off?

What powers an aircraft prior to the APU being switched on?

What causes standard door hinges to close up to a certain amount automatically?

Modern warfare theory in a medieval setting

Does Australia produce unique 'specialty steel'?

How honest to be with US immigration about uncertainty about travel plans?

How to use an equalizer?

Type and strength of a typical chain

An employee has low self-confidence, and is performing poorly. How can I help?

Suspicious crontab entry running 'xribfa4' every 15 minutes

What are the different ways one can refer to the home in everyday French

Why did the range based for loop specification change in C++17



Would you use a proportion to solve this problem?


Very simple - Volume of ParallelepipedHow to minimize the surface area taken by a cylinder?Finding the volume of the region bounded by $z=sqrtfracx^24+y^2$and $x+4z=a$. Cylindrical coordinates.How should this volume be calculated? It's the volume within a cylinder minus two cones and another cylinder.AP Calc AB Problem - Finding volumeSomeone please help me out with a simple geometry question about the size and volume of the earth?Volume of solid $y = x−4x^2$ revolved about y-axis using shell approach.Maximise right circular cone volume with fixed surface area using inequalitesRatio of surface area of two prisms given only volume of those prisms?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








2














$begingroup$


A math class is working with similar figures. Mr. Kole told the class that the surface area of the cones are 180 and 320 square units, and the volume of the smaller cone is 151 cubic units. He challenged his class to find the volume of the bigger cone. What is the volume of the bigger cone?



I tried to use the proportion 320/180 = x/151 to solve the problem. But my answer did not match the correct answer, which is 358 cubic units.



How would you solve this problem?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Surface areas of similar figures are in proportion to the squares of corresponding lines; volumes are in proportion to the cubes.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are cones open bases or closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    8 hours ago

















2














$begingroup$


A math class is working with similar figures. Mr. Kole told the class that the surface area of the cones are 180 and 320 square units, and the volume of the smaller cone is 151 cubic units. He challenged his class to find the volume of the bigger cone. What is the volume of the bigger cone?



I tried to use the proportion 320/180 = x/151 to solve the problem. But my answer did not match the correct answer, which is 358 cubic units.



How would you solve this problem?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Surface areas of similar figures are in proportion to the squares of corresponding lines; volumes are in proportion to the cubes.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are cones open bases or closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    8 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


A math class is working with similar figures. Mr. Kole told the class that the surface area of the cones are 180 and 320 square units, and the volume of the smaller cone is 151 cubic units. He challenged his class to find the volume of the bigger cone. What is the volume of the bigger cone?



I tried to use the proportion 320/180 = x/151 to solve the problem. But my answer did not match the correct answer, which is 358 cubic units.



How would you solve this problem?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




A math class is working with similar figures. Mr. Kole told the class that the surface area of the cones are 180 and 320 square units, and the volume of the smaller cone is 151 cubic units. He challenged his class to find the volume of the bigger cone. What is the volume of the bigger cone?



I tried to use the proportion 320/180 = x/151 to solve the problem. But my answer did not match the correct answer, which is 358 cubic units.



How would you solve this problem?







volume






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question



share|cite|improve this question








edited 46 mins ago







orangebull













New contributor



orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









orangebullorangebull

204 bronze badges




204 bronze badges




New contributor



orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




orangebull is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • $begingroup$
    Surface areas of similar figures are in proportion to the squares of corresponding lines; volumes are in proportion to the cubes.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are cones open bases or closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    8 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Surface areas of similar figures are in proportion to the squares of corresponding lines; volumes are in proportion to the cubes.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Are cones open bases or closed?
    $endgroup$
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    8 hours ago















$begingroup$
Surface areas of similar figures are in proportion to the squares of corresponding lines; volumes are in proportion to the cubes.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Surface areas of similar figures are in proportion to the squares of corresponding lines; volumes are in proportion to the cubes.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Are cones open bases or closed?
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are cones open bases or closed?
$endgroup$
– Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3
















$begingroup$

Since the cones are similar the ratio of their areas is equal to the square of corresponding lines. (For example, the height or the radius of the base.) The ration of those lines is $$a=sqrt320over180=frac43$$ The ratio of the volume is $a^3$ so the volume of the large cone is $$left(frac43right)^3cdot151$$






share|cite|improve this answer










$endgroup$






















    2
















    $begingroup$

    Well you could use the formulas for the are and volume of cones to figure everything out and I guess that will be enough to solve the problem. However the problem is much more simple than that.



    The area scales as a square of the radius $Apropto r^2$ and the volume as the cube $Vpropto r^3$, then the quantity
    $$
    fracA^3V^2
    $$

    is an invariant of similar cones (or any other figure for that mater). And we have
    $$
    frac320^3x^2 = frac180^3151^2
    $$



    This should be alright, however I am getting $x=358$ which doesn't seem to be the answer you are getting. Could you please check the numbers?






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Yes. Your answer 358 is right. I made a typo.
      $endgroup$
      – orangebull
      44 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      But why did you put $fracA^3V^2$? Shouldn't it have been $fracA^2V^3$?
      $endgroup$
      – orangebull
      42 mins ago



















    1
















    $begingroup$

    No, surface area is not directly proportional to volume.



    I would try to construct a cone with surface area $180$ and volume $151$ using the formulas for surface area and volume, in particular keeping track of the ratio between the cone's height and radius.



    Then I would construct a cone with surface area $320$ and the same ratio between its height and radius. Finally, apply the volume formula to this larger cone.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      All you need is the ratio of the areas. The shape of the cone doesn't matter.
      $endgroup$
      – saulspatz
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @saulspatz Really? Aren't there infinitely many cones with surface area $320$ but different volumes, depending on their heights and radii? And only one of these will be similar to the smaller cone?
      $endgroup$
      – 79037662
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I guess I assumed the cones being similar was relevant information.
      $endgroup$
      – 79037662
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      It is relevant. That why all you need is the ratio of the areas.
      $endgroup$
      – saulspatz
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @saulspatz At the first glance I think the ratio alone is not sufficient.
      $endgroup$
      – callculus
      8 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );







    orangebull is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3379668%2fwould-you-use-a-proportion-to-solve-this-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3
















    $begingroup$

    Since the cones are similar the ratio of their areas is equal to the square of corresponding lines. (For example, the height or the radius of the base.) The ration of those lines is $$a=sqrt320over180=frac43$$ The ratio of the volume is $a^3$ so the volume of the large cone is $$left(frac43right)^3cdot151$$






    share|cite|improve this answer










    $endgroup$



















      3
















      $begingroup$

      Since the cones are similar the ratio of their areas is equal to the square of corresponding lines. (For example, the height or the radius of the base.) The ration of those lines is $$a=sqrt320over180=frac43$$ The ratio of the volume is $a^3$ so the volume of the large cone is $$left(frac43right)^3cdot151$$






      share|cite|improve this answer










      $endgroup$

















        3














        3










        3







        $begingroup$

        Since the cones are similar the ratio of their areas is equal to the square of corresponding lines. (For example, the height or the radius of the base.) The ration of those lines is $$a=sqrt320over180=frac43$$ The ratio of the volume is $a^3$ so the volume of the large cone is $$left(frac43right)^3cdot151$$






        share|cite|improve this answer










        $endgroup$



        Since the cones are similar the ratio of their areas is equal to the square of corresponding lines. (For example, the height or the radius of the base.) The ration of those lines is $$a=sqrt320over180=frac43$$ The ratio of the volume is $a^3$ so the volume of the large cone is $$left(frac43right)^3cdot151$$







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer




        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        saulspatzsaulspatz

        24.9k4 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges




        24.9k4 gold badges16 silver badges41 bronze badges


























            2
















            $begingroup$

            Well you could use the formulas for the are and volume of cones to figure everything out and I guess that will be enough to solve the problem. However the problem is much more simple than that.



            The area scales as a square of the radius $Apropto r^2$ and the volume as the cube $Vpropto r^3$, then the quantity
            $$
            fracA^3V^2
            $$

            is an invariant of similar cones (or any other figure for that mater). And we have
            $$
            frac320^3x^2 = frac180^3151^2
            $$



            This should be alright, however I am getting $x=358$ which doesn't seem to be the answer you are getting. Could you please check the numbers?






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Yes. Your answer 358 is right. I made a typo.
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              44 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              But why did you put $fracA^3V^2$? Shouldn't it have been $fracA^2V^3$?
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              42 mins ago
















            2
















            $begingroup$

            Well you could use the formulas for the are and volume of cones to figure everything out and I guess that will be enough to solve the problem. However the problem is much more simple than that.



            The area scales as a square of the radius $Apropto r^2$ and the volume as the cube $Vpropto r^3$, then the quantity
            $$
            fracA^3V^2
            $$

            is an invariant of similar cones (or any other figure for that mater). And we have
            $$
            frac320^3x^2 = frac180^3151^2
            $$



            This should be alright, however I am getting $x=358$ which doesn't seem to be the answer you are getting. Could you please check the numbers?






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Yes. Your answer 358 is right. I made a typo.
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              44 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              But why did you put $fracA^3V^2$? Shouldn't it have been $fracA^2V^3$?
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              42 mins ago














            2














            2










            2







            $begingroup$

            Well you could use the formulas for the are and volume of cones to figure everything out and I guess that will be enough to solve the problem. However the problem is much more simple than that.



            The area scales as a square of the radius $Apropto r^2$ and the volume as the cube $Vpropto r^3$, then the quantity
            $$
            fracA^3V^2
            $$

            is an invariant of similar cones (or any other figure for that mater). And we have
            $$
            frac320^3x^2 = frac180^3151^2
            $$



            This should be alright, however I am getting $x=358$ which doesn't seem to be the answer you are getting. Could you please check the numbers?






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



            Well you could use the formulas for the are and volume of cones to figure everything out and I guess that will be enough to solve the problem. However the problem is much more simple than that.



            The area scales as a square of the radius $Apropto r^2$ and the volume as the cube $Vpropto r^3$, then the quantity
            $$
            fracA^3V^2
            $$

            is an invariant of similar cones (or any other figure for that mater). And we have
            $$
            frac320^3x^2 = frac180^3151^2
            $$



            This should be alright, however I am getting $x=358$ which doesn't seem to be the answer you are getting. Could you please check the numbers?







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer




            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            David JaramilloDavid Jaramillo

            5442 silver badges8 bronze badges




            5442 silver badges8 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              Yes. Your answer 358 is right. I made a typo.
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              44 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              But why did you put $fracA^3V^2$? Shouldn't it have been $fracA^2V^3$?
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              42 mins ago

















            • $begingroup$
              Yes. Your answer 358 is right. I made a typo.
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              44 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              But why did you put $fracA^3V^2$? Shouldn't it have been $fracA^2V^3$?
              $endgroup$
              – orangebull
              42 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            Yes. Your answer 358 is right. I made a typo.
            $endgroup$
            – orangebull
            44 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Yes. Your answer 358 is right. I made a typo.
            $endgroup$
            – orangebull
            44 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            But why did you put $fracA^3V^2$? Shouldn't it have been $fracA^2V^3$?
            $endgroup$
            – orangebull
            42 mins ago





            $begingroup$
            But why did you put $fracA^3V^2$? Shouldn't it have been $fracA^2V^3$?
            $endgroup$
            – orangebull
            42 mins ago












            1
















            $begingroup$

            No, surface area is not directly proportional to volume.



            I would try to construct a cone with surface area $180$ and volume $151$ using the formulas for surface area and volume, in particular keeping track of the ratio between the cone's height and radius.



            Then I would construct a cone with surface area $320$ and the same ratio between its height and radius. Finally, apply the volume formula to this larger cone.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              All you need is the ratio of the areas. The shape of the cone doesn't matter.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz Really? Aren't there infinitely many cones with surface area $320$ but different volumes, depending on their heights and radii? And only one of these will be similar to the smaller cone?
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I guess I assumed the cones being similar was relevant information.
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It is relevant. That why all you need is the ratio of the areas.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz At the first glance I think the ratio alone is not sufficient.
              $endgroup$
              – callculus
              8 hours ago
















            1
















            $begingroup$

            No, surface area is not directly proportional to volume.



            I would try to construct a cone with surface area $180$ and volume $151$ using the formulas for surface area and volume, in particular keeping track of the ratio between the cone's height and radius.



            Then I would construct a cone with surface area $320$ and the same ratio between its height and radius. Finally, apply the volume formula to this larger cone.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              All you need is the ratio of the areas. The shape of the cone doesn't matter.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz Really? Aren't there infinitely many cones with surface area $320$ but different volumes, depending on their heights and radii? And only one of these will be similar to the smaller cone?
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I guess I assumed the cones being similar was relevant information.
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It is relevant. That why all you need is the ratio of the areas.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz At the first glance I think the ratio alone is not sufficient.
              $endgroup$
              – callculus
              8 hours ago














            1














            1










            1







            $begingroup$

            No, surface area is not directly proportional to volume.



            I would try to construct a cone with surface area $180$ and volume $151$ using the formulas for surface area and volume, in particular keeping track of the ratio between the cone's height and radius.



            Then I would construct a cone with surface area $320$ and the same ratio between its height and radius. Finally, apply the volume formula to this larger cone.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



            No, surface area is not directly proportional to volume.



            I would try to construct a cone with surface area $180$ and volume $151$ using the formulas for surface area and volume, in particular keeping track of the ratio between the cone's height and radius.



            Then I would construct a cone with surface area $320$ and the same ratio between its height and radius. Finally, apply the volume formula to this larger cone.







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer




            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 8 hours ago









            7903766279037662

            67812 bronze badges




            67812 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              All you need is the ratio of the areas. The shape of the cone doesn't matter.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz Really? Aren't there infinitely many cones with surface area $320$ but different volumes, depending on their heights and radii? And only one of these will be similar to the smaller cone?
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I guess I assumed the cones being similar was relevant information.
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It is relevant. That why all you need is the ratio of the areas.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz At the first glance I think the ratio alone is not sufficient.
              $endgroup$
              – callculus
              8 hours ago

















            • $begingroup$
              All you need is the ratio of the areas. The shape of the cone doesn't matter.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz Really? Aren't there infinitely many cones with surface area $320$ but different volumes, depending on their heights and radii? And only one of these will be similar to the smaller cone?
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              I guess I assumed the cones being similar was relevant information.
              $endgroup$
              – 79037662
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              It is relevant. That why all you need is the ratio of the areas.
              $endgroup$
              – saulspatz
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @saulspatz At the first glance I think the ratio alone is not sufficient.
              $endgroup$
              – callculus
              8 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            All you need is the ratio of the areas. The shape of the cone doesn't matter.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            All you need is the ratio of the areas. The shape of the cone doesn't matter.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @saulspatz Really? Aren't there infinitely many cones with surface area $320$ but different volumes, depending on their heights and radii? And only one of these will be similar to the smaller cone?
            $endgroup$
            – 79037662
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @saulspatz Really? Aren't there infinitely many cones with surface area $320$ but different volumes, depending on their heights and radii? And only one of these will be similar to the smaller cone?
            $endgroup$
            – 79037662
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            I guess I assumed the cones being similar was relevant information.
            $endgroup$
            – 79037662
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I guess I assumed the cones being similar was relevant information.
            $endgroup$
            – 79037662
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            It is relevant. That why all you need is the ratio of the areas.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            It is relevant. That why all you need is the ratio of the areas.
            $endgroup$
            – saulspatz
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @saulspatz At the first glance I think the ratio alone is not sufficient.
            $endgroup$
            – callculus
            8 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            @saulspatz At the first glance I think the ratio alone is not sufficient.
            $endgroup$
            – callculus
            8 hours ago












            orangebull is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded

















            orangebull is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            orangebull is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            orangebull is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3379668%2fwould-you-use-a-proportion-to-solve-this-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її