Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?Addressing client's security and controllability concernsWhy do big companies hire subcontractors through staffing agencies?I was told I may be expected to lie for company, what questions I should ask regarding this?What are the mainly used policies to evaluated interns/juniors besides personal interactions and/or interests?Why is non-professional technical experience sometimes snubbed by interviewers?

bash - sum numbers in a variable

How can my hammerspace safely "decompress"?

My professor says my digit summing code is flawed. Is he right?

Is there a practical way of making democratic-like system skewed towards competence?

What can I do to avoid potential charges for bribery?

A demigod among men

Dedicated solver for convex problems

A variant of the Shortest Path Problem

Why is lying to Congress a crime?

Type and strength of a typical chain

5v home network

How do you translate "Don't Fear the Reaper" into Latin?

Is it realistic that an advanced species isn't good at war?

Sanitise a high score table to remove offensive terms / usernames

Transferring 9 pegs on a 9x9 grid

Why did Batman design Robin's suit with only the underwear without pants?

Disrespectful employee going above my head and telling me what to do. I am his manager

How can I replicate this effect of the Infinity Gauntlet using official material?

Should a grammatical article be a part of a web link anchor

Calculate the shadow on earth of a large orbital disk

what to upgrade first

Delete line if next line is the same

How does the Trump administration justify tariffs on luxury goods?

Fill a bowl with alphabet soup



Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?


Addressing client's security and controllability concernsWhy do big companies hire subcontractors through staffing agencies?I was told I may be expected to lie for company, what questions I should ask regarding this?What are the mainly used policies to evaluated interns/juniors besides personal interactions and/or interests?Why is non-professional technical experience sometimes snubbed by interviewers?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









-4

















So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.



I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.



Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.



Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.



Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.










share|improve this question









New contributor



foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • 1





    Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.

    – DJClayworth
    46 mins ago











  • @DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.

    – foo-baar
    44 mins ago











  • @joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.

    – foo-baar
    38 mins ago






  • 1





    So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.

    – DJClayworth
    37 mins ago






  • 1





    It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.

    – DJClayworth
    34 mins ago

















-4

















So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.



I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.



Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.



Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.



Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.










share|improve this question









New contributor



foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • 1





    Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.

    – DJClayworth
    46 mins ago











  • @DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.

    – foo-baar
    44 mins ago











  • @joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.

    – foo-baar
    38 mins ago






  • 1





    So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.

    – DJClayworth
    37 mins ago






  • 1





    It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.

    – DJClayworth
    34 mins ago













-4












-4








-4








So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.



I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.



Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.



Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.



Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.










share|improve this question









New contributor



foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.



I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.



Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.



Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.



Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.







software-industry united-states hiring-process recruitment hiring






share|improve this question









New contributor



foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question



share|improve this question








edited 36 mins ago







foo-baar













New contributor



foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 49 mins ago









foo-baarfoo-baar

932 bronze badges




932 bronze badges




New contributor



foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




foo-baar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 1





    Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.

    – DJClayworth
    46 mins ago











  • @DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.

    – foo-baar
    44 mins ago











  • @joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.

    – foo-baar
    38 mins ago






  • 1





    So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.

    – DJClayworth
    37 mins ago






  • 1





    It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.

    – DJClayworth
    34 mins ago












  • 1





    Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.

    – DJClayworth
    46 mins ago











  • @DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.

    – foo-baar
    44 mins ago











  • @joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.

    – foo-baar
    38 mins ago






  • 1





    So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.

    – DJClayworth
    37 mins ago






  • 1





    It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.

    – DJClayworth
    34 mins ago







1




1





Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.

– DJClayworth
46 mins ago





Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.

– DJClayworth
46 mins ago













@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.

– foo-baar
44 mins ago





@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.

– foo-baar
44 mins ago













@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.

– foo-baar
38 mins ago





@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.

– foo-baar
38 mins ago




1




1





So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.

– DJClayworth
37 mins ago





So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.

– DJClayworth
37 mins ago




1




1





It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.

– DJClayworth
34 mins ago





It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.

– DJClayworth
34 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1


















Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.



Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.



Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.






share|improve this answer

































    1


















    How is any of this fake or corrupt?



    They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.



    The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.



    Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.



    Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.






    share|improve this answer




























    • I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.

      – foo-baar
      30 mins ago











    • I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.

      – joeqwerty
      28 mins ago











    • Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?

      – foo-baar
      13 mins ago












    • I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?

      – joeqwerty
      8 mins ago











    • As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?

      – joeqwerty
      7 mins ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );







    foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145985%2fwhy-do-it-companies-sometimes-use-contracting-firms%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1


















    Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.



    Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.



    Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.






    share|improve this answer






























      1


















      Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.



      Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.



      Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.






      share|improve this answer




























        1














        1










        1









        Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.



        Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.



        Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.






        share|improve this answer














        Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.



        Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.



        Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 32 mins ago









        ShadowzeeShadowzee

        9252 silver badges10 bronze badges




        9252 silver badges10 bronze badges


























            1


















            How is any of this fake or corrupt?



            They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.



            The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.



            Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.



            Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.






            share|improve this answer




























            • I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.

              – foo-baar
              30 mins ago











            • I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.

              – joeqwerty
              28 mins ago











            • Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?

              – foo-baar
              13 mins ago












            • I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?

              – joeqwerty
              8 mins ago











            • As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?

              – joeqwerty
              7 mins ago
















            1


















            How is any of this fake or corrupt?



            They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.



            The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.



            Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.



            Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.






            share|improve this answer




























            • I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.

              – foo-baar
              30 mins ago











            • I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.

              – joeqwerty
              28 mins ago











            • Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?

              – foo-baar
              13 mins ago












            • I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?

              – joeqwerty
              8 mins ago











            • As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?

              – joeqwerty
              7 mins ago














            1














            1










            1









            How is any of this fake or corrupt?



            They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.



            The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.



            Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.



            Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.






            share|improve this answer
















            How is any of this fake or corrupt?



            They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.



            The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.



            Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.



            Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.







            share|improve this answer















            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 24 mins ago

























            answered 37 mins ago









            joeqwertyjoeqwerty

            13.1k4 gold badges22 silver badges53 bronze badges




            13.1k4 gold badges22 silver badges53 bronze badges















            • I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.

              – foo-baar
              30 mins ago











            • I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.

              – joeqwerty
              28 mins ago











            • Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?

              – foo-baar
              13 mins ago












            • I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?

              – joeqwerty
              8 mins ago











            • As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?

              – joeqwerty
              7 mins ago


















            • I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.

              – foo-baar
              30 mins ago











            • I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.

              – joeqwerty
              28 mins ago











            • Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?

              – foo-baar
              13 mins ago












            • I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?

              – joeqwerty
              8 mins ago











            • As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?

              – joeqwerty
              7 mins ago

















            I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.

            – foo-baar
            30 mins ago





            I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.

            – foo-baar
            30 mins ago













            I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.

            – joeqwerty
            28 mins ago





            I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.

            – joeqwerty
            28 mins ago













            Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?

            – foo-baar
            13 mins ago






            Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?

            – foo-baar
            13 mins ago














            I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?

            – joeqwerty
            8 mins ago





            I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?

            – joeqwerty
            8 mins ago













            As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?

            – joeqwerty
            7 mins ago






            As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?

            – joeqwerty
            7 mins ago












            foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded

















            foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145985%2fwhy-do-it-companies-sometimes-use-contracting-firms%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367