Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?Addressing client's security and controllability concernsWhy do big companies hire subcontractors through staffing agencies?I was told I may be expected to lie for company, what questions I should ask regarding this?What are the mainly used policies to evaluated interns/juniors besides personal interactions and/or interests?Why is non-professional technical experience sometimes snubbed by interviewers?
bash - sum numbers in a variable
How can my hammerspace safely "decompress"?
My professor says my digit summing code is flawed. Is he right?
Is there a practical way of making democratic-like system skewed towards competence?
What can I do to avoid potential charges for bribery?
A demigod among men
Dedicated solver for convex problems
A variant of the Shortest Path Problem
Why is lying to Congress a crime?
Type and strength of a typical chain
5v home network
How do you translate "Don't Fear the Reaper" into Latin?
Is it realistic that an advanced species isn't good at war?
Sanitise a high score table to remove offensive terms / usernames
Transferring 9 pegs on a 9x9 grid
Why did Batman design Robin's suit with only the underwear without pants?
Disrespectful employee going above my head and telling me what to do. I am his manager
How can I replicate this effect of the Infinity Gauntlet using official material?
Should a grammatical article be a part of a web link anchor
Calculate the shadow on earth of a large orbital disk
what to upgrade first
Delete line if next line is the same
How does the Trump administration justify tariffs on luxury goods?
Fill a bowl with alphabet soup
Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?
Addressing client's security and controllability concernsWhy do big companies hire subcontractors through staffing agencies?I was told I may be expected to lie for company, what questions I should ask regarding this?What are the mainly used policies to evaluated interns/juniors besides personal interactions and/or interests?Why is non-professional technical experience sometimes snubbed by interviewers?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.
I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.
Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.
Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.
Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.
software-industry united-states hiring-process recruitment hiring
New contributor
|
show 3 more comments
So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.
I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.
Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.
Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.
Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.
software-industry united-states hiring-process recruitment hiring
New contributor
1
Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.
– DJClayworth
46 mins ago
@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.
– foo-baar
44 mins ago
@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.
– foo-baar
38 mins ago
1
So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.
– DJClayworth
37 mins ago
1
It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.
– DJClayworth
34 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.
I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.
Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.
Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.
Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.
software-industry united-states hiring-process recruitment hiring
New contributor
So I have been in the job market from the past month & I have learned a major process flaw and big-time corruption in recruitment layers.
I do receive mail/calls from many fake companies established at onshore/offshore locations, for the Job opening with some of the fortune 500 clients, who are willing to arrange an interview between me and the x company but the x company won't hire me directly. The terms are that I'll work on the payroll of one of these fake companies and will be paid on an hourly agreed rate.
Strange enough when I look for the same job opening on the site of the actual company (end client in other words) these positions are either expired or on hold or not taking applications anymore, If they are somehow still open and I apply directly I would never hear back from them.
Now one may think how does it really matter unless these fake companies are willing to pay me what I demand. Well look at it this way, these companies are keeping somewhere between 20 to 25% of your hourly paycheck without doing absolutely nothing and this corruption will go on until you work with the end client.
Why is it this way? Why companies do not hire resources directly? I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it.
software-industry united-states hiring-process recruitment hiring
software-industry united-states hiring-process recruitment hiring
New contributor
New contributor
edited 36 mins ago
foo-baar
New contributor
asked 49 mins ago
foo-baarfoo-baar
932 bronze badges
932 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
1
Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.
– DJClayworth
46 mins ago
@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.
– foo-baar
44 mins ago
@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.
– foo-baar
38 mins ago
1
So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.
– DJClayworth
37 mins ago
1
It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.
– DJClayworth
34 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
1
Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.
– DJClayworth
46 mins ago
@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.
– foo-baar
44 mins ago
@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.
– foo-baar
38 mins ago
1
So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.
– DJClayworth
37 mins ago
1
It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.
– DJClayworth
34 mins ago
1
1
Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.
– DJClayworth
46 mins ago
Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.
– DJClayworth
46 mins ago
@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.
– foo-baar
44 mins ago
@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.
– foo-baar
44 mins ago
@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.
– foo-baar
38 mins ago
@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.
– foo-baar
38 mins ago
1
1
So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.
– DJClayworth
37 mins ago
So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.
– DJClayworth
37 mins ago
1
1
It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.
– DJClayworth
34 mins ago
It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.
– DJClayworth
34 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.
Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.
Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.
add a comment
|
How is any of this fake or corrupt?
They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.
The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.
Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.
Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.
I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.
– foo-baar
30 mins ago
I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.
– joeqwerty
28 mins ago
Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?
– foo-baar
13 mins ago
I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?
– joeqwerty
8 mins ago
As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?
– joeqwerty
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145985%2fwhy-do-it-companies-sometimes-use-contracting-firms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.
Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.
Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.
add a comment
|
Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.
Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.
Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.
add a comment
|
Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.
Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.
Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.
Recruitment is an expensive process, and many times, companies will hire a contracting company to manage this process for them. Depending on the setup, it could be a flat fee or a commission or any matter agreements that pays the contracting company. But no matter how the contracting company is being paid, they are not taking it from your pay.
Contracting companies have the resources setup to filter through applicants. There are a lot of applicants and for good well paying jobs, there are thousands of applicants. A company can struggle to filter through all these applicants, so hiring a contracting company removes this load from a companies shoulder. In addition to this, a contracting company will double check the skills of any applicants, perform preliminary interviews and a whole range of extra tasks to ensure you get the role filled with a suitable applicant.
Thats not to say all contracting companies do this. Some will actively try to get people jobs so they can get a commission and chances are it is these aggressive recruiters that you are encountering. You can think of it as the difference between an reputable sales agent who works in an office and has a steady supply of clients coming through the door, verses a telemarketer who is trying to gather and sell as many products to as many people as possible.
answered 32 mins ago
ShadowzeeShadowzee
9252 silver badges10 bronze badges
9252 silver badges10 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
How is any of this fake or corrupt?
They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.
The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.
Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.
Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.
I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.
– foo-baar
30 mins ago
I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.
– joeqwerty
28 mins ago
Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?
– foo-baar
13 mins ago
I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?
– joeqwerty
8 mins ago
As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?
– joeqwerty
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
How is any of this fake or corrupt?
They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.
The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.
Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.
Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.
I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.
– foo-baar
30 mins ago
I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.
– joeqwerty
28 mins ago
Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?
– foo-baar
13 mins ago
I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?
– joeqwerty
8 mins ago
As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?
– joeqwerty
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
How is any of this fake or corrupt?
They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.
The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.
Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.
Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.
How is any of this fake or corrupt?
They're not taking money from your paycheck. They're being paid a fee by the company. If you let that fee come out of your hourly rate or your salary then that's your fault.
The fee a company pays to a recruiting company is part of their cost of doing business. I don't doubt that they'll try to recoup that cost by offering you a lower hourly rate or salary than is expected or desired, but you have the choice and ability to either negotiate for what you want or turn down the offer. If you accept their offer then you really can't be upset with them.
Years ago I was hired on as a sub-contractor for a technology migration project. The company that won the bid for the project contracted with a local IT company, who in turn sub-contracted with me to perform the work. So that's 4 layers of different parties involved. All completely legitimate. Each party got paid what they negotiated for. I got the hourly rate that I negotiated for. That's not fake and it's not corrupt. That's business.
Company A pays Company B xxxx dollars, Company B pays company C xxx dollars, Company C pays me xx dollars. If xx dollars isn't acceptable to me then I don't accept the contract. There's no fakeness and no corruption involved.
edited 24 mins ago
answered 37 mins ago
joeqwertyjoeqwerty
13.1k4 gold badges22 silver badges53 bronze badges
13.1k4 gold badges22 silver badges53 bronze badges
I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.
– foo-baar
30 mins ago
I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.
– joeqwerty
28 mins ago
Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?
– foo-baar
13 mins ago
I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?
– joeqwerty
8 mins ago
As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?
– joeqwerty
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.
– foo-baar
30 mins ago
I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.
– joeqwerty
28 mins ago
Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?
– foo-baar
13 mins ago
I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?
– joeqwerty
8 mins ago
As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?
– joeqwerty
7 mins ago
I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.
– foo-baar
30 mins ago
I called them fake as it's not just 1 company, most of the time its multiple layers, each trying to keep some chuck from the actual billing. Also keeping a one-time fee makes sense but not a regular drip from your pocket isn't that corruption.
– foo-baar
30 mins ago
I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.
– joeqwerty
28 mins ago
I think you don't understand how the recruiting industry works.
– joeqwerty
28 mins ago
Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?
– foo-baar
13 mins ago
Wouldn't it be sensible for Company A to pay XXX to you directly ? A win win for both ?
– foo-baar
13 mins ago
I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?
– joeqwerty
8 mins ago
I'd like it better but that's not the way it works. Each party needs to be paid. If a company chooses to use a recruiting company to fill positions rather than filling them directly then that's their right to do so. That doesn't make it fake or corrupt. You negotiate for what you want and why do you care what everybody else makes if you get what you want?
– joeqwerty
8 mins ago
As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?
– joeqwerty
7 mins ago
As en example, it would be cheaper for you to buy a car directly from the manufacturer rather than a retail car dealer, but that's not they way it works. Car manufacturers don't sell cars directly to the public. That's their right. If you negotiate to pay the car dealer the price you want to pay for your car why does it matter how much the car dealer makes?
– joeqwerty
7 mins ago
add a comment
|
foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
foo-baar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145985%2fwhy-do-it-companies-sometimes-use-contracting-firms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Those are not fake companies they are contracting companies. And many companies do hire IT professionals directly.
– DJClayworth
46 mins ago
@DJClayworth But why would you let them keep 20% from your paycheck for not doing anything? And BTW thanks for downvoting my questions.
– foo-baar
44 mins ago
@joeqwerty : May be I am missing some process information here, but why would these companies take a share from your salary for doing nothing and not giving you any job security or commitment.
– foo-baar
38 mins ago
1
So your question is "Why do IT companies sometimes use contracting firms?" If you edit the question to ask that and remove the ranting it could be answered.
– DJClayworth
37 mins ago
1
It's still a rant that talks about fake companies.
– DJClayworth
34 mins ago