Another gcd problemPillai's arithmetical function upper boundShow $displaystylesum_k=N_1^N_2-1 k^s_0left(frac1k^s-frac1(k+1)^sright) rightarrow0$ as $N_1, N_2 rightarrow infty$Prove that if $gcd(a,b)=1$ then $gcd(ab,c) = gcd(a,c) gcd(b,c)$At most one divisor in $[sqrtn,sqrtn+sqrt[4]n]$If $gcd(a,b)=d$, then $gcd(a/d, b/d)=1$Question on proof of $gcd(a,b)$ is the smallest positive linear combinationProve that $a^n bmod n$ congruent to $a^n - phi(n) bmod n$Since $zeta(1) neq 1$, does this mean that $zeta$ is not multiplicative?Proving a complex inequality using Cauchy Schwartz inequality
What is a word for the feeling of constantly wanting new possessions?
How to initiate a conversation with a person who recently had transition but you were not in touch with them?
What is the "more" means here?
For the Dungeon of the Mad Mage adventure, which dimension is used to determine a room's ceiling height?
What would be the best propulsion system for this aircraft carrier?
Is is likely that my lack of post-secondary education is holding my resume back?
Dangers of being sympathetic to the killer
Why did Grima shed a tear?
Why does the passage the Letwin amendment "scrap the possibility of a meaningful vote on Johnson's deal"?
Reviewer wants me to do massive amount of work, the result would be a different article. Should I tell that to the editor?
Can Genjutsu be used like Shadow clones for training?
Why is the past tense of vomit generally spelled 'vomited' rather than 'vomitted'?
What does "speed checked" mean?
How to help my son improve without being discouraging?
How does an aircraft descend without its nose pointing down?
Meaning of "in arms"
Is velocity a valid measure of team and process improvement?
Is it possible to have a healthy work-life balance as a professor?
Why does Thorin tell Bilbo that he has "keen eyes"?
Welding steerer tubes
Continents with simplex noise
How offensive is Fachidiot?
Where do overtones in a 555 generated square wave come from?
Why do electrons tend to be in energy eigenstates?
Another gcd problem
Pillai's arithmetical function upper boundShow $displaystylesum_k=N_1^N_2-1 k^s_0left(frac1k^s-frac1(k+1)^sright) rightarrow0$ as $N_1, N_2 rightarrow infty$Prove that if $gcd(a,b)=1$ then $gcd(ab,c) = gcd(a,c) gcd(b,c)$At most one divisor in $[sqrtn,sqrtn+sqrt[4]n]$If $gcd(a,b)=d$, then $gcd(a/d, b/d)=1$Question on proof of $gcd(a,b)$ is the smallest positive linear combinationProve that $a^n bmod n$ congruent to $a^n - phi(n) bmod n$Since $zeta(1) neq 1$, does this mean that $zeta$ is not multiplicative?Proving a complex inequality using Cauchy Schwartz inequality
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
$begingroup$
My friend gave me yet another challenge.
Show that $sum_a=1^ngcd(n,a)leq 2n^3/2.$
I have no idea where to start.
This is known as Pillai's arithmetic function, and I put this inequality in OEIS, and it seems to hold, but I don't know how to construct a proof for this.
algebra-precalculus elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
My friend gave me yet another challenge.
Show that $sum_a=1^ngcd(n,a)leq 2n^3/2.$
I have no idea where to start.
This is known as Pillai's arithmetic function, and I put this inequality in OEIS, and it seems to hold, but I don't know how to construct a proof for this.
algebra-precalculus elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Actually, this function is $O(n^1+varepsilon)$. See this paper.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 14 at 14:14
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
My friend gave me yet another challenge.
Show that $sum_a=1^ngcd(n,a)leq 2n^3/2.$
I have no idea where to start.
This is known as Pillai's arithmetic function, and I put this inequality in OEIS, and it seems to hold, but I don't know how to construct a proof for this.
algebra-precalculus elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
My friend gave me yet another challenge.
Show that $sum_a=1^ngcd(n,a)leq 2n^3/2.$
I have no idea where to start.
This is known as Pillai's arithmetic function, and I put this inequality in OEIS, and it seems to hold, but I don't know how to construct a proof for this.
algebra-precalculus elementary-number-theory
algebra-precalculus elementary-number-theory
asked Oct 14 at 14:01
user686533user686533
1
$begingroup$
Actually, this function is $O(n^1+varepsilon)$. See this paper.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 14 at 14:14
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Actually, this function is $O(n^1+varepsilon)$. See this paper.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 14 at 14:14
1
1
$begingroup$
Actually, this function is $O(n^1+varepsilon)$. See this paper.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 14 at 14:14
$begingroup$
Actually, this function is $O(n^1+varepsilon)$. See this paper.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 14 at 14:14
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: Since we have
$$
P(n)=sum_k=1^n operatornamegcd(n,k)=sum_dmid ndphi(n/d),
$$
we can apply estimates for $phi(n/d)$. More details can be found here:
Pillai's arithmetical function upper bound
A bound
$$ P(n) < a n^frac32 $$
was argued there, with some constant $ale 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Actually, your particular challenge follows from a simple rewrite of the given function in terms of the Euler Totient function. Recall $phi(n) = |1 leq a leq n : gcd(a,n ) = 1|$.
I present it in steps for easiness.
Given $a,b$, show that $d= gcd(a,b)$ if and only if $d|a,d|b$ and $gcd(a/d,b/d)= 1$.
Conclude for any $n$ and $d$ divisor of $n$ that $|1 leq j leq n : gcd(n,j) = d| = phi(n/d)$.
Thus, since the gcd of $n$ and anything must be a divisor of $n$, we get that the sum is equal to $sum_d dphi(frac nd)$, since the $d$ gets counted that many times. A change of index $d to frac nd$ gives $nsum_d fracphi(d)d$.
Thus, the sum is equal to $n sum_d fracphi(d)d$. And now all you need to do is note that $fracphi(x)x leq 1$ for any $x$, therefore an upper bound for the sum is $n$ times the number of divisors of $n$. Can you show that any $n$ has less than $2sqrt n$ divisors? This should not be too difficult.
Prove it first for numbers of the form $2^p3^q$ where $p,q geq 1$. Recall the number of divisors is then $(p+1)(q+1)$. See if you can push through an argument by induction or something here.
For the others, proceed by induction : note that $1$ has less than $2$ divisors, and the same for any prime which has only $2$ divisors. Let us keep them also as base cases anyway.
Let composite $n$ be given : divide $n$ by its largest prime factor $P$, which we assume is $geq 5$ since the other cases have been tackled. Then $frac nP$ has at most $2 sqrtfrac nP$ divisors by induction. Now, if a number $k$ has $l$ divisors, then $kP$ has at most $2l$ many divisors, the originals plus multiplying a $P$ with each one.
Thus, $n$ has at most $4 sqrt frac nP$ divisors, which of course is smaller than $2sqrt n$ since $P geq 5$. Thus we may conclude.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You don't even need to use induction for the last part. We can just pair up the factors.
$endgroup$
– user686533
Oct 15 at 4:43
$begingroup$
Oh yes, I see. Anyway, the answer should be fine.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Oct 15 at 5:54
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3393406%2fanother-gcd-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: Since we have
$$
P(n)=sum_k=1^n operatornamegcd(n,k)=sum_dmid ndphi(n/d),
$$
we can apply estimates for $phi(n/d)$. More details can be found here:
Pillai's arithmetical function upper bound
A bound
$$ P(n) < a n^frac32 $$
was argued there, with some constant $ale 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Hint: Since we have
$$
P(n)=sum_k=1^n operatornamegcd(n,k)=sum_dmid ndphi(n/d),
$$
we can apply estimates for $phi(n/d)$. More details can be found here:
Pillai's arithmetical function upper bound
A bound
$$ P(n) < a n^frac32 $$
was argued there, with some constant $ale 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Hint: Since we have
$$
P(n)=sum_k=1^n operatornamegcd(n,k)=sum_dmid ndphi(n/d),
$$
we can apply estimates for $phi(n/d)$. More details can be found here:
Pillai's arithmetical function upper bound
A bound
$$ P(n) < a n^frac32 $$
was argued there, with some constant $ale 2$.
$endgroup$
Hint: Since we have
$$
P(n)=sum_k=1^n operatornamegcd(n,k)=sum_dmid ndphi(n/d),
$$
we can apply estimates for $phi(n/d)$. More details can be found here:
Pillai's arithmetical function upper bound
A bound
$$ P(n) < a n^frac32 $$
was argued there, with some constant $ale 2$.
edited Oct 14 at 14:31
answered Oct 14 at 14:22
Dietrich BurdeDietrich Burde
89k6 gold badges50 silver badges112 bronze badges
89k6 gold badges50 silver badges112 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Actually, your particular challenge follows from a simple rewrite of the given function in terms of the Euler Totient function. Recall $phi(n) = |1 leq a leq n : gcd(a,n ) = 1|$.
I present it in steps for easiness.
Given $a,b$, show that $d= gcd(a,b)$ if and only if $d|a,d|b$ and $gcd(a/d,b/d)= 1$.
Conclude for any $n$ and $d$ divisor of $n$ that $|1 leq j leq n : gcd(n,j) = d| = phi(n/d)$.
Thus, since the gcd of $n$ and anything must be a divisor of $n$, we get that the sum is equal to $sum_d dphi(frac nd)$, since the $d$ gets counted that many times. A change of index $d to frac nd$ gives $nsum_d fracphi(d)d$.
Thus, the sum is equal to $n sum_d fracphi(d)d$. And now all you need to do is note that $fracphi(x)x leq 1$ for any $x$, therefore an upper bound for the sum is $n$ times the number of divisors of $n$. Can you show that any $n$ has less than $2sqrt n$ divisors? This should not be too difficult.
Prove it first for numbers of the form $2^p3^q$ where $p,q geq 1$. Recall the number of divisors is then $(p+1)(q+1)$. See if you can push through an argument by induction or something here.
For the others, proceed by induction : note that $1$ has less than $2$ divisors, and the same for any prime which has only $2$ divisors. Let us keep them also as base cases anyway.
Let composite $n$ be given : divide $n$ by its largest prime factor $P$, which we assume is $geq 5$ since the other cases have been tackled. Then $frac nP$ has at most $2 sqrtfrac nP$ divisors by induction. Now, if a number $k$ has $l$ divisors, then $kP$ has at most $2l$ many divisors, the originals plus multiplying a $P$ with each one.
Thus, $n$ has at most $4 sqrt frac nP$ divisors, which of course is smaller than $2sqrt n$ since $P geq 5$. Thus we may conclude.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You don't even need to use induction for the last part. We can just pair up the factors.
$endgroup$
– user686533
Oct 15 at 4:43
$begingroup$
Oh yes, I see. Anyway, the answer should be fine.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Oct 15 at 5:54
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Actually, your particular challenge follows from a simple rewrite of the given function in terms of the Euler Totient function. Recall $phi(n) = |1 leq a leq n : gcd(a,n ) = 1|$.
I present it in steps for easiness.
Given $a,b$, show that $d= gcd(a,b)$ if and only if $d|a,d|b$ and $gcd(a/d,b/d)= 1$.
Conclude for any $n$ and $d$ divisor of $n$ that $|1 leq j leq n : gcd(n,j) = d| = phi(n/d)$.
Thus, since the gcd of $n$ and anything must be a divisor of $n$, we get that the sum is equal to $sum_d dphi(frac nd)$, since the $d$ gets counted that many times. A change of index $d to frac nd$ gives $nsum_d fracphi(d)d$.
Thus, the sum is equal to $n sum_d fracphi(d)d$. And now all you need to do is note that $fracphi(x)x leq 1$ for any $x$, therefore an upper bound for the sum is $n$ times the number of divisors of $n$. Can you show that any $n$ has less than $2sqrt n$ divisors? This should not be too difficult.
Prove it first for numbers of the form $2^p3^q$ where $p,q geq 1$. Recall the number of divisors is then $(p+1)(q+1)$. See if you can push through an argument by induction or something here.
For the others, proceed by induction : note that $1$ has less than $2$ divisors, and the same for any prime which has only $2$ divisors. Let us keep them also as base cases anyway.
Let composite $n$ be given : divide $n$ by its largest prime factor $P$, which we assume is $geq 5$ since the other cases have been tackled. Then $frac nP$ has at most $2 sqrtfrac nP$ divisors by induction. Now, if a number $k$ has $l$ divisors, then $kP$ has at most $2l$ many divisors, the originals plus multiplying a $P$ with each one.
Thus, $n$ has at most $4 sqrt frac nP$ divisors, which of course is smaller than $2sqrt n$ since $P geq 5$. Thus we may conclude.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You don't even need to use induction for the last part. We can just pair up the factors.
$endgroup$
– user686533
Oct 15 at 4:43
$begingroup$
Oh yes, I see. Anyway, the answer should be fine.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Oct 15 at 5:54
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Actually, your particular challenge follows from a simple rewrite of the given function in terms of the Euler Totient function. Recall $phi(n) = |1 leq a leq n : gcd(a,n ) = 1|$.
I present it in steps for easiness.
Given $a,b$, show that $d= gcd(a,b)$ if and only if $d|a,d|b$ and $gcd(a/d,b/d)= 1$.
Conclude for any $n$ and $d$ divisor of $n$ that $|1 leq j leq n : gcd(n,j) = d| = phi(n/d)$.
Thus, since the gcd of $n$ and anything must be a divisor of $n$, we get that the sum is equal to $sum_d dphi(frac nd)$, since the $d$ gets counted that many times. A change of index $d to frac nd$ gives $nsum_d fracphi(d)d$.
Thus, the sum is equal to $n sum_d fracphi(d)d$. And now all you need to do is note that $fracphi(x)x leq 1$ for any $x$, therefore an upper bound for the sum is $n$ times the number of divisors of $n$. Can you show that any $n$ has less than $2sqrt n$ divisors? This should not be too difficult.
Prove it first for numbers of the form $2^p3^q$ where $p,q geq 1$. Recall the number of divisors is then $(p+1)(q+1)$. See if you can push through an argument by induction or something here.
For the others, proceed by induction : note that $1$ has less than $2$ divisors, and the same for any prime which has only $2$ divisors. Let us keep them also as base cases anyway.
Let composite $n$ be given : divide $n$ by its largest prime factor $P$, which we assume is $geq 5$ since the other cases have been tackled. Then $frac nP$ has at most $2 sqrtfrac nP$ divisors by induction. Now, if a number $k$ has $l$ divisors, then $kP$ has at most $2l$ many divisors, the originals plus multiplying a $P$ with each one.
Thus, $n$ has at most $4 sqrt frac nP$ divisors, which of course is smaller than $2sqrt n$ since $P geq 5$. Thus we may conclude.
$endgroup$
Actually, your particular challenge follows from a simple rewrite of the given function in terms of the Euler Totient function. Recall $phi(n) = |1 leq a leq n : gcd(a,n ) = 1|$.
I present it in steps for easiness.
Given $a,b$, show that $d= gcd(a,b)$ if and only if $d|a,d|b$ and $gcd(a/d,b/d)= 1$.
Conclude for any $n$ and $d$ divisor of $n$ that $|1 leq j leq n : gcd(n,j) = d| = phi(n/d)$.
Thus, since the gcd of $n$ and anything must be a divisor of $n$, we get that the sum is equal to $sum_d dphi(frac nd)$, since the $d$ gets counted that many times. A change of index $d to frac nd$ gives $nsum_d fracphi(d)d$.
Thus, the sum is equal to $n sum_d fracphi(d)d$. And now all you need to do is note that $fracphi(x)x leq 1$ for any $x$, therefore an upper bound for the sum is $n$ times the number of divisors of $n$. Can you show that any $n$ has less than $2sqrt n$ divisors? This should not be too difficult.
Prove it first for numbers of the form $2^p3^q$ where $p,q geq 1$. Recall the number of divisors is then $(p+1)(q+1)$. See if you can push through an argument by induction or something here.
For the others, proceed by induction : note that $1$ has less than $2$ divisors, and the same for any prime which has only $2$ divisors. Let us keep them also as base cases anyway.
Let composite $n$ be given : divide $n$ by its largest prime factor $P$, which we assume is $geq 5$ since the other cases have been tackled. Then $frac nP$ has at most $2 sqrtfrac nP$ divisors by induction. Now, if a number $k$ has $l$ divisors, then $kP$ has at most $2l$ many divisors, the originals plus multiplying a $P$ with each one.
Thus, $n$ has at most $4 sqrt frac nP$ divisors, which of course is smaller than $2sqrt n$ since $P geq 5$. Thus we may conclude.
answered Oct 14 at 14:57
астон вілла олоф мэллбэргастон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
43.5k3 gold badges39 silver badges78 bronze badges
43.5k3 gold badges39 silver badges78 bronze badges
$begingroup$
You don't even need to use induction for the last part. We can just pair up the factors.
$endgroup$
– user686533
Oct 15 at 4:43
$begingroup$
Oh yes, I see. Anyway, the answer should be fine.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Oct 15 at 5:54
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
You don't even need to use induction for the last part. We can just pair up the factors.
$endgroup$
– user686533
Oct 15 at 4:43
$begingroup$
Oh yes, I see. Anyway, the answer should be fine.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Oct 15 at 5:54
$begingroup$
You don't even need to use induction for the last part. We can just pair up the factors.
$endgroup$
– user686533
Oct 15 at 4:43
$begingroup$
You don't even need to use induction for the last part. We can just pair up the factors.
$endgroup$
– user686533
Oct 15 at 4:43
$begingroup$
Oh yes, I see. Anyway, the answer should be fine.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Oct 15 at 5:54
$begingroup$
Oh yes, I see. Anyway, the answer should be fine.
$endgroup$
– астон вілла олоф мэллбэрг
Oct 15 at 5:54
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3393406%2fanother-gcd-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Actually, this function is $O(n^1+varepsilon)$. See this paper.
$endgroup$
– lhf
Oct 14 at 14:14