Geological aftereffects of an asteroid impact on a large mountain range?Which moon is most favourable as a refuelling station?How high/large can a mountain range get?What is the climate of a mountain range at the border of the polar front?What's the width of the average mountain?How would a large arctic mountain range affect the weather?How could a mountain range naturally form in a roughly clean, complete shape?Medieval town built on the desert side of a mountain range?Is an offset mountain range plausible?What would be used for “coordinates” on a large asteroid?High-Altitude Asteroid ImpactGeological Explanation for an Unusually Temperate Northern Mountain Valley

Crossing US border with music files I'm legally allowed to possess

Would jet fuel for an F-16 or F-35 be producible during WW2?

Where is the logic in castrating fighters?

Full backup on database creation

How can I get exact maximal value of this expression?

Rests in pickup measure (anacrusis)

How to prevent bad sectors?

Is there a public standard for 8 and 10 character grid locators?

Employer asking for online access to bank account - Is this a scam?

What's the Difference between Two Single-Quotes and One Double-Quote?

Why does the 'metric Lagrangian' approach appear to fail in Newtonian mechanics?

What is the largest (size) solid object ever dropped from an airplane to impact the ground in freefall?

Riley Rebuses that Share a Common Theme

Dictionary size reduces upon increasing one element

Full horizontal justification in table

Is the first derivative operation on a signal a causal system?

Would the Geas spell work in a dead magic zone once you enter it?

Why is this Simple Puzzle impossible to solve?

How to make a crossed out leftrightarrow?

How bitcoin nodes update UTXO set when their latests blocks are replaced?

Why doesn't the Earth's acceleration towards the Moon accumulate to push the Earth off its orbit?

Apparent Ring of Craters on the Moon

Rename photos to match video titles

How do I subvert the tropes of a train heist?



Geological aftereffects of an asteroid impact on a large mountain range?


Which moon is most favourable as a refuelling station?How high/large can a mountain range get?What is the climate of a mountain range at the border of the polar front?What's the width of the average mountain?How would a large arctic mountain range affect the weather?How could a mountain range naturally form in a roughly clean, complete shape?Medieval town built on the desert side of a mountain range?Is an offset mountain range plausible?What would be used for “coordinates” on a large asteroid?High-Altitude Asteroid ImpactGeological Explanation for an Unusually Temperate Northern Mountain Valley













6












$begingroup$


For the sake of analogy, let's take the Chixclub impactor and move it a mountain range akin to the modern Himalayas. Obviously we're dealing with an extinction level event here so I'm not concerned with the effects on life, and only loosely interested in the atmospheric effects. My primary concern is with the effects of the impact on the surrounding geology.



I'm mostly looking for information on how the area would look a few thousand years out - would the nature of the area better preserve a crater? Or would the ejecta fill the hollow and leave a sort of semi-flat (but still high altitude) plateau?



Feel free to ignore this, as I don't want to overburden the question, but does the result change if the impactor is at a lower speed (e.g. an orbiting body forced to deorbit)?



edit: per the clarification request below, here is a link to a spot on Earth most analogous to the environment I am imagining. A fairly wide stretch of a range of high peaks of marble and schist (et al) fairly well removed from an ocean. The impact's 'epicenter' would be surrounded by mountains on all sides.



Well, pre-impact. 'After the impact' is part of the answer I'm seeking.










share|improve this question









New contributor



ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site ngonStrafe, when you have a few minutes, please take the tour and read up in our help center about how we work: How to Ask. Others may post comments to help refine the question, good first post though. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Hoyle's ghost
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Help us out by giving us a longitude and latitude linked to Google maps showing the exact mountain range you'd like us to use as an example. I ask for this because a generic list is difficult and potentially unproductive, while explaining what would happen to that exact range (the composition and situation for which would be well known) would allow us to go into detail that I believe would be more helpful to you.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link! +1 And that's a great spot. Deep ravine surrounded by mountains. High altitude, few trees, probably tons of basalt. I'm hoping Arkenstein XII shows up. This sounds like his kind of question!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago
















6












$begingroup$


For the sake of analogy, let's take the Chixclub impactor and move it a mountain range akin to the modern Himalayas. Obviously we're dealing with an extinction level event here so I'm not concerned with the effects on life, and only loosely interested in the atmospheric effects. My primary concern is with the effects of the impact on the surrounding geology.



I'm mostly looking for information on how the area would look a few thousand years out - would the nature of the area better preserve a crater? Or would the ejecta fill the hollow and leave a sort of semi-flat (but still high altitude) plateau?



Feel free to ignore this, as I don't want to overburden the question, but does the result change if the impactor is at a lower speed (e.g. an orbiting body forced to deorbit)?



edit: per the clarification request below, here is a link to a spot on Earth most analogous to the environment I am imagining. A fairly wide stretch of a range of high peaks of marble and schist (et al) fairly well removed from an ocean. The impact's 'epicenter' would be surrounded by mountains on all sides.



Well, pre-impact. 'After the impact' is part of the answer I'm seeking.










share|improve this question









New contributor



ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site ngonStrafe, when you have a few minutes, please take the tour and read up in our help center about how we work: How to Ask. Others may post comments to help refine the question, good first post though. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Hoyle's ghost
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Help us out by giving us a longitude and latitude linked to Google maps showing the exact mountain range you'd like us to use as an example. I ask for this because a generic list is difficult and potentially unproductive, while explaining what would happen to that exact range (the composition and situation for which would be well known) would allow us to go into detail that I believe would be more helpful to you.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link! +1 And that's a great spot. Deep ravine surrounded by mountains. High altitude, few trees, probably tons of basalt. I'm hoping Arkenstein XII shows up. This sounds like his kind of question!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$


For the sake of analogy, let's take the Chixclub impactor and move it a mountain range akin to the modern Himalayas. Obviously we're dealing with an extinction level event here so I'm not concerned with the effects on life, and only loosely interested in the atmospheric effects. My primary concern is with the effects of the impact on the surrounding geology.



I'm mostly looking for information on how the area would look a few thousand years out - would the nature of the area better preserve a crater? Or would the ejecta fill the hollow and leave a sort of semi-flat (but still high altitude) plateau?



Feel free to ignore this, as I don't want to overburden the question, but does the result change if the impactor is at a lower speed (e.g. an orbiting body forced to deorbit)?



edit: per the clarification request below, here is a link to a spot on Earth most analogous to the environment I am imagining. A fairly wide stretch of a range of high peaks of marble and schist (et al) fairly well removed from an ocean. The impact's 'epicenter' would be surrounded by mountains on all sides.



Well, pre-impact. 'After the impact' is part of the answer I'm seeking.










share|improve this question









New contributor



ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




For the sake of analogy, let's take the Chixclub impactor and move it a mountain range akin to the modern Himalayas. Obviously we're dealing with an extinction level event here so I'm not concerned with the effects on life, and only loosely interested in the atmospheric effects. My primary concern is with the effects of the impact on the surrounding geology.



I'm mostly looking for information on how the area would look a few thousand years out - would the nature of the area better preserve a crater? Or would the ejecta fill the hollow and leave a sort of semi-flat (but still high altitude) plateau?



Feel free to ignore this, as I don't want to overburden the question, but does the result change if the impactor is at a lower speed (e.g. an orbiting body forced to deorbit)?



edit: per the clarification request below, here is a link to a spot on Earth most analogous to the environment I am imagining. A fairly wide stretch of a range of high peaks of marble and schist (et al) fairly well removed from an ocean. The impact's 'epicenter' would be surrounded by mountains on all sides.



Well, pre-impact. 'After the impact' is part of the answer I'm seeking.







geology asteroids mountains






share|improve this question









New contributor



ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







ngonStrafe













New contributor



ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









ngonStrafengonStrafe

345




345




New contributor



ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




ngonStrafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site ngonStrafe, when you have a few minutes, please take the tour and read up in our help center about how we work: How to Ask. Others may post comments to help refine the question, good first post though. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Hoyle's ghost
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Help us out by giving us a longitude and latitude linked to Google maps showing the exact mountain range you'd like us to use as an example. I ask for this because a generic list is difficult and potentially unproductive, while explaining what would happen to that exact range (the composition and situation for which would be well known) would allow us to go into detail that I believe would be more helpful to you.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link! +1 And that's a great spot. Deep ravine surrounded by mountains. High altitude, few trees, probably tons of basalt. I'm hoping Arkenstein XII shows up. This sounds like his kind of question!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site ngonStrafe, when you have a few minutes, please take the tour and read up in our help center about how we work: How to Ask. Others may post comments to help refine the question, good first post though. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Hoyle's ghost
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Help us out by giving us a longitude and latitude linked to Google maps showing the exact mountain range you'd like us to use as an example. I ask for this because a generic list is difficult and potentially unproductive, while explaining what would happen to that exact range (the composition and situation for which would be well known) would allow us to go into detail that I believe would be more helpful to you.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the link! +1 And that's a great spot. Deep ravine surrounded by mountains. High altitude, few trees, probably tons of basalt. I'm hoping Arkenstein XII shows up. This sounds like his kind of question!
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    7 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Welcome to the site ngonStrafe, when you have a few minutes, please take the tour and read up in our help center about how we work: How to Ask. Others may post comments to help refine the question, good first post though. +1
$endgroup$
– Hoyle's ghost
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to the site ngonStrafe, when you have a few minutes, please take the tour and read up in our help center about how we work: How to Ask. Others may post comments to help refine the question, good first post though. +1
$endgroup$
– Hoyle's ghost
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Help us out by giving us a longitude and latitude linked to Google maps showing the exact mountain range you'd like us to use as an example. I ask for this because a generic list is difficult and potentially unproductive, while explaining what would happen to that exact range (the composition and situation for which would be well known) would allow us to go into detail that I believe would be more helpful to you.
$endgroup$
– JBH
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Help us out by giving us a longitude and latitude linked to Google maps showing the exact mountain range you'd like us to use as an example. I ask for this because a generic list is difficult and potentially unproductive, while explaining what would happen to that exact range (the composition and situation for which would be well known) would allow us to go into detail that I believe would be more helpful to you.
$endgroup$
– JBH
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Thanks for the link! +1 And that's a great spot. Deep ravine surrounded by mountains. High altitude, few trees, probably tons of basalt. I'm hoping Arkenstein XII shows up. This sounds like his kind of question!
$endgroup$
– JBH
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
Thanks for the link! +1 And that's a great spot. Deep ravine surrounded by mountains. High altitude, few trees, probably tons of basalt. I'm hoping Arkenstein XII shows up. This sounds like his kind of question!
$endgroup$
– JBH
7 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

The crust in that region is about 80 km thick. And there is no ocean around to fill the hole immediately after the impact. So, there would be no exposed magma interacting with water causing additional explosions.



After the impact there would be some rivers slowly pouring into the crater, filling it with water and sediments over the passing of millennia.



Until the basin is filled by sediments you would have a fairly circular lake, surrounded by a ridge of mountains.



After a fair amount of time the movement of the Indian subcontinent against the Eurasian plaque would probably distort the circular shape and the depth profile of the crater, but it would take more than some millennia.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for this answer. It covers all the salient points bar one. High mountain ranges experience far more erosion compared to flat ground near sea level, so there's a lot of sediment being created and transported. A crater in a mountain range is likely to fill up reasonably rapidly (thousands to tens of thousands of years).
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crater diameter is about 15 times impactor diameter at least at sizes up to 1 km diameter. Depth is about 1/4 diameter or about 4 times impactor diameter. So a 10 km object will create a 40 km deep crater. This is deep enough that plastic flow will be significant, and the rock hot enough to make steam.
    $endgroup$
    – Sherwood Botsford
    6 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






ngonStrafe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147789%2fgeological-aftereffects-of-an-asteroid-impact-on-a-large-mountain-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

The crust in that region is about 80 km thick. And there is no ocean around to fill the hole immediately after the impact. So, there would be no exposed magma interacting with water causing additional explosions.



After the impact there would be some rivers slowly pouring into the crater, filling it with water and sediments over the passing of millennia.



Until the basin is filled by sediments you would have a fairly circular lake, surrounded by a ridge of mountains.



After a fair amount of time the movement of the Indian subcontinent against the Eurasian plaque would probably distort the circular shape and the depth profile of the crater, but it would take more than some millennia.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for this answer. It covers all the salient points bar one. High mountain ranges experience far more erosion compared to flat ground near sea level, so there's a lot of sediment being created and transported. A crater in a mountain range is likely to fill up reasonably rapidly (thousands to tens of thousands of years).
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crater diameter is about 15 times impactor diameter at least at sizes up to 1 km diameter. Depth is about 1/4 diameter or about 4 times impactor diameter. So a 10 km object will create a 40 km deep crater. This is deep enough that plastic flow will be significant, and the rock hot enough to make steam.
    $endgroup$
    – Sherwood Botsford
    6 hours ago















6












$begingroup$

The crust in that region is about 80 km thick. And there is no ocean around to fill the hole immediately after the impact. So, there would be no exposed magma interacting with water causing additional explosions.



After the impact there would be some rivers slowly pouring into the crater, filling it with water and sediments over the passing of millennia.



Until the basin is filled by sediments you would have a fairly circular lake, surrounded by a ridge of mountains.



After a fair amount of time the movement of the Indian subcontinent against the Eurasian plaque would probably distort the circular shape and the depth profile of the crater, but it would take more than some millennia.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for this answer. It covers all the salient points bar one. High mountain ranges experience far more erosion compared to flat ground near sea level, so there's a lot of sediment being created and transported. A crater in a mountain range is likely to fill up reasonably rapidly (thousands to tens of thousands of years).
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crater diameter is about 15 times impactor diameter at least at sizes up to 1 km diameter. Depth is about 1/4 diameter or about 4 times impactor diameter. So a 10 km object will create a 40 km deep crater. This is deep enough that plastic flow will be significant, and the rock hot enough to make steam.
    $endgroup$
    – Sherwood Botsford
    6 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$

The crust in that region is about 80 km thick. And there is no ocean around to fill the hole immediately after the impact. So, there would be no exposed magma interacting with water causing additional explosions.



After the impact there would be some rivers slowly pouring into the crater, filling it with water and sediments over the passing of millennia.



Until the basin is filled by sediments you would have a fairly circular lake, surrounded by a ridge of mountains.



After a fair amount of time the movement of the Indian subcontinent against the Eurasian plaque would probably distort the circular shape and the depth profile of the crater, but it would take more than some millennia.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The crust in that region is about 80 km thick. And there is no ocean around to fill the hole immediately after the impact. So, there would be no exposed magma interacting with water causing additional explosions.



After the impact there would be some rivers slowly pouring into the crater, filling it with water and sediments over the passing of millennia.



Until the basin is filled by sediments you would have a fairly circular lake, surrounded by a ridge of mountains.



After a fair amount of time the movement of the Indian subcontinent against the Eurasian plaque would probably distort the circular shape and the depth profile of the crater, but it would take more than some millennia.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









L.DutchL.Dutch

96.6k30224467




96.6k30224467







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for this answer. It covers all the salient points bar one. High mountain ranges experience far more erosion compared to flat ground near sea level, so there's a lot of sediment being created and transported. A crater in a mountain range is likely to fill up reasonably rapidly (thousands to tens of thousands of years).
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crater diameter is about 15 times impactor diameter at least at sizes up to 1 km diameter. Depth is about 1/4 diameter or about 4 times impactor diameter. So a 10 km object will create a 40 km deep crater. This is deep enough that plastic flow will be significant, and the rock hot enough to make steam.
    $endgroup$
    – Sherwood Botsford
    6 hours ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    +1 for this answer. It covers all the salient points bar one. High mountain ranges experience far more erosion compared to flat ground near sea level, so there's a lot of sediment being created and transported. A crater in a mountain range is likely to fill up reasonably rapidly (thousands to tens of thousands of years).
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Crater diameter is about 15 times impactor diameter at least at sizes up to 1 km diameter. Depth is about 1/4 diameter or about 4 times impactor diameter. So a 10 km object will create a 40 km deep crater. This is deep enough that plastic flow will be significant, and the rock hot enough to make steam.
    $endgroup$
    – Sherwood Botsford
    6 hours ago







1




1




$begingroup$
+1 for this answer. It covers all the salient points bar one. High mountain ranges experience far more erosion compared to flat ground near sea level, so there's a lot of sediment being created and transported. A crater in a mountain range is likely to fill up reasonably rapidly (thousands to tens of thousands of years).
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
+1 for this answer. It covers all the salient points bar one. High mountain ranges experience far more erosion compared to flat ground near sea level, so there's a lot of sediment being created and transported. A crater in a mountain range is likely to fill up reasonably rapidly (thousands to tens of thousands of years).
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
6 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Crater diameter is about 15 times impactor diameter at least at sizes up to 1 km diameter. Depth is about 1/4 diameter or about 4 times impactor diameter. So a 10 km object will create a 40 km deep crater. This is deep enough that plastic flow will be significant, and the rock hot enough to make steam.
$endgroup$
– Sherwood Botsford
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Crater diameter is about 15 times impactor diameter at least at sizes up to 1 km diameter. Depth is about 1/4 diameter or about 4 times impactor diameter. So a 10 km object will create a 40 km deep crater. This is deep enough that plastic flow will be significant, and the rock hot enough to make steam.
$endgroup$
– Sherwood Botsford
6 hours ago










ngonStrafe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















ngonStrafe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












ngonStrafe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











ngonStrafe is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147789%2fgeological-aftereffects-of-an-asteroid-impact-on-a-large-mountain-range%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її