Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

Variable does not exist: sObjectType (Task.sObjectType)

What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?

RIP Packet Format

Is it OK if I do not take the receipt in Germany?

When I export an AI 300x60 art board it saves with bigger dimensions

Are there existing rules/lore for MTG planeswalkers?

A journey... into the MIND

Is there a possibility to generate a list dynamically in Latex?

How to compute a Jacobian using polar coordinates?

false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'

What's parked in Mil Moscow helicopter plant?

Is it accepted to use working hours to read general interest books?

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?

Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of the directed De Bruijn graph

Simulate round-robin tournament draw

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Specify the range of GridLines

Co-worker works way more than he should

How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?



Why I cannot instantiate a class whose constructor is private in a friend class?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30 pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Can an abstract class have a constructor?Why do this() and super() have to be the first statement in a constructor?Why can't I change a private member of a class from a friend class in a different namespace?Passing a class as argument which has a private constructor that takes no parametersPrivate data members are inaccessible to friend functionFriend function is not accessing private members of another friend classDeclaring constructors as private shows errors. Is at least one public constructor mandatory?Cannot access private member declared in class, even declared friend classPrivate Data member is inaccessible in Friend FunctionPassing an object into the constructor of another class



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
























  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    17 mins ago

















7















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
























  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    17 mins ago













7












7








7


6






I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?









share|improve this question
















I have two classes; Salary that is intended to hold information and calculations regarding the salary of an employee and Employee that has an object of type class Salary and some members like name and address of the employee...




  • What I want to do is to prevent class Salary from being instantiated and only class Employee can instantiate it. So I declared the constructors of Salary private and made Employee friend of Salary. But I get errors:



    class Employee;

    class Salary
    public:

    private:
    Salary() : revenue_, cost_
    Salary(int x, int y) : revenue_ x ,
    cost_ y


    int revenue_, cost_;
    friend class Employee;
    ;

    class Employee
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;

    int main()

    Employee emp; // "Salary::Salary()" is inaccessible




  • The problem raised for me if I forward declare main:



    int main(int, char*[]);


    And make main friend of class Salary so in Salary:



    class Salary 
    //...
    friend int main(int argc, char* argv[]);
    ;


Now the program compiles correctly!



*** Another thing in main if I declare an object this way:



Employee emp; // ok
Employee emp; // error?






c++ constructor friend-class






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 53 mins ago







Syfu_H

















asked 1 hour ago









Syfu_HSyfu_H

35518




35518












  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    17 mins ago

















  • Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

    – J. Antonio Perez
    17 mins ago
















Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

– J. Antonio Perez
17 mins ago





Why are you making Salary's constructor private? It seems like there are contexts when you'd want to use Salary outside of Employee

– J. Antonio Perez
17 mins ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7














Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



class Employee 
public:
Employee() = default;
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;





share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

    – wally
    24 mins ago












  • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

    – wally
    13 mins ago



















2














You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



class Employee 
public:
Employee() // add it
std::string name_;
Salary sal;
;

int main()
Employee emp; // now this should compile







share|improve this answer






























    2














    You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



    eg:



    class Employee 
    public:
    Employee() : sal()
    public:
    std::string name_;
    Salary sal;
    ;





    share|improve this answer
































      0














      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        I recommend explaining why.

        – user4581301
        51 mins ago











      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

        – Syfu_H
        49 mins ago











      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

        – user4581301
        41 mins ago











      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7














      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        24 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        13 mins ago
















      7














      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        24 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        13 mins ago














      7












      7








      7







      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;





      share|improve this answer















      Because you don't provide a constructor for Employee the braces in your initialization Employee emp; will perform an aggregate initialization, which essentially means that each member is initialized one-by-one using the default rules, in the context of main(). Since main() doesn't have access to the Salary constructor, it fails.



      As others have pointed out, adding an Employee default constructor will resolve your problem:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() = default;
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;






      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 26 mins ago

























      answered 41 mins ago









      zdanzdan

      22.1k34864




      22.1k34864







      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        24 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        13 mins ago













      • 1





        I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

        – wally
        24 mins ago












      • GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

        – wally
        13 mins ago








      1




      1





      I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

      – wally
      24 mins ago






      I'm trying on MSVS and only Employee() ; allows Employee emp; to compile. Clang seems to accept Employee() = default;, but then again, Clang seems to accept having no default constructor here.

      – wally
      24 mins ago














      GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

      – wally
      13 mins ago






      GCC does the same as Clang, and doesn't need a default constructor to compile in this case. Have you tried this answer on any specific compiler?

      – wally
      13 mins ago














      2














      You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



      class Employee 
      public:
      Employee() // add it
      std::string name_;
      Salary sal;
      ;

      int main()
      Employee emp; // now this should compile







      share|improve this answer



























        2














        You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



        class Employee 
        public:
        Employee() // add it
        std::string name_;
        Salary sal;
        ;

        int main()
        Employee emp; // now this should compile







        share|improve this answer

























          2












          2








          2







          You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



          class Employee 
          public:
          Employee() // add it
          std::string name_;
          Salary sal;
          ;

          int main()
          Employee emp; // now this should compile







          share|improve this answer













          You have to explicitly declare the default constructor of class Employee thus you can initialize an abject via uniform initialization:



          class Employee 
          public:
          Employee() // add it
          std::string name_;
          Salary sal;
          ;

          int main()
          Employee emp; // now this should compile








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 43 mins ago









          Raindrop7Raindrop7

          3,74531224




          3,74531224





















              2














              You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



              eg:



              class Employee 
              public:
              Employee() : sal()
              public:
              std::string name_;
              Salary sal;
              ;





              share|improve this answer





























                2














                You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                eg:



                class Employee 
                public:
                Employee() : sal()
                public:
                std::string name_;
                Salary sal;
                ;





                share|improve this answer



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                  eg:



                  class Employee 
                  public:
                  Employee() : sal()
                  public:
                  std::string name_;
                  Salary sal;
                  ;





                  share|improve this answer















                  You need Employee's ctor to call the ctor of Salary. The ctor of Salary is not accessible from main.



                  eg:



                  class Employee 
                  public:
                  Employee() : sal()
                  public:
                  std::string name_;
                  Salary sal;
                  ;






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 32 mins ago









                  Pavan Manjunath

                  20.1k1181108




                  20.1k1181108










                  answered 53 mins ago









                  schuessschuess

                  536416




                  536416





















                      0














                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        51 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        49 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        41 mins ago















                      0














                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        51 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        49 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        41 mins ago













                      0












                      0








                      0







                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).






                      share|improve this answer













                      If you erase the "" after "Employee emp" in your main() function it compiles just fine (gcc 7.3.1 on Fedora 27).







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 53 mins ago









                      Eric SokolowskyEric Sokolowsky

                      514




                      514







                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        51 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        49 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        41 mins ago












                      • 1





                        I recommend explaining why.

                        – user4581301
                        51 mins ago











                      • Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                        – Syfu_H
                        49 mins ago











                      • @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                        – user4581301
                        41 mins ago







                      1




                      1





                      I recommend explaining why.

                      – user4581301
                      51 mins ago





                      I recommend explaining why.

                      – user4581301
                      51 mins ago













                      Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                      – Syfu_H
                      49 mins ago





                      Yes. Not onyl GCC but also MSVC14 also compiles Employee emp; but why?

                      – Syfu_H
                      49 mins ago













                      @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                      – user4581301
                      41 mins ago





                      @Syfu_H Value Initialization. And I could be mistaken here (been caught on this in the past), but the Value Initialization is being replaced by Aggregate Initialization

                      – user4581301
                      41 mins ago

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55819962%2fwhy-i-cannot-instantiate-a-class-whose-constructor-is-private-in-a-friend-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      François Viète Contents Biography Work and thought Bibliography See also Notes Further reading External links Navigation menup. 21Google Bookspp. 75–77Google BooksDe thou (from University of Saint Andrews)ArchivedGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle booksGoogle Bookscc-parthenay.frL'histoire universelle (fr)Universal History (en)ArchivedAdsabs.harvard.eduPagesperso-orange.frArchive.orgChikara Sasaki. Descartes' mathematical thought p.259Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle Bookspp. 152 and onwardGoogle BooksGoogle BooksScribd.comGoogle Books1257-7979Google BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGoogle BooksGallica.bnf.frGoogle BooksGoogle Books"François Viète"Francois Viète: Father of Modern Algebraic NotationThe Lawyer and the GamblerAbout TarporleySite de Jean-Paul GuichardL'algèbre nouvelle"About the Harmonicon"cb120511976(data)1188044800000 0001 0913 5903n82164680ola2013766880073431702w6vt1sb70287374827140948071409480