Mfcttrf

is this simply something that should be left out of the workplace?

Yes, it has nothing to do with your work, they're not offering dog meat to you, or maligning your customs.

So the "country" is well known for eating dog meat, but you have no actual evidence of the people you work with eating dogs?

And you think your company shouldn't extend their contract with this company because of this.

Or, is this simply something that should be left out of the workplace?

Absolutely, this has zero business being in the workplace.

This is basically the same as someone who is anti-gun saying that they don't want their company to work with and American firm since America is well known for people having guns.

I'm no fan of the idea personally (I like dogs, I don't have dogs myself but enjoy spending time with the dogs of friends and family) but to give some perspective on the notion of your company contracting with this East Asian company..

It is legal to eat dog meat in 43 states in the US - only California, Georgia, Hawaii, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, and Virginia outlaw the practice so if you were to truly take a "stand" regarding this I suggest you ensure that you don't have any dealings with any American company based in one of the above states.

Or any of the following countries:

• Canada


• Nigeria


• Democratic Republic of Congo


• China


• Thailand


• North Korea


• South Korea


• Timor-Leste


• Vietnam


• Switzerland


• New Zealand

In all these countries, dogs are eaten or are legal to be eaten.

Given China's status as the highest consumer of dogs as food in the world (20 million annually) I suggest paying careful attention to where your products come from - after all a substantial amount of goods in the UK are manufactured in China and the odds are pretty good that many of those factory workers eat dog at some point in their lives.

Do you have a Samsung phone or Apple iPhone? Congratulations! You're supporting the eating of dogs.

3 of the top 5 exporters of electronic components in the world are consumers of dog meat, so, the chances are pretty good that at least part of the device you used to post this question was produced in a country where eating dog meat is legal and accepted. (Although kudos to Taiwan and Hong Kong where it's been banned!)

Is it unethical / unprofessional to make a stand of some sort in the workplace regarding animal rights?

Unethical depends on how you do it. Spraying dog blood around the office to protest would be unethical (and likely illegal), posting signs (that you printed with your own resources) against dog consumption not so much. To assess if it were unprofessional again depends on how you do it and what the company culture is (maybe the company has ethics against eating dog). If you have a desk/cubicle you are allowed to personalize then doing so might not be considered unprofessional, but beyond that, the company would like the work environment to be for work, not protesting. Telling your boss how you feel would not be professional either since your view has a lot of cultural bias.

We have hired a 3rd party company in another country in East Asia that is well known for eating dog meat a lot, which doesn't sit particularly well with me, been a dog owner and lover since childhood.

This is clearly about your ethnocentric judgement towards another culture. You consider dogs to be companions, but other people in other countries don't have that attitude or frankly luxury. A dog is a tool for security and livestock in one. Besides, you don't even know if anyone on the other team even eats dog regularly. Further there are people that think you are unethical for eating meat (maybe Indian firms will cease doing business because you eat cow) or not eating insects. I think you will find it to be an unproductive exercise imposing your ethics and values on others especially when they are of different cultural backgrounds.

What you want to do is not 'taking a stand' for animal rights, but against consuming dogs. As a web developer, neither have anything to do with your work, but I strongly advice you to open your mind some...

• Inhabitants of Europe and North America usually consume the meat of fowl, fish, cattle and pigs


• Many animals bred for consumption (especially in factory farms) are treated quite badly and don't have what could be called a happy life. Do you protest working with companies where people might eat factory farmed animals as well?


• In some countries where meat is rare, people eat for example rats or guinea pigs. Would you want to stop having business relations with companies from those countries?


• In Islam the consumption of pork is forbidden. Do these people stop their professional cooperations with countries where eating pork is normal?


• In India the consumption of beef is forbidden for religious reasons. Do Indians stop making business with Europeans and Americans?

Your protest might be seen as ridiculous or even racist and in the worst case impact your professional image. Try to be more accepting of the customs of other people and don't let your professional attitude towards people be tainted by rumors.

While it is a good thing to promote good throughout the world, your good is not someone else's good, there are limited resources to effect any policy (no matter how worthy), and sometimes it is far better to focus on the Human animals first.

Unless your company is directly involved in producing products for dogs, or dog food, you are asking your company to take on an expense for a benefit that doesn't further the company's goals (and is unlikely to improve the company).

It also may be interesting to you that the USA has one of the higher per capita dog ownership, and in many other countries dogs are viewed in the same way we view calves or sheep, as a food source. When one culture views something as precious that another culture eats, there are these kinds of clashes. In India, they probably would prefer that the USA doesn't eat hamburgers; but, I doubt any kind of social warrior effort from India would do much to change our stance on the all-beef hamburger patty.

In this case, it should be left out of the workplace.

Taking a moral stand is not necessarily unprofessional or unethical. Sometimes the opposite is true actually (think about Googlers' opposition to the construction of a censored search machine). But it should be reserved for very clear cases like human rights, democracy, free speech.

In your case, I'm not sure what your goal would be. Do you expect your company not to search for partners/ employees from the Asian country at all because people eat dogs there? If it was just one company that promoted eating dogs, the case wouldn't be so clear for me and my answer could be different. But it's about a country or even a whole huge geographical region.

This could be very much a CLM on your part.

Your "stand" may end up being in line to receive unemployment benefits.

This will likely be seen not as an ethical position, but bigotry against an entire nation, which will likely be of great detriment to your present and future employment prospects. Worse, it could be perceived as racism on your part.

Additionally, this is not a personal stand on your part. You are trying to get your company to take action based on your viewpoint and the associated risks and penalties in the very likely event this goes south.

Lastly, you have no idea if people in this group engage in this behavior, do not, or are even acting to end it. Again, this presents a very bad optic, especially if an outrage mob forms on twitter.

I would leave this out of the workplace and engage in slightly less risky activities such as hang gliding over active volcanoes.

It would be unprofessional. You are assuming they eat dog-meat or support the idea...

An analogous example would be an Arabic-based company refusing to do further business with your UK-based organization because a lot of people in the UK eat pork and drink alcohol. And because you live in the UK you clearly associate with those that eat pork and get drunk (and act like a bunch of drunken animals).

None of this sounds fair or ethical in foreign business-relations.

Most of the answers say something like "absolutely you should not do this". While I agree with those answers personally, I'm going to take a slightly different tack:

I think you should do what you think is right. If you think it is right to go to your manager/boss/whoever is responsible for making this business decision and explain to them your opposition, then by all means go ahead. You are an adult, you know what you think is right, and you have an understanding (I hope) of how the person would respond to your concern, as to whether they would be receptive or not. So by all means, if you feel strongly about it and you think it is the right thing to do, then go ahead and do it.

That said, be aware that, as others have said, this may come off as extremely unprofessional; you are not only raising an issue against the company where they are trying to reduce costs (working with East Asian companies tends to be a cost-cutting measure), but you are also doing so using an issue which is both completely unrelated to the business, and also, to be honest, somewhat racist and also logically unsound ("In X country they eat dogs, therefore these people specifically eat dogs. People who eat dogs are morally suspect, therefore these people specifically are morally suspect.", is basically how I would read your objection). Be warned that if you raise this concern in the way you have explained here, you may jeopardize your own position at the company due to possibly gaining a reputation as a racist (and as a side note, a reasonable grasp and command of the principles of formal logic are skills I would consider a requirement of a good engineer, and your lack thereof may disqualify you, at the very least, from the position of "senior" which you currently hold).

So bottom line: You should do what you feel is right, but this might become the proverbial "hill to die on" for you, as concerns your employment at this company. Is it worth it?

You are wanting to ask your company not to extend their contract with another company because they are based in a country known for eating dogs...

What you are suggesting will do far more harm than good. Such a stance can be used to breed xenophobia in the workpace (it's a short step to go from a company based out there to an individual who hails from there), will harm your reputation in the company, will harm your company's reputation if you go outside normal channels about it (because you haven't proven the third party is doing anything wrong) and is on the whole completely unneccesssary from a business standpoint.

That's bad for you, bad for your business, and it won't save any dogs.

The most constructive thing you can do is have a charity day for an animal based charity such as RSPCA. DON'T tie it to the third party or any other company, just make it a fun, innocent little thing that promotes treating animals properly.