Why would an airport be depicted with symbology for runways longer than 8,069 feet even though it is reported on the sectional as 7,200 feet?What is significant about the number 8069 ft?Is the US certification process for airliners shorter or longer than in other countries?On an IFR Low Altitude Chart what does this symbol mean?What is the FAA's official outlet for informing the public of permanent, systemic changes?What is significant about the number 8069 ft?What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports KACV and KTLV have E4 extensions to E2 airspace?Why are KACV and KTLV depicted differently on sectional charts than KSGU, KBIH, and KTPL, even though each is E2 w/ E4 extensions?Considering all US untowered airports, what is the furthest distance that E2 airspace (dashed magneta line) projects from the airport?Can the Class-E-to-surface airspace near Eagle County Regional airport (KEGE) and Marshall AAF (KFRI) be ignored when the tower is open?
Why do the Brexit opposition parties not want a new election?
The meaning of "offing" in "an agreement in the offing"
Template default argument loses its reference type
How to finish my PhD?
Contour plot of a sequence of spheres with increasing radius
I need to know information from an old German birth certificate
Leaving the USA for 10 yrs when you have asylum
is it possible to change a material depending on whether it is intersecting with another object?
How do English-speaking kids loudly request something?
Can taking my 1-week-old on a 6-7 hours journey in the car lead to medical complications?
Word for something that used to be popular but not anymore
How to restrain your dragon?
Poor management handling of recent sickness and how to approach my return?
After a few interviews, What should I do after told to wait?
If every star in the universe except the Sun were destroyed, would we die?
Protecting programs on external drives with the same priviledges as in Program Files
Would a character take damage when surrounded by, but not in, flames?
When did computers stop checking memory on boot?
How do German speakers decide what should be on the left side of the verb?
Are fast interviews red flags?
Yet another calculator problem
Could someone please explain what this inline #define assembly is doing?
Why is it that I have to play this note on the piano as A sharp?
Dragons and gems
Why would an airport be depicted with symbology for runways longer than 8,069 feet even though it is reported on the sectional as 7,200 feet?
What is significant about the number 8069 ft?Is the US certification process for airliners shorter or longer than in other countries?On an IFR Low Altitude Chart what does this symbol mean?What is the FAA's official outlet for informing the public of permanent, systemic changes?What is significant about the number 8069 ft?What is the primary reason that the non-towered airports KACV and KTLV have E4 extensions to E2 airspace?Why are KACV and KTLV depicted differently on sectional charts than KSGU, KBIH, and KTPL, even though each is E2 w/ E4 extensions?Considering all US untowered airports, what is the furthest distance that E2 airspace (dashed magneta line) projects from the airport?Can the Class-E-to-surface airspace near Eagle County Regional airport (KEGE) and Marshall AAF (KFRI) be ignored when the tower is open?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
This airport, KMKO, Muskogee-Davis Regional in Oklahoma southeast of Tulsa is depicted on the sectional chart with symbology normally reserved for airport with a hard surfaced runway longer than 8069 feet, but this one is only reported on the sectional as 7200.
Is this a mistake by the FAA or is there some clear explanation about why this is?
faa aeronautical-charts symbology
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This airport, KMKO, Muskogee-Davis Regional in Oklahoma southeast of Tulsa is depicted on the sectional chart with symbology normally reserved for airport with a hard surfaced runway longer than 8069 feet, but this one is only reported on the sectional as 7200.
Is this a mistake by the FAA or is there some clear explanation about why this is?
faa aeronautical-charts symbology
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This airport, KMKO, Muskogee-Davis Regional in Oklahoma southeast of Tulsa is depicted on the sectional chart with symbology normally reserved for airport with a hard surfaced runway longer than 8069 feet, but this one is only reported on the sectional as 7200.
Is this a mistake by the FAA or is there some clear explanation about why this is?
faa aeronautical-charts symbology
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
$endgroup$
This airport, KMKO, Muskogee-Davis Regional in Oklahoma southeast of Tulsa is depicted on the sectional chart with symbology normally reserved for airport with a hard surfaced runway longer than 8069 feet, but this one is only reported on the sectional as 7200.
Is this a mistake by the FAA or is there some clear explanation about why this is?
faa aeronautical-charts symbology
faa aeronautical-charts symbology
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
edited 4 hours ago
Ryan Mortensen
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
Ryan MortensenRyan Mortensen
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
4,19414 silver badges46 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The FAA chart user's guide says:
Hard-surfaced runways greater than 8069' or some multiple runways less than 8069'
It's the latter case of some multiple runways less than 8069'.
This is also confirmed in the post, "What is significant about the number 8069 ft?"
Specialists also place these polygons around the runway pattern of aerodromes with multiple runways that are less than 8069 feet, in cases where the multiple runway pattern does not fit into the largest, circular aerodrome symbol.
(FAA FAQ; emphasis mine.)
Most likely MKO doesn't fit in the standard circle 
because of 36-18 and/or 4-22 intersecting the circumference.
(Chart Supplement via skyvector.com)
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68474%2fwhy-would-an-airport-be-depicted-with-symbology-for-runways-longer-than-8-069-fe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The FAA chart user's guide says:
It's the latter case of some multiple runways less than 8069'.
This is also confirmed in the post, "What is significant about the number 8069 ft?"
Specialists also place these polygons around the runway pattern of aerodromes with multiple runways that are less than 8069 feet, in cases where the multiple runway pattern does not fit into the largest, circular aerodrome symbol.
(FAA FAQ; emphasis mine.)
Most likely MKO doesn't fit in the standard circle because of 36-18 and/or 4-22 intersecting the circumference.
(Chart Supplement via skyvector.com)
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The FAA chart user's guide says:
It's the latter case of some multiple runways less than 8069'.
This is also confirmed in the post, "What is significant about the number 8069 ft?"
Specialists also place these polygons around the runway pattern of aerodromes with multiple runways that are less than 8069 feet, in cases where the multiple runway pattern does not fit into the largest, circular aerodrome symbol.
(FAA FAQ; emphasis mine.)
Most likely MKO doesn't fit in the standard circle because of 36-18 and/or 4-22 intersecting the circumference.
(Chart Supplement via skyvector.com)
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The FAA chart user's guide says:
It's the latter case of some multiple runways less than 8069'.
This is also confirmed in the post, "What is significant about the number 8069 ft?"
Specialists also place these polygons around the runway pattern of aerodromes with multiple runways that are less than 8069 feet, in cases where the multiple runway pattern does not fit into the largest, circular aerodrome symbol.
(FAA FAQ; emphasis mine.)
Most likely MKO doesn't fit in the standard circle because of 36-18 and/or 4-22 intersecting the circumference.
(Chart Supplement via skyvector.com)
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
$endgroup$
The FAA chart user's guide says:
It's the latter case of some multiple runways less than 8069'.
This is also confirmed in the post, "What is significant about the number 8069 ft?"
Specialists also place these polygons around the runway pattern of aerodromes with multiple runways that are less than 8069 feet, in cases where the multiple runway pattern does not fit into the largest, circular aerodrome symbol.
(FAA FAQ; emphasis mine.)
Most likely MKO doesn't fit in the standard circle because of 36-18 and/or 4-22 intersecting the circumference.
(Chart Supplement via skyvector.com)
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
answered 9 hours ago
ymb1ymb1
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
79.8k9 gold badges262 silver badges432 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f68474%2fwhy-would-an-airport-be-depicted-with-symbology-for-runways-longer-than-8-069-fe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
