Is multiplication of real numbers uniquely defined as being distributive over addition?Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?Real Numbers as Well Defined SetsHow is addition different than multiplication?Binary operation commutative, associative, and distributive over multiplicationA foundation where objects are unlabelledCommutative binary operations on $Bbb C$ that distribute over both multiplication and additionSo there's addition, multiplication, exponentiation and tetration, but is there a level before addition?Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?Binary multiplication as combination of addition and left shiftChecking a set with the Axiom of IntegersIs addition on $mathbbR$ unique up to automorphism?

Is it really ~648.69 km/s Delta-V to "Land" on the Surface of the Sun?

How quickly could a country build a tall concrete wall around a city?

Why do private jets such as Gulfstream fly higher than other civilian jets?

Would the Elder Wand have been able to destroy a Horcrux?

What are these mathematical groups in U.S. universities?

How to realistically deal with a shield user?

Colleagues speaking another language and it impacts work

How does the oscilloscope trigger really work?

Does this smartphone photo show Mars just below the Sun?

Short story about a teenager who has his brain replaced with a microchip (Psychological Horror)

Does the Voyager team use a wrapper (Fortran(77?) to Python) to transmit current commands?

Why is there a need to prevent a racist, sexist, or otherwise bigoted vendor from discriminating who they sell to?

"How do you solve a problem like Maria?"

Using Select on Dataset with missing keys

In the movie Harry Potter and the Order or the Phoenix, why didn't Mr. Filch succeed to open the Room of Requirement if it's what he needed?

French equivalent of "Make leaps and bounds"

What are good ways to improve as a writer other than writing courses?

tikz-3dplot: angle-placed cones in a sphere

Our group keeps dying during the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign. What are we doing wrong?

Does it make sense to occupy open space?

How to help new students accept function notation

Why are the inside diameters of some pipe larger than the stated size?

Double blind peer review when paper cites author's GitHub repo for code

What can make Linux unresponsive for minutes when browsing certain websites?



Is multiplication of real numbers uniquely defined as being distributive over addition?


Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?Real Numbers as Well Defined SetsHow is addition different than multiplication?Binary operation commutative, associative, and distributive over multiplicationA foundation where objects are unlabelledCommutative binary operations on $Bbb C$ that distribute over both multiplication and additionSo there's addition, multiplication, exponentiation and tetration, but is there a level before addition?Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?Binary multiplication as combination of addition and left shiftChecking a set with the Axiom of IntegersIs addition on $mathbbR$ unique up to automorphism?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $BbbRtimesBbbR$ $to$ $BbbR$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:



  1. $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$

  2. $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$

  3. $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $

From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?



In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^1/3$. So am I missing something obvious here?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – Ameryr
    7 hours ago

















5












$begingroup$


In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $BbbRtimesBbbR$ $to$ $BbbR$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:



  1. $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$

  2. $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$

  3. $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $

From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?



In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^1/3$. So am I missing something obvious here?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – Ameryr
    7 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $BbbRtimesBbbR$ $to$ $BbbR$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:



  1. $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$

  2. $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$

  3. $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $

From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?



In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^1/3$. So am I missing something obvious here?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In the set of real numbers, I wonder whether the distributive law uniquely determines multiplication.
Suppose that for a function $f$: $BbbRtimesBbbR$ $to$ $BbbR$ the following hold for every $x,y,z$, where $+$ is the usual addition
(as defined via Cauchy sequences of rationals), and $1$ is the known natural number:



  1. $f(x+y,z) = f(x,z) + f(y,z)$

  2. $f(x, y+z) = f(x,y) + f(x,z)$

  3. $f(1,x) = f(x,1) = x $

From the above does it follow that $f(x,y) = xy$, the usual multiplication?



In this post: Are the addition and multiplication of real numbers, as we know them, unique?
a somewhat related "dual" question is asked concerning addition, and a simple solution is given in the form of $(x^3+y^3)^1/3$. So am I missing something obvious here?







foundations binary-operations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









José Carlos Santos

206k26 gold badges159 silver badges283 bronze badges




206k26 gold badges159 silver badges283 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









exp8jexp8j

1249 bronze badges




1249 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – Ameryr
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
    $endgroup$
    – Ameryr
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
We can do that for natural numbers then for rationals hence for real numbers
$endgroup$
– Ameryr
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
    $endgroup$
    – exp8j
    8 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

First for a natural $n$
$f(x,n)= underbracef(x,1)+...+f(x,1)_n text. times=nx$



Then for a rational $1/n$
$x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$



Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
$f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3317613%2fis-multiplication-of-real-numbers-uniquely-defined-as-being-distributive-over-ad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
      $endgroup$
      – mathcounterexamples.net
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
      $endgroup$
      – exp8j
      8 hours ago















    5












    $begingroup$

    For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
      $endgroup$
      – mathcounterexamples.net
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
      $endgroup$
      – exp8j
      8 hours ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    For one thing $Bbb R$ is a $Bbb Q$-vector space, therefore by choosing a Hamel basis it is possible to define uncountably many symmetric $Bbb Q$-bilinear maps $Bbb RtimesBbb RtoBbb R$, even with the restriction $phi(1,bullet)=phi(bullet,1)=id$. The only continuous one among these is the usual product, though.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 8 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    Gae. S.Gae. S.

    1,2645 silver badges14 bronze badges




    1,2645 silver badges14 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
      $endgroup$
      – mathcounterexamples.net
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
      $endgroup$
      – exp8j
      8 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
      $endgroup$
      – mathcounterexamples.net
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
      $endgroup$
      – exp8j
      8 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Good answer! Would be good to detail the way to define a $mathbb Q$-bilinear map from a Hamel basis and what a Hamel basis is, as the OP is probably not familiar with it.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    8 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
    $endgroup$
    – exp8j
    8 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Gae. S. Could you suggest a good reference where I can study the concepts that you mention? In fact, what motivated me to ask this question is that I've just started studying calculus in normed spaces on my own, and I bumped into bilinear maps...
    $endgroup$
    – exp8j
    8 hours ago













    1












    $begingroup$

    First for a natural $n$
    $f(x,n)= underbracef(x,1)+...+f(x,1)_n text. times=nx$



    Then for a rational $1/n$
    $x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$



    Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
    $f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      1












      $begingroup$

      First for a natural $n$
      $f(x,n)= underbracef(x,1)+...+f(x,1)_n text. times=nx$



      Then for a rational $1/n$
      $x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$



      Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
      $f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        First for a natural $n$
        $f(x,n)= underbracef(x,1)+...+f(x,1)_n text. times=nx$



        Then for a rational $1/n$
        $x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$



        Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
        $f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        First for a natural $n$
        $f(x,n)= underbracef(x,1)+...+f(x,1)_n text. times=nx$



        Then for a rational $1/n$
        $x=f(x,1)=f(x,n/n) = n f(x,1/n) $ so $f(x,1/n) =x/n$



        Now for a $y$ which is a Cauchy sequence of rational numbers $y=lim r_n$
        $f(x,y) = f(x,lim r_n) = lim f(x,r_n)= lim x r_n = xy$ pulling limit outside require the continuity of $f$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        AmeryrAmeryr

        8423 silver badges12 bronze badges




        8423 silver badges12 bronze badges






























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3317613%2fis-multiplication-of-real-numbers-uniquely-defined-as-being-distributive-over-ad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її