Asimov's story where a man's speech contains no informationSF novel featuring a ship called Kraftwerk IIStory about food designers who create cultured meat, eventually cultured human fleshVirus replicating through signals to civilizationsTrying to identify a short story of missed opportunitiesHelp identifying a story where kids discover some kind of wormhole in a gardenBook about ancient Martian astronauts being the root of modern humanity and time travelDid Isaac Asimov give two or more unrelated characters the same name component in any of his science fiction stories?Parallels between Asimov's Foundation characters and real historical figures

Can a German employer force mandatory overtime and forbid salary discussion?

How many atoms in the hydrocarbon?

How do electric hot water heaters explode and what can be done to prevent that from happening?

Does the same caching algorithm apply to storable actions and @AuraEnabled(caching=true)

What comes next in this sequence, and why?

Does detect magic detect itself?

Disjoint Collection Method in Apex?

What does 36.000€ mean?

How can I get a ride in the jump seat as a non-professional pilot?

What are the factors that decide on whether you die instantly or get knocked out in PUBG?

"Applicants for asylum must prove that they have fifteen family members in the Netherlands."

How to pay less tax on a high salary?

I feel ashamed about my old code

Template not provided using create-react-app

How does an immortal vampire king hide his vampirism and immortality?

How can I convince my department that I have the academic freedom to select textbooks and use multiple-choice tests in my courses?

Why try to impeach Trump now?

Thoughts on using user stories to define business/platform needs?

Was playing with both hands ever allowed in chess?

Is it harder to enter an atmosphere perpendicular or at an angle

Did the computer mouse always output relative x/y and not absolute?

Who verifies the trust of certificate authorities?

Why are green parties so often opposed to nuclear power?

Does being invisible grant advantage on stealth checks by RAW?



Asimov's story where a man's speech contains no information


SF novel featuring a ship called Kraftwerk IIStory about food designers who create cultured meat, eventually cultured human fleshVirus replicating through signals to civilizationsTrying to identify a short story of missed opportunitiesHelp identifying a story where kids discover some kind of wormhole in a gardenBook about ancient Martian astronauts being the root of modern humanity and time travelDid Isaac Asimov give two or more unrelated characters the same name component in any of his science fiction stories?Parallels between Asimov's Foundation characters and real historical figures






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









64


















I am trying to remember the name of a tale or novel by Isaac Asimov. I am positive I've read this some years ago, but for the life of me, I can't recall the name.



In the story, one of the characters, some kind of diplomat, speaks profusely. Only after recording and analysing his speech, the main character(s) come to the conclusion that there is no actual information to all his verbosity. He was a master at speaking without actually saying a thing.










share|improve this question

































    64


















    I am trying to remember the name of a tale or novel by Isaac Asimov. I am positive I've read this some years ago, but for the life of me, I can't recall the name.



    In the story, one of the characters, some kind of diplomat, speaks profusely. Only after recording and analysing his speech, the main character(s) come to the conclusion that there is no actual information to all his verbosity. He was a master at speaking without actually saying a thing.










    share|improve this question





























      64













      64









      64


      6






      I am trying to remember the name of a tale or novel by Isaac Asimov. I am positive I've read this some years ago, but for the life of me, I can't recall the name.



      In the story, one of the characters, some kind of diplomat, speaks profusely. Only after recording and analysing his speech, the main character(s) come to the conclusion that there is no actual information to all his verbosity. He was a master at speaking without actually saying a thing.










      share|improve this question
















      I am trying to remember the name of a tale or novel by Isaac Asimov. I am positive I've read this some years ago, but for the life of me, I can't recall the name.



      In the story, one of the characters, some kind of diplomat, speaks profusely. Only after recording and analysing his speech, the main character(s) come to the conclusion that there is no actual information to all his verbosity. He was a master at speaking without actually saying a thing.







      story-identification isaac-asimov






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Oct 15 at 15:40









      TheLethalCarrot

      92.1k38 gold badges559 silver badges595 bronze badges




      92.1k38 gold badges559 silver badges595 bronze badges










      asked Oct 15 at 15:35









      houcroshoucros

      6231 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges




      6231 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          108



















          This is the Foundation classic.



          enter image description here



          (Link)



          In a comparative article The Art of Saying Nothing the author recounts Asimov's Foundation exactly as described:




          In the Isaac Asimov sci-fi classic Foundation, an envoy from the Empire arrives for 5 days of talks to promise a small planet Imperial protection against attack. Scientists at the Foundation then use symbolic logic to analyze the Imperial envoy's transcript, and reach this conclusion -- real guarantees of protection: zero; content of 5 days of talk: zero.




          The interaction you recall is included below:




          “But then,” interposed Sutt, “how would Mayor Hardin account for Lord Dorwin's assurances of Empire support? They seemed” he shrugged “Well, they seemed satisfactory.”



          Hardin threw himself back in the chair. “You know, that's the most interesting part of the whole business. I admit that I thought his Lordship a most consummate donkey when I first met him – but it turned out that he is an accomplished diplomat and a most clever man. I took the liberty of recording all his statements.”



          There was a flurry, and Pirenne opened his mouth in horror.



          “What of it?” demanded Hardin. “I realize it was a gross breach of hospitality and a thing no so-called gentleman would ever do. Also that if his Lordship had caught on things might have been unpleasant; but he didn't and I have the record and that's that. I took that record, had it copied out, and sent that to Houk for analysis, also.”



          Lundin Crast asked, “And where is the analysis?”



          “That,” replied Hardin, “is the interesting thing. The analysis was the most difficult of the three by all odds. When Houk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications—in short all the goo and dribble—he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out. Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one damned thing, and said it so that you never noticed. There are the assurances you had from your precious Empire.”







          share|improve this answer






















          • 6





            Shame on me. I've read the Foundation trilogy twice and still couldn't remember the analyst was no other than Mayor Hardin! Thanks a lot, this is exactly was I was looking for :)

            – houcros
            Oct 15 at 20:10







          • 2





            @houcros that's because Hardin wasn't the analyst. That was Houk. :P

            – muru
            Oct 16 at 7:48






          • 1





            Vogon Poet (love the name). A nice find of the answer and well presented too. I'm interested in how you found the answer, specifically what got you from "a man's speech contains no information" to "the art of saying nothing". Specifically, identifying and (re)formulating the relevant context is an interest of mine.

            – Najinsky
            Oct 17 at 13:21











          • I remember a comment about how his speech boiled down to A = A, but I couldn't have told you much more about it than that.

            – Ross Thompson
            Oct 17 at 18:15












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "186"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );














          draft saved

          draft discarded
















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f221620%2fasimovs-story-where-a-mans-speech-contains-no-information%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown


























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          108



















          This is the Foundation classic.



          enter image description here



          (Link)



          In a comparative article The Art of Saying Nothing the author recounts Asimov's Foundation exactly as described:




          In the Isaac Asimov sci-fi classic Foundation, an envoy from the Empire arrives for 5 days of talks to promise a small planet Imperial protection against attack. Scientists at the Foundation then use symbolic logic to analyze the Imperial envoy's transcript, and reach this conclusion -- real guarantees of protection: zero; content of 5 days of talk: zero.




          The interaction you recall is included below:




          “But then,” interposed Sutt, “how would Mayor Hardin account for Lord Dorwin's assurances of Empire support? They seemed” he shrugged “Well, they seemed satisfactory.”



          Hardin threw himself back in the chair. “You know, that's the most interesting part of the whole business. I admit that I thought his Lordship a most consummate donkey when I first met him – but it turned out that he is an accomplished diplomat and a most clever man. I took the liberty of recording all his statements.”



          There was a flurry, and Pirenne opened his mouth in horror.



          “What of it?” demanded Hardin. “I realize it was a gross breach of hospitality and a thing no so-called gentleman would ever do. Also that if his Lordship had caught on things might have been unpleasant; but he didn't and I have the record and that's that. I took that record, had it copied out, and sent that to Houk for analysis, also.”



          Lundin Crast asked, “And where is the analysis?”



          “That,” replied Hardin, “is the interesting thing. The analysis was the most difficult of the three by all odds. When Houk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications—in short all the goo and dribble—he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out. Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one damned thing, and said it so that you never noticed. There are the assurances you had from your precious Empire.”







          share|improve this answer






















          • 6





            Shame on me. I've read the Foundation trilogy twice and still couldn't remember the analyst was no other than Mayor Hardin! Thanks a lot, this is exactly was I was looking for :)

            – houcros
            Oct 15 at 20:10







          • 2





            @houcros that's because Hardin wasn't the analyst. That was Houk. :P

            – muru
            Oct 16 at 7:48






          • 1





            Vogon Poet (love the name). A nice find of the answer and well presented too. I'm interested in how you found the answer, specifically what got you from "a man's speech contains no information" to "the art of saying nothing". Specifically, identifying and (re)formulating the relevant context is an interest of mine.

            – Najinsky
            Oct 17 at 13:21











          • I remember a comment about how his speech boiled down to A = A, but I couldn't have told you much more about it than that.

            – Ross Thompson
            Oct 17 at 18:15















          108



















          This is the Foundation classic.



          enter image description here



          (Link)



          In a comparative article The Art of Saying Nothing the author recounts Asimov's Foundation exactly as described:




          In the Isaac Asimov sci-fi classic Foundation, an envoy from the Empire arrives for 5 days of talks to promise a small planet Imperial protection against attack. Scientists at the Foundation then use symbolic logic to analyze the Imperial envoy's transcript, and reach this conclusion -- real guarantees of protection: zero; content of 5 days of talk: zero.




          The interaction you recall is included below:




          “But then,” interposed Sutt, “how would Mayor Hardin account for Lord Dorwin's assurances of Empire support? They seemed” he shrugged “Well, they seemed satisfactory.”



          Hardin threw himself back in the chair. “You know, that's the most interesting part of the whole business. I admit that I thought his Lordship a most consummate donkey when I first met him – but it turned out that he is an accomplished diplomat and a most clever man. I took the liberty of recording all his statements.”



          There was a flurry, and Pirenne opened his mouth in horror.



          “What of it?” demanded Hardin. “I realize it was a gross breach of hospitality and a thing no so-called gentleman would ever do. Also that if his Lordship had caught on things might have been unpleasant; but he didn't and I have the record and that's that. I took that record, had it copied out, and sent that to Houk for analysis, also.”



          Lundin Crast asked, “And where is the analysis?”



          “That,” replied Hardin, “is the interesting thing. The analysis was the most difficult of the three by all odds. When Houk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications—in short all the goo and dribble—he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out. Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one damned thing, and said it so that you never noticed. There are the assurances you had from your precious Empire.”







          share|improve this answer






















          • 6





            Shame on me. I've read the Foundation trilogy twice and still couldn't remember the analyst was no other than Mayor Hardin! Thanks a lot, this is exactly was I was looking for :)

            – houcros
            Oct 15 at 20:10







          • 2





            @houcros that's because Hardin wasn't the analyst. That was Houk. :P

            – muru
            Oct 16 at 7:48






          • 1





            Vogon Poet (love the name). A nice find of the answer and well presented too. I'm interested in how you found the answer, specifically what got you from "a man's speech contains no information" to "the art of saying nothing". Specifically, identifying and (re)formulating the relevant context is an interest of mine.

            – Najinsky
            Oct 17 at 13:21











          • I remember a comment about how his speech boiled down to A = A, but I couldn't have told you much more about it than that.

            – Ross Thompson
            Oct 17 at 18:15













          108















          108











          108









          This is the Foundation classic.



          enter image description here



          (Link)



          In a comparative article The Art of Saying Nothing the author recounts Asimov's Foundation exactly as described:




          In the Isaac Asimov sci-fi classic Foundation, an envoy from the Empire arrives for 5 days of talks to promise a small planet Imperial protection against attack. Scientists at the Foundation then use symbolic logic to analyze the Imperial envoy's transcript, and reach this conclusion -- real guarantees of protection: zero; content of 5 days of talk: zero.




          The interaction you recall is included below:




          “But then,” interposed Sutt, “how would Mayor Hardin account for Lord Dorwin's assurances of Empire support? They seemed” he shrugged “Well, they seemed satisfactory.”



          Hardin threw himself back in the chair. “You know, that's the most interesting part of the whole business. I admit that I thought his Lordship a most consummate donkey when I first met him – but it turned out that he is an accomplished diplomat and a most clever man. I took the liberty of recording all his statements.”



          There was a flurry, and Pirenne opened his mouth in horror.



          “What of it?” demanded Hardin. “I realize it was a gross breach of hospitality and a thing no so-called gentleman would ever do. Also that if his Lordship had caught on things might have been unpleasant; but he didn't and I have the record and that's that. I took that record, had it copied out, and sent that to Houk for analysis, also.”



          Lundin Crast asked, “And where is the analysis?”



          “That,” replied Hardin, “is the interesting thing. The analysis was the most difficult of the three by all odds. When Houk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications—in short all the goo and dribble—he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out. Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one damned thing, and said it so that you never noticed. There are the assurances you had from your precious Empire.”







          share|improve this answer
















          This is the Foundation classic.



          enter image description here



          (Link)



          In a comparative article The Art of Saying Nothing the author recounts Asimov's Foundation exactly as described:




          In the Isaac Asimov sci-fi classic Foundation, an envoy from the Empire arrives for 5 days of talks to promise a small planet Imperial protection against attack. Scientists at the Foundation then use symbolic logic to analyze the Imperial envoy's transcript, and reach this conclusion -- real guarantees of protection: zero; content of 5 days of talk: zero.




          The interaction you recall is included below:




          “But then,” interposed Sutt, “how would Mayor Hardin account for Lord Dorwin's assurances of Empire support? They seemed” he shrugged “Well, they seemed satisfactory.”



          Hardin threw himself back in the chair. “You know, that's the most interesting part of the whole business. I admit that I thought his Lordship a most consummate donkey when I first met him – but it turned out that he is an accomplished diplomat and a most clever man. I took the liberty of recording all his statements.”



          There was a flurry, and Pirenne opened his mouth in horror.



          “What of it?” demanded Hardin. “I realize it was a gross breach of hospitality and a thing no so-called gentleman would ever do. Also that if his Lordship had caught on things might have been unpleasant; but he didn't and I have the record and that's that. I took that record, had it copied out, and sent that to Houk for analysis, also.”



          Lundin Crast asked, “And where is the analysis?”



          “That,” replied Hardin, “is the interesting thing. The analysis was the most difficult of the three by all odds. When Houk, after two days of steady work, succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications—in short all the goo and dribble—he found he had nothing left. Everything canceled out. Lord Dorwin, gentlemen, in five days of discussion didn't say one damned thing, and said it so that you never noticed. There are the assurances you had from your precious Empire.”








          share|improve this answer















          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer








          edited Oct 16 at 11:05









          Maaark

          1032 bronze badges




          1032 bronze badges










          answered Oct 15 at 15:57









          Vogon PoetVogon Poet

          4,7742 gold badges17 silver badges52 bronze badges




          4,7742 gold badges17 silver badges52 bronze badges










          • 6





            Shame on me. I've read the Foundation trilogy twice and still couldn't remember the analyst was no other than Mayor Hardin! Thanks a lot, this is exactly was I was looking for :)

            – houcros
            Oct 15 at 20:10







          • 2





            @houcros that's because Hardin wasn't the analyst. That was Houk. :P

            – muru
            Oct 16 at 7:48






          • 1





            Vogon Poet (love the name). A nice find of the answer and well presented too. I'm interested in how you found the answer, specifically what got you from "a man's speech contains no information" to "the art of saying nothing". Specifically, identifying and (re)formulating the relevant context is an interest of mine.

            – Najinsky
            Oct 17 at 13:21











          • I remember a comment about how his speech boiled down to A = A, but I couldn't have told you much more about it than that.

            – Ross Thompson
            Oct 17 at 18:15












          • 6





            Shame on me. I've read the Foundation trilogy twice and still couldn't remember the analyst was no other than Mayor Hardin! Thanks a lot, this is exactly was I was looking for :)

            – houcros
            Oct 15 at 20:10







          • 2





            @houcros that's because Hardin wasn't the analyst. That was Houk. :P

            – muru
            Oct 16 at 7:48






          • 1





            Vogon Poet (love the name). A nice find of the answer and well presented too. I'm interested in how you found the answer, specifically what got you from "a man's speech contains no information" to "the art of saying nothing". Specifically, identifying and (re)formulating the relevant context is an interest of mine.

            – Najinsky
            Oct 17 at 13:21











          • I remember a comment about how his speech boiled down to A = A, but I couldn't have told you much more about it than that.

            – Ross Thompson
            Oct 17 at 18:15







          6




          6





          Shame on me. I've read the Foundation trilogy twice and still couldn't remember the analyst was no other than Mayor Hardin! Thanks a lot, this is exactly was I was looking for :)

          – houcros
          Oct 15 at 20:10






          Shame on me. I've read the Foundation trilogy twice and still couldn't remember the analyst was no other than Mayor Hardin! Thanks a lot, this is exactly was I was looking for :)

          – houcros
          Oct 15 at 20:10





          2




          2





          @houcros that's because Hardin wasn't the analyst. That was Houk. :P

          – muru
          Oct 16 at 7:48





          @houcros that's because Hardin wasn't the analyst. That was Houk. :P

          – muru
          Oct 16 at 7:48




          1




          1





          Vogon Poet (love the name). A nice find of the answer and well presented too. I'm interested in how you found the answer, specifically what got you from "a man's speech contains no information" to "the art of saying nothing". Specifically, identifying and (re)formulating the relevant context is an interest of mine.

          – Najinsky
          Oct 17 at 13:21





          Vogon Poet (love the name). A nice find of the answer and well presented too. I'm interested in how you found the answer, specifically what got you from "a man's speech contains no information" to "the art of saying nothing". Specifically, identifying and (re)formulating the relevant context is an interest of mine.

          – Najinsky
          Oct 17 at 13:21













          I remember a comment about how his speech boiled down to A = A, but I couldn't have told you much more about it than that.

          – Ross Thompson
          Oct 17 at 18:15





          I remember a comment about how his speech boiled down to A = A, but I couldn't have told you much more about it than that.

          – Ross Thompson
          Oct 17 at 18:15


















          draft saved

          draft discarded















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f221620%2fasimovs-story-where-a-mans-speech-contains-no-information%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown









          Popular posts from this blog

          Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

          Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

          Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її