I'm on the Titanic, what should I do to survive? [closed]How to survive in the Triassic periodWould a person from the past be able to survive for a week in New York?How far in the past could unprepared humans survive?How long could an operational Virginia-class sub survive in the Jurassic sea?Could a giant floating self-supporting city survive a thousand year voyage?Would ancient people understand “I'm from the future?”What are the building materials, crops, and livestock my post-apocalyptic community needs to survive?What dog breeds survive the apocalypse for generations?

Graph with cropped letters

Why are there cows on my spaceship?

Can Alter Self be used to enter an enemy's body and destroy it from the inside?

There are polygons with only right angles which have an odd number of corners

What does it mean that North Carolina's maps were thrown out but new ones weren't ordered drawn?

How did composers "test" their music?

How is calculated fill-factor percentage related to size of database?

A word(?) on giving something a different name on media to make it more acceptable?

How to learn Unpublished checkpoints

What is the literary style used in the King James Bible Called?

How do you link two checking accounts from two different banks in two different countries?

Call local emergency number using a foreign mobile number

Employer reneged on negotiated clauses, citing budget cuts - what can I do?

Wood versus marble rolling pin 'performance'

Would webs catch fire if Fire Bolt is used on a creature inside of them?

Is the "Watchmen" TV series a continuation of the movie or the comics?

Has an engineer called Trevor Jackson invented a revolutionary battery allowing for a car range of 1500 miles?

What is the etymology of 迷信?

Funny story about galactic postal union?

English equivalent of the Malayalam saying "don't stab/poke the dead body"?

What is the equivalent of "if you say so" in German?

How to secure cables to a PCB

How are side-channel attacks executed? What does an attacker need to execute a side channel attack?

Add new column to dataframe based on dictionary



I'm on the Titanic, what should I do to survive? [closed]


How to survive in the Triassic periodWould a person from the past be able to survive for a week in New York?How far in the past could unprepared humans survive?How long could an operational Virginia-class sub survive in the Jurassic sea?Could a giant floating self-supporting city survive a thousand year voyage?Would ancient people understand “I'm from the future?”What are the building materials, crops, and livestock my post-apocalyptic community needs to survive?What dog breeds survive the apocalypse for generations?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








75














$begingroup$


I time traveled to the date of April 14th, 1912 with my time machine. It’s evening, 6:00 PM to be exact and my location is the deck of the ship Titanic. We all know what is going to happen not too long from now. I need to survive. So my question is: what can I do to survive the midnight sinking?



One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg. The Titanic must hit the iceberg tonight. And in order to change the timeline as little as possible, I want to stay under the radar as much as possible.



Important thing to say, I’m already wearing a Radiation Suit










share|improve this question












$endgroup$





closed as off-topic by Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor Oct 16 at 18:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Monty Wild
    Oct 15 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are you a man or a woman or child?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    Oct 17 at 16:54

















75














$begingroup$


I time traveled to the date of April 14th, 1912 with my time machine. It’s evening, 6:00 PM to be exact and my location is the deck of the ship Titanic. We all know what is going to happen not too long from now. I need to survive. So my question is: what can I do to survive the midnight sinking?



One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg. The Titanic must hit the iceberg tonight. And in order to change the timeline as little as possible, I want to stay under the radar as much as possible.



Important thing to say, I’m already wearing a Radiation Suit










share|improve this question












$endgroup$





closed as off-topic by Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor Oct 16 at 18:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Monty Wild
    Oct 15 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are you a man or a woman or child?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    Oct 17 at 16:54













75












75








75


10



$begingroup$


I time traveled to the date of April 14th, 1912 with my time machine. It’s evening, 6:00 PM to be exact and my location is the deck of the ship Titanic. We all know what is going to happen not too long from now. I need to survive. So my question is: what can I do to survive the midnight sinking?



One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg. The Titanic must hit the iceberg tonight. And in order to change the timeline as little as possible, I want to stay under the radar as much as possible.



Important thing to say, I’m already wearing a Radiation Suit










share|improve this question












$endgroup$




I time traveled to the date of April 14th, 1912 with my time machine. It’s evening, 6:00 PM to be exact and my location is the deck of the ship Titanic. We all know what is going to happen not too long from now. I need to survive. So my question is: what can I do to survive the midnight sinking?



One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg. The Titanic must hit the iceberg tonight. And in order to change the timeline as little as possible, I want to stay under the radar as much as possible.



Important thing to say, I’m already wearing a Radiation Suit







time-travel survival ships






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 15 at 20:30







DT Cooper

















asked Oct 15 at 1:30









DT CooperDT Cooper

3,2568 gold badges25 silver badges61 bronze badges




3,2568 gold badges25 silver badges61 bronze badges





closed as off-topic by Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor Oct 16 at 18:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as off-topic by Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor Oct 16 at 18:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor Oct 16 at 18:04


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "You are asking questions about a story set in a world instead of about building a world. For more information, see Why is my question "Too Story Based" and how do I get it opened?." – Renan, dot_Sp0T, ckersch, Morris The Cat, Trevor
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Monty Wild
    Oct 15 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are you a man or a woman or child?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    Oct 17 at 16:54
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Monty Wild
    Oct 15 at 21:13










  • $begingroup$
    Are you a man or a woman or child?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    Oct 17 at 16:54















$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild
Oct 15 at 21:13




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild
Oct 15 at 21:13












$begingroup$
Are you a man or a woman or child?
$endgroup$
– hszmv
Oct 17 at 16:54




$begingroup$
Are you a man or a woman or child?
$endgroup$
– hszmv
Oct 17 at 16:54










16 Answers
16






active

oldest

votes


















97
















$begingroup$

Befriend and hang out with fellow passenger, Margaret (Molly/Maggie) Brown then follow her to lifeboat #6 which historically will have available seats.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 24




    $begingroup$
    While going to a lifeboat with historically available seats appears like a good idea, stay away from boat #6 (or all portside boats for that matter) if you are neither a woman nor a child. Apparantly, the officers in charge of the lifeboats interpreted the order to let "women and children" down differently and male passengers were entirely denied entry to portside boats while they were awarded free seats on starboard boats if no women or children were near.
    $endgroup$
    – inVader
    Oct 15 at 12:58







  • 17




    $begingroup$
    For boat #6 in particular, the article says (my emphasis/annotations): "While being lowered, pleas from women in the boat for additional oarsmen forced Lightoller to solicit the crowd on deck for anyone who had sailing experience. Major Arthur Godfrey Peuchen of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club volunteered, shimmying down the falls (ropes) into the boat. Peuchen was the only male passenger whom Second Officer Lightoller permitted to board a [portside] lifeboat."
    $endgroup$
    – inVader
    Oct 15 at 13:06







  • 31




    $begingroup$
    Since it had free seats historically, wouldn't getting in one change that fact, removing this SO answer from existence?
    $endgroup$
    – Parrotmaster
    Oct 15 at 13:33






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    If it had more than 1 free seat, the narrative remains the same. History will not care if it had 5 free seats or 6, just as long as he is not taking the last one.
    $endgroup$
    – Nosajimiki
    Oct 15 at 15:09






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @KalleMP, we don't... and this is exactly why I was advising to try to board on the starboard side instead if (and only if) they were neither a woman nor a child (or, in fact, could be mistaken for one) in the original comment.
    $endgroup$
    – inVader
    Oct 16 at 1:41


















72
















$begingroup$

As soon as a lifeboat launches, volunteer to be in it.



At first there were quite a lot of people who hesitated to go into a little wooden boat in the middle of the Atlantic, when the big reassuring liner still had power and light and was merely stopped.




Here is the wikipedia link looked up by DevSolar. Pryftan is right, a source never hurts.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 13




    $begingroup$
    Do you have a source for that information? I'm not disbelieving you I just think it would improve the answer and would be for interesting reading.
    $endgroup$
    – Pryftan
    Oct 15 at 11:38






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Early lifeboats were undermanned. I don't think this needs specific sourcing...
    $endgroup$
    – DevSolar
    Oct 15 at 14:40










  • $begingroup$
    Specific sourcing helps, but I think the knowledge that nobody back then expected the Titanic to sink was pretty common by now. (Spoiler alert it sank...)
    $endgroup$
    – Nelson
    Oct 16 at 3:32











  • $begingroup$
    The article that @DevSolar posted should be its own answer. It lets you pick the perfect boat to be on depending on your preference of company and when exactly you'd like to be picked up.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    Oct 16 at 10:45


















46
















$begingroup$

Buy a first class ticket



enter image description here



If you had a child with you would increase it more. You could also have your life jacket with you and wait near the lifeboats. Being a woman would also increase the odds.




Even if you were a first-class passenger with a higher likelihood of
getting a seat in a lifeboat, your chances of getting that seat
increased if you were a woman or child. The “women and children first”
rule applied when loading the lifeboats, although the rule wasn’t
strictly or equally enforced. If a lifeboat was about to be launched
on the starboard side and empty seats were available, men could take
the seats if no women or children were at hand to take them. On the
port side, however, it was more apt to be “women and children only” —
very few men escaped the ship from this side. So if you were a man,
your chances of survival were greatly increased by going starboard, as
opposed to going port.




Titanic passenger survival rates






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Correlation is not causation. There may be other reasons why first-class passengers had a higher survival rate, like where on the ship their rooms were located, where they typically spent their time (both of which can likely fully be counteracted if you knew when the ship would start sinking) or the demographics (and general mindset) of each class. Or were first-class passengers specifically prioritised when loading life boats? The latter quote has a similar problem - there may simply have been fewer men on the port side (which could end up that a man is more likely to survive on that side).
    $endgroup$
    – NotThatGuy
    Oct 15 at 12:08







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Gee so it wasn't because the third class passengers were locked downstairs while the first class got loaded on the boats? Good to know.....
    $endgroup$
    – Thorne
    Oct 15 at 19:36






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @Thorne No. All classes of women and children had higher survival rates than first class men. abisaab.wordpress.com/interesting-facts/survival-rates-by-class
    $endgroup$
    – DrMcCleod
    Oct 15 at 20:10






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Thorne Evacuation of 3rd class passengers was less prompt than for others, but the claim that 3rd class passengers were locked below while the ship sank is a myth, possibly caused by confusion with the fact that they were segregated from other classes during the voyage. See e.g. timmaltin.com/2019/04/23/third-class-passengers-titanic
    $endgroup$
    – Geoffrey Brent
    Oct 16 at 1:35






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The impact will occur in 5 hours, and the person in already onboard. There are no ticket sales points on the actual boat when its underway. What kind of silly answer is this, and how did it get 38 upvotes, what is wrong with this community
    $endgroup$
    – Innovine
    Oct 16 at 10:42



















43
















$begingroup$

You're on deck, which is the most important thing. Your survival odds are already waaay up.



It'll be cold on deck. Wear a big coat. Underneath your coat, wear a good dry suit with some high-quality thermals underneath (possibly battery heated ones). The photos on the Wikipedia page notwithstanding, a drysuit needn't make you look like an astronaut, especially a suit that's intended for short term use whilst swimming, not diving.



Even if you don't get into a boat (and as the other answers have said, you should be able to do this) you'll be vastly better off than anyone else in the water. The lifeboats didn't move far away from site of the sinking, but they did not dare to return to collect swimmers for fear of being swamped and overturned. As a result, most of the swimmers died of hypothermia, but you don't need to let that happen to you. Swim out to the boats... one of them will eventually let you on board, or haul yourself up onto one of the bigger bits of debris and await rescue.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 22




    $begingroup$
    This. Most who died very likely died of hypothermia. With a dry suit, a PFD and a whistle, you can tread water for hours until help arrives and then signal for them. Trying to get on a lifeboat carries the risk of failure -- this very nearly eliminates that risk. Granted, staying under the radar will be out the window when you're pulled out of the water completely comfortable and wearing a strange outfit. Not sure how to address that one...
    $endgroup$
    – bvoyelr
    Oct 15 at 13:35






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    @bvoyelr the big coat should help conceal it ;-) honestly, you'd be in the middle of a catastrophe, and there are a lot of other dead and dying and hypothermic people to deal with, and no-one will have a handy camera or really care about that one dude or dudette with a funny accent who looked a bit fat and didn't seem that chilly. Take a blanket, thank them, and tell them to deal with the other people who are more in need.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    Oct 15 at 20:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    An electrically heated wetsuit under your clothes would be barely noticeable considered the style of clothing. With everything going on, nobody would be looking that hard. A dry suit usually has gloves, boots and head coverings with would be harder to hide but would work better.
    $endgroup$
    – Thorne
    Oct 16 at 10:37










  • $begingroup$
    @Thorne the gloves and boots would be easy to conceal (and the boots can be optional and the gloves often are) and the hood is always a separate component so can be left behind if you were feeling brave.
    $endgroup$
    – Starfish Prime
    Oct 16 at 10:54


















30
















$begingroup$

The simplest way to ensure that you yourself - and as many others as possible- survive the Titanic disaster is to distract the forward lookout at the critical moment so that he does not give warning of the iceberg ahead until it is too late to turn the ship... if at all.



If the means by which you distract the lookout is to offer him the use of your period-appropriate 10×50 binoculars - there were no binoculars on board, as they had been forgotten - with a comment that you had seen that no-one was using them, and the ship's speed in these conditions was making you nervous, no-one could reproach you: you saw a matter that compromised safety, and you acted as expeditiously as possible to correct matters. You didn't approach the other crew in fear it would take them too long to pass the binoculars on to where they were needed, a fear that proved to be well founded, as the ship struck an iceberg right afterwards.



What will this do?



Instead of the Titanic grazing along the side of the iceberg, it will most likely impact head on, crumpling and breaching the bow compartment, and possibly the next compartment back, and transmitted shock may cause other leaks. However, the ship could remain afloat with the first several compartments completely flooded, and the ship's pumps could likely keep ahead of the minor leakage caused by shock.



It may be a close call, and the Titanic may settle quite deeply by the bow before it reaches equilibrium, so it is not impossible that the passengers may be put onto the lifeboats, especially as a direct impact will cause a lot of otherwise insignificant damage and minor injuries.



In the following investigation, it could be pointed out that the captain was driving the ship at a reckless speed given the conditions, and had the lookout done his job just moments earlier, the ship might have sunk as a result of a glancing impact rupturing many more compartments, plus the triple-screw design meaning that the ship could not turn as rapidly as an even-screw design.



So... the disaster happens... but most will survive, even if it is discovered that there were not enough lifeboats.



Failing that... bring and wear beneath your clothing a drysuit made for diving in Arctic conditions, and be sure to remain on-deck.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 5




    $begingroup$
    I often thought of this - the ship would've survived a head-on collision. With its bows stoved in it would've been written off, but would've stayed afloat and would even have been able to limp into New York a week late. The furore and loss of reputation for the White Star Line would've been immense, but the death toll would've been a fraction of the real thing.
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Bravo
    Oct 15 at 12:27






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @OscarBravo "With its bows stoved in it would've been written off" that depends. Titanic's sister ship Olympic went through a lot and was kept in service until its age caught up with it.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Lint
    Oct 15 at 12:31







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    With this strategy, there is some risk that you will take on some of the blame for the crash. Even if you are not found legally at fault, you may be found guilty by the media. After all, people might believe, "if the lookout wasn't distracted, the iceberg could have been dodged entirely."
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    Oct 15 at 15:08






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    There is a potential dangerous side effect to this answer: Because of the scope of the Titanic disaster, the London Board of Trade regulations on ship safety were (eventually) replaced by the Safety of Life at Sea convention. One critical change was that a ship must have sufficient lifeboat space for all people on board, deployable to each side of the ship. (LBoT regs required ships of tonnage X and up to have lifeboat space for Y people [~900], and the Olympic class far exceeded that X.)
    $endgroup$
    – Codes with Hammer
    Oct 15 at 15:13






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    (continued) So this approach might change history, causing SOLAS to be adopted much later or not at all.
    $endgroup$
    – Codes with Hammer
    Oct 15 at 15:13


















19
















$begingroup$

Locate crew member Jack Phillips, the ship's "senior wireless operator". Making a few changes to his timeline this evening will increase your chances of survival immensely. The general idea is that the SS Californian was in the vicinity and had the capacity to save essentially everyone on board the Titanic, if only they were aware of the disaster.



On that fateful evening, Phillips had a massive backlog of work. The ship's wireless operator was responsible both for sending and receiving "official" communication as well as personal messages sent by passengers; he was employed by the Marconi radio company (not a ship crewman) who charged a fee for these personal messages, so they were viewed as equal importance as ship-to-ship messages. Phillips spent many hours that evening transmitting overdue personal messages. The transmitter had broken the day before and he was a full day behind on sending these messages. The radio operator on board the Californian transmitted an ice warning at 10:55 PM. Since the Californian was relatively close and the relay station used for personal messages was far away (Newfoundland), the message from the Californian was significantly louder and was drowning out the signals coming in from the Newfoundland relay station. Phillips responded to the Californian's message with a snippy, aggravated "shut up!". The radio operator for the Californian responded to this rude response by shutting off his radio and going to bed for the night. He missed the Titanic's distress calls, and the next closest ship was too far away to respond in time.



You have several options here:



  • Eliminate Phillips' backlog so that he's less stressed and (ideally) can finish the personal messages well before 10PM. Break into his cabin and steal/destroy most of the messages in the outbox. For a less destructive option, explain to him that you just discovered that your three mischievous children have been writing numerous fake telegrams and dropping them into the messages box over the last several days. Apologize for their behavior and ask if you can skim through his outbox and pull out those that look like they were written by your children. Once he's given you access, remove and discard at least half the pile. He should now finish early and be alert and ready at the fateful hour, preventing the rude reply that sent the Californian's operator offline. Keeping them online for a mere half hour would enable them to pick up the initial distress call and respond immediately.

  • Disable the wireless transmitter in a way that you can reverse. The transmitter broke down the previous day, so it wouldn't be too surprising to Phillips if it broke down again. Do this as soon as possible. After Phillips gives up, reports the radio as broken, and goes to bed for the night, you'll sneak into the radio compartment and take his place. The Californian's ice warning comes in at 10:55 PM, so we know their radio operator was working until at least that point. Send a pre-emptive distress message around 10:30 PM. Use both the traditional "CQD" distress code as well as the new "SOS" distress code. By the time the ship hits the iceberg, the Californian should be close enough to shuttle you (and most everybody else) off of the Titanic via lifeboat.

  • Tamper with the radio in a way that leaves it operational, but either reduces the antenna's signal gain considerably or introduces low-level background noise. The goal is to reduce the ship's effective communication range. The Newfoundland relay station was roughly 375 miles away, which is close to the max range for the ship's radio. Cutting the radio's effective range down to ~275 miles means Phillips can't get bogged down with passenger messages, but still has plenty of range to communicate with other ships and send distress signals.

  • Chat up Phillips and talk about how you were in the Army signal corps until a few years ago. Ask whether the ship still has signal lanterns (it does), or if it's all been replaced by that newfangled wireless stuff. Remember where he says the signal lanterns are located. Around 11:10 PM, an officer aboard the Californian attempts to contact an unidentified ship in the distance (the Titanic) via signal lantern, but receives no reply. Man the signal lantern at that time and when you see the Californian's signal, reply. Identify your ship, request emergency assistance, and report your radio is down so they don't try to contact Phillips and get a different story (you haven't actually hit the iceberg yet).

With any of these options, you run the risk of not being able to access the ship's radio room. Fortunately, the radios of the time used relatively primitive "spark-gap" transmitters. It's not that difficult to build one yourself, especially if you have access to modern components (I assume you do since you have a time machine). The antenna for the radio system was a massive wire running between poles mounted at either end of the ship, with a wire running between the middle of the overhead wire and the radio room. If you disconnect that wire and attach it to your radio, you've essentially replaced the ship's onboard radio with your own and you're now the signal officer. Here's hoping you remember Morse code.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I would not recommend sending a pre-emptive distress signal. That's going to raise A LOT of questions during the inevitable investigation, like why there was a distress signal sent BEFORE the collision, or why the distress signal was sent AFTER Phillips went to bed, or why the transmitter suddenly started working again after it was disabled already.
    $endgroup$
    – Nzall
    Oct 16 at 9:13







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Nzall The real distress call went out more than 35 minutes after the collision. Even changing things so that the distress call went out immediately and the Californian was still listening would boost survival odds immensely. If some things don't exactly line up, it's easy to chalk that up to the record keeper recording it wrong due to being distracted by the "not dying" part of the evening.
    $endgroup$
    – bta
    Oct 16 at 20:08










  • $begingroup$
    Regarding bullet point 2, the historical record shows that Titanic did indeed transmit both CQD and SOS. (There are plenty of time traveler observation reports indicating that no time travelers were involved in the choice of which distress signal to send.)
    $endgroup$
    – Codes with Hammer
    Oct 17 at 15:23


















10
















$begingroup$

  1. Get in your time machine and leave.


  2. Bring your own dry suit and Arctic survival gear so you can go in the water without risking your life


  3. Bring your own inflatable life raft


  4. Lock the proper doors so the hoi poloi in steerage can’t get to the life boats, ensuring there is adequate room for you and no pushing and shoving


  5. Use the pistol you brought back with you to force crew members to launch a life boat or the captain’s gig early, before the impact so you are away and clear. Make sure to murder them before you leave so they can’t go whine to the Captain and change events






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Why do you need the crew to launch a life boat? You brought your own raft.
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    Oct 15 at 12:38






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @NuclearWang I presume these are all different options, as in "you could do one of these".
    $endgroup$
    – Inferry
    Oct 15 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @NuclearWang what would you use the raft for, if you've already left in your time machine?
    $endgroup$
    – Nij
    Oct 16 at 7:37


















8
















$begingroup$

Well, from it sounds like, the lower decks for the poor folks were locked off which made it impossible to get outside. So, don't go there.



From what I've seen, the boat rose up and then cracked in half. The middle would be bad because you're going to end up plummeting into the water along with a whole mess of wood, metal, and screaming bodies. I don't recommend that either.



The prow rose the highest and that is probably not a roller coaster ride you would enjoy. If you don't have a way of bracing yourself, that is probably not a good place either.



The furthest part in the back is also probably bad because the impact with the iceberg is going to cause everything to shake violently and anyone on the rear decks are probably going swimming.



Likewise, large rooms filled with glass windows are going to be deadly as everything shatters. Not to mention you're going to have to walk through that.



Crowds in general are going to do what crowds do which means you get a fluid-like dynamics in the panic. This means that your danger is less being crushed by people. The biggest danger is when the "ripples" of people push back, you are most likely to be knocked off your feet. So, having some sort of wall to brace against will help with this too.



So, I'd say near the back and near the lifeboats. Somewhere relatively small and able to handle jostling, such as a linen closet or somewhere you can bounce off the walls, recover, and head to the boats right away.



If you are one of the first on the boat to help others, that would be best for getting on and out of there. I'd also make sure there were better supplies under the seats if you could.



Now, if you happen to fall in the water, I highly recommend you avoid massive wooden doors with just one person on them. They don't share and you are going to dramatically drown.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    There is reason to believe that the breaking actually happened mostly under water, and the prow sank first, as the stern rose the highest. Here is well done illustrative CGI of the sinking.
    $endgroup$
    – Backup Plan
    Oct 15 at 11:39






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Are you the only person on the planet not to have seen the movie? It actually did a fairly faithful reconstruction of the sinking (we have extensive witness testimony of the events): The "prow" (front) sank first, the "impact" with the iceberg was a glancing blow that led to some vibration and rumbling but no great destruction, there was very little panic at least until the end.
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Bravo
    Oct 15 at 12:24


















8
















$begingroup$

Get first class and dress as a rich woman of that time



First class women had the best chances of survival.

Get hold of a first class location and/or ticket.



Even if you are female, you need to get conforming clothes, your 21st century wear needs to be recognized as 100% female in an emergency, you cannot risk it.

If you are male, you also need to shave and you need to do it as soon as possible.



Your best chance for obtaining the needed clothes is kidnapping or seducing a drunk passenger from first class. In case you go for kidnapping, you can try going for a seasick first class female passenger.



If you get the chance to prepare for the journey, you go for Miss Edith Corse as to not interfere with the survivor list.



Source for chart.
Chart source: https://rstudio-pubs-static.s3.amazonaws.com/185508_5c6b7ef40dd9438b82239c4b57ec9ab4.html






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Oh no! All of the child laborers employed on the Titanic died? The monsters! :P
    $endgroup$
    – bvoyelr
    Oct 15 at 13:48


















6
















$begingroup$

You must demand entry aboard the SS Californian.



The Californian was roughly 5 miles away from the Titanic after it struck ice. Because it was so close, the idea of rescue was not out of the question. Therefore, you should volunteer to enter a life boat headed towards the Californian when they are first launched.



It is, however, well-known that the Californian ignored emergency rockets and the Marconi wireless operator was not at his station during the crisis. However you choose to convince Captain Stanley Lord is up to you.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Five miles is a long way to row a lifeboat. By the time you get there, get aboard, and get back, the Titanic will have sunk.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Oct 15 at 21:55






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mark Why do you need to get back?
    $endgroup$
    – Azor Ahai
    Oct 15 at 23:23










  • $begingroup$
    @AzorAhai, to bring the Californian with you.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Oct 15 at 23:28






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @Mark The question doesn't ask how to save anyone but the OP
    $endgroup$
    – Azor Ahai
    Oct 15 at 23:28


















6
















$begingroup$

Find "Rose's door"



I mean this seriously, but figuratively.



In the movie, the floating door was how Rose survived. It was a literary device to allow a believable, yet unexpected way for her to live to tell her story.



Create "Rose's door" for your story. It could be a paddle, maybe some kind of semi-waterproof wrapping, a makeshift wetsuit, or even a buoyant bathtub. You might even survive by floating in your time machine itself.



That would be the "least likely to contaminate the timeline" while allowing you to be witness to more.



Think "fly on the wall", or "Rose on the door". Be creative and inventive.




Note on comedy:



If you are going for some comedy, you could make it an actual door, perhaps even drop a line, "I remember someone survived by floating on a door." Especially in time travel, some tongue-in-cheek humor makes the medicine go down. Comedy often plays a role in time travel, consider Back to the Future or Avengers: End Game where Captain America fights himself.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$






















    3
















    $begingroup$

    1. Travel first-class (or if you're transporting directly onto the ship without a ticket, make every effort to look like a first-class passenger). This gives you a 62% chance of survival, compared to an overall 32%. Since you're a time traveler, I assume that you've already gotten rich from bringing back winning lottery numbers and stock quotes from the future, so this will be easy.

    2. If you're a woman, you've got it made, as long as you're on the boat deck while there are still lifeboats left to launch. If you're a man, then make sure to be on the starboard side of the ship, where Officer Murdoch was more willing to let men into boats than his counterpart Lightoller on the port side.

    3. If it's getting late in the sinking do not follow the crowd towards the stern, as they'll mostly be doomed. Instead, head forward towards the officer's quarters, where the four collapsible lifeboats are kept. These will be the last boats to leave the ship. Volunteer to help launch these boats, as the crew will be struggling with them.





    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      point 3 about the crew lifeboats is excellent
      $endgroup$
      – Pureferret
      Oct 16 at 14:15


















    2
















    $begingroup$

    I think the most reliable way to survive would be to get the radiation suit off (they're very good at helping people sink) and get back to the time-machine. You're wearing a radiation suit meaning at best you'll get funny looks from everyone - which while it might seem it won't matter (since most of them will die anyway) could seriously impact the timeline.



    In addition, you don't actually need to jump too far. A jump of 30 minutes after the sinking will have you in the water just as the Caroathia is arriving.



    The joy of this, is that it was pure luck that they were able to locate the survivors at all, since they had drifted and only a flare alerted the rescue teams to the new location. By making that jump just a little further; you can be the one that happened to look the right way at the right time to see the flare. (if one was ever launched!)






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$






















      0
















      $begingroup$

      I would attempt to steal a lifeboat and depart from the ship prior to the accident.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 2




        $begingroup$
        There weren't any reports of such a thing happening, so that may fall afoul of the requiremen to avoid changing the timeline as much as possible.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 16 at 10:58










      • $begingroup$
        Because they had the correct number of lifeboats, you mean?
        $endgroup$
        – Innovine
        Oct 16 at 22:08










      • $begingroup$
        As far as I'm aware, yes. I'd like to think that such a thing would have been noticed during the post-accident investigation, but I've no idea how reliable or thorough such things were.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 17 at 8:57






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @StarfishPrime Titanic was only carrying two thirds of the maximum number of lifeboats, so there were already empty places on the deck. Several went down with the ship, and their location and condition were undetermined for many years.. OP may scuttle the boat after viewing the disaster, and no one would be the wiser.
        $endgroup$
        – Innovine
        Oct 17 at 19:19











      • $begingroup$
        @Innovine: None of Titanic's lifeboats went down with the ship. A couple floated off the ship without being properly launched, but people were able to take refuge on them.
        $endgroup$
        – dan04
        Oct 20 at 15:31


















      -3
















      $begingroup$

      Are you planning on coming back to your own time? If your time machine is on the Titanic then obviously it's going down with it. Unless you joined in port and the machine is there, in which case you're obviously having an extended visit during which you'll already have had to blend in during the journey, and will have to continue to do so until you can get back to Southampton/Cherbourg/Cobh to collect the machine.



      In either case, the simplest answer would seem to be to research somebody who is known to have survived, including which lifeboat they were in (or how else they survived).



      Kill them before the journey (if on board since port) or at least before the ship sinks (otherwise). Although the latter may not be necessary - perhaps the always drowned and you're the one recorded as having survived. Take their lifeboat seat, and you're safe.



      If you're not planning on returning to your own time, you'll need to keep up the pretence of being this person, so best to choose someone you bear a physical resemblance to, without close family (maybe the whole family die on board?). If possible, make some previous reconnaissance trips to learn more about the individual, or even introduce yourself to some people as them in order to help maintain the fiction.



      If you are planning to return, pick someone who was died shortly afterwards. This actually works out simpler if you've been on board since port, since you just kill them before the trip and stash the body, take the trip as them, then when you return to collect your time machine you leave there body to be discovered as it always was.



      Finally, killing them before the trip rather than on board (or just letting them die in the sinking) is probably preferable since at least you know before you board that it's you that survives. Otherwise maybe something goes wrong and it is actually them, and you're lost with the ship.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Seems like overkill (literally) to murder someone for their seat on a lifeboat, considering that there were plenty of empty seats. Why not do some research to find one of the half-empty lifeboats and go there instead?
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Oct 15 at 15:17







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Oh definitely, if the only goal is surviving. I was possibly focusing too much on the "changing the timeline as little as possible" aspect. Given there's a fair bit of detail about the survivors, adding a new one might have undesired repercussions
        $endgroup$
        – Mohirl
        Oct 15 at 15:47










      • $begingroup$
        There were several Titanic passengers who were travelling under fake identities. Adding one more wouldn't change history that much.
        $endgroup$
        – dan04
        Oct 20 at 15:35


















      -4
















      $begingroup$

      Titanic struck the iceberg at 23:40 local time.



      1. At 23:20, yell "Man overboard". Make as much noise to warn the bridge, namely First Officer Murdoch, that someone fell overboard and tried to die by suicide.

      You can overstate your lie by alleging that you were trying to talk him/her out of suicide, but (s)he jumped anyways.



      Murdoch would then order the ship to stop and find this person. If he does, then the Titanic would've stopped right before hitting the iceberg. And you can point to the iceberg that you saved everyone from!



      I got this idea from Rose DeWitt's attempted suicide in the 1997 movie.



      1. Bring a LED flashlight that can output at least 53K lumens. Then at 23:30, go to the bow and shine it in front so that the lookouts and Officer Murdoch will see the iceberg.

      Reddit has a video clip of such a flashlight. Does anyone know how to embed it in-line?






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 5




        $begingroup$
        The question text includes "One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg." (emphasis added)
        $endgroup$
        – Nij
        Oct 16 at 7:48










      • $begingroup$
        Even if this light reaches 2 km away would that be enough for the Titanic to stop?
        $endgroup$
        – gerrit
        Oct 16 at 15:10


















      16 Answers
      16






      active

      oldest

      votes








      16 Answers
      16






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      97
















      $begingroup$

      Befriend and hang out with fellow passenger, Margaret (Molly/Maggie) Brown then follow her to lifeboat #6 which historically will have available seats.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 24




        $begingroup$
        While going to a lifeboat with historically available seats appears like a good idea, stay away from boat #6 (or all portside boats for that matter) if you are neither a woman nor a child. Apparantly, the officers in charge of the lifeboats interpreted the order to let "women and children" down differently and male passengers were entirely denied entry to portside boats while they were awarded free seats on starboard boats if no women or children were near.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 12:58







      • 17




        $begingroup$
        For boat #6 in particular, the article says (my emphasis/annotations): "While being lowered, pleas from women in the boat for additional oarsmen forced Lightoller to solicit the crowd on deck for anyone who had sailing experience. Major Arthur Godfrey Peuchen of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club volunteered, shimmying down the falls (ropes) into the boat. Peuchen was the only male passenger whom Second Officer Lightoller permitted to board a [portside] lifeboat."
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 13:06







      • 31




        $begingroup$
        Since it had free seats historically, wouldn't getting in one change that fact, removing this SO answer from existence?
        $endgroup$
        – Parrotmaster
        Oct 15 at 13:33






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        If it had more than 1 free seat, the narrative remains the same. History will not care if it had 5 free seats or 6, just as long as he is not taking the last one.
        $endgroup$
        – Nosajimiki
        Oct 15 at 15:09






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @KalleMP, we don't... and this is exactly why I was advising to try to board on the starboard side instead if (and only if) they were neither a woman nor a child (or, in fact, could be mistaken for one) in the original comment.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 16 at 1:41















      97
















      $begingroup$

      Befriend and hang out with fellow passenger, Margaret (Molly/Maggie) Brown then follow her to lifeboat #6 which historically will have available seats.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 24




        $begingroup$
        While going to a lifeboat with historically available seats appears like a good idea, stay away from boat #6 (or all portside boats for that matter) if you are neither a woman nor a child. Apparantly, the officers in charge of the lifeboats interpreted the order to let "women and children" down differently and male passengers were entirely denied entry to portside boats while they were awarded free seats on starboard boats if no women or children were near.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 12:58







      • 17




        $begingroup$
        For boat #6 in particular, the article says (my emphasis/annotations): "While being lowered, pleas from women in the boat for additional oarsmen forced Lightoller to solicit the crowd on deck for anyone who had sailing experience. Major Arthur Godfrey Peuchen of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club volunteered, shimmying down the falls (ropes) into the boat. Peuchen was the only male passenger whom Second Officer Lightoller permitted to board a [portside] lifeboat."
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 13:06







      • 31




        $begingroup$
        Since it had free seats historically, wouldn't getting in one change that fact, removing this SO answer from existence?
        $endgroup$
        – Parrotmaster
        Oct 15 at 13:33






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        If it had more than 1 free seat, the narrative remains the same. History will not care if it had 5 free seats or 6, just as long as he is not taking the last one.
        $endgroup$
        – Nosajimiki
        Oct 15 at 15:09






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @KalleMP, we don't... and this is exactly why I was advising to try to board on the starboard side instead if (and only if) they were neither a woman nor a child (or, in fact, could be mistaken for one) in the original comment.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 16 at 1:41













      97














      97










      97







      $begingroup$

      Befriend and hang out with fellow passenger, Margaret (Molly/Maggie) Brown then follow her to lifeboat #6 which historically will have available seats.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



      Befriend and hang out with fellow passenger, Margaret (Molly/Maggie) Brown then follow her to lifeboat #6 which historically will have available seats.







      share|improve this answer













      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer










      answered Oct 15 at 1:41









      Henry TaylorHenry Taylor

      52.1k10 gold badges83 silver badges191 bronze badges




      52.1k10 gold badges83 silver badges191 bronze badges










      • 24




        $begingroup$
        While going to a lifeboat with historically available seats appears like a good idea, stay away from boat #6 (or all portside boats for that matter) if you are neither a woman nor a child. Apparantly, the officers in charge of the lifeboats interpreted the order to let "women and children" down differently and male passengers were entirely denied entry to portside boats while they were awarded free seats on starboard boats if no women or children were near.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 12:58







      • 17




        $begingroup$
        For boat #6 in particular, the article says (my emphasis/annotations): "While being lowered, pleas from women in the boat for additional oarsmen forced Lightoller to solicit the crowd on deck for anyone who had sailing experience. Major Arthur Godfrey Peuchen of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club volunteered, shimmying down the falls (ropes) into the boat. Peuchen was the only male passenger whom Second Officer Lightoller permitted to board a [portside] lifeboat."
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 13:06







      • 31




        $begingroup$
        Since it had free seats historically, wouldn't getting in one change that fact, removing this SO answer from existence?
        $endgroup$
        – Parrotmaster
        Oct 15 at 13:33






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        If it had more than 1 free seat, the narrative remains the same. History will not care if it had 5 free seats or 6, just as long as he is not taking the last one.
        $endgroup$
        – Nosajimiki
        Oct 15 at 15:09






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @KalleMP, we don't... and this is exactly why I was advising to try to board on the starboard side instead if (and only if) they were neither a woman nor a child (or, in fact, could be mistaken for one) in the original comment.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 16 at 1:41












      • 24




        $begingroup$
        While going to a lifeboat with historically available seats appears like a good idea, stay away from boat #6 (or all portside boats for that matter) if you are neither a woman nor a child. Apparantly, the officers in charge of the lifeboats interpreted the order to let "women and children" down differently and male passengers were entirely denied entry to portside boats while they were awarded free seats on starboard boats if no women or children were near.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 12:58







      • 17




        $begingroup$
        For boat #6 in particular, the article says (my emphasis/annotations): "While being lowered, pleas from women in the boat for additional oarsmen forced Lightoller to solicit the crowd on deck for anyone who had sailing experience. Major Arthur Godfrey Peuchen of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club volunteered, shimmying down the falls (ropes) into the boat. Peuchen was the only male passenger whom Second Officer Lightoller permitted to board a [portside] lifeboat."
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 15 at 13:06







      • 31




        $begingroup$
        Since it had free seats historically, wouldn't getting in one change that fact, removing this SO answer from existence?
        $endgroup$
        – Parrotmaster
        Oct 15 at 13:33






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        If it had more than 1 free seat, the narrative remains the same. History will not care if it had 5 free seats or 6, just as long as he is not taking the last one.
        $endgroup$
        – Nosajimiki
        Oct 15 at 15:09






      • 4




        $begingroup$
        @KalleMP, we don't... and this is exactly why I was advising to try to board on the starboard side instead if (and only if) they were neither a woman nor a child (or, in fact, could be mistaken for one) in the original comment.
        $endgroup$
        – inVader
        Oct 16 at 1:41







      24




      24




      $begingroup$
      While going to a lifeboat with historically available seats appears like a good idea, stay away from boat #6 (or all portside boats for that matter) if you are neither a woman nor a child. Apparantly, the officers in charge of the lifeboats interpreted the order to let "women and children" down differently and male passengers were entirely denied entry to portside boats while they were awarded free seats on starboard boats if no women or children were near.
      $endgroup$
      – inVader
      Oct 15 at 12:58





      $begingroup$
      While going to a lifeboat with historically available seats appears like a good idea, stay away from boat #6 (or all portside boats for that matter) if you are neither a woman nor a child. Apparantly, the officers in charge of the lifeboats interpreted the order to let "women and children" down differently and male passengers were entirely denied entry to portside boats while they were awarded free seats on starboard boats if no women or children were near.
      $endgroup$
      – inVader
      Oct 15 at 12:58





      17




      17




      $begingroup$
      For boat #6 in particular, the article says (my emphasis/annotations): "While being lowered, pleas from women in the boat for additional oarsmen forced Lightoller to solicit the crowd on deck for anyone who had sailing experience. Major Arthur Godfrey Peuchen of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club volunteered, shimmying down the falls (ropes) into the boat. Peuchen was the only male passenger whom Second Officer Lightoller permitted to board a [portside] lifeboat."
      $endgroup$
      – inVader
      Oct 15 at 13:06





      $begingroup$
      For boat #6 in particular, the article says (my emphasis/annotations): "While being lowered, pleas from women in the boat for additional oarsmen forced Lightoller to solicit the crowd on deck for anyone who had sailing experience. Major Arthur Godfrey Peuchen of the Royal Canadian Yacht Club volunteered, shimmying down the falls (ropes) into the boat. Peuchen was the only male passenger whom Second Officer Lightoller permitted to board a [portside] lifeboat."
      $endgroup$
      – inVader
      Oct 15 at 13:06





      31




      31




      $begingroup$
      Since it had free seats historically, wouldn't getting in one change that fact, removing this SO answer from existence?
      $endgroup$
      – Parrotmaster
      Oct 15 at 13:33




      $begingroup$
      Since it had free seats historically, wouldn't getting in one change that fact, removing this SO answer from existence?
      $endgroup$
      – Parrotmaster
      Oct 15 at 13:33




      8




      8




      $begingroup$
      If it had more than 1 free seat, the narrative remains the same. History will not care if it had 5 free seats or 6, just as long as he is not taking the last one.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      Oct 15 at 15:09




      $begingroup$
      If it had more than 1 free seat, the narrative remains the same. History will not care if it had 5 free seats or 6, just as long as he is not taking the last one.
      $endgroup$
      – Nosajimiki
      Oct 15 at 15:09




      4




      4




      $begingroup$
      @KalleMP, we don't... and this is exactly why I was advising to try to board on the starboard side instead if (and only if) they were neither a woman nor a child (or, in fact, could be mistaken for one) in the original comment.
      $endgroup$
      – inVader
      Oct 16 at 1:41




      $begingroup$
      @KalleMP, we don't... and this is exactly why I was advising to try to board on the starboard side instead if (and only if) they were neither a woman nor a child (or, in fact, could be mistaken for one) in the original comment.
      $endgroup$
      – inVader
      Oct 16 at 1:41













      72
















      $begingroup$

      As soon as a lifeboat launches, volunteer to be in it.



      At first there were quite a lot of people who hesitated to go into a little wooden boat in the middle of the Atlantic, when the big reassuring liner still had power and light and was merely stopped.




      Here is the wikipedia link looked up by DevSolar. Pryftan is right, a source never hurts.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 13




        $begingroup$
        Do you have a source for that information? I'm not disbelieving you I just think it would improve the answer and would be for interesting reading.
        $endgroup$
        – Pryftan
        Oct 15 at 11:38






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        Early lifeboats were undermanned. I don't think this needs specific sourcing...
        $endgroup$
        – DevSolar
        Oct 15 at 14:40










      • $begingroup$
        Specific sourcing helps, but I think the knowledge that nobody back then expected the Titanic to sink was pretty common by now. (Spoiler alert it sank...)
        $endgroup$
        – Nelson
        Oct 16 at 3:32











      • $begingroup$
        The article that @DevSolar posted should be its own answer. It lets you pick the perfect boat to be on depending on your preference of company and when exactly you'd like to be picked up.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom
        Oct 16 at 10:45















      72
















      $begingroup$

      As soon as a lifeboat launches, volunteer to be in it.



      At first there were quite a lot of people who hesitated to go into a little wooden boat in the middle of the Atlantic, when the big reassuring liner still had power and light and was merely stopped.




      Here is the wikipedia link looked up by DevSolar. Pryftan is right, a source never hurts.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 13




        $begingroup$
        Do you have a source for that information? I'm not disbelieving you I just think it would improve the answer and would be for interesting reading.
        $endgroup$
        – Pryftan
        Oct 15 at 11:38






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        Early lifeboats were undermanned. I don't think this needs specific sourcing...
        $endgroup$
        – DevSolar
        Oct 15 at 14:40










      • $begingroup$
        Specific sourcing helps, but I think the knowledge that nobody back then expected the Titanic to sink was pretty common by now. (Spoiler alert it sank...)
        $endgroup$
        – Nelson
        Oct 16 at 3:32











      • $begingroup$
        The article that @DevSolar posted should be its own answer. It lets you pick the perfect boat to be on depending on your preference of company and when exactly you'd like to be picked up.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom
        Oct 16 at 10:45













      72














      72










      72







      $begingroup$

      As soon as a lifeboat launches, volunteer to be in it.



      At first there were quite a lot of people who hesitated to go into a little wooden boat in the middle of the Atlantic, when the big reassuring liner still had power and light and was merely stopped.




      Here is the wikipedia link looked up by DevSolar. Pryftan is right, a source never hurts.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      As soon as a lifeboat launches, volunteer to be in it.



      At first there were quite a lot of people who hesitated to go into a little wooden boat in the middle of the Atlantic, when the big reassuring liner still had power and light and was merely stopped.




      Here is the wikipedia link looked up by DevSolar. Pryftan is right, a source never hurts.







      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 15 at 15:52

























      answered Oct 15 at 4:35









      o.m.o.m.

      70k7 gold badges105 silver badges235 bronze badges




      70k7 gold badges105 silver badges235 bronze badges










      • 13




        $begingroup$
        Do you have a source for that information? I'm not disbelieving you I just think it would improve the answer and would be for interesting reading.
        $endgroup$
        – Pryftan
        Oct 15 at 11:38






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        Early lifeboats were undermanned. I don't think this needs specific sourcing...
        $endgroup$
        – DevSolar
        Oct 15 at 14:40










      • $begingroup$
        Specific sourcing helps, but I think the knowledge that nobody back then expected the Titanic to sink was pretty common by now. (Spoiler alert it sank...)
        $endgroup$
        – Nelson
        Oct 16 at 3:32











      • $begingroup$
        The article that @DevSolar posted should be its own answer. It lets you pick the perfect boat to be on depending on your preference of company and when exactly you'd like to be picked up.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom
        Oct 16 at 10:45












      • 13




        $begingroup$
        Do you have a source for that information? I'm not disbelieving you I just think it would improve the answer and would be for interesting reading.
        $endgroup$
        – Pryftan
        Oct 15 at 11:38






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        Early lifeboats were undermanned. I don't think this needs specific sourcing...
        $endgroup$
        – DevSolar
        Oct 15 at 14:40










      • $begingroup$
        Specific sourcing helps, but I think the knowledge that nobody back then expected the Titanic to sink was pretty common by now. (Spoiler alert it sank...)
        $endgroup$
        – Nelson
        Oct 16 at 3:32











      • $begingroup$
        The article that @DevSolar posted should be its own answer. It lets you pick the perfect boat to be on depending on your preference of company and when exactly you'd like to be picked up.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom
        Oct 16 at 10:45







      13




      13




      $begingroup$
      Do you have a source for that information? I'm not disbelieving you I just think it would improve the answer and would be for interesting reading.
      $endgroup$
      – Pryftan
      Oct 15 at 11:38




      $begingroup$
      Do you have a source for that information? I'm not disbelieving you I just think it would improve the answer and would be for interesting reading.
      $endgroup$
      – Pryftan
      Oct 15 at 11:38




      11




      11




      $begingroup$
      Early lifeboats were undermanned. I don't think this needs specific sourcing...
      $endgroup$
      – DevSolar
      Oct 15 at 14:40




      $begingroup$
      Early lifeboats were undermanned. I don't think this needs specific sourcing...
      $endgroup$
      – DevSolar
      Oct 15 at 14:40












      $begingroup$
      Specific sourcing helps, but I think the knowledge that nobody back then expected the Titanic to sink was pretty common by now. (Spoiler alert it sank...)
      $endgroup$
      – Nelson
      Oct 16 at 3:32





      $begingroup$
      Specific sourcing helps, but I think the knowledge that nobody back then expected the Titanic to sink was pretty common by now. (Spoiler alert it sank...)
      $endgroup$
      – Nelson
      Oct 16 at 3:32













      $begingroup$
      The article that @DevSolar posted should be its own answer. It lets you pick the perfect boat to be on depending on your preference of company and when exactly you'd like to be picked up.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom
      Oct 16 at 10:45




      $begingroup$
      The article that @DevSolar posted should be its own answer. It lets you pick the perfect boat to be on depending on your preference of company and when exactly you'd like to be picked up.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom
      Oct 16 at 10:45











      46
















      $begingroup$

      Buy a first class ticket



      enter image description here



      If you had a child with you would increase it more. You could also have your life jacket with you and wait near the lifeboats. Being a woman would also increase the odds.




      Even if you were a first-class passenger with a higher likelihood of
      getting a seat in a lifeboat, your chances of getting that seat
      increased if you were a woman or child. The “women and children first”
      rule applied when loading the lifeboats, although the rule wasn’t
      strictly or equally enforced. If a lifeboat was about to be launched
      on the starboard side and empty seats were available, men could take
      the seats if no women or children were at hand to take them. On the
      port side, however, it was more apt to be “women and children only” —
      very few men escaped the ship from this side. So if you were a man,
      your chances of survival were greatly increased by going starboard, as
      opposed to going port.




      Titanic passenger survival rates






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 12




        $begingroup$
        Correlation is not causation. There may be other reasons why first-class passengers had a higher survival rate, like where on the ship their rooms were located, where they typically spent their time (both of which can likely fully be counteracted if you knew when the ship would start sinking) or the demographics (and general mindset) of each class. Or were first-class passengers specifically prioritised when loading life boats? The latter quote has a similar problem - there may simply have been fewer men on the port side (which could end up that a man is more likely to survive on that side).
        $endgroup$
        – NotThatGuy
        Oct 15 at 12:08







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Gee so it wasn't because the third class passengers were locked downstairs while the first class got loaded on the boats? Good to know.....
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 15 at 19:36






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne No. All classes of women and children had higher survival rates than first class men. abisaab.wordpress.com/interesting-facts/survival-rates-by-class
        $endgroup$
        – DrMcCleod
        Oct 15 at 20:10






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne Evacuation of 3rd class passengers was less prompt than for others, but the claim that 3rd class passengers were locked below while the ship sank is a myth, possibly caused by confusion with the fact that they were segregated from other classes during the voyage. See e.g. timmaltin.com/2019/04/23/third-class-passengers-titanic
        $endgroup$
        – Geoffrey Brent
        Oct 16 at 1:35






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The impact will occur in 5 hours, and the person in already onboard. There are no ticket sales points on the actual boat when its underway. What kind of silly answer is this, and how did it get 38 upvotes, what is wrong with this community
        $endgroup$
        – Innovine
        Oct 16 at 10:42
















      46
















      $begingroup$

      Buy a first class ticket



      enter image description here



      If you had a child with you would increase it more. You could also have your life jacket with you and wait near the lifeboats. Being a woman would also increase the odds.




      Even if you were a first-class passenger with a higher likelihood of
      getting a seat in a lifeboat, your chances of getting that seat
      increased if you were a woman or child. The “women and children first”
      rule applied when loading the lifeboats, although the rule wasn’t
      strictly or equally enforced. If a lifeboat was about to be launched
      on the starboard side and empty seats were available, men could take
      the seats if no women or children were at hand to take them. On the
      port side, however, it was more apt to be “women and children only” —
      very few men escaped the ship from this side. So if you were a man,
      your chances of survival were greatly increased by going starboard, as
      opposed to going port.




      Titanic passenger survival rates






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 12




        $begingroup$
        Correlation is not causation. There may be other reasons why first-class passengers had a higher survival rate, like where on the ship their rooms were located, where they typically spent their time (both of which can likely fully be counteracted if you knew when the ship would start sinking) or the demographics (and general mindset) of each class. Or were first-class passengers specifically prioritised when loading life boats? The latter quote has a similar problem - there may simply have been fewer men on the port side (which could end up that a man is more likely to survive on that side).
        $endgroup$
        – NotThatGuy
        Oct 15 at 12:08







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Gee so it wasn't because the third class passengers were locked downstairs while the first class got loaded on the boats? Good to know.....
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 15 at 19:36






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne No. All classes of women and children had higher survival rates than first class men. abisaab.wordpress.com/interesting-facts/survival-rates-by-class
        $endgroup$
        – DrMcCleod
        Oct 15 at 20:10






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne Evacuation of 3rd class passengers was less prompt than for others, but the claim that 3rd class passengers were locked below while the ship sank is a myth, possibly caused by confusion with the fact that they were segregated from other classes during the voyage. See e.g. timmaltin.com/2019/04/23/third-class-passengers-titanic
        $endgroup$
        – Geoffrey Brent
        Oct 16 at 1:35






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The impact will occur in 5 hours, and the person in already onboard. There are no ticket sales points on the actual boat when its underway. What kind of silly answer is this, and how did it get 38 upvotes, what is wrong with this community
        $endgroup$
        – Innovine
        Oct 16 at 10:42














      46














      46










      46







      $begingroup$

      Buy a first class ticket



      enter image description here



      If you had a child with you would increase it more. You could also have your life jacket with you and wait near the lifeboats. Being a woman would also increase the odds.




      Even if you were a first-class passenger with a higher likelihood of
      getting a seat in a lifeboat, your chances of getting that seat
      increased if you were a woman or child. The “women and children first”
      rule applied when loading the lifeboats, although the rule wasn’t
      strictly or equally enforced. If a lifeboat was about to be launched
      on the starboard side and empty seats were available, men could take
      the seats if no women or children were at hand to take them. On the
      port side, however, it was more apt to be “women and children only” —
      very few men escaped the ship from this side. So if you were a man,
      your chances of survival were greatly increased by going starboard, as
      opposed to going port.




      Titanic passenger survival rates






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



      Buy a first class ticket



      enter image description here



      If you had a child with you would increase it more. You could also have your life jacket with you and wait near the lifeboats. Being a woman would also increase the odds.




      Even if you were a first-class passenger with a higher likelihood of
      getting a seat in a lifeboat, your chances of getting that seat
      increased if you were a woman or child. The “women and children first”
      rule applied when loading the lifeboats, although the rule wasn’t
      strictly or equally enforced. If a lifeboat was about to be launched
      on the starboard side and empty seats were available, men could take
      the seats if no women or children were at hand to take them. On the
      port side, however, it was more apt to be “women and children only” —
      very few men escaped the ship from this side. So if you were a man,
      your chances of survival were greatly increased by going starboard, as
      opposed to going port.




      Titanic passenger survival rates







      share|improve this answer













      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer










      answered Oct 15 at 1:57









      ThorneThorne

      26.5k6 gold badges42 silver badges84 bronze badges




      26.5k6 gold badges42 silver badges84 bronze badges










      • 12




        $begingroup$
        Correlation is not causation. There may be other reasons why first-class passengers had a higher survival rate, like where on the ship their rooms were located, where they typically spent their time (both of which can likely fully be counteracted if you knew when the ship would start sinking) or the demographics (and general mindset) of each class. Or were first-class passengers specifically prioritised when loading life boats? The latter quote has a similar problem - there may simply have been fewer men on the port side (which could end up that a man is more likely to survive on that side).
        $endgroup$
        – NotThatGuy
        Oct 15 at 12:08







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Gee so it wasn't because the third class passengers were locked downstairs while the first class got loaded on the boats? Good to know.....
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 15 at 19:36






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne No. All classes of women and children had higher survival rates than first class men. abisaab.wordpress.com/interesting-facts/survival-rates-by-class
        $endgroup$
        – DrMcCleod
        Oct 15 at 20:10






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne Evacuation of 3rd class passengers was less prompt than for others, but the claim that 3rd class passengers were locked below while the ship sank is a myth, possibly caused by confusion with the fact that they were segregated from other classes during the voyage. See e.g. timmaltin.com/2019/04/23/third-class-passengers-titanic
        $endgroup$
        – Geoffrey Brent
        Oct 16 at 1:35






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The impact will occur in 5 hours, and the person in already onboard. There are no ticket sales points on the actual boat when its underway. What kind of silly answer is this, and how did it get 38 upvotes, what is wrong with this community
        $endgroup$
        – Innovine
        Oct 16 at 10:42













      • 12




        $begingroup$
        Correlation is not causation. There may be other reasons why first-class passengers had a higher survival rate, like where on the ship their rooms were located, where they typically spent their time (both of which can likely fully be counteracted if you knew when the ship would start sinking) or the demographics (and general mindset) of each class. Or were first-class passengers specifically prioritised when loading life boats? The latter quote has a similar problem - there may simply have been fewer men on the port side (which could end up that a man is more likely to survive on that side).
        $endgroup$
        – NotThatGuy
        Oct 15 at 12:08







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Gee so it wasn't because the third class passengers were locked downstairs while the first class got loaded on the boats? Good to know.....
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 15 at 19:36






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne No. All classes of women and children had higher survival rates than first class men. abisaab.wordpress.com/interesting-facts/survival-rates-by-class
        $endgroup$
        – DrMcCleod
        Oct 15 at 20:10






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @Thorne Evacuation of 3rd class passengers was less prompt than for others, but the claim that 3rd class passengers were locked below while the ship sank is a myth, possibly caused by confusion with the fact that they were segregated from other classes during the voyage. See e.g. timmaltin.com/2019/04/23/third-class-passengers-titanic
        $endgroup$
        – Geoffrey Brent
        Oct 16 at 1:35






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The impact will occur in 5 hours, and the person in already onboard. There are no ticket sales points on the actual boat when its underway. What kind of silly answer is this, and how did it get 38 upvotes, what is wrong with this community
        $endgroup$
        – Innovine
        Oct 16 at 10:42








      12




      12




      $begingroup$
      Correlation is not causation. There may be other reasons why first-class passengers had a higher survival rate, like where on the ship their rooms were located, where they typically spent their time (both of which can likely fully be counteracted if you knew when the ship would start sinking) or the demographics (and general mindset) of each class. Or were first-class passengers specifically prioritised when loading life boats? The latter quote has a similar problem - there may simply have been fewer men on the port side (which could end up that a man is more likely to survive on that side).
      $endgroup$
      – NotThatGuy
      Oct 15 at 12:08





      $begingroup$
      Correlation is not causation. There may be other reasons why first-class passengers had a higher survival rate, like where on the ship their rooms were located, where they typically spent their time (both of which can likely fully be counteracted if you knew when the ship would start sinking) or the demographics (and general mindset) of each class. Or were first-class passengers specifically prioritised when loading life boats? The latter quote has a similar problem - there may simply have been fewer men on the port side (which could end up that a man is more likely to survive on that side).
      $endgroup$
      – NotThatGuy
      Oct 15 at 12:08





      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      Gee so it wasn't because the third class passengers were locked downstairs while the first class got loaded on the boats? Good to know.....
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      Oct 15 at 19:36




      $begingroup$
      Gee so it wasn't because the third class passengers were locked downstairs while the first class got loaded on the boats? Good to know.....
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      Oct 15 at 19:36




      5




      5




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne No. All classes of women and children had higher survival rates than first class men. abisaab.wordpress.com/interesting-facts/survival-rates-by-class
      $endgroup$
      – DrMcCleod
      Oct 15 at 20:10




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne No. All classes of women and children had higher survival rates than first class men. abisaab.wordpress.com/interesting-facts/survival-rates-by-class
      $endgroup$
      – DrMcCleod
      Oct 15 at 20:10




      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne Evacuation of 3rd class passengers was less prompt than for others, but the claim that 3rd class passengers were locked below while the ship sank is a myth, possibly caused by confusion with the fact that they were segregated from other classes during the voyage. See e.g. timmaltin.com/2019/04/23/third-class-passengers-titanic
      $endgroup$
      – Geoffrey Brent
      Oct 16 at 1:35




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne Evacuation of 3rd class passengers was less prompt than for others, but the claim that 3rd class passengers were locked below while the ship sank is a myth, possibly caused by confusion with the fact that they were segregated from other classes during the voyage. See e.g. timmaltin.com/2019/04/23/third-class-passengers-titanic
      $endgroup$
      – Geoffrey Brent
      Oct 16 at 1:35




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      The impact will occur in 5 hours, and the person in already onboard. There are no ticket sales points on the actual boat when its underway. What kind of silly answer is this, and how did it get 38 upvotes, what is wrong with this community
      $endgroup$
      – Innovine
      Oct 16 at 10:42





      $begingroup$
      The impact will occur in 5 hours, and the person in already onboard. There are no ticket sales points on the actual boat when its underway. What kind of silly answer is this, and how did it get 38 upvotes, what is wrong with this community
      $endgroup$
      – Innovine
      Oct 16 at 10:42












      43
















      $begingroup$

      You're on deck, which is the most important thing. Your survival odds are already waaay up.



      It'll be cold on deck. Wear a big coat. Underneath your coat, wear a good dry suit with some high-quality thermals underneath (possibly battery heated ones). The photos on the Wikipedia page notwithstanding, a drysuit needn't make you look like an astronaut, especially a suit that's intended for short term use whilst swimming, not diving.



      Even if you don't get into a boat (and as the other answers have said, you should be able to do this) you'll be vastly better off than anyone else in the water. The lifeboats didn't move far away from site of the sinking, but they did not dare to return to collect swimmers for fear of being swamped and overturned. As a result, most of the swimmers died of hypothermia, but you don't need to let that happen to you. Swim out to the boats... one of them will eventually let you on board, or haul yourself up onto one of the bigger bits of debris and await rescue.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 22




        $begingroup$
        This. Most who died very likely died of hypothermia. With a dry suit, a PFD and a whistle, you can tread water for hours until help arrives and then signal for them. Trying to get on a lifeboat carries the risk of failure -- this very nearly eliminates that risk. Granted, staying under the radar will be out the window when you're pulled out of the water completely comfortable and wearing a strange outfit. Not sure how to address that one...
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:35






      • 13




        $begingroup$
        @bvoyelr the big coat should help conceal it ;-) honestly, you'd be in the middle of a catastrophe, and there are a lot of other dead and dying and hypothermic people to deal with, and no-one will have a handy camera or really care about that one dude or dudette with a funny accent who looked a bit fat and didn't seem that chilly. Take a blanket, thank them, and tell them to deal with the other people who are more in need.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 15 at 20:40






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        An electrically heated wetsuit under your clothes would be barely noticeable considered the style of clothing. With everything going on, nobody would be looking that hard. A dry suit usually has gloves, boots and head coverings with would be harder to hide but would work better.
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 16 at 10:37










      • $begingroup$
        @Thorne the gloves and boots would be easy to conceal (and the boots can be optional and the gloves often are) and the hood is always a separate component so can be left behind if you were feeling brave.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 16 at 10:54















      43
















      $begingroup$

      You're on deck, which is the most important thing. Your survival odds are already waaay up.



      It'll be cold on deck. Wear a big coat. Underneath your coat, wear a good dry suit with some high-quality thermals underneath (possibly battery heated ones). The photos on the Wikipedia page notwithstanding, a drysuit needn't make you look like an astronaut, especially a suit that's intended for short term use whilst swimming, not diving.



      Even if you don't get into a boat (and as the other answers have said, you should be able to do this) you'll be vastly better off than anyone else in the water. The lifeboats didn't move far away from site of the sinking, but they did not dare to return to collect swimmers for fear of being swamped and overturned. As a result, most of the swimmers died of hypothermia, but you don't need to let that happen to you. Swim out to the boats... one of them will eventually let you on board, or haul yourself up onto one of the bigger bits of debris and await rescue.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 22




        $begingroup$
        This. Most who died very likely died of hypothermia. With a dry suit, a PFD and a whistle, you can tread water for hours until help arrives and then signal for them. Trying to get on a lifeboat carries the risk of failure -- this very nearly eliminates that risk. Granted, staying under the radar will be out the window when you're pulled out of the water completely comfortable and wearing a strange outfit. Not sure how to address that one...
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:35






      • 13




        $begingroup$
        @bvoyelr the big coat should help conceal it ;-) honestly, you'd be in the middle of a catastrophe, and there are a lot of other dead and dying and hypothermic people to deal with, and no-one will have a handy camera or really care about that one dude or dudette with a funny accent who looked a bit fat and didn't seem that chilly. Take a blanket, thank them, and tell them to deal with the other people who are more in need.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 15 at 20:40






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        An electrically heated wetsuit under your clothes would be barely noticeable considered the style of clothing. With everything going on, nobody would be looking that hard. A dry suit usually has gloves, boots and head coverings with would be harder to hide but would work better.
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 16 at 10:37










      • $begingroup$
        @Thorne the gloves and boots would be easy to conceal (and the boots can be optional and the gloves often are) and the hood is always a separate component so can be left behind if you were feeling brave.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 16 at 10:54













      43














      43










      43







      $begingroup$

      You're on deck, which is the most important thing. Your survival odds are already waaay up.



      It'll be cold on deck. Wear a big coat. Underneath your coat, wear a good dry suit with some high-quality thermals underneath (possibly battery heated ones). The photos on the Wikipedia page notwithstanding, a drysuit needn't make you look like an astronaut, especially a suit that's intended for short term use whilst swimming, not diving.



      Even if you don't get into a boat (and as the other answers have said, you should be able to do this) you'll be vastly better off than anyone else in the water. The lifeboats didn't move far away from site of the sinking, but they did not dare to return to collect swimmers for fear of being swamped and overturned. As a result, most of the swimmers died of hypothermia, but you don't need to let that happen to you. Swim out to the boats... one of them will eventually let you on board, or haul yourself up onto one of the bigger bits of debris and await rescue.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      You're on deck, which is the most important thing. Your survival odds are already waaay up.



      It'll be cold on deck. Wear a big coat. Underneath your coat, wear a good dry suit with some high-quality thermals underneath (possibly battery heated ones). The photos on the Wikipedia page notwithstanding, a drysuit needn't make you look like an astronaut, especially a suit that's intended for short term use whilst swimming, not diving.



      Even if you don't get into a boat (and as the other answers have said, you should be able to do this) you'll be vastly better off than anyone else in the water. The lifeboats didn't move far away from site of the sinking, but they did not dare to return to collect swimmers for fear of being swamped and overturned. As a result, most of the swimmers died of hypothermia, but you don't need to let that happen to you. Swim out to the boats... one of them will eventually let you on board, or haul yourself up onto one of the bigger bits of debris and await rescue.







      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 15 at 15:45









      William R. Ebenezer

      1033 bronze badges




      1033 bronze badges










      answered Oct 15 at 6:40









      Starfish PrimeStarfish Prime

      19.6k38 silver badges90 bronze badges




      19.6k38 silver badges90 bronze badges










      • 22




        $begingroup$
        This. Most who died very likely died of hypothermia. With a dry suit, a PFD and a whistle, you can tread water for hours until help arrives and then signal for them. Trying to get on a lifeboat carries the risk of failure -- this very nearly eliminates that risk. Granted, staying under the radar will be out the window when you're pulled out of the water completely comfortable and wearing a strange outfit. Not sure how to address that one...
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:35






      • 13




        $begingroup$
        @bvoyelr the big coat should help conceal it ;-) honestly, you'd be in the middle of a catastrophe, and there are a lot of other dead and dying and hypothermic people to deal with, and no-one will have a handy camera or really care about that one dude or dudette with a funny accent who looked a bit fat and didn't seem that chilly. Take a blanket, thank them, and tell them to deal with the other people who are more in need.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 15 at 20:40






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        An electrically heated wetsuit under your clothes would be barely noticeable considered the style of clothing. With everything going on, nobody would be looking that hard. A dry suit usually has gloves, boots and head coverings with would be harder to hide but would work better.
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 16 at 10:37










      • $begingroup$
        @Thorne the gloves and boots would be easy to conceal (and the boots can be optional and the gloves often are) and the hood is always a separate component so can be left behind if you were feeling brave.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 16 at 10:54












      • 22




        $begingroup$
        This. Most who died very likely died of hypothermia. With a dry suit, a PFD and a whistle, you can tread water for hours until help arrives and then signal for them. Trying to get on a lifeboat carries the risk of failure -- this very nearly eliminates that risk. Granted, staying under the radar will be out the window when you're pulled out of the water completely comfortable and wearing a strange outfit. Not sure how to address that one...
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:35






      • 13




        $begingroup$
        @bvoyelr the big coat should help conceal it ;-) honestly, you'd be in the middle of a catastrophe, and there are a lot of other dead and dying and hypothermic people to deal with, and no-one will have a handy camera or really care about that one dude or dudette with a funny accent who looked a bit fat and didn't seem that chilly. Take a blanket, thank them, and tell them to deal with the other people who are more in need.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 15 at 20:40






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        An electrically heated wetsuit under your clothes would be barely noticeable considered the style of clothing. With everything going on, nobody would be looking that hard. A dry suit usually has gloves, boots and head coverings with would be harder to hide but would work better.
        $endgroup$
        – Thorne
        Oct 16 at 10:37










      • $begingroup$
        @Thorne the gloves and boots would be easy to conceal (and the boots can be optional and the gloves often are) and the hood is always a separate component so can be left behind if you were feeling brave.
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        Oct 16 at 10:54







      22




      22




      $begingroup$
      This. Most who died very likely died of hypothermia. With a dry suit, a PFD and a whistle, you can tread water for hours until help arrives and then signal for them. Trying to get on a lifeboat carries the risk of failure -- this very nearly eliminates that risk. Granted, staying under the radar will be out the window when you're pulled out of the water completely comfortable and wearing a strange outfit. Not sure how to address that one...
      $endgroup$
      – bvoyelr
      Oct 15 at 13:35




      $begingroup$
      This. Most who died very likely died of hypothermia. With a dry suit, a PFD and a whistle, you can tread water for hours until help arrives and then signal for them. Trying to get on a lifeboat carries the risk of failure -- this very nearly eliminates that risk. Granted, staying under the radar will be out the window when you're pulled out of the water completely comfortable and wearing a strange outfit. Not sure how to address that one...
      $endgroup$
      – bvoyelr
      Oct 15 at 13:35




      13




      13




      $begingroup$
      @bvoyelr the big coat should help conceal it ;-) honestly, you'd be in the middle of a catastrophe, and there are a lot of other dead and dying and hypothermic people to deal with, and no-one will have a handy camera or really care about that one dude or dudette with a funny accent who looked a bit fat and didn't seem that chilly. Take a blanket, thank them, and tell them to deal with the other people who are more in need.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      Oct 15 at 20:40




      $begingroup$
      @bvoyelr the big coat should help conceal it ;-) honestly, you'd be in the middle of a catastrophe, and there are a lot of other dead and dying and hypothermic people to deal with, and no-one will have a handy camera or really care about that one dude or dudette with a funny accent who looked a bit fat and didn't seem that chilly. Take a blanket, thank them, and tell them to deal with the other people who are more in need.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      Oct 15 at 20:40




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      An electrically heated wetsuit under your clothes would be barely noticeable considered the style of clothing. With everything going on, nobody would be looking that hard. A dry suit usually has gloves, boots and head coverings with would be harder to hide but would work better.
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      Oct 16 at 10:37




      $begingroup$
      An electrically heated wetsuit under your clothes would be barely noticeable considered the style of clothing. With everything going on, nobody would be looking that hard. A dry suit usually has gloves, boots and head coverings with would be harder to hide but would work better.
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      Oct 16 at 10:37












      $begingroup$
      @Thorne the gloves and boots would be easy to conceal (and the boots can be optional and the gloves often are) and the hood is always a separate component so can be left behind if you were feeling brave.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      Oct 16 at 10:54




      $begingroup$
      @Thorne the gloves and boots would be easy to conceal (and the boots can be optional and the gloves often are) and the hood is always a separate component so can be left behind if you were feeling brave.
      $endgroup$
      – Starfish Prime
      Oct 16 at 10:54











      30
















      $begingroup$

      The simplest way to ensure that you yourself - and as many others as possible- survive the Titanic disaster is to distract the forward lookout at the critical moment so that he does not give warning of the iceberg ahead until it is too late to turn the ship... if at all.



      If the means by which you distract the lookout is to offer him the use of your period-appropriate 10×50 binoculars - there were no binoculars on board, as they had been forgotten - with a comment that you had seen that no-one was using them, and the ship's speed in these conditions was making you nervous, no-one could reproach you: you saw a matter that compromised safety, and you acted as expeditiously as possible to correct matters. You didn't approach the other crew in fear it would take them too long to pass the binoculars on to where they were needed, a fear that proved to be well founded, as the ship struck an iceberg right afterwards.



      What will this do?



      Instead of the Titanic grazing along the side of the iceberg, it will most likely impact head on, crumpling and breaching the bow compartment, and possibly the next compartment back, and transmitted shock may cause other leaks. However, the ship could remain afloat with the first several compartments completely flooded, and the ship's pumps could likely keep ahead of the minor leakage caused by shock.



      It may be a close call, and the Titanic may settle quite deeply by the bow before it reaches equilibrium, so it is not impossible that the passengers may be put onto the lifeboats, especially as a direct impact will cause a lot of otherwise insignificant damage and minor injuries.



      In the following investigation, it could be pointed out that the captain was driving the ship at a reckless speed given the conditions, and had the lookout done his job just moments earlier, the ship might have sunk as a result of a glancing impact rupturing many more compartments, plus the triple-screw design meaning that the ship could not turn as rapidly as an even-screw design.



      So... the disaster happens... but most will survive, even if it is discovered that there were not enough lifeboats.



      Failing that... bring and wear beneath your clothing a drysuit made for diving in Arctic conditions, and be sure to remain on-deck.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 5




        $begingroup$
        I often thought of this - the ship would've survived a head-on collision. With its bows stoved in it would've been written off, but would've stayed afloat and would even have been able to limp into New York a week late. The furore and loss of reputation for the White Star Line would've been immense, but the death toll would've been a fraction of the real thing.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:27






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @OscarBravo "With its bows stoved in it would've been written off" that depends. Titanic's sister ship Olympic went through a lot and was kept in service until its age caught up with it.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom Lint
        Oct 15 at 12:31







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        With this strategy, there is some risk that you will take on some of the blame for the crash. Even if you are not found legally at fault, you may be found guilty by the media. After all, people might believe, "if the lookout wasn't distracted, the iceberg could have been dodged entirely."
        $endgroup$
        – Brian
        Oct 15 at 15:08






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        There is a potential dangerous side effect to this answer: Because of the scope of the Titanic disaster, the London Board of Trade regulations on ship safety were (eventually) replaced by the Safety of Life at Sea convention. One critical change was that a ship must have sufficient lifeboat space for all people on board, deployable to each side of the ship. (LBoT regs required ships of tonnage X and up to have lifeboat space for Y people [~900], and the Olympic class far exceeded that X.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        (continued) So this approach might change history, causing SOLAS to be adopted much later or not at all.
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13















      30
















      $begingroup$

      The simplest way to ensure that you yourself - and as many others as possible- survive the Titanic disaster is to distract the forward lookout at the critical moment so that he does not give warning of the iceberg ahead until it is too late to turn the ship... if at all.



      If the means by which you distract the lookout is to offer him the use of your period-appropriate 10×50 binoculars - there were no binoculars on board, as they had been forgotten - with a comment that you had seen that no-one was using them, and the ship's speed in these conditions was making you nervous, no-one could reproach you: you saw a matter that compromised safety, and you acted as expeditiously as possible to correct matters. You didn't approach the other crew in fear it would take them too long to pass the binoculars on to where they were needed, a fear that proved to be well founded, as the ship struck an iceberg right afterwards.



      What will this do?



      Instead of the Titanic grazing along the side of the iceberg, it will most likely impact head on, crumpling and breaching the bow compartment, and possibly the next compartment back, and transmitted shock may cause other leaks. However, the ship could remain afloat with the first several compartments completely flooded, and the ship's pumps could likely keep ahead of the minor leakage caused by shock.



      It may be a close call, and the Titanic may settle quite deeply by the bow before it reaches equilibrium, so it is not impossible that the passengers may be put onto the lifeboats, especially as a direct impact will cause a lot of otherwise insignificant damage and minor injuries.



      In the following investigation, it could be pointed out that the captain was driving the ship at a reckless speed given the conditions, and had the lookout done his job just moments earlier, the ship might have sunk as a result of a glancing impact rupturing many more compartments, plus the triple-screw design meaning that the ship could not turn as rapidly as an even-screw design.



      So... the disaster happens... but most will survive, even if it is discovered that there were not enough lifeboats.



      Failing that... bring and wear beneath your clothing a drysuit made for diving in Arctic conditions, and be sure to remain on-deck.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 5




        $begingroup$
        I often thought of this - the ship would've survived a head-on collision. With its bows stoved in it would've been written off, but would've stayed afloat and would even have been able to limp into New York a week late. The furore and loss of reputation for the White Star Line would've been immense, but the death toll would've been a fraction of the real thing.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:27






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @OscarBravo "With its bows stoved in it would've been written off" that depends. Titanic's sister ship Olympic went through a lot and was kept in service until its age caught up with it.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom Lint
        Oct 15 at 12:31







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        With this strategy, there is some risk that you will take on some of the blame for the crash. Even if you are not found legally at fault, you may be found guilty by the media. After all, people might believe, "if the lookout wasn't distracted, the iceberg could have been dodged entirely."
        $endgroup$
        – Brian
        Oct 15 at 15:08






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        There is a potential dangerous side effect to this answer: Because of the scope of the Titanic disaster, the London Board of Trade regulations on ship safety were (eventually) replaced by the Safety of Life at Sea convention. One critical change was that a ship must have sufficient lifeboat space for all people on board, deployable to each side of the ship. (LBoT regs required ships of tonnage X and up to have lifeboat space for Y people [~900], and the Olympic class far exceeded that X.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        (continued) So this approach might change history, causing SOLAS to be adopted much later or not at all.
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13













      30














      30










      30







      $begingroup$

      The simplest way to ensure that you yourself - and as many others as possible- survive the Titanic disaster is to distract the forward lookout at the critical moment so that he does not give warning of the iceberg ahead until it is too late to turn the ship... if at all.



      If the means by which you distract the lookout is to offer him the use of your period-appropriate 10×50 binoculars - there were no binoculars on board, as they had been forgotten - with a comment that you had seen that no-one was using them, and the ship's speed in these conditions was making you nervous, no-one could reproach you: you saw a matter that compromised safety, and you acted as expeditiously as possible to correct matters. You didn't approach the other crew in fear it would take them too long to pass the binoculars on to where they were needed, a fear that proved to be well founded, as the ship struck an iceberg right afterwards.



      What will this do?



      Instead of the Titanic grazing along the side of the iceberg, it will most likely impact head on, crumpling and breaching the bow compartment, and possibly the next compartment back, and transmitted shock may cause other leaks. However, the ship could remain afloat with the first several compartments completely flooded, and the ship's pumps could likely keep ahead of the minor leakage caused by shock.



      It may be a close call, and the Titanic may settle quite deeply by the bow before it reaches equilibrium, so it is not impossible that the passengers may be put onto the lifeboats, especially as a direct impact will cause a lot of otherwise insignificant damage and minor injuries.



      In the following investigation, it could be pointed out that the captain was driving the ship at a reckless speed given the conditions, and had the lookout done his job just moments earlier, the ship might have sunk as a result of a glancing impact rupturing many more compartments, plus the triple-screw design meaning that the ship could not turn as rapidly as an even-screw design.



      So... the disaster happens... but most will survive, even if it is discovered that there were not enough lifeboats.



      Failing that... bring and wear beneath your clothing a drysuit made for diving in Arctic conditions, and be sure to remain on-deck.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      The simplest way to ensure that you yourself - and as many others as possible- survive the Titanic disaster is to distract the forward lookout at the critical moment so that he does not give warning of the iceberg ahead until it is too late to turn the ship... if at all.



      If the means by which you distract the lookout is to offer him the use of your period-appropriate 10×50 binoculars - there were no binoculars on board, as they had been forgotten - with a comment that you had seen that no-one was using them, and the ship's speed in these conditions was making you nervous, no-one could reproach you: you saw a matter that compromised safety, and you acted as expeditiously as possible to correct matters. You didn't approach the other crew in fear it would take them too long to pass the binoculars on to where they were needed, a fear that proved to be well founded, as the ship struck an iceberg right afterwards.



      What will this do?



      Instead of the Titanic grazing along the side of the iceberg, it will most likely impact head on, crumpling and breaching the bow compartment, and possibly the next compartment back, and transmitted shock may cause other leaks. However, the ship could remain afloat with the first several compartments completely flooded, and the ship's pumps could likely keep ahead of the minor leakage caused by shock.



      It may be a close call, and the Titanic may settle quite deeply by the bow before it reaches equilibrium, so it is not impossible that the passengers may be put onto the lifeboats, especially as a direct impact will cause a lot of otherwise insignificant damage and minor injuries.



      In the following investigation, it could be pointed out that the captain was driving the ship at a reckless speed given the conditions, and had the lookout done his job just moments earlier, the ship might have sunk as a result of a glancing impact rupturing many more compartments, plus the triple-screw design meaning that the ship could not turn as rapidly as an even-screw design.



      So... the disaster happens... but most will survive, even if it is discovered that there were not enough lifeboats.



      Failing that... bring and wear beneath your clothing a drysuit made for diving in Arctic conditions, and be sure to remain on-deck.







      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 15 at 21:05

























      answered Oct 15 at 10:56









      Monty WildMonty Wild

      26.4k6 gold badges71 silver badges163 bronze badges




      26.4k6 gold badges71 silver badges163 bronze badges










      • 5




        $begingroup$
        I often thought of this - the ship would've survived a head-on collision. With its bows stoved in it would've been written off, but would've stayed afloat and would even have been able to limp into New York a week late. The furore and loss of reputation for the White Star Line would've been immense, but the death toll would've been a fraction of the real thing.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:27






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @OscarBravo "With its bows stoved in it would've been written off" that depends. Titanic's sister ship Olympic went through a lot and was kept in service until its age caught up with it.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom Lint
        Oct 15 at 12:31







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        With this strategy, there is some risk that you will take on some of the blame for the crash. Even if you are not found legally at fault, you may be found guilty by the media. After all, people might believe, "if the lookout wasn't distracted, the iceberg could have been dodged entirely."
        $endgroup$
        – Brian
        Oct 15 at 15:08






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        There is a potential dangerous side effect to this answer: Because of the scope of the Titanic disaster, the London Board of Trade regulations on ship safety were (eventually) replaced by the Safety of Life at Sea convention. One critical change was that a ship must have sufficient lifeboat space for all people on board, deployable to each side of the ship. (LBoT regs required ships of tonnage X and up to have lifeboat space for Y people [~900], and the Olympic class far exceeded that X.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        (continued) So this approach might change history, causing SOLAS to be adopted much later or not at all.
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13












      • 5




        $begingroup$
        I often thought of this - the ship would've survived a head-on collision. With its bows stoved in it would've been written off, but would've stayed afloat and would even have been able to limp into New York a week late. The furore and loss of reputation for the White Star Line would've been immense, but the death toll would've been a fraction of the real thing.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:27






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @OscarBravo "With its bows stoved in it would've been written off" that depends. Titanic's sister ship Olympic went through a lot and was kept in service until its age caught up with it.
        $endgroup$
        – Tom Lint
        Oct 15 at 12:31







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        With this strategy, there is some risk that you will take on some of the blame for the crash. Even if you are not found legally at fault, you may be found guilty by the media. After all, people might believe, "if the lookout wasn't distracted, the iceberg could have been dodged entirely."
        $endgroup$
        – Brian
        Oct 15 at 15:08






      • 11




        $begingroup$
        There is a potential dangerous side effect to this answer: Because of the scope of the Titanic disaster, the London Board of Trade regulations on ship safety were (eventually) replaced by the Safety of Life at Sea convention. One critical change was that a ship must have sufficient lifeboat space for all people on board, deployable to each side of the ship. (LBoT regs required ships of tonnage X and up to have lifeboat space for Y people [~900], and the Olympic class far exceeded that X.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        (continued) So this approach might change history, causing SOLAS to be adopted much later or not at all.
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 15 at 15:13







      5




      5




      $begingroup$
      I often thought of this - the ship would've survived a head-on collision. With its bows stoved in it would've been written off, but would've stayed afloat and would even have been able to limp into New York a week late. The furore and loss of reputation for the White Star Line would've been immense, but the death toll would've been a fraction of the real thing.
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      Oct 15 at 12:27




      $begingroup$
      I often thought of this - the ship would've survived a head-on collision. With its bows stoved in it would've been written off, but would've stayed afloat and would even have been able to limp into New York a week late. The furore and loss of reputation for the White Star Line would've been immense, but the death toll would've been a fraction of the real thing.
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      Oct 15 at 12:27




      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      @OscarBravo "With its bows stoved in it would've been written off" that depends. Titanic's sister ship Olympic went through a lot and was kept in service until its age caught up with it.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Lint
      Oct 15 at 12:31





      $begingroup$
      @OscarBravo "With its bows stoved in it would've been written off" that depends. Titanic's sister ship Olympic went through a lot and was kept in service until its age caught up with it.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Lint
      Oct 15 at 12:31





      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      With this strategy, there is some risk that you will take on some of the blame for the crash. Even if you are not found legally at fault, you may be found guilty by the media. After all, people might believe, "if the lookout wasn't distracted, the iceberg could have been dodged entirely."
      $endgroup$
      – Brian
      Oct 15 at 15:08




      $begingroup$
      With this strategy, there is some risk that you will take on some of the blame for the crash. Even if you are not found legally at fault, you may be found guilty by the media. After all, people might believe, "if the lookout wasn't distracted, the iceberg could have been dodged entirely."
      $endgroup$
      – Brian
      Oct 15 at 15:08




      11




      11




      $begingroup$
      There is a potential dangerous side effect to this answer: Because of the scope of the Titanic disaster, the London Board of Trade regulations on ship safety were (eventually) replaced by the Safety of Life at Sea convention. One critical change was that a ship must have sufficient lifeboat space for all people on board, deployable to each side of the ship. (LBoT regs required ships of tonnage X and up to have lifeboat space for Y people [~900], and the Olympic class far exceeded that X.)
      $endgroup$
      – Codes with Hammer
      Oct 15 at 15:13




      $begingroup$
      There is a potential dangerous side effect to this answer: Because of the scope of the Titanic disaster, the London Board of Trade regulations on ship safety were (eventually) replaced by the Safety of Life at Sea convention. One critical change was that a ship must have sufficient lifeboat space for all people on board, deployable to each side of the ship. (LBoT regs required ships of tonnage X and up to have lifeboat space for Y people [~900], and the Olympic class far exceeded that X.)
      $endgroup$
      – Codes with Hammer
      Oct 15 at 15:13




      5




      5




      $begingroup$
      (continued) So this approach might change history, causing SOLAS to be adopted much later or not at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Codes with Hammer
      Oct 15 at 15:13




      $begingroup$
      (continued) So this approach might change history, causing SOLAS to be adopted much later or not at all.
      $endgroup$
      – Codes with Hammer
      Oct 15 at 15:13











      19
















      $begingroup$

      Locate crew member Jack Phillips, the ship's "senior wireless operator". Making a few changes to his timeline this evening will increase your chances of survival immensely. The general idea is that the SS Californian was in the vicinity and had the capacity to save essentially everyone on board the Titanic, if only they were aware of the disaster.



      On that fateful evening, Phillips had a massive backlog of work. The ship's wireless operator was responsible both for sending and receiving "official" communication as well as personal messages sent by passengers; he was employed by the Marconi radio company (not a ship crewman) who charged a fee for these personal messages, so they were viewed as equal importance as ship-to-ship messages. Phillips spent many hours that evening transmitting overdue personal messages. The transmitter had broken the day before and he was a full day behind on sending these messages. The radio operator on board the Californian transmitted an ice warning at 10:55 PM. Since the Californian was relatively close and the relay station used for personal messages was far away (Newfoundland), the message from the Californian was significantly louder and was drowning out the signals coming in from the Newfoundland relay station. Phillips responded to the Californian's message with a snippy, aggravated "shut up!". The radio operator for the Californian responded to this rude response by shutting off his radio and going to bed for the night. He missed the Titanic's distress calls, and the next closest ship was too far away to respond in time.



      You have several options here:



      • Eliminate Phillips' backlog so that he's less stressed and (ideally) can finish the personal messages well before 10PM. Break into his cabin and steal/destroy most of the messages in the outbox. For a less destructive option, explain to him that you just discovered that your three mischievous children have been writing numerous fake telegrams and dropping them into the messages box over the last several days. Apologize for their behavior and ask if you can skim through his outbox and pull out those that look like they were written by your children. Once he's given you access, remove and discard at least half the pile. He should now finish early and be alert and ready at the fateful hour, preventing the rude reply that sent the Californian's operator offline. Keeping them online for a mere half hour would enable them to pick up the initial distress call and respond immediately.

      • Disable the wireless transmitter in a way that you can reverse. The transmitter broke down the previous day, so it wouldn't be too surprising to Phillips if it broke down again. Do this as soon as possible. After Phillips gives up, reports the radio as broken, and goes to bed for the night, you'll sneak into the radio compartment and take his place. The Californian's ice warning comes in at 10:55 PM, so we know their radio operator was working until at least that point. Send a pre-emptive distress message around 10:30 PM. Use both the traditional "CQD" distress code as well as the new "SOS" distress code. By the time the ship hits the iceberg, the Californian should be close enough to shuttle you (and most everybody else) off of the Titanic via lifeboat.

      • Tamper with the radio in a way that leaves it operational, but either reduces the antenna's signal gain considerably or introduces low-level background noise. The goal is to reduce the ship's effective communication range. The Newfoundland relay station was roughly 375 miles away, which is close to the max range for the ship's radio. Cutting the radio's effective range down to ~275 miles means Phillips can't get bogged down with passenger messages, but still has plenty of range to communicate with other ships and send distress signals.

      • Chat up Phillips and talk about how you were in the Army signal corps until a few years ago. Ask whether the ship still has signal lanterns (it does), or if it's all been replaced by that newfangled wireless stuff. Remember where he says the signal lanterns are located. Around 11:10 PM, an officer aboard the Californian attempts to contact an unidentified ship in the distance (the Titanic) via signal lantern, but receives no reply. Man the signal lantern at that time and when you see the Californian's signal, reply. Identify your ship, request emergency assistance, and report your radio is down so they don't try to contact Phillips and get a different story (you haven't actually hit the iceberg yet).

      With any of these options, you run the risk of not being able to access the ship's radio room. Fortunately, the radios of the time used relatively primitive "spark-gap" transmitters. It's not that difficult to build one yourself, especially if you have access to modern components (I assume you do since you have a time machine). The antenna for the radio system was a massive wire running between poles mounted at either end of the ship, with a wire running between the middle of the overhead wire and the radio room. If you disconnect that wire and attach it to your radio, you've essentially replaced the ship's onboard radio with your own and you're now the signal officer. Here's hoping you remember Morse code.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I would not recommend sending a pre-emptive distress signal. That's going to raise A LOT of questions during the inevitable investigation, like why there was a distress signal sent BEFORE the collision, or why the distress signal was sent AFTER Phillips went to bed, or why the transmitter suddenly started working again after it was disabled already.
        $endgroup$
        – Nzall
        Oct 16 at 9:13







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @Nzall The real distress call went out more than 35 minutes after the collision. Even changing things so that the distress call went out immediately and the Californian was still listening would boost survival odds immensely. If some things don't exactly line up, it's easy to chalk that up to the record keeper recording it wrong due to being distracted by the "not dying" part of the evening.
        $endgroup$
        – bta
        Oct 16 at 20:08










      • $begingroup$
        Regarding bullet point 2, the historical record shows that Titanic did indeed transmit both CQD and SOS. (There are plenty of time traveler observation reports indicating that no time travelers were involved in the choice of which distress signal to send.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 17 at 15:23















      19
















      $begingroup$

      Locate crew member Jack Phillips, the ship's "senior wireless operator". Making a few changes to his timeline this evening will increase your chances of survival immensely. The general idea is that the SS Californian was in the vicinity and had the capacity to save essentially everyone on board the Titanic, if only they were aware of the disaster.



      On that fateful evening, Phillips had a massive backlog of work. The ship's wireless operator was responsible both for sending and receiving "official" communication as well as personal messages sent by passengers; he was employed by the Marconi radio company (not a ship crewman) who charged a fee for these personal messages, so they were viewed as equal importance as ship-to-ship messages. Phillips spent many hours that evening transmitting overdue personal messages. The transmitter had broken the day before and he was a full day behind on sending these messages. The radio operator on board the Californian transmitted an ice warning at 10:55 PM. Since the Californian was relatively close and the relay station used for personal messages was far away (Newfoundland), the message from the Californian was significantly louder and was drowning out the signals coming in from the Newfoundland relay station. Phillips responded to the Californian's message with a snippy, aggravated "shut up!". The radio operator for the Californian responded to this rude response by shutting off his radio and going to bed for the night. He missed the Titanic's distress calls, and the next closest ship was too far away to respond in time.



      You have several options here:



      • Eliminate Phillips' backlog so that he's less stressed and (ideally) can finish the personal messages well before 10PM. Break into his cabin and steal/destroy most of the messages in the outbox. For a less destructive option, explain to him that you just discovered that your three mischievous children have been writing numerous fake telegrams and dropping them into the messages box over the last several days. Apologize for their behavior and ask if you can skim through his outbox and pull out those that look like they were written by your children. Once he's given you access, remove and discard at least half the pile. He should now finish early and be alert and ready at the fateful hour, preventing the rude reply that sent the Californian's operator offline. Keeping them online for a mere half hour would enable them to pick up the initial distress call and respond immediately.

      • Disable the wireless transmitter in a way that you can reverse. The transmitter broke down the previous day, so it wouldn't be too surprising to Phillips if it broke down again. Do this as soon as possible. After Phillips gives up, reports the radio as broken, and goes to bed for the night, you'll sneak into the radio compartment and take his place. The Californian's ice warning comes in at 10:55 PM, so we know their radio operator was working until at least that point. Send a pre-emptive distress message around 10:30 PM. Use both the traditional "CQD" distress code as well as the new "SOS" distress code. By the time the ship hits the iceberg, the Californian should be close enough to shuttle you (and most everybody else) off of the Titanic via lifeboat.

      • Tamper with the radio in a way that leaves it operational, but either reduces the antenna's signal gain considerably or introduces low-level background noise. The goal is to reduce the ship's effective communication range. The Newfoundland relay station was roughly 375 miles away, which is close to the max range for the ship's radio. Cutting the radio's effective range down to ~275 miles means Phillips can't get bogged down with passenger messages, but still has plenty of range to communicate with other ships and send distress signals.

      • Chat up Phillips and talk about how you were in the Army signal corps until a few years ago. Ask whether the ship still has signal lanterns (it does), or if it's all been replaced by that newfangled wireless stuff. Remember where he says the signal lanterns are located. Around 11:10 PM, an officer aboard the Californian attempts to contact an unidentified ship in the distance (the Titanic) via signal lantern, but receives no reply. Man the signal lantern at that time and when you see the Californian's signal, reply. Identify your ship, request emergency assistance, and report your radio is down so they don't try to contact Phillips and get a different story (you haven't actually hit the iceberg yet).

      With any of these options, you run the risk of not being able to access the ship's radio room. Fortunately, the radios of the time used relatively primitive "spark-gap" transmitters. It's not that difficult to build one yourself, especially if you have access to modern components (I assume you do since you have a time machine). The antenna for the radio system was a massive wire running between poles mounted at either end of the ship, with a wire running between the middle of the overhead wire and the radio room. If you disconnect that wire and attach it to your radio, you've essentially replaced the ship's onboard radio with your own and you're now the signal officer. Here's hoping you remember Morse code.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$










      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I would not recommend sending a pre-emptive distress signal. That's going to raise A LOT of questions during the inevitable investigation, like why there was a distress signal sent BEFORE the collision, or why the distress signal was sent AFTER Phillips went to bed, or why the transmitter suddenly started working again after it was disabled already.
        $endgroup$
        – Nzall
        Oct 16 at 9:13







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @Nzall The real distress call went out more than 35 minutes after the collision. Even changing things so that the distress call went out immediately and the Californian was still listening would boost survival odds immensely. If some things don't exactly line up, it's easy to chalk that up to the record keeper recording it wrong due to being distracted by the "not dying" part of the evening.
        $endgroup$
        – bta
        Oct 16 at 20:08










      • $begingroup$
        Regarding bullet point 2, the historical record shows that Titanic did indeed transmit both CQD and SOS. (There are plenty of time traveler observation reports indicating that no time travelers were involved in the choice of which distress signal to send.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 17 at 15:23













      19














      19










      19







      $begingroup$

      Locate crew member Jack Phillips, the ship's "senior wireless operator". Making a few changes to his timeline this evening will increase your chances of survival immensely. The general idea is that the SS Californian was in the vicinity and had the capacity to save essentially everyone on board the Titanic, if only they were aware of the disaster.



      On that fateful evening, Phillips had a massive backlog of work. The ship's wireless operator was responsible both for sending and receiving "official" communication as well as personal messages sent by passengers; he was employed by the Marconi radio company (not a ship crewman) who charged a fee for these personal messages, so they were viewed as equal importance as ship-to-ship messages. Phillips spent many hours that evening transmitting overdue personal messages. The transmitter had broken the day before and he was a full day behind on sending these messages. The radio operator on board the Californian transmitted an ice warning at 10:55 PM. Since the Californian was relatively close and the relay station used for personal messages was far away (Newfoundland), the message from the Californian was significantly louder and was drowning out the signals coming in from the Newfoundland relay station. Phillips responded to the Californian's message with a snippy, aggravated "shut up!". The radio operator for the Californian responded to this rude response by shutting off his radio and going to bed for the night. He missed the Titanic's distress calls, and the next closest ship was too far away to respond in time.



      You have several options here:



      • Eliminate Phillips' backlog so that he's less stressed and (ideally) can finish the personal messages well before 10PM. Break into his cabin and steal/destroy most of the messages in the outbox. For a less destructive option, explain to him that you just discovered that your three mischievous children have been writing numerous fake telegrams and dropping them into the messages box over the last several days. Apologize for their behavior and ask if you can skim through his outbox and pull out those that look like they were written by your children. Once he's given you access, remove and discard at least half the pile. He should now finish early and be alert and ready at the fateful hour, preventing the rude reply that sent the Californian's operator offline. Keeping them online for a mere half hour would enable them to pick up the initial distress call and respond immediately.

      • Disable the wireless transmitter in a way that you can reverse. The transmitter broke down the previous day, so it wouldn't be too surprising to Phillips if it broke down again. Do this as soon as possible. After Phillips gives up, reports the radio as broken, and goes to bed for the night, you'll sneak into the radio compartment and take his place. The Californian's ice warning comes in at 10:55 PM, so we know their radio operator was working until at least that point. Send a pre-emptive distress message around 10:30 PM. Use both the traditional "CQD" distress code as well as the new "SOS" distress code. By the time the ship hits the iceberg, the Californian should be close enough to shuttle you (and most everybody else) off of the Titanic via lifeboat.

      • Tamper with the radio in a way that leaves it operational, but either reduces the antenna's signal gain considerably or introduces low-level background noise. The goal is to reduce the ship's effective communication range. The Newfoundland relay station was roughly 375 miles away, which is close to the max range for the ship's radio. Cutting the radio's effective range down to ~275 miles means Phillips can't get bogged down with passenger messages, but still has plenty of range to communicate with other ships and send distress signals.

      • Chat up Phillips and talk about how you were in the Army signal corps until a few years ago. Ask whether the ship still has signal lanterns (it does), or if it's all been replaced by that newfangled wireless stuff. Remember where he says the signal lanterns are located. Around 11:10 PM, an officer aboard the Californian attempts to contact an unidentified ship in the distance (the Titanic) via signal lantern, but receives no reply. Man the signal lantern at that time and when you see the Californian's signal, reply. Identify your ship, request emergency assistance, and report your radio is down so they don't try to contact Phillips and get a different story (you haven't actually hit the iceberg yet).

      With any of these options, you run the risk of not being able to access the ship's radio room. Fortunately, the radios of the time used relatively primitive "spark-gap" transmitters. It's not that difficult to build one yourself, especially if you have access to modern components (I assume you do since you have a time machine). The antenna for the radio system was a massive wire running between poles mounted at either end of the ship, with a wire running between the middle of the overhead wire and the radio room. If you disconnect that wire and attach it to your radio, you've essentially replaced the ship's onboard radio with your own and you're now the signal officer. Here's hoping you remember Morse code.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



      Locate crew member Jack Phillips, the ship's "senior wireless operator". Making a few changes to his timeline this evening will increase your chances of survival immensely. The general idea is that the SS Californian was in the vicinity and had the capacity to save essentially everyone on board the Titanic, if only they were aware of the disaster.



      On that fateful evening, Phillips had a massive backlog of work. The ship's wireless operator was responsible both for sending and receiving "official" communication as well as personal messages sent by passengers; he was employed by the Marconi radio company (not a ship crewman) who charged a fee for these personal messages, so they were viewed as equal importance as ship-to-ship messages. Phillips spent many hours that evening transmitting overdue personal messages. The transmitter had broken the day before and he was a full day behind on sending these messages. The radio operator on board the Californian transmitted an ice warning at 10:55 PM. Since the Californian was relatively close and the relay station used for personal messages was far away (Newfoundland), the message from the Californian was significantly louder and was drowning out the signals coming in from the Newfoundland relay station. Phillips responded to the Californian's message with a snippy, aggravated "shut up!". The radio operator for the Californian responded to this rude response by shutting off his radio and going to bed for the night. He missed the Titanic's distress calls, and the next closest ship was too far away to respond in time.



      You have several options here:



      • Eliminate Phillips' backlog so that he's less stressed and (ideally) can finish the personal messages well before 10PM. Break into his cabin and steal/destroy most of the messages in the outbox. For a less destructive option, explain to him that you just discovered that your three mischievous children have been writing numerous fake telegrams and dropping them into the messages box over the last several days. Apologize for their behavior and ask if you can skim through his outbox and pull out those that look like they were written by your children. Once he's given you access, remove and discard at least half the pile. He should now finish early and be alert and ready at the fateful hour, preventing the rude reply that sent the Californian's operator offline. Keeping them online for a mere half hour would enable them to pick up the initial distress call and respond immediately.

      • Disable the wireless transmitter in a way that you can reverse. The transmitter broke down the previous day, so it wouldn't be too surprising to Phillips if it broke down again. Do this as soon as possible. After Phillips gives up, reports the radio as broken, and goes to bed for the night, you'll sneak into the radio compartment and take his place. The Californian's ice warning comes in at 10:55 PM, so we know their radio operator was working until at least that point. Send a pre-emptive distress message around 10:30 PM. Use both the traditional "CQD" distress code as well as the new "SOS" distress code. By the time the ship hits the iceberg, the Californian should be close enough to shuttle you (and most everybody else) off of the Titanic via lifeboat.

      • Tamper with the radio in a way that leaves it operational, but either reduces the antenna's signal gain considerably or introduces low-level background noise. The goal is to reduce the ship's effective communication range. The Newfoundland relay station was roughly 375 miles away, which is close to the max range for the ship's radio. Cutting the radio's effective range down to ~275 miles means Phillips can't get bogged down with passenger messages, but still has plenty of range to communicate with other ships and send distress signals.

      • Chat up Phillips and talk about how you were in the Army signal corps until a few years ago. Ask whether the ship still has signal lanterns (it does), or if it's all been replaced by that newfangled wireless stuff. Remember where he says the signal lanterns are located. Around 11:10 PM, an officer aboard the Californian attempts to contact an unidentified ship in the distance (the Titanic) via signal lantern, but receives no reply. Man the signal lantern at that time and when you see the Californian's signal, reply. Identify your ship, request emergency assistance, and report your radio is down so they don't try to contact Phillips and get a different story (you haven't actually hit the iceberg yet).

      With any of these options, you run the risk of not being able to access the ship's radio room. Fortunately, the radios of the time used relatively primitive "spark-gap" transmitters. It's not that difficult to build one yourself, especially if you have access to modern components (I assume you do since you have a time machine). The antenna for the radio system was a massive wire running between poles mounted at either end of the ship, with a wire running between the middle of the overhead wire and the radio room. If you disconnect that wire and attach it to your radio, you've essentially replaced the ship's onboard radio with your own and you're now the signal officer. Here's hoping you remember Morse code.







      share|improve this answer













      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer










      answered Oct 16 at 1:32









      btabta

      3,3427 silver badges16 bronze badges




      3,3427 silver badges16 bronze badges










      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I would not recommend sending a pre-emptive distress signal. That's going to raise A LOT of questions during the inevitable investigation, like why there was a distress signal sent BEFORE the collision, or why the distress signal was sent AFTER Phillips went to bed, or why the transmitter suddenly started working again after it was disabled already.
        $endgroup$
        – Nzall
        Oct 16 at 9:13







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @Nzall The real distress call went out more than 35 minutes after the collision. Even changing things so that the distress call went out immediately and the Californian was still listening would boost survival odds immensely. If some things don't exactly line up, it's easy to chalk that up to the record keeper recording it wrong due to being distracted by the "not dying" part of the evening.
        $endgroup$
        – bta
        Oct 16 at 20:08










      • $begingroup$
        Regarding bullet point 2, the historical record shows that Titanic did indeed transmit both CQD and SOS. (There are plenty of time traveler observation reports indicating that no time travelers were involved in the choice of which distress signal to send.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 17 at 15:23












      • 4




        $begingroup$
        I would not recommend sending a pre-emptive distress signal. That's going to raise A LOT of questions during the inevitable investigation, like why there was a distress signal sent BEFORE the collision, or why the distress signal was sent AFTER Phillips went to bed, or why the transmitter suddenly started working again after it was disabled already.
        $endgroup$
        – Nzall
        Oct 16 at 9:13







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        @Nzall The real distress call went out more than 35 minutes after the collision. Even changing things so that the distress call went out immediately and the Californian was still listening would boost survival odds immensely. If some things don't exactly line up, it's easy to chalk that up to the record keeper recording it wrong due to being distracted by the "not dying" part of the evening.
        $endgroup$
        – bta
        Oct 16 at 20:08










      • $begingroup$
        Regarding bullet point 2, the historical record shows that Titanic did indeed transmit both CQD and SOS. (There are plenty of time traveler observation reports indicating that no time travelers were involved in the choice of which distress signal to send.)
        $endgroup$
        – Codes with Hammer
        Oct 17 at 15:23







      4




      4




      $begingroup$
      I would not recommend sending a pre-emptive distress signal. That's going to raise A LOT of questions during the inevitable investigation, like why there was a distress signal sent BEFORE the collision, or why the distress signal was sent AFTER Phillips went to bed, or why the transmitter suddenly started working again after it was disabled already.
      $endgroup$
      – Nzall
      Oct 16 at 9:13





      $begingroup$
      I would not recommend sending a pre-emptive distress signal. That's going to raise A LOT of questions during the inevitable investigation, like why there was a distress signal sent BEFORE the collision, or why the distress signal was sent AFTER Phillips went to bed, or why the transmitter suddenly started working again after it was disabled already.
      $endgroup$
      – Nzall
      Oct 16 at 9:13





      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      @Nzall The real distress call went out more than 35 minutes after the collision. Even changing things so that the distress call went out immediately and the Californian was still listening would boost survival odds immensely. If some things don't exactly line up, it's easy to chalk that up to the record keeper recording it wrong due to being distracted by the "not dying" part of the evening.
      $endgroup$
      – bta
      Oct 16 at 20:08




      $begingroup$
      @Nzall The real distress call went out more than 35 minutes after the collision. Even changing things so that the distress call went out immediately and the Californian was still listening would boost survival odds immensely. If some things don't exactly line up, it's easy to chalk that up to the record keeper recording it wrong due to being distracted by the "not dying" part of the evening.
      $endgroup$
      – bta
      Oct 16 at 20:08












      $begingroup$
      Regarding bullet point 2, the historical record shows that Titanic did indeed transmit both CQD and SOS. (There are plenty of time traveler observation reports indicating that no time travelers were involved in the choice of which distress signal to send.)
      $endgroup$
      – Codes with Hammer
      Oct 17 at 15:23




      $begingroup$
      Regarding bullet point 2, the historical record shows that Titanic did indeed transmit both CQD and SOS. (There are plenty of time traveler observation reports indicating that no time travelers were involved in the choice of which distress signal to send.)
      $endgroup$
      – Codes with Hammer
      Oct 17 at 15:23











      10
















      $begingroup$

      1. Get in your time machine and leave.


      2. Bring your own dry suit and Arctic survival gear so you can go in the water without risking your life


      3. Bring your own inflatable life raft


      4. Lock the proper doors so the hoi poloi in steerage can’t get to the life boats, ensuring there is adequate room for you and no pushing and shoving


      5. Use the pistol you brought back with you to force crew members to launch a life boat or the captain’s gig early, before the impact so you are away and clear. Make sure to murder them before you leave so they can’t go whine to the Captain and change events






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 4




        $begingroup$
        Why do you need the crew to launch a life boat? You brought your own raft.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Oct 15 at 12:38






      • 7




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang I presume these are all different options, as in "you could do one of these".
        $endgroup$
        – Inferry
        Oct 15 at 15:59






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang what would you use the raft for, if you've already left in your time machine?
        $endgroup$
        – Nij
        Oct 16 at 7:37















      10
















      $begingroup$

      1. Get in your time machine and leave.


      2. Bring your own dry suit and Arctic survival gear so you can go in the water without risking your life


      3. Bring your own inflatable life raft


      4. Lock the proper doors so the hoi poloi in steerage can’t get to the life boats, ensuring there is adequate room for you and no pushing and shoving


      5. Use the pistol you brought back with you to force crew members to launch a life boat or the captain’s gig early, before the impact so you are away and clear. Make sure to murder them before you leave so they can’t go whine to the Captain and change events






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 4




        $begingroup$
        Why do you need the crew to launch a life boat? You brought your own raft.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Oct 15 at 12:38






      • 7




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang I presume these are all different options, as in "you could do one of these".
        $endgroup$
        – Inferry
        Oct 15 at 15:59






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang what would you use the raft for, if you've already left in your time machine?
        $endgroup$
        – Nij
        Oct 16 at 7:37













      10














      10










      10







      $begingroup$

      1. Get in your time machine and leave.


      2. Bring your own dry suit and Arctic survival gear so you can go in the water without risking your life


      3. Bring your own inflatable life raft


      4. Lock the proper doors so the hoi poloi in steerage can’t get to the life boats, ensuring there is adequate room for you and no pushing and shoving


      5. Use the pistol you brought back with you to force crew members to launch a life boat or the captain’s gig early, before the impact so you are away and clear. Make sure to murder them before you leave so they can’t go whine to the Captain and change events






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      1. Get in your time machine and leave.


      2. Bring your own dry suit and Arctic survival gear so you can go in the water without risking your life


      3. Bring your own inflatable life raft


      4. Lock the proper doors so the hoi poloi in steerage can’t get to the life boats, ensuring there is adequate room for you and no pushing and shoving


      5. Use the pistol you brought back with you to force crew members to launch a life boat or the captain’s gig early, before the impact so you are away and clear. Make sure to murder them before you leave so they can’t go whine to the Captain and change events







      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 15 at 19:55

























      answered Oct 15 at 8:55









      EDLEDL

      5,9621 gold badge4 silver badges31 bronze badges




      5,9621 gold badge4 silver badges31 bronze badges










      • 4




        $begingroup$
        Why do you need the crew to launch a life boat? You brought your own raft.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Oct 15 at 12:38






      • 7




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang I presume these are all different options, as in "you could do one of these".
        $endgroup$
        – Inferry
        Oct 15 at 15:59






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang what would you use the raft for, if you've already left in your time machine?
        $endgroup$
        – Nij
        Oct 16 at 7:37












      • 4




        $begingroup$
        Why do you need the crew to launch a life boat? You brought your own raft.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Oct 15 at 12:38






      • 7




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang I presume these are all different options, as in "you could do one of these".
        $endgroup$
        – Inferry
        Oct 15 at 15:59






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @NuclearWang what would you use the raft for, if you've already left in your time machine?
        $endgroup$
        – Nij
        Oct 16 at 7:37







      4




      4




      $begingroup$
      Why do you need the crew to launch a life boat? You brought your own raft.
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Oct 15 at 12:38




      $begingroup$
      Why do you need the crew to launch a life boat? You brought your own raft.
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Oct 15 at 12:38




      7




      7




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang I presume these are all different options, as in "you could do one of these".
      $endgroup$
      – Inferry
      Oct 15 at 15:59




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang I presume these are all different options, as in "you could do one of these".
      $endgroup$
      – Inferry
      Oct 15 at 15:59




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang what would you use the raft for, if you've already left in your time machine?
      $endgroup$
      – Nij
      Oct 16 at 7:37




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang what would you use the raft for, if you've already left in your time machine?
      $endgroup$
      – Nij
      Oct 16 at 7:37











      8
















      $begingroup$

      Well, from it sounds like, the lower decks for the poor folks were locked off which made it impossible to get outside. So, don't go there.



      From what I've seen, the boat rose up and then cracked in half. The middle would be bad because you're going to end up plummeting into the water along with a whole mess of wood, metal, and screaming bodies. I don't recommend that either.



      The prow rose the highest and that is probably not a roller coaster ride you would enjoy. If you don't have a way of bracing yourself, that is probably not a good place either.



      The furthest part in the back is also probably bad because the impact with the iceberg is going to cause everything to shake violently and anyone on the rear decks are probably going swimming.



      Likewise, large rooms filled with glass windows are going to be deadly as everything shatters. Not to mention you're going to have to walk through that.



      Crowds in general are going to do what crowds do which means you get a fluid-like dynamics in the panic. This means that your danger is less being crushed by people. The biggest danger is when the "ripples" of people push back, you are most likely to be knocked off your feet. So, having some sort of wall to brace against will help with this too.



      So, I'd say near the back and near the lifeboats. Somewhere relatively small and able to handle jostling, such as a linen closet or somewhere you can bounce off the walls, recover, and head to the boats right away.



      If you are one of the first on the boat to help others, that would be best for getting on and out of there. I'd also make sure there were better supplies under the seats if you could.



      Now, if you happen to fall in the water, I highly recommend you avoid massive wooden doors with just one person on them. They don't share and you are going to dramatically drown.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 2




        $begingroup$
        There is reason to believe that the breaking actually happened mostly under water, and the prow sank first, as the stern rose the highest. Here is well done illustrative CGI of the sinking.
        $endgroup$
        – Backup Plan
        Oct 15 at 11:39






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Are you the only person on the planet not to have seen the movie? It actually did a fairly faithful reconstruction of the sinking (we have extensive witness testimony of the events): The "prow" (front) sank first, the "impact" with the iceberg was a glancing blow that led to some vibration and rumbling but no great destruction, there was very little panic at least until the end.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:24















      8
















      $begingroup$

      Well, from it sounds like, the lower decks for the poor folks were locked off which made it impossible to get outside. So, don't go there.



      From what I've seen, the boat rose up and then cracked in half. The middle would be bad because you're going to end up plummeting into the water along with a whole mess of wood, metal, and screaming bodies. I don't recommend that either.



      The prow rose the highest and that is probably not a roller coaster ride you would enjoy. If you don't have a way of bracing yourself, that is probably not a good place either.



      The furthest part in the back is also probably bad because the impact with the iceberg is going to cause everything to shake violently and anyone on the rear decks are probably going swimming.



      Likewise, large rooms filled with glass windows are going to be deadly as everything shatters. Not to mention you're going to have to walk through that.



      Crowds in general are going to do what crowds do which means you get a fluid-like dynamics in the panic. This means that your danger is less being crushed by people. The biggest danger is when the "ripples" of people push back, you are most likely to be knocked off your feet. So, having some sort of wall to brace against will help with this too.



      So, I'd say near the back and near the lifeboats. Somewhere relatively small and able to handle jostling, such as a linen closet or somewhere you can bounce off the walls, recover, and head to the boats right away.



      If you are one of the first on the boat to help others, that would be best for getting on and out of there. I'd also make sure there were better supplies under the seats if you could.



      Now, if you happen to fall in the water, I highly recommend you avoid massive wooden doors with just one person on them. They don't share and you are going to dramatically drown.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 2




        $begingroup$
        There is reason to believe that the breaking actually happened mostly under water, and the prow sank first, as the stern rose the highest. Here is well done illustrative CGI of the sinking.
        $endgroup$
        – Backup Plan
        Oct 15 at 11:39






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Are you the only person on the planet not to have seen the movie? It actually did a fairly faithful reconstruction of the sinking (we have extensive witness testimony of the events): The "prow" (front) sank first, the "impact" with the iceberg was a glancing blow that led to some vibration and rumbling but no great destruction, there was very little panic at least until the end.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:24













      8














      8










      8







      $begingroup$

      Well, from it sounds like, the lower decks for the poor folks were locked off which made it impossible to get outside. So, don't go there.



      From what I've seen, the boat rose up and then cracked in half. The middle would be bad because you're going to end up plummeting into the water along with a whole mess of wood, metal, and screaming bodies. I don't recommend that either.



      The prow rose the highest and that is probably not a roller coaster ride you would enjoy. If you don't have a way of bracing yourself, that is probably not a good place either.



      The furthest part in the back is also probably bad because the impact with the iceberg is going to cause everything to shake violently and anyone on the rear decks are probably going swimming.



      Likewise, large rooms filled with glass windows are going to be deadly as everything shatters. Not to mention you're going to have to walk through that.



      Crowds in general are going to do what crowds do which means you get a fluid-like dynamics in the panic. This means that your danger is less being crushed by people. The biggest danger is when the "ripples" of people push back, you are most likely to be knocked off your feet. So, having some sort of wall to brace against will help with this too.



      So, I'd say near the back and near the lifeboats. Somewhere relatively small and able to handle jostling, such as a linen closet or somewhere you can bounce off the walls, recover, and head to the boats right away.



      If you are one of the first on the boat to help others, that would be best for getting on and out of there. I'd also make sure there were better supplies under the seats if you could.



      Now, if you happen to fall in the water, I highly recommend you avoid massive wooden doors with just one person on them. They don't share and you are going to dramatically drown.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      Well, from it sounds like, the lower decks for the poor folks were locked off which made it impossible to get outside. So, don't go there.



      From what I've seen, the boat rose up and then cracked in half. The middle would be bad because you're going to end up plummeting into the water along with a whole mess of wood, metal, and screaming bodies. I don't recommend that either.



      The prow rose the highest and that is probably not a roller coaster ride you would enjoy. If you don't have a way of bracing yourself, that is probably not a good place either.



      The furthest part in the back is also probably bad because the impact with the iceberg is going to cause everything to shake violently and anyone on the rear decks are probably going swimming.



      Likewise, large rooms filled with glass windows are going to be deadly as everything shatters. Not to mention you're going to have to walk through that.



      Crowds in general are going to do what crowds do which means you get a fluid-like dynamics in the panic. This means that your danger is less being crushed by people. The biggest danger is when the "ripples" of people push back, you are most likely to be knocked off your feet. So, having some sort of wall to brace against will help with this too.



      So, I'd say near the back and near the lifeboats. Somewhere relatively small and able to handle jostling, such as a linen closet or somewhere you can bounce off the walls, recover, and head to the boats right away.



      If you are one of the first on the boat to help others, that would be best for getting on and out of there. I'd also make sure there were better supplies under the seats if you could.



      Now, if you happen to fall in the water, I highly recommend you avoid massive wooden doors with just one person on them. They don't share and you are going to dramatically drown.







      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 15 at 13:28









      Jenkar

      1072 bronze badges




      1072 bronze badges










      answered Oct 15 at 1:47









      dmoonfiredmoonfire

      1,1516 silver badges9 bronze badges




      1,1516 silver badges9 bronze badges










      • 2




        $begingroup$
        There is reason to believe that the breaking actually happened mostly under water, and the prow sank first, as the stern rose the highest. Here is well done illustrative CGI of the sinking.
        $endgroup$
        – Backup Plan
        Oct 15 at 11:39






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Are you the only person on the planet not to have seen the movie? It actually did a fairly faithful reconstruction of the sinking (we have extensive witness testimony of the events): The "prow" (front) sank first, the "impact" with the iceberg was a glancing blow that led to some vibration and rumbling but no great destruction, there was very little panic at least until the end.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:24












      • 2




        $begingroup$
        There is reason to believe that the breaking actually happened mostly under water, and the prow sank first, as the stern rose the highest. Here is well done illustrative CGI of the sinking.
        $endgroup$
        – Backup Plan
        Oct 15 at 11:39






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Are you the only person on the planet not to have seen the movie? It actually did a fairly faithful reconstruction of the sinking (we have extensive witness testimony of the events): The "prow" (front) sank first, the "impact" with the iceberg was a glancing blow that led to some vibration and rumbling but no great destruction, there was very little panic at least until the end.
        $endgroup$
        – Oscar Bravo
        Oct 15 at 12:24







      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      There is reason to believe that the breaking actually happened mostly under water, and the prow sank first, as the stern rose the highest. Here is well done illustrative CGI of the sinking.
      $endgroup$
      – Backup Plan
      Oct 15 at 11:39




      $begingroup$
      There is reason to believe that the breaking actually happened mostly under water, and the prow sank first, as the stern rose the highest. Here is well done illustrative CGI of the sinking.
      $endgroup$
      – Backup Plan
      Oct 15 at 11:39




      8




      8




      $begingroup$
      Are you the only person on the planet not to have seen the movie? It actually did a fairly faithful reconstruction of the sinking (we have extensive witness testimony of the events): The "prow" (front) sank first, the "impact" with the iceberg was a glancing blow that led to some vibration and rumbling but no great destruction, there was very little panic at least until the end.
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      Oct 15 at 12:24




      $begingroup$
      Are you the only person on the planet not to have seen the movie? It actually did a fairly faithful reconstruction of the sinking (we have extensive witness testimony of the events): The "prow" (front) sank first, the "impact" with the iceberg was a glancing blow that led to some vibration and rumbling but no great destruction, there was very little panic at least until the end.
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      Oct 15 at 12:24











      8
















      $begingroup$

      Get first class and dress as a rich woman of that time



      First class women had the best chances of survival.

      Get hold of a first class location and/or ticket.



      Even if you are female, you need to get conforming clothes, your 21st century wear needs to be recognized as 100% female in an emergency, you cannot risk it.

      If you are male, you also need to shave and you need to do it as soon as possible.



      Your best chance for obtaining the needed clothes is kidnapping or seducing a drunk passenger from first class. In case you go for kidnapping, you can try going for a seasick first class female passenger.



      If you get the chance to prepare for the journey, you go for Miss Edith Corse as to not interfere with the survivor list.



      Source for chart.
      Chart source: https://rstudio-pubs-static.s3.amazonaws.com/185508_5c6b7ef40dd9438b82239c4b57ec9ab4.html






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Oh no! All of the child laborers employed on the Titanic died? The monsters! :P
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:48















      8
















      $begingroup$

      Get first class and dress as a rich woman of that time



      First class women had the best chances of survival.

      Get hold of a first class location and/or ticket.



      Even if you are female, you need to get conforming clothes, your 21st century wear needs to be recognized as 100% female in an emergency, you cannot risk it.

      If you are male, you also need to shave and you need to do it as soon as possible.



      Your best chance for obtaining the needed clothes is kidnapping or seducing a drunk passenger from first class. In case you go for kidnapping, you can try going for a seasick first class female passenger.



      If you get the chance to prepare for the journey, you go for Miss Edith Corse as to not interfere with the survivor list.



      Source for chart.
      Chart source: https://rstudio-pubs-static.s3.amazonaws.com/185508_5c6b7ef40dd9438b82239c4b57ec9ab4.html






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$










      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Oh no! All of the child laborers employed on the Titanic died? The monsters! :P
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:48













      8














      8










      8







      $begingroup$

      Get first class and dress as a rich woman of that time



      First class women had the best chances of survival.

      Get hold of a first class location and/or ticket.



      Even if you are female, you need to get conforming clothes, your 21st century wear needs to be recognized as 100% female in an emergency, you cannot risk it.

      If you are male, you also need to shave and you need to do it as soon as possible.



      Your best chance for obtaining the needed clothes is kidnapping or seducing a drunk passenger from first class. In case you go for kidnapping, you can try going for a seasick first class female passenger.



      If you get the chance to prepare for the journey, you go for Miss Edith Corse as to not interfere with the survivor list.



      Source for chart.
      Chart source: https://rstudio-pubs-static.s3.amazonaws.com/185508_5c6b7ef40dd9438b82239c4b57ec9ab4.html






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      Get first class and dress as a rich woman of that time



      First class women had the best chances of survival.

      Get hold of a first class location and/or ticket.



      Even if you are female, you need to get conforming clothes, your 21st century wear needs to be recognized as 100% female in an emergency, you cannot risk it.

      If you are male, you also need to shave and you need to do it as soon as possible.



      Your best chance for obtaining the needed clothes is kidnapping or seducing a drunk passenger from first class. In case you go for kidnapping, you can try going for a seasick first class female passenger.



      If you get the chance to prepare for the journey, you go for Miss Edith Corse as to not interfere with the survivor list.



      Source for chart.
      Chart source: https://rstudio-pubs-static.s3.amazonaws.com/185508_5c6b7ef40dd9438b82239c4b57ec9ab4.html







      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited Oct 16 at 17:37









      Community

      1




      1










      answered Oct 15 at 12:55









      user3819867user3819867

      1913 bronze badges




      1913 bronze badges










      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Oh no! All of the child laborers employed on the Titanic died? The monsters! :P
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:48












      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Oh no! All of the child laborers employed on the Titanic died? The monsters! :P
        $endgroup$
        – bvoyelr
        Oct 15 at 13:48







      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      Oh no! All of the child laborers employed on the Titanic died? The monsters! :P
      $endgroup$
      – bvoyelr
      Oct 15 at 13:48




      $begingroup$
      Oh no! All of the child laborers employed on the Titanic died? The monsters! :P
      $endgroup$
      – bvoyelr
      Oct 15 at 13:48











      6
















      $begingroup$

      You must demand entry aboard the SS Californian.



      The Californian was roughly 5 miles away from the Titanic after it struck ice. Because it was so close, the idea of rescue was not out of the question. Therefore, you should volunteer to enter a life boat headed towards the Californian when they are first launched.



      It is, however, well-known that the Californian ignored emergency rockets and the Marconi wireless operator was not at his station during the crisis. However you choose to convince Captain Stanley Lord is up to you.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        Five miles is a long way to row a lifeboat. By the time you get there, get aboard, and get back, the Titanic will have sunk.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 21:55






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Mark Why do you need to get back?
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:23










      • $begingroup$
        @AzorAhai, to bring the Californian with you.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 23:28






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Mark The question doesn't ask how to save anyone but the OP
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:28















      6
















      $begingroup$

      You must demand entry aboard the SS Californian.



      The Californian was roughly 5 miles away from the Titanic after it struck ice. Because it was so close, the idea of rescue was not out of the question. Therefore, you should volunteer to enter a life boat headed towards the Californian when they are first launched.



      It is, however, well-known that the Californian ignored emergency rockets and the Marconi wireless operator was not at his station during the crisis. However you choose to convince Captain Stanley Lord is up to you.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        Five miles is a long way to row a lifeboat. By the time you get there, get aboard, and get back, the Titanic will have sunk.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 21:55






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Mark Why do you need to get back?
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:23










      • $begingroup$
        @AzorAhai, to bring the Californian with you.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 23:28






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Mark The question doesn't ask how to save anyone but the OP
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:28













      6














      6










      6







      $begingroup$

      You must demand entry aboard the SS Californian.



      The Californian was roughly 5 miles away from the Titanic after it struck ice. Because it was so close, the idea of rescue was not out of the question. Therefore, you should volunteer to enter a life boat headed towards the Californian when they are first launched.



      It is, however, well-known that the Californian ignored emergency rockets and the Marconi wireless operator was not at his station during the crisis. However you choose to convince Captain Stanley Lord is up to you.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$



      You must demand entry aboard the SS Californian.



      The Californian was roughly 5 miles away from the Titanic after it struck ice. Because it was so close, the idea of rescue was not out of the question. Therefore, you should volunteer to enter a life boat headed towards the Californian when they are first launched.



      It is, however, well-known that the Californian ignored emergency rockets and the Marconi wireless operator was not at his station during the crisis. However you choose to convince Captain Stanley Lord is up to you.







      share|improve this answer













      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer










      answered Oct 15 at 14:01









      Yamcha_KippurYamcha_Kippur

      691 bronze badge




      691 bronze badge














      • $begingroup$
        Five miles is a long way to row a lifeboat. By the time you get there, get aboard, and get back, the Titanic will have sunk.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 21:55






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Mark Why do you need to get back?
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:23










      • $begingroup$
        @AzorAhai, to bring the Californian with you.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 23:28






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Mark The question doesn't ask how to save anyone but the OP
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:28
















      • $begingroup$
        Five miles is a long way to row a lifeboat. By the time you get there, get aboard, and get back, the Titanic will have sunk.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 21:55






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @Mark Why do you need to get back?
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:23










      • $begingroup$
        @AzorAhai, to bring the Californian with you.
        $endgroup$
        – Mark
        Oct 15 at 23:28






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        @Mark The question doesn't ask how to save anyone but the OP
        $endgroup$
        – Azor Ahai
        Oct 15 at 23:28















      $begingroup$
      Five miles is a long way to row a lifeboat. By the time you get there, get aboard, and get back, the Titanic will have sunk.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Oct 15 at 21:55




      $begingroup$
      Five miles is a long way to row a lifeboat. By the time you get there, get aboard, and get back, the Titanic will have sunk.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Oct 15 at 21:55




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @Mark Why do you need to get back?
      $endgroup$
      – Azor Ahai
      Oct 15 at 23:23




      $begingroup$
      @Mark Why do you need to get back?
      $endgroup$
      – Azor Ahai
      Oct 15 at 23:23












      $begingroup$
      @AzorAhai, to bring the Californian with you.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Oct 15 at 23:28




      $begingroup$
      @AzorAhai, to bring the Californian with you.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Oct 15 at 23:28




      5




      5




      $begingroup$
      @Mark The question doesn't ask how to save anyone but the OP
      $endgroup$
      – Azor Ahai
      Oct 15 at 23:28




      $begingroup$
      @Mark The question doesn't ask how to save anyone but the OP
      $endgroup$
      – Azor Ahai
      Oct 15 at 23:28











      6
















      $begingroup$

      Find "Rose's door"



      I mean this seriously, but figuratively.



      In the movie, the floating door was how Rose survived. It was a literary device to allow a believable, yet unexpected way for her to live to tell her story.



      Create "Rose's door" for your story. It could be a paddle, maybe some kind of semi-waterproof wrapping, a makeshift wetsuit, or even a buoyant bathtub. You might even survive by floating in your time machine itself.



      That would be the "least likely to contaminate the timeline" while allowing you to be witness to more.



      Think "fly on the wall", or "Rose on the door". Be creative and inventive.




      Note on comedy:



      If you are going for some comedy, you could make it an actual door, perhaps even drop a line, "I remember someone survived by floating on a door." Especially in time travel, some tongue-in-cheek humor makes the medicine go down. Comedy often plays a role in time travel, consider Back to the Future or Avengers: End Game where Captain America fights himself.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



















        6
















        $begingroup$

        Find "Rose's door"



        I mean this seriously, but figuratively.



        In the movie, the floating door was how Rose survived. It was a literary device to allow a believable, yet unexpected way for her to live to tell her story.



        Create "Rose's door" for your story. It could be a paddle, maybe some kind of semi-waterproof wrapping, a makeshift wetsuit, or even a buoyant bathtub. You might even survive by floating in your time machine itself.



        That would be the "least likely to contaminate the timeline" while allowing you to be witness to more.



        Think "fly on the wall", or "Rose on the door". Be creative and inventive.




        Note on comedy:



        If you are going for some comedy, you could make it an actual door, perhaps even drop a line, "I remember someone survived by floating on a door." Especially in time travel, some tongue-in-cheek humor makes the medicine go down. Comedy often plays a role in time travel, consider Back to the Future or Avengers: End Game where Captain America fights himself.






        share|improve this answer












        $endgroup$

















          6














          6










          6







          $begingroup$

          Find "Rose's door"



          I mean this seriously, but figuratively.



          In the movie, the floating door was how Rose survived. It was a literary device to allow a believable, yet unexpected way for her to live to tell her story.



          Create "Rose's door" for your story. It could be a paddle, maybe some kind of semi-waterproof wrapping, a makeshift wetsuit, or even a buoyant bathtub. You might even survive by floating in your time machine itself.



          That would be the "least likely to contaminate the timeline" while allowing you to be witness to more.



          Think "fly on the wall", or "Rose on the door". Be creative and inventive.




          Note on comedy:



          If you are going for some comedy, you could make it an actual door, perhaps even drop a line, "I remember someone survived by floating on a door." Especially in time travel, some tongue-in-cheek humor makes the medicine go down. Comedy often plays a role in time travel, consider Back to the Future or Avengers: End Game where Captain America fights himself.






          share|improve this answer












          $endgroup$



          Find "Rose's door"



          I mean this seriously, but figuratively.



          In the movie, the floating door was how Rose survived. It was a literary device to allow a believable, yet unexpected way for her to live to tell her story.



          Create "Rose's door" for your story. It could be a paddle, maybe some kind of semi-waterproof wrapping, a makeshift wetsuit, or even a buoyant bathtub. You might even survive by floating in your time machine itself.



          That would be the "least likely to contaminate the timeline" while allowing you to be witness to more.



          Think "fly on the wall", or "Rose on the door". Be creative and inventive.




          Note on comedy:



          If you are going for some comedy, you could make it an actual door, perhaps even drop a line, "I remember someone survived by floating on a door." Especially in time travel, some tongue-in-cheek humor makes the medicine go down. Comedy often plays a role in time travel, consider Back to the Future or Avengers: End Game where Captain America fights himself.







          share|improve this answer















          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer








          edited Oct 16 at 17:16

























          answered Oct 15 at 16:09









          Jesse SteeleJesse Steele

          7413 silver badges7 bronze badges




          7413 silver badges7 bronze badges
























              3
















              $begingroup$

              1. Travel first-class (or if you're transporting directly onto the ship without a ticket, make every effort to look like a first-class passenger). This gives you a 62% chance of survival, compared to an overall 32%. Since you're a time traveler, I assume that you've already gotten rich from bringing back winning lottery numbers and stock quotes from the future, so this will be easy.

              2. If you're a woman, you've got it made, as long as you're on the boat deck while there are still lifeboats left to launch. If you're a man, then make sure to be on the starboard side of the ship, where Officer Murdoch was more willing to let men into boats than his counterpart Lightoller on the port side.

              3. If it's getting late in the sinking do not follow the crowd towards the stern, as they'll mostly be doomed. Instead, head forward towards the officer's quarters, where the four collapsible lifeboats are kept. These will be the last boats to leave the ship. Volunteer to help launch these boats, as the crew will be struggling with them.





              share|improve this answer










              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                point 3 about the crew lifeboats is excellent
                $endgroup$
                – Pureferret
                Oct 16 at 14:15















              3
















              $begingroup$

              1. Travel first-class (or if you're transporting directly onto the ship without a ticket, make every effort to look like a first-class passenger). This gives you a 62% chance of survival, compared to an overall 32%. Since you're a time traveler, I assume that you've already gotten rich from bringing back winning lottery numbers and stock quotes from the future, so this will be easy.

              2. If you're a woman, you've got it made, as long as you're on the boat deck while there are still lifeboats left to launch. If you're a man, then make sure to be on the starboard side of the ship, where Officer Murdoch was more willing to let men into boats than his counterpart Lightoller on the port side.

              3. If it's getting late in the sinking do not follow the crowd towards the stern, as they'll mostly be doomed. Instead, head forward towards the officer's quarters, where the four collapsible lifeboats are kept. These will be the last boats to leave the ship. Volunteer to help launch these boats, as the crew will be struggling with them.





              share|improve this answer










              $endgroup$














              • $begingroup$
                point 3 about the crew lifeboats is excellent
                $endgroup$
                – Pureferret
                Oct 16 at 14:15













              3














              3










              3







              $begingroup$

              1. Travel first-class (or if you're transporting directly onto the ship without a ticket, make every effort to look like a first-class passenger). This gives you a 62% chance of survival, compared to an overall 32%. Since you're a time traveler, I assume that you've already gotten rich from bringing back winning lottery numbers and stock quotes from the future, so this will be easy.

              2. If you're a woman, you've got it made, as long as you're on the boat deck while there are still lifeboats left to launch. If you're a man, then make sure to be on the starboard side of the ship, where Officer Murdoch was more willing to let men into boats than his counterpart Lightoller on the port side.

              3. If it's getting late in the sinking do not follow the crowd towards the stern, as they'll mostly be doomed. Instead, head forward towards the officer's quarters, where the four collapsible lifeboats are kept. These will be the last boats to leave the ship. Volunteer to help launch these boats, as the crew will be struggling with them.





              share|improve this answer










              $endgroup$



              1. Travel first-class (or if you're transporting directly onto the ship without a ticket, make every effort to look like a first-class passenger). This gives you a 62% chance of survival, compared to an overall 32%. Since you're a time traveler, I assume that you've already gotten rich from bringing back winning lottery numbers and stock quotes from the future, so this will be easy.

              2. If you're a woman, you've got it made, as long as you're on the boat deck while there are still lifeboats left to launch. If you're a man, then make sure to be on the starboard side of the ship, where Officer Murdoch was more willing to let men into boats than his counterpart Lightoller on the port side.

              3. If it's getting late in the sinking do not follow the crowd towards the stern, as they'll mostly be doomed. Instead, head forward towards the officer's quarters, where the four collapsible lifeboats are kept. These will be the last boats to leave the ship. Volunteer to help launch these boats, as the crew will be struggling with them.






              share|improve this answer













              share|improve this answer




              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 15 at 13:32









              dan04dan04

              3783 silver badges8 bronze badges




              3783 silver badges8 bronze badges














              • $begingroup$
                point 3 about the crew lifeboats is excellent
                $endgroup$
                – Pureferret
                Oct 16 at 14:15
















              • $begingroup$
                point 3 about the crew lifeboats is excellent
                $endgroup$
                – Pureferret
                Oct 16 at 14:15















              $begingroup$
              point 3 about the crew lifeboats is excellent
              $endgroup$
              – Pureferret
              Oct 16 at 14:15




              $begingroup$
              point 3 about the crew lifeboats is excellent
              $endgroup$
              – Pureferret
              Oct 16 at 14:15











              2
















              $begingroup$

              I think the most reliable way to survive would be to get the radiation suit off (they're very good at helping people sink) and get back to the time-machine. You're wearing a radiation suit meaning at best you'll get funny looks from everyone - which while it might seem it won't matter (since most of them will die anyway) could seriously impact the timeline.



              In addition, you don't actually need to jump too far. A jump of 30 minutes after the sinking will have you in the water just as the Caroathia is arriving.



              The joy of this, is that it was pure luck that they were able to locate the survivors at all, since they had drifted and only a flare alerted the rescue teams to the new location. By making that jump just a little further; you can be the one that happened to look the right way at the right time to see the flare. (if one was ever launched!)






              share|improve this answer










              $endgroup$



















                2
















                $begingroup$

                I think the most reliable way to survive would be to get the radiation suit off (they're very good at helping people sink) and get back to the time-machine. You're wearing a radiation suit meaning at best you'll get funny looks from everyone - which while it might seem it won't matter (since most of them will die anyway) could seriously impact the timeline.



                In addition, you don't actually need to jump too far. A jump of 30 minutes after the sinking will have you in the water just as the Caroathia is arriving.



                The joy of this, is that it was pure luck that they were able to locate the survivors at all, since they had drifted and only a flare alerted the rescue teams to the new location. By making that jump just a little further; you can be the one that happened to look the right way at the right time to see the flare. (if one was ever launched!)






                share|improve this answer










                $endgroup$

















                  2














                  2










                  2







                  $begingroup$

                  I think the most reliable way to survive would be to get the radiation suit off (they're very good at helping people sink) and get back to the time-machine. You're wearing a radiation suit meaning at best you'll get funny looks from everyone - which while it might seem it won't matter (since most of them will die anyway) could seriously impact the timeline.



                  In addition, you don't actually need to jump too far. A jump of 30 minutes after the sinking will have you in the water just as the Caroathia is arriving.



                  The joy of this, is that it was pure luck that they were able to locate the survivors at all, since they had drifted and only a flare alerted the rescue teams to the new location. By making that jump just a little further; you can be the one that happened to look the right way at the right time to see the flare. (if one was ever launched!)






                  share|improve this answer










                  $endgroup$



                  I think the most reliable way to survive would be to get the radiation suit off (they're very good at helping people sink) and get back to the time-machine. You're wearing a radiation suit meaning at best you'll get funny looks from everyone - which while it might seem it won't matter (since most of them will die anyway) could seriously impact the timeline.



                  In addition, you don't actually need to jump too far. A jump of 30 minutes after the sinking will have you in the water just as the Caroathia is arriving.



                  The joy of this, is that it was pure luck that they were able to locate the survivors at all, since they had drifted and only a flare alerted the rescue teams to the new location. By making that jump just a little further; you can be the one that happened to look the right way at the right time to see the flare. (if one was ever launched!)







                  share|improve this answer













                  share|improve this answer




                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Oct 16 at 0:07









                  UKMonkeyUKMonkey

                  5462 silver badges6 bronze badges




                  5462 silver badges6 bronze badges
























                      0
















                      $begingroup$

                      I would attempt to steal a lifeboat and depart from the ship prior to the accident.






                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$










                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        There weren't any reports of such a thing happening, so that may fall afoul of the requiremen to avoid changing the timeline as much as possible.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 16 at 10:58










                      • $begingroup$
                        Because they had the correct number of lifeboats, you mean?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 16 at 22:08










                      • $begingroup$
                        As far as I'm aware, yes. I'd like to think that such a thing would have been noticed during the post-accident investigation, but I've no idea how reliable or thorough such things were.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 17 at 8:57






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime Titanic was only carrying two thirds of the maximum number of lifeboats, so there were already empty places on the deck. Several went down with the ship, and their location and condition were undetermined for many years.. OP may scuttle the boat after viewing the disaster, and no one would be the wiser.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 17 at 19:19











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Innovine: None of Titanic's lifeboats went down with the ship. A couple floated off the ship without being properly launched, but people were able to take refuge on them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:31















                      0
















                      $begingroup$

                      I would attempt to steal a lifeboat and depart from the ship prior to the accident.






                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$










                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        There weren't any reports of such a thing happening, so that may fall afoul of the requiremen to avoid changing the timeline as much as possible.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 16 at 10:58










                      • $begingroup$
                        Because they had the correct number of lifeboats, you mean?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 16 at 22:08










                      • $begingroup$
                        As far as I'm aware, yes. I'd like to think that such a thing would have been noticed during the post-accident investigation, but I've no idea how reliable or thorough such things were.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 17 at 8:57






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime Titanic was only carrying two thirds of the maximum number of lifeboats, so there were already empty places on the deck. Several went down with the ship, and their location and condition were undetermined for many years.. OP may scuttle the boat after viewing the disaster, and no one would be the wiser.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 17 at 19:19











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Innovine: None of Titanic's lifeboats went down with the ship. A couple floated off the ship without being properly launched, but people were able to take refuge on them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:31













                      0














                      0










                      0







                      $begingroup$

                      I would attempt to steal a lifeboat and depart from the ship prior to the accident.






                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$



                      I would attempt to steal a lifeboat and depart from the ship prior to the accident.







                      share|improve this answer













                      share|improve this answer




                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Oct 16 at 10:35









                      InnovineInnovine

                      4,45810 silver badges28 bronze badges




                      4,45810 silver badges28 bronze badges










                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        There weren't any reports of such a thing happening, so that may fall afoul of the requiremen to avoid changing the timeline as much as possible.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 16 at 10:58










                      • $begingroup$
                        Because they had the correct number of lifeboats, you mean?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 16 at 22:08










                      • $begingroup$
                        As far as I'm aware, yes. I'd like to think that such a thing would have been noticed during the post-accident investigation, but I've no idea how reliable or thorough such things were.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 17 at 8:57






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime Titanic was only carrying two thirds of the maximum number of lifeboats, so there were already empty places on the deck. Several went down with the ship, and their location and condition were undetermined for many years.. OP may scuttle the boat after viewing the disaster, and no one would be the wiser.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 17 at 19:19











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Innovine: None of Titanic's lifeboats went down with the ship. A couple floated off the ship without being properly launched, but people were able to take refuge on them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:31












                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        There weren't any reports of such a thing happening, so that may fall afoul of the requiremen to avoid changing the timeline as much as possible.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 16 at 10:58










                      • $begingroup$
                        Because they had the correct number of lifeboats, you mean?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 16 at 22:08










                      • $begingroup$
                        As far as I'm aware, yes. I'd like to think that such a thing would have been noticed during the post-accident investigation, but I've no idea how reliable or thorough such things were.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        Oct 17 at 8:57






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime Titanic was only carrying two thirds of the maximum number of lifeboats, so there were already empty places on the deck. Several went down with the ship, and their location and condition were undetermined for many years.. OP may scuttle the boat after viewing the disaster, and no one would be the wiser.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Innovine
                        Oct 17 at 19:19











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Innovine: None of Titanic's lifeboats went down with the ship. A couple floated off the ship without being properly launched, but people were able to take refuge on them.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:31







                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      There weren't any reports of such a thing happening, so that may fall afoul of the requiremen to avoid changing the timeline as much as possible.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      Oct 16 at 10:58




                      $begingroup$
                      There weren't any reports of such a thing happening, so that may fall afoul of the requiremen to avoid changing the timeline as much as possible.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      Oct 16 at 10:58












                      $begingroup$
                      Because they had the correct number of lifeboats, you mean?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Innovine
                      Oct 16 at 22:08




                      $begingroup$
                      Because they had the correct number of lifeboats, you mean?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Innovine
                      Oct 16 at 22:08












                      $begingroup$
                      As far as I'm aware, yes. I'd like to think that such a thing would have been noticed during the post-accident investigation, but I've no idea how reliable or thorough such things were.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      Oct 17 at 8:57




                      $begingroup$
                      As far as I'm aware, yes. I'd like to think that such a thing would have been noticed during the post-accident investigation, but I've no idea how reliable or thorough such things were.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      Oct 17 at 8:57




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      @StarfishPrime Titanic was only carrying two thirds of the maximum number of lifeboats, so there were already empty places on the deck. Several went down with the ship, and their location and condition were undetermined for many years.. OP may scuttle the boat after viewing the disaster, and no one would be the wiser.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Innovine
                      Oct 17 at 19:19





                      $begingroup$
                      @StarfishPrime Titanic was only carrying two thirds of the maximum number of lifeboats, so there were already empty places on the deck. Several went down with the ship, and their location and condition were undetermined for many years.. OP may scuttle the boat after viewing the disaster, and no one would be the wiser.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Innovine
                      Oct 17 at 19:19













                      $begingroup$
                      @Innovine: None of Titanic's lifeboats went down with the ship. A couple floated off the ship without being properly launched, but people were able to take refuge on them.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dan04
                      Oct 20 at 15:31




                      $begingroup$
                      @Innovine: None of Titanic's lifeboats went down with the ship. A couple floated off the ship without being properly launched, but people were able to take refuge on them.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dan04
                      Oct 20 at 15:31











                      -3
















                      $begingroup$

                      Are you planning on coming back to your own time? If your time machine is on the Titanic then obviously it's going down with it. Unless you joined in port and the machine is there, in which case you're obviously having an extended visit during which you'll already have had to blend in during the journey, and will have to continue to do so until you can get back to Southampton/Cherbourg/Cobh to collect the machine.



                      In either case, the simplest answer would seem to be to research somebody who is known to have survived, including which lifeboat they were in (or how else they survived).



                      Kill them before the journey (if on board since port) or at least before the ship sinks (otherwise). Although the latter may not be necessary - perhaps the always drowned and you're the one recorded as having survived. Take their lifeboat seat, and you're safe.



                      If you're not planning on returning to your own time, you'll need to keep up the pretence of being this person, so best to choose someone you bear a physical resemblance to, without close family (maybe the whole family die on board?). If possible, make some previous reconnaissance trips to learn more about the individual, or even introduce yourself to some people as them in order to help maintain the fiction.



                      If you are planning to return, pick someone who was died shortly afterwards. This actually works out simpler if you've been on board since port, since you just kill them before the trip and stash the body, take the trip as them, then when you return to collect your time machine you leave there body to be discovered as it always was.



                      Finally, killing them before the trip rather than on board (or just letting them die in the sinking) is probably preferable since at least you know before you board that it's you that survives. Otherwise maybe something goes wrong and it is actually them, and you're lost with the ship.






                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$










                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Seems like overkill (literally) to murder someone for their seat on a lifeboat, considering that there were plenty of empty seats. Why not do some research to find one of the half-empty lifeboats and go there instead?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nuclear Wang
                        Oct 15 at 15:17







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Oh definitely, if the only goal is surviving. I was possibly focusing too much on the "changing the timeline as little as possible" aspect. Given there's a fair bit of detail about the survivors, adding a new one might have undesired repercussions
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mohirl
                        Oct 15 at 15:47










                      • $begingroup$
                        There were several Titanic passengers who were travelling under fake identities. Adding one more wouldn't change history that much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:35















                      -3
















                      $begingroup$

                      Are you planning on coming back to your own time? If your time machine is on the Titanic then obviously it's going down with it. Unless you joined in port and the machine is there, in which case you're obviously having an extended visit during which you'll already have had to blend in during the journey, and will have to continue to do so until you can get back to Southampton/Cherbourg/Cobh to collect the machine.



                      In either case, the simplest answer would seem to be to research somebody who is known to have survived, including which lifeboat they were in (or how else they survived).



                      Kill them before the journey (if on board since port) or at least before the ship sinks (otherwise). Although the latter may not be necessary - perhaps the always drowned and you're the one recorded as having survived. Take their lifeboat seat, and you're safe.



                      If you're not planning on returning to your own time, you'll need to keep up the pretence of being this person, so best to choose someone you bear a physical resemblance to, without close family (maybe the whole family die on board?). If possible, make some previous reconnaissance trips to learn more about the individual, or even introduce yourself to some people as them in order to help maintain the fiction.



                      If you are planning to return, pick someone who was died shortly afterwards. This actually works out simpler if you've been on board since port, since you just kill them before the trip and stash the body, take the trip as them, then when you return to collect your time machine you leave there body to be discovered as it always was.



                      Finally, killing them before the trip rather than on board (or just letting them die in the sinking) is probably preferable since at least you know before you board that it's you that survives. Otherwise maybe something goes wrong and it is actually them, and you're lost with the ship.






                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$










                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Seems like overkill (literally) to murder someone for their seat on a lifeboat, considering that there were plenty of empty seats. Why not do some research to find one of the half-empty lifeboats and go there instead?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nuclear Wang
                        Oct 15 at 15:17







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Oh definitely, if the only goal is surviving. I was possibly focusing too much on the "changing the timeline as little as possible" aspect. Given there's a fair bit of detail about the survivors, adding a new one might have undesired repercussions
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mohirl
                        Oct 15 at 15:47










                      • $begingroup$
                        There were several Titanic passengers who were travelling under fake identities. Adding one more wouldn't change history that much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:35













                      -3














                      -3










                      -3







                      $begingroup$

                      Are you planning on coming back to your own time? If your time machine is on the Titanic then obviously it's going down with it. Unless you joined in port and the machine is there, in which case you're obviously having an extended visit during which you'll already have had to blend in during the journey, and will have to continue to do so until you can get back to Southampton/Cherbourg/Cobh to collect the machine.



                      In either case, the simplest answer would seem to be to research somebody who is known to have survived, including which lifeboat they were in (or how else they survived).



                      Kill them before the journey (if on board since port) or at least before the ship sinks (otherwise). Although the latter may not be necessary - perhaps the always drowned and you're the one recorded as having survived. Take their lifeboat seat, and you're safe.



                      If you're not planning on returning to your own time, you'll need to keep up the pretence of being this person, so best to choose someone you bear a physical resemblance to, without close family (maybe the whole family die on board?). If possible, make some previous reconnaissance trips to learn more about the individual, or even introduce yourself to some people as them in order to help maintain the fiction.



                      If you are planning to return, pick someone who was died shortly afterwards. This actually works out simpler if you've been on board since port, since you just kill them before the trip and stash the body, take the trip as them, then when you return to collect your time machine you leave there body to be discovered as it always was.



                      Finally, killing them before the trip rather than on board (or just letting them die in the sinking) is probably preferable since at least you know before you board that it's you that survives. Otherwise maybe something goes wrong and it is actually them, and you're lost with the ship.






                      share|improve this answer










                      $endgroup$



                      Are you planning on coming back to your own time? If your time machine is on the Titanic then obviously it's going down with it. Unless you joined in port and the machine is there, in which case you're obviously having an extended visit during which you'll already have had to blend in during the journey, and will have to continue to do so until you can get back to Southampton/Cherbourg/Cobh to collect the machine.



                      In either case, the simplest answer would seem to be to research somebody who is known to have survived, including which lifeboat they were in (or how else they survived).



                      Kill them before the journey (if on board since port) or at least before the ship sinks (otherwise). Although the latter may not be necessary - perhaps the always drowned and you're the one recorded as having survived. Take their lifeboat seat, and you're safe.



                      If you're not planning on returning to your own time, you'll need to keep up the pretence of being this person, so best to choose someone you bear a physical resemblance to, without close family (maybe the whole family die on board?). If possible, make some previous reconnaissance trips to learn more about the individual, or even introduce yourself to some people as them in order to help maintain the fiction.



                      If you are planning to return, pick someone who was died shortly afterwards. This actually works out simpler if you've been on board since port, since you just kill them before the trip and stash the body, take the trip as them, then when you return to collect your time machine you leave there body to be discovered as it always was.



                      Finally, killing them before the trip rather than on board (or just letting them die in the sinking) is probably preferable since at least you know before you board that it's you that survives. Otherwise maybe something goes wrong and it is actually them, and you're lost with the ship.







                      share|improve this answer













                      share|improve this answer




                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Oct 15 at 13:23









                      MohirlMohirl

                      1624 bronze badges




                      1624 bronze badges










                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Seems like overkill (literally) to murder someone for their seat on a lifeboat, considering that there were plenty of empty seats. Why not do some research to find one of the half-empty lifeboats and go there instead?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nuclear Wang
                        Oct 15 at 15:17







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Oh definitely, if the only goal is surviving. I was possibly focusing too much on the "changing the timeline as little as possible" aspect. Given there's a fair bit of detail about the survivors, adding a new one might have undesired repercussions
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mohirl
                        Oct 15 at 15:47










                      • $begingroup$
                        There were several Titanic passengers who were travelling under fake identities. Adding one more wouldn't change history that much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:35












                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Seems like overkill (literally) to murder someone for their seat on a lifeboat, considering that there were plenty of empty seats. Why not do some research to find one of the half-empty lifeboats and go there instead?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nuclear Wang
                        Oct 15 at 15:17







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Oh definitely, if the only goal is surviving. I was possibly focusing too much on the "changing the timeline as little as possible" aspect. Given there's a fair bit of detail about the survivors, adding a new one might have undesired repercussions
                        $endgroup$
                        – Mohirl
                        Oct 15 at 15:47










                      • $begingroup$
                        There were several Titanic passengers who were travelling under fake identities. Adding one more wouldn't change history that much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dan04
                        Oct 20 at 15:35







                      3




                      3




                      $begingroup$
                      Seems like overkill (literally) to murder someone for their seat on a lifeboat, considering that there were plenty of empty seats. Why not do some research to find one of the half-empty lifeboats and go there instead?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      Oct 15 at 15:17





                      $begingroup$
                      Seems like overkill (literally) to murder someone for their seat on a lifeboat, considering that there were plenty of empty seats. Why not do some research to find one of the half-empty lifeboats and go there instead?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nuclear Wang
                      Oct 15 at 15:17





                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Oh definitely, if the only goal is surviving. I was possibly focusing too much on the "changing the timeline as little as possible" aspect. Given there's a fair bit of detail about the survivors, adding a new one might have undesired repercussions
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mohirl
                      Oct 15 at 15:47




                      $begingroup$
                      Oh definitely, if the only goal is surviving. I was possibly focusing too much on the "changing the timeline as little as possible" aspect. Given there's a fair bit of detail about the survivors, adding a new one might have undesired repercussions
                      $endgroup$
                      – Mohirl
                      Oct 15 at 15:47












                      $begingroup$
                      There were several Titanic passengers who were travelling under fake identities. Adding one more wouldn't change history that much.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dan04
                      Oct 20 at 15:35




                      $begingroup$
                      There were several Titanic passengers who were travelling under fake identities. Adding one more wouldn't change history that much.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dan04
                      Oct 20 at 15:35











                      -4
















                      $begingroup$

                      Titanic struck the iceberg at 23:40 local time.



                      1. At 23:20, yell "Man overboard". Make as much noise to warn the bridge, namely First Officer Murdoch, that someone fell overboard and tried to die by suicide.

                      You can overstate your lie by alleging that you were trying to talk him/her out of suicide, but (s)he jumped anyways.



                      Murdoch would then order the ship to stop and find this person. If he does, then the Titanic would've stopped right before hitting the iceberg. And you can point to the iceberg that you saved everyone from!



                      I got this idea from Rose DeWitt's attempted suicide in the 1997 movie.



                      1. Bring a LED flashlight that can output at least 53K lumens. Then at 23:30, go to the bow and shine it in front so that the lookouts and Officer Murdoch will see the iceberg.

                      Reddit has a video clip of such a flashlight. Does anyone know how to embed it in-line?






                      share|improve this answer












                      $endgroup$










                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        The question text includes "One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg." (emphasis added)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nij
                        Oct 16 at 7:48










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even if this light reaches 2 km away would that be enough for the Titanic to stop?
                        $endgroup$
                        – gerrit
                        Oct 16 at 15:10















                      -4
















                      $begingroup$

                      Titanic struck the iceberg at 23:40 local time.



                      1. At 23:20, yell "Man overboard". Make as much noise to warn the bridge, namely First Officer Murdoch, that someone fell overboard and tried to die by suicide.

                      You can overstate your lie by alleging that you were trying to talk him/her out of suicide, but (s)he jumped anyways.



                      Murdoch would then order the ship to stop and find this person. If he does, then the Titanic would've stopped right before hitting the iceberg. And you can point to the iceberg that you saved everyone from!



                      I got this idea from Rose DeWitt's attempted suicide in the 1997 movie.



                      1. Bring a LED flashlight that can output at least 53K lumens. Then at 23:30, go to the bow and shine it in front so that the lookouts and Officer Murdoch will see the iceberg.

                      Reddit has a video clip of such a flashlight. Does anyone know how to embed it in-line?






                      share|improve this answer












                      $endgroup$










                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        The question text includes "One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg." (emphasis added)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nij
                        Oct 16 at 7:48










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even if this light reaches 2 km away would that be enough for the Titanic to stop?
                        $endgroup$
                        – gerrit
                        Oct 16 at 15:10













                      -4














                      -4










                      -4







                      $begingroup$

                      Titanic struck the iceberg at 23:40 local time.



                      1. At 23:20, yell "Man overboard". Make as much noise to warn the bridge, namely First Officer Murdoch, that someone fell overboard and tried to die by suicide.

                      You can overstate your lie by alleging that you were trying to talk him/her out of suicide, but (s)he jumped anyways.



                      Murdoch would then order the ship to stop and find this person. If he does, then the Titanic would've stopped right before hitting the iceberg. And you can point to the iceberg that you saved everyone from!



                      I got this idea from Rose DeWitt's attempted suicide in the 1997 movie.



                      1. Bring a LED flashlight that can output at least 53K lumens. Then at 23:30, go to the bow and shine it in front so that the lookouts and Officer Murdoch will see the iceberg.

                      Reddit has a video clip of such a flashlight. Does anyone know how to embed it in-line?






                      share|improve this answer












                      $endgroup$



                      Titanic struck the iceberg at 23:40 local time.



                      1. At 23:20, yell "Man overboard". Make as much noise to warn the bridge, namely First Officer Murdoch, that someone fell overboard and tried to die by suicide.

                      You can overstate your lie by alleging that you were trying to talk him/her out of suicide, but (s)he jumped anyways.



                      Murdoch would then order the ship to stop and find this person. If he does, then the Titanic would've stopped right before hitting the iceberg. And you can point to the iceberg that you saved everyone from!



                      I got this idea from Rose DeWitt's attempted suicide in the 1997 movie.



                      1. Bring a LED flashlight that can output at least 53K lumens. Then at 23:30, go to the bow and shine it in front so that the lookouts and Officer Murdoch will see the iceberg.

                      Reddit has a video clip of such a flashlight. Does anyone know how to embed it in-line?







                      share|improve this answer















                      share|improve this answer




                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Oct 16 at 2:53

























                      answered Oct 16 at 2:46









                      Melissa Yue WallaceMelissa Yue Wallace

                      1631 silver badge6 bronze badges




                      1631 silver badge6 bronze badges










                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        The question text includes "One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg." (emphasis added)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nij
                        Oct 16 at 7:48










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even if this light reaches 2 km away would that be enough for the Titanic to stop?
                        $endgroup$
                        – gerrit
                        Oct 16 at 15:10












                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        The question text includes "One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg." (emphasis added)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Nij
                        Oct 16 at 7:48










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even if this light reaches 2 km away would that be enough for the Titanic to stop?
                        $endgroup$
                        – gerrit
                        Oct 16 at 15:10







                      5




                      5




                      $begingroup$
                      The question text includes "One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg." (emphasis added)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nij
                      Oct 16 at 7:48




                      $begingroup$
                      The question text includes "One important thing I need to say is that I cannot under any circumstances stop the Titanic from hitting the iceberg." (emphasis added)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Nij
                      Oct 16 at 7:48












                      $begingroup$
                      Even if this light reaches 2 km away would that be enough for the Titanic to stop?
                      $endgroup$
                      – gerrit
                      Oct 16 at 15:10




                      $begingroup$
                      Even if this light reaches 2 km away would that be enough for the Titanic to stop?
                      $endgroup$
                      – gerrit
                      Oct 16 at 15:10



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367