How to get the nth value of a function with arbitrary number of argumentsHow to distribute a generic function of two arguments (without evaluating the arguments)How to take the derivative w.r.t. an arbitrary function?How can I get the number of slots in Function?General function taking general number of argumentsOptional arguments with lists as function parameterFunction with lazy and non-lazy arguments

Continents with simplex noise

What is a word for the feeling of constantly wanting new possessions?

For the Dungeon of the Mad Mage adventure, which dimension is used to determine a room's ceiling height?

How to initiate a conversation with a person who recently had transition but you were not in touch with them?

Is there a problem using A LOT of locks in a process?

What are the max current rating for 3.3v and 5v rail of the Rpi 4B

Is is likely that my lack of post-secondary education is holding my resume back?

Reviewer wants me to do massive amount of work, the result would be a different article. Should I tell that to the editor?

Yarok and Animate Dead

Why don't my appliances work when my tester shows voltage at the outlets?

How safe is it to leave my passport in my hotel room?

Is velocity a valid measure of team and process improvement?

Precious Stone, as Clear as Diamond

Are MOSFET drains ESD sensitive?

Plot problems: vertical lines and letters

How much transparency about runway should I expect from startup employer?

Meaning of "in arms"

Are there any real life instances of aircraft aborting a landing to avoid a vehicle?

Leaving car in Lubbock, Texas for 1 month

Are the Properties of the EM Spectrum Fluid?

Can a stolen Android phone with USB debugging enabled have screen lock bypassed?

What would be the best propulsion system for this aircraft carrier?

Multiline Tag command

What does a single quote inside a C# date time format mean?



How to get the nth value of a function with arbitrary number of arguments


How to distribute a generic function of two arguments (without evaluating the arguments)How to take the derivative w.r.t. an arbitrary function?How can I get the number of slots in Function?General function taking general number of argumentsOptional arguments with lists as function parameterFunction with lazy and non-lazy arguments






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;

.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;








3














$begingroup$


I know that I can define a function of a List and get the nth argument like:



f[x_List]:=x[[1]]+x[[2]]


What if the argument of f is not a list? I.e. how to define an equivalent function for



f[x__Integer]:=?


This is probably extremely basic, but I couldn't figure it out from the Slot documentation.










share|improve this question










$endgroup$





















    3














    $begingroup$


    I know that I can define a function of a List and get the nth argument like:



    f[x_List]:=x[[1]]+x[[2]]


    What if the argument of f is not a list? I.e. how to define an equivalent function for



    f[x__Integer]:=?


    This is probably extremely basic, but I couldn't figure it out from the Slot documentation.










    share|improve this question










    $endgroup$

















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I know that I can define a function of a List and get the nth argument like:



      f[x_List]:=x[[1]]+x[[2]]


      What if the argument of f is not a list? I.e. how to define an equivalent function for



      f[x__Integer]:=?


      This is probably extremely basic, but I couldn't figure it out from the Slot documentation.










      share|improve this question










      $endgroup$




      I know that I can define a function of a List and get the nth argument like:



      f[x_List]:=x[[1]]+x[[2]]


      What if the argument of f is not a list? I.e. how to define an equivalent function for



      f[x__Integer]:=?


      This is probably extremely basic, but I couldn't figure it out from the Slot documentation.







      functions






      share|improve this question














      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Oct 14 at 11:40









      user366202user366202

      755 bronze badges




      755 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4
















          $begingroup$

          With f[x__Integer] := ... you can use



          x[[i]]


          to get the ith argument.






          share|improve this answer










          $endgroup$






















            3
















            $begingroup$

            Szabolcs's answer (wrapping the sequence x with List and using Part) is the way.



            An alternative is to use Indexed



            ClearAll[f2]

            f2[x__Integer] := Indexed[x, 1] + Indexed[x, 2]
            f2[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



            3




            You can also use Slot (#):



            ClearAll[f3, f4]

            f3[x__Integer] := Slot[1] + Slot[2] &[x]
            f3[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



            3




            f4[x__Integer] := #1 + #2 &[x]
            f4[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



            3




            but you can use a pure function directly to define your function:



            f5 = #1 + #2 &





            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Thanks. Is the pure function method likely to be faster than the Indexed/List methods?
              $endgroup$
              – user366202
              Oct 14 at 14:24










            • $begingroup$
              @user366202, I am not sure.
              $endgroup$
              – kglr
              Oct 14 at 14:26












            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "387"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );














            draft saved

            draft discarded
















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207840%2fhow-to-get-the-nth-value-of-a-function-with-arbitrary-number-of-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown


























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4
















            $begingroup$

            With f[x__Integer] := ... you can use



            x[[i]]


            to get the ith argument.






            share|improve this answer










            $endgroup$



















              4
















              $begingroup$

              With f[x__Integer] := ... you can use



              x[[i]]


              to get the ith argument.






              share|improve this answer










              $endgroup$

















                4














                4










                4







                $begingroup$

                With f[x__Integer] := ... you can use



                x[[i]]


                to get the ith argument.






                share|improve this answer










                $endgroup$



                With f[x__Integer] := ... you can use



                x[[i]]


                to get the ith argument.







                share|improve this answer













                share|improve this answer




                share|improve this answer










                answered Oct 14 at 11:43









                SzabolcsSzabolcs

                173k18 gold badges473 silver badges1008 bronze badges




                173k18 gold badges473 silver badges1008 bronze badges


























                    3
















                    $begingroup$

                    Szabolcs's answer (wrapping the sequence x with List and using Part) is the way.



                    An alternative is to use Indexed



                    ClearAll[f2]

                    f2[x__Integer] := Indexed[x, 1] + Indexed[x, 2]
                    f2[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    You can also use Slot (#):



                    ClearAll[f3, f4]

                    f3[x__Integer] := Slot[1] + Slot[2] &[x]
                    f3[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    f4[x__Integer] := #1 + #2 &[x]
                    f4[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    but you can use a pure function directly to define your function:



                    f5 = #1 + #2 &





                    share|improve this answer










                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. Is the pure function method likely to be faster than the Indexed/List methods?
                      $endgroup$
                      – user366202
                      Oct 14 at 14:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @user366202, I am not sure.
                      $endgroup$
                      – kglr
                      Oct 14 at 14:26















                    3
















                    $begingroup$

                    Szabolcs's answer (wrapping the sequence x with List and using Part) is the way.



                    An alternative is to use Indexed



                    ClearAll[f2]

                    f2[x__Integer] := Indexed[x, 1] + Indexed[x, 2]
                    f2[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    You can also use Slot (#):



                    ClearAll[f3, f4]

                    f3[x__Integer] := Slot[1] + Slot[2] &[x]
                    f3[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    f4[x__Integer] := #1 + #2 &[x]
                    f4[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    but you can use a pure function directly to define your function:



                    f5 = #1 + #2 &





                    share|improve this answer










                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. Is the pure function method likely to be faster than the Indexed/List methods?
                      $endgroup$
                      – user366202
                      Oct 14 at 14:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @user366202, I am not sure.
                      $endgroup$
                      – kglr
                      Oct 14 at 14:26













                    3














                    3










                    3







                    $begingroup$

                    Szabolcs's answer (wrapping the sequence x with List and using Part) is the way.



                    An alternative is to use Indexed



                    ClearAll[f2]

                    f2[x__Integer] := Indexed[x, 1] + Indexed[x, 2]
                    f2[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    You can also use Slot (#):



                    ClearAll[f3, f4]

                    f3[x__Integer] := Slot[1] + Slot[2] &[x]
                    f3[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    f4[x__Integer] := #1 + #2 &[x]
                    f4[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    but you can use a pure function directly to define your function:



                    f5 = #1 + #2 &





                    share|improve this answer










                    $endgroup$



                    Szabolcs's answer (wrapping the sequence x with List and using Part) is the way.



                    An alternative is to use Indexed



                    ClearAll[f2]

                    f2[x__Integer] := Indexed[x, 1] + Indexed[x, 2]
                    f2[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    You can also use Slot (#):



                    ClearAll[f3, f4]

                    f3[x__Integer] := Slot[1] + Slot[2] &[x]
                    f3[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    f4[x__Integer] := #1 + #2 &[x]
                    f4[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]



                    3




                    but you can use a pure function directly to define your function:



                    f5 = #1 + #2 &






                    share|improve this answer













                    share|improve this answer




                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Oct 14 at 12:24









                    kglrkglr

                    223k10 gold badges253 silver badges511 bronze badges




                    223k10 gold badges253 silver badges511 bronze badges














                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. Is the pure function method likely to be faster than the Indexed/List methods?
                      $endgroup$
                      – user366202
                      Oct 14 at 14:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @user366202, I am not sure.
                      $endgroup$
                      – kglr
                      Oct 14 at 14:26
















                    • $begingroup$
                      Thanks. Is the pure function method likely to be faster than the Indexed/List methods?
                      $endgroup$
                      – user366202
                      Oct 14 at 14:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @user366202, I am not sure.
                      $endgroup$
                      – kglr
                      Oct 14 at 14:26















                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks. Is the pure function method likely to be faster than the Indexed/List methods?
                    $endgroup$
                    – user366202
                    Oct 14 at 14:24




                    $begingroup$
                    Thanks. Is the pure function method likely to be faster than the Indexed/List methods?
                    $endgroup$
                    – user366202
                    Oct 14 at 14:24












                    $begingroup$
                    @user366202, I am not sure.
                    $endgroup$
                    – kglr
                    Oct 14 at 14:26




                    $begingroup$
                    @user366202, I am not sure.
                    $endgroup$
                    – kglr
                    Oct 14 at 14:26


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207840%2fhow-to-get-the-nth-value-of-a-function-with-arbitrary-number-of-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown









                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її