How to find parallel tangent linesFinding equations of tangent lines that are parallelTangent lines to curve parallel to $x-4y = 2$Finding a tangent to an ellipse parallel to a given lineUse implicit differentiation to find tangent lines parallel to a given lineBasic Derivatives-finding tangent linesHow many lines tangent to the graph of $f$ are parallel to the lineEquation of two parallel tangent lines and coordinatesFind Equations of tangent linesFinding where two graphs have perpendicular tangent linesFind specific tangent lines of $y=2x^3-3x^2-12x+20$

Is it possible for a particle to decay via gravity?

Should I intervene when a colleague in a different department makes students run laps as part of their grade?

How does Asimov's second law deal with contradictory orders from different people?

Move arrows along a contour

Prepare a user to perform an action before proceeding to the next step

May a hotel provide accommodation for fewer people than booked?

Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?

Using Python in a Bash Script

Is it okay for me to decline a project on ethical grounds?

How would a lunar colony attack Earth?

Do the books ever say oliphaunts aren’t elephants?

Avoiding Implicit Conversion in Constructor. Explicit keyword doesn't help here

Was Donald Trump at ground zero helping out on 9-11?

Just how much information should you share with a former client?

What are the cons of stateless password generators?

How can Paypal know my card is being used in another account?

Boots or trail runners with reference to blisters?

"Valet parking " or "parking valet"

How to innovate in OR

What would the United Kingdom's "optimal" Brexit deal look like?

How to find parallel tangent lines

Is there any way to work simultaneously on the same DAW project remotely?

How should I quote American English speakers in a British English essay?

What is the highest achievable score in Catan



How to find parallel tangent lines


Finding equations of tangent lines that are parallelTangent lines to curve parallel to $x-4y = 2$Finding a tangent to an ellipse parallel to a given lineUse implicit differentiation to find tangent lines parallel to a given lineBasic Derivatives-finding tangent linesHow many lines tangent to the graph of $f$ are parallel to the lineEquation of two parallel tangent lines and coordinatesFind Equations of tangent linesFinding where two graphs have perpendicular tangent linesFind specific tangent lines of $y=2x^3-3x^2-12x+20$






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


I was given this problem:




Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?




To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?



I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$


    I was given this problem:




    Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?




    To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?



    I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      I was given this problem:




      Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?




      To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?



      I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I was given this problem:




      Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?




      To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?



      I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.







      calculus derivatives






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      Adrian Keister

      6,3727 gold badges22 silver badges33 bronze badges




      6,3727 gold badges22 silver badges33 bronze badges










      asked 9 hours ago









      burtburt

      13910 bronze badges




      13910 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
          $$x^2=e^3x$$
          $$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
          $$x=pm e^3x/2$$
          $$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
          $$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
          $$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
          $$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
          for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
          $$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
          which is the value provided by your calculator.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$






















            3












            $begingroup$

            Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.



            Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.



            If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:



            Intersection



            Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.



            Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.



            1. Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

            2. Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

            Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.



            For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
            $$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
            Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
              $endgroup$
              – burt
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
              $endgroup$
              – Luca Bressan
              8 hours ago













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3309598%2fhow-to-find-parallel-tangent-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
            $$x^2=e^3x$$
            $$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
            $$x=pm e^3x/2$$
            $$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
            $$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
            $$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
            $$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
            for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
            $$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
            which is the value provided by your calculator.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



















              3












              $begingroup$

              This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
              $$x^2=e^3x$$
              $$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
              $$x=pm e^3x/2$$
              $$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
              $$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
              $$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
              $$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
              for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
              $$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
              which is the value provided by your calculator.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
                $$x^2=e^3x$$
                $$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
                $$x=pm e^3x/2$$
                $$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
                $$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
                $$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
                $$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
                for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
                $$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
                which is the value provided by your calculator.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
                $$x^2=e^3x$$
                $$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
                $$x=pm e^3x/2$$
                $$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
                $$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
                $$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
                $$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
                for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
                $$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
                which is the value provided by your calculator.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 8 hours ago









                Peter ForemanPeter Foreman

                12.9k1 gold badge5 silver badges28 bronze badges




                12.9k1 gold badge5 silver badges28 bronze badges


























                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.



                    Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.



                    If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:



                    Intersection



                    Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.



                    Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.



                    1. Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    2. Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.



                    For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
                    $$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
                    Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
                      $endgroup$
                      – burt
                      8 hours ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Luca Bressan
                      8 hours ago















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.



                    Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.



                    If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:



                    Intersection



                    Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.



                    Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.



                    1. Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    2. Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.



                    For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
                    $$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
                    Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
                      $endgroup$
                      – burt
                      8 hours ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Luca Bressan
                      8 hours ago













                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.



                    Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.



                    If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:



                    Intersection



                    Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.



                    Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.



                    1. Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    2. Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.



                    For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
                    $$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
                    Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.



                    Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.



                    If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:



                    Intersection



                    Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.



                    Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.



                    1. Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    2. Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.

                    Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.



                    For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
                    $$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
                    Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 8 hours ago









                    Luca BressanLuca Bressan

                    4,2902 gold badges10 silver badges38 bronze badges




                    4,2902 gold badges10 silver badges38 bronze badges














                    • $begingroup$
                      So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
                      $endgroup$
                      – burt
                      8 hours ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Luca Bressan
                      8 hours ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
                      $endgroup$
                      – burt
                      8 hours ago






                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Luca Bressan
                      8 hours ago















                    $begingroup$
                    So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
                    $endgroup$
                    – burt
                    8 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
                    $endgroup$
                    – burt
                    8 hours ago




                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Luca Bressan
                    8 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Luca Bressan
                    8 hours ago

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3309598%2fhow-to-find-parallel-tangent-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її