How to find parallel tangent linesFinding equations of tangent lines that are parallelTangent lines to curve parallel to $x-4y = 2$Finding a tangent to an ellipse parallel to a given lineUse implicit differentiation to find tangent lines parallel to a given lineBasic Derivatives-finding tangent linesHow many lines tangent to the graph of $f$ are parallel to the lineEquation of two parallel tangent lines and coordinatesFind Equations of tangent linesFinding where two graphs have perpendicular tangent linesFind specific tangent lines of $y=2x^3-3x^2-12x+20$
Is it possible for a particle to decay via gravity?
Should I intervene when a colleague in a different department makes students run laps as part of their grade?
How does Asimov's second law deal with contradictory orders from different people?
Move arrows along a contour
Prepare a user to perform an action before proceeding to the next step
May a hotel provide accommodation for fewer people than booked?
Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?
Using Python in a Bash Script
Is it okay for me to decline a project on ethical grounds?
How would a lunar colony attack Earth?
Do the books ever say oliphaunts aren’t elephants?
Avoiding Implicit Conversion in Constructor. Explicit keyword doesn't help here
Was Donald Trump at ground zero helping out on 9-11?
Just how much information should you share with a former client?
What are the cons of stateless password generators?
How can Paypal know my card is being used in another account?
Boots or trail runners with reference to blisters?
"Valet parking " or "parking valet"
How to innovate in OR
What would the United Kingdom's "optimal" Brexit deal look like?
How to find parallel tangent lines
Is there any way to work simultaneously on the same DAW project remotely?
How should I quote American English speakers in a British English essay?
What is the highest achievable score in Catan
How to find parallel tangent lines
Finding equations of tangent lines that are parallelTangent lines to curve parallel to $x-4y = 2$Finding a tangent to an ellipse parallel to a given lineUse implicit differentiation to find tangent lines parallel to a given lineBasic Derivatives-finding tangent linesHow many lines tangent to the graph of $f$ are parallel to the lineEquation of two parallel tangent lines and coordinatesFind Equations of tangent linesFinding where two graphs have perpendicular tangent linesFind specific tangent lines of $y=2x^3-3x^2-12x+20$
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I was given this problem:
Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?
To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?
I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.
calculus derivatives
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was given this problem:
Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?
To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?
I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.
calculus derivatives
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was given this problem:
Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?
To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?
I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.
calculus derivatives
$endgroup$
I was given this problem:
Let $f$ be the function defined by $f(x)=e^3x$, and let $g$ be the function defined by $g(x)=x^3$. At what value of $x$ do the graphs of $f$ and $g$ have parallel tangent lines?
To solve this problem, I set the derivatives of $f$ and $g$ equal to each other: $3x^2=3e^3x$. Now, I just need to solve for $x$, but for some reason I am completely at a loss of how to do that. I divided the problem by $3$, which got me $x^2=e^3x$. But, now what?
I also plugged it into my calculators solver, which got me the correct answer: $-.484$. But, I don't know how to find that answer without solver.
calculus derivatives
calculus derivatives
edited 8 hours ago
Adrian Keister
6,3727 gold badges22 silver badges33 bronze badges
6,3727 gold badges22 silver badges33 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
burtburt
13910 bronze badges
13910 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
$$x^2=e^3x$$
$$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
$$x=pm e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
$$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
$$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
$$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
which is the value provided by your calculator.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.
Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.
If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:
Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.
Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.
- Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
- Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.
For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
$$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
$endgroup$
– burt
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
$endgroup$
– Luca Bressan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3309598%2fhow-to-find-parallel-tangent-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
$$x^2=e^3x$$
$$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
$$x=pm e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
$$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
$$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
$$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
which is the value provided by your calculator.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
$$x^2=e^3x$$
$$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
$$x=pm e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
$$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
$$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
$$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
which is the value provided by your calculator.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
$$x^2=e^3x$$
$$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
$$x=pm e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
$$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
$$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
$$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
which is the value provided by your calculator.
$endgroup$
This problem can be solved using the Lambert-W function as follows.
$$x^2=e^3x$$
$$sqrtx^2=sqrte^3x$$
$$x=pm e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 x=mpfrac32 e^3x/2$$
$$-frac32 xe^-3x/2=mpfrac32$$
$$-frac32 x=W_kleft(mpfrac32right)$$
$$x=-frac23W_kleft(pmfrac32right)$$
for any branch of the function $kinmathbbZ$. The only real solution would be when $k=0$ and $+$ is taken for the $pm$ giving
$$x=-frac23W_0left(frac32right)approx-0.4839075718dots$$
which is the value provided by your calculator.
answered 8 hours ago
Peter ForemanPeter Foreman
12.9k1 gold badge5 silver badges28 bronze badges
12.9k1 gold badge5 silver badges28 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.
Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.
If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:
Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.
Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.
- Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
- Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.
For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
$$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
$endgroup$
– burt
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
$endgroup$
– Luca Bressan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.
Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.
If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:
Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.
Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.
- Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
- Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.
For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
$$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
$endgroup$
– burt
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
$endgroup$
– Luca Bressan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.
Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.
If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:
Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.
Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.
- Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
- Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.
For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
$$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.
$endgroup$
Since the other answers provide the exact solution using the Lambert $W$ function, let me show you how you can prove that the equation $x^2 = e^3x$ has one and only one solution using elementary methods.
Let $F(x) = x^2$ and $G(x) = e^3x$.
If you plot $F$ and $G$ on the same plane, you can see that there is exactly one point $x$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Here $y = F(x)$ is in red and $y = G(x)$ is in blue:
Now, if you want to prove that there is a unique solution to the equation, you can reason as follows.
Consider first the interval $(-infty, 0]$.
- Since $F$ is decreasing and $G$ is increasing, there is at most one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
- Since $F(-1) > G(-1)$ and $F(0) < G(0)$, there is at least one $x in (-1, 0)$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$.
Combining the two results, we know that there is exactly one $x in (-infty, 0]$ such that $F(x) = G(x)$. Moreover, $x in (-1, 0)$.
For the interval $(0, infty)$ the situation is a bit trickier, because both functions are increasing. But if you know that $x < e^x$ for any $x > 0$, you can prove that $F(x) < G(x)$ as follows:
$$x^2 < (e^x)^2 = e^2x < e^3x$$
Therefore there are no solutions in $(0, infty)$.
answered 8 hours ago
Luca BressanLuca Bressan
4,2902 gold badges10 silver badges38 bronze badges
4,2902 gold badges10 silver badges38 bronze badges
$begingroup$
So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
$endgroup$
– burt
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
$endgroup$
– Luca Bressan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
$endgroup$
– burt
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
$endgroup$
– Luca Bressan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
$endgroup$
– burt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
So would I be able to find the answer on a calculator by graphing the two equations and finding the intersection?
$endgroup$
– burt
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
$endgroup$
– Luca Bressan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes. If you don't want (or aren't allowed) to use a graphing calculator, you can still plot the two graphs by hand. For a better approximation of $x$, you just need to find a sufficiently small interval $(a, b)$ such that $F(a) > G(a)$ and $F(b) < G(b)$, e.g. $(-0.49, -0.48)$.
$endgroup$
– Luca Bressan
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3309598%2fhow-to-find-parallel-tangent-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown