Could the U.S. Congress abolish itself?Could the President of the United States refuse to wage a war Congress declared?Does controlling the two chambers of the congress make the passing of new laws easier in the U.S.A.?Educational records of congress?What are the 3 Offices of President in America?Trump's recent siding with the democrats on 3 months debt extension - trying to understand a few thingsAs a non-U.S. citizen, who can I write to in the U.S. government about a corrupt organization?Why does it matter which house of Congress a bill originates in?How far could Congress strip the President of his powers if they so wished?How many treaties ratified by Congress did the US exit unilaterally?Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?

Can Ogre clerics use Purify Food and Drink on humanoid characters?

Should developer taking test phones home or put in office?

How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?

Could the U.S. Congress abolish itself?

Why is the voltage measurement of this circuit different when the switch is on?

3D Crossword, Cryptic, Statue View & Maze

Require advice on power conservation for backpacking trip

C-152 carb heat on before landing in hot weather?

Cascading Repair Costs following Blown Head Gasket on a 2004 Subaru Outback

expiry or manufactured date?

Swapping rooks in a 4x4 board

Trainee keeps missing deadlines for independent learning

What is this tool/thing in an Aztec painting?

How was Hillel permitted to go to the skylight to hear the shiur

How risky is real estate?

How does a blind passenger not die, if driver becomes unconscious

Can we put equal sign after aggregate functions in sql?

If you snatch, I trade

Why do textbooks often include the solutions to odd or even numbered problems but not both?

Where can I find a database of galactic spectra?

Why do some professors with PhDs leave their professorships to teach high school?

Why aren't cotton tents more popular?

Can humans ever directly see a few photons at a time? Can a human see a single photon?

Interaction between Leyline of Anticipation and Teferi, Time Raveler



Could the U.S. Congress abolish itself?


Could the President of the United States refuse to wage a war Congress declared?Does controlling the two chambers of the congress make the passing of new laws easier in the U.S.A.?Educational records of congress?What are the 3 Offices of President in America?Trump's recent siding with the democrats on 3 months debt extension - trying to understand a few thingsAs a non-U.S. citizen, who can I write to in the U.S. government about a corrupt organization?Why does it matter which house of Congress a bill originates in?How far could Congress strip the President of his powers if they so wished?How many treaties ratified by Congress did the US exit unilaterally?Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Congress can pass laws that delegate power to the President, but those laws can be changed or revoked by Congress whenever they want. Is this kind of thing what you're looking for? Or are you asking specifically asking about Congress truly abolishing itself, in a way that they can't take that power back if they want?

    – divibisan
    8 hours ago











  • @divibisan I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.

    – Ramon
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    @Ramon Importantly, Congress (alone) can't amend the Constitution.

    – owjburnham
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Even if Congress passed a law giving it powers to the executive branch, would the intelligible principle block this law from taking effect? Also, certain powers are constitutionally granted specifically to Congress and these cannot be delegated.

    – doneal24
    7 hours ago











  • @doneal24 Certainly, these would apply if Congress passed a law about this, but this question is specifically asking about possible constitutional amendments which specifically have the power to change the text and meaning of the constitution

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago

















1















Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Congress can pass laws that delegate power to the President, but those laws can be changed or revoked by Congress whenever they want. Is this kind of thing what you're looking for? Or are you asking specifically asking about Congress truly abolishing itself, in a way that they can't take that power back if they want?

    – divibisan
    8 hours ago











  • @divibisan I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.

    – Ramon
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    @Ramon Importantly, Congress (alone) can't amend the Constitution.

    – owjburnham
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Even if Congress passed a law giving it powers to the executive branch, would the intelligible principle block this law from taking effect? Also, certain powers are constitutionally granted specifically to Congress and these cannot be delegated.

    – doneal24
    7 hours ago











  • @doneal24 Certainly, these would apply if Congress passed a law about this, but this question is specifically asking about possible constitutional amendments which specifically have the power to change the text and meaning of the constitution

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago













1












1








1








Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.







united-states congress constitution






share|improve this question









New contributor



Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









divibisan

2,84812 silver badges30 bronze badges




2,84812 silver badges30 bronze badges






New contributor



Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









RamonRamon

91 bronze badge




91 bronze badge




New contributor



Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Ramon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • Congress can pass laws that delegate power to the President, but those laws can be changed or revoked by Congress whenever they want. Is this kind of thing what you're looking for? Or are you asking specifically asking about Congress truly abolishing itself, in a way that they can't take that power back if they want?

    – divibisan
    8 hours ago











  • @divibisan I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.

    – Ramon
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    @Ramon Importantly, Congress (alone) can't amend the Constitution.

    – owjburnham
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Even if Congress passed a law giving it powers to the executive branch, would the intelligible principle block this law from taking effect? Also, certain powers are constitutionally granted specifically to Congress and these cannot be delegated.

    – doneal24
    7 hours ago











  • @doneal24 Certainly, these would apply if Congress passed a law about this, but this question is specifically asking about possible constitutional amendments which specifically have the power to change the text and meaning of the constitution

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago

















  • Congress can pass laws that delegate power to the President, but those laws can be changed or revoked by Congress whenever they want. Is this kind of thing what you're looking for? Or are you asking specifically asking about Congress truly abolishing itself, in a way that they can't take that power back if they want?

    – divibisan
    8 hours ago











  • @divibisan I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.

    – Ramon
    8 hours ago






  • 3





    @Ramon Importantly, Congress (alone) can't amend the Constitution.

    – owjburnham
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @divibisan Even if Congress passed a law giving it powers to the executive branch, would the intelligible principle block this law from taking effect? Also, certain powers are constitutionally granted specifically to Congress and these cannot be delegated.

    – doneal24
    7 hours ago











  • @doneal24 Certainly, these would apply if Congress passed a law about this, but this question is specifically asking about possible constitutional amendments which specifically have the power to change the text and meaning of the constitution

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago
















Congress can pass laws that delegate power to the President, but those laws can be changed or revoked by Congress whenever they want. Is this kind of thing what you're looking for? Or are you asking specifically asking about Congress truly abolishing itself, in a way that they can't take that power back if they want?

– divibisan
8 hours ago





Congress can pass laws that delegate power to the President, but those laws can be changed or revoked by Congress whenever they want. Is this kind of thing what you're looking for? Or are you asking specifically asking about Congress truly abolishing itself, in a way that they can't take that power back if they want?

– divibisan
8 hours ago













@divibisan I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.

– Ramon
8 hours ago





@divibisan I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also removing it's own power.

– Ramon
8 hours ago




3




3





@Ramon Importantly, Congress (alone) can't amend the Constitution.

– owjburnham
8 hours ago





@Ramon Importantly, Congress (alone) can't amend the Constitution.

– owjburnham
8 hours ago




1




1





@divibisan Even if Congress passed a law giving it powers to the executive branch, would the intelligible principle block this law from taking effect? Also, certain powers are constitutionally granted specifically to Congress and these cannot be delegated.

– doneal24
7 hours ago





@divibisan Even if Congress passed a law giving it powers to the executive branch, would the intelligible principle block this law from taking effect? Also, certain powers are constitutionally granted specifically to Congress and these cannot be delegated.

– doneal24
7 hours ago













@doneal24 Certainly, these would apply if Congress passed a law about this, but this question is specifically asking about possible constitutional amendments which specifically have the power to change the text and meaning of the constitution

– divibisan
7 hours ago





@doneal24 Certainly, these would apply if Congress passed a law about this, but this question is specifically asking about possible constitutional amendments which specifically have the power to change the text and meaning of the constitution

– divibisan
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Theoretically Yes, but they couldn't do it on their own



Amendments to the US Constitution can change or overrule earlier parts without issue. For example, the 17th Amendment modified the part of Article 1, Section 3 which said that Senators were elected by the State Legislature, and replaced it with direct elections by voters in each state.



Therefore, there is no reason that a constitutional amendment couldn't make other fundamental changes, such as letting the President appoint Congress, or giving the President the ability to propose and approve bills.




However, even if they wanted to give up their power, Congress couldn't pass a Constitutional Amendment on their own. Article 5 of the US Constitution dictates a 2-step process for passing an amendment:




The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;




First, an amendment must be proposed, either by passing both the House and the Senate with a 2/3 majority, or by being approved at a Constitutional Convention called by the states (which has never happened, after the original Convention).



Then, the amendment must be ratified by the State Legislature, or a state Constitutional Convention, in 3/4 (currently 38) states.



So, it wouldn't be enough for Congress to want to institute a dictatorship, the individual states would have to agree too.




There's one other limitation:



The last clause of Article 5 puts another limitation on constitutional amendments:




Provided that ... no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate




You could make an argument that abolishing the Senate would maintain equal Suffrage (every state gets the same 0 Senators), but any State that opposed this plan would almost certainly have grounds to sue to the Supreme Court on these grounds.






share|improve this answer























  • Couldn't Article 5 be amended though, in theory?

    – Time4Tea
    7 hours ago











  • Yes, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the normal process. So, sure, you could amend Article 5 to let Congress amend the constitution without involving the states, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the states. You could imagine a process of amendments that gradually eat away at these restrictions, but that's getting pretty far into the speculative

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago


















2















Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer
all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress
amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also
removing it's own power.




No.



Congress can proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution, but it can't adopt amendments to the U.S. Constitution without approval from state legislatures. So, because Congress can't amend the Constitution, the answer is no.



Furthermore, Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides that:




no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage
in the Senate




via a Constitutional Amendment. And, I do not believe that any fair reading of the U.S. Constitution would find that abolishing the U.S. Senate entirely would not violate this provision.



Since this is beyond the scope of a permitted constitutional amendment, the only way to secure your proposed change would be to violate the law and the constitution in some sort of coup or revolution (bloodless or otherwise) and to establish a new regime, much as the United States did when it extra-legally declared its independence from the British Monarch.



Congress also cannot pass a law that would do this because the non-delegation doctrine (a separation of powers concept that is part of U.S. Constitutional law) provides that a law that does not provide an "intelligible principle" to govern how it should be carried out is unconstitutional and void.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "475"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Ramon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42328%2fcould-the-u-s-congress-abolish-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Theoretically Yes, but they couldn't do it on their own



    Amendments to the US Constitution can change or overrule earlier parts without issue. For example, the 17th Amendment modified the part of Article 1, Section 3 which said that Senators were elected by the State Legislature, and replaced it with direct elections by voters in each state.



    Therefore, there is no reason that a constitutional amendment couldn't make other fundamental changes, such as letting the President appoint Congress, or giving the President the ability to propose and approve bills.




    However, even if they wanted to give up their power, Congress couldn't pass a Constitutional Amendment on their own. Article 5 of the US Constitution dictates a 2-step process for passing an amendment:




    The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;




    First, an amendment must be proposed, either by passing both the House and the Senate with a 2/3 majority, or by being approved at a Constitutional Convention called by the states (which has never happened, after the original Convention).



    Then, the amendment must be ratified by the State Legislature, or a state Constitutional Convention, in 3/4 (currently 38) states.



    So, it wouldn't be enough for Congress to want to institute a dictatorship, the individual states would have to agree too.




    There's one other limitation:



    The last clause of Article 5 puts another limitation on constitutional amendments:




    Provided that ... no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate




    You could make an argument that abolishing the Senate would maintain equal Suffrage (every state gets the same 0 Senators), but any State that opposed this plan would almost certainly have grounds to sue to the Supreme Court on these grounds.






    share|improve this answer























    • Couldn't Article 5 be amended though, in theory?

      – Time4Tea
      7 hours ago











    • Yes, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the normal process. So, sure, you could amend Article 5 to let Congress amend the constitution without involving the states, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the states. You could imagine a process of amendments that gradually eat away at these restrictions, but that's getting pretty far into the speculative

      – divibisan
      7 hours ago















    3














    Theoretically Yes, but they couldn't do it on their own



    Amendments to the US Constitution can change or overrule earlier parts without issue. For example, the 17th Amendment modified the part of Article 1, Section 3 which said that Senators were elected by the State Legislature, and replaced it with direct elections by voters in each state.



    Therefore, there is no reason that a constitutional amendment couldn't make other fundamental changes, such as letting the President appoint Congress, or giving the President the ability to propose and approve bills.




    However, even if they wanted to give up their power, Congress couldn't pass a Constitutional Amendment on their own. Article 5 of the US Constitution dictates a 2-step process for passing an amendment:




    The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;




    First, an amendment must be proposed, either by passing both the House and the Senate with a 2/3 majority, or by being approved at a Constitutional Convention called by the states (which has never happened, after the original Convention).



    Then, the amendment must be ratified by the State Legislature, or a state Constitutional Convention, in 3/4 (currently 38) states.



    So, it wouldn't be enough for Congress to want to institute a dictatorship, the individual states would have to agree too.




    There's one other limitation:



    The last clause of Article 5 puts another limitation on constitutional amendments:




    Provided that ... no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate




    You could make an argument that abolishing the Senate would maintain equal Suffrage (every state gets the same 0 Senators), but any State that opposed this plan would almost certainly have grounds to sue to the Supreme Court on these grounds.






    share|improve this answer























    • Couldn't Article 5 be amended though, in theory?

      – Time4Tea
      7 hours ago











    • Yes, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the normal process. So, sure, you could amend Article 5 to let Congress amend the constitution without involving the states, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the states. You could imagine a process of amendments that gradually eat away at these restrictions, but that's getting pretty far into the speculative

      – divibisan
      7 hours ago













    3












    3








    3







    Theoretically Yes, but they couldn't do it on their own



    Amendments to the US Constitution can change or overrule earlier parts without issue. For example, the 17th Amendment modified the part of Article 1, Section 3 which said that Senators were elected by the State Legislature, and replaced it with direct elections by voters in each state.



    Therefore, there is no reason that a constitutional amendment couldn't make other fundamental changes, such as letting the President appoint Congress, or giving the President the ability to propose and approve bills.




    However, even if they wanted to give up their power, Congress couldn't pass a Constitutional Amendment on their own. Article 5 of the US Constitution dictates a 2-step process for passing an amendment:




    The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;




    First, an amendment must be proposed, either by passing both the House and the Senate with a 2/3 majority, or by being approved at a Constitutional Convention called by the states (which has never happened, after the original Convention).



    Then, the amendment must be ratified by the State Legislature, or a state Constitutional Convention, in 3/4 (currently 38) states.



    So, it wouldn't be enough for Congress to want to institute a dictatorship, the individual states would have to agree too.




    There's one other limitation:



    The last clause of Article 5 puts another limitation on constitutional amendments:




    Provided that ... no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate




    You could make an argument that abolishing the Senate would maintain equal Suffrage (every state gets the same 0 Senators), but any State that opposed this plan would almost certainly have grounds to sue to the Supreme Court on these grounds.






    share|improve this answer













    Theoretically Yes, but they couldn't do it on their own



    Amendments to the US Constitution can change or overrule earlier parts without issue. For example, the 17th Amendment modified the part of Article 1, Section 3 which said that Senators were elected by the State Legislature, and replaced it with direct elections by voters in each state.



    Therefore, there is no reason that a constitutional amendment couldn't make other fundamental changes, such as letting the President appoint Congress, or giving the President the ability to propose and approve bills.




    However, even if they wanted to give up their power, Congress couldn't pass a Constitutional Amendment on their own. Article 5 of the US Constitution dictates a 2-step process for passing an amendment:




    The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress;




    First, an amendment must be proposed, either by passing both the House and the Senate with a 2/3 majority, or by being approved at a Constitutional Convention called by the states (which has never happened, after the original Convention).



    Then, the amendment must be ratified by the State Legislature, or a state Constitutional Convention, in 3/4 (currently 38) states.



    So, it wouldn't be enough for Congress to want to institute a dictatorship, the individual states would have to agree too.




    There's one other limitation:



    The last clause of Article 5 puts another limitation on constitutional amendments:




    Provided that ... no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate




    You could make an argument that abolishing the Senate would maintain equal Suffrage (every state gets the same 0 Senators), but any State that opposed this plan would almost certainly have grounds to sue to the Supreme Court on these grounds.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    divibisandivibisan

    2,84812 silver badges30 bronze badges




    2,84812 silver badges30 bronze badges












    • Couldn't Article 5 be amended though, in theory?

      – Time4Tea
      7 hours ago











    • Yes, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the normal process. So, sure, you could amend Article 5 to let Congress amend the constitution without involving the states, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the states. You could imagine a process of amendments that gradually eat away at these restrictions, but that's getting pretty far into the speculative

      – divibisan
      7 hours ago

















    • Couldn't Article 5 be amended though, in theory?

      – Time4Tea
      7 hours ago











    • Yes, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the normal process. So, sure, you could amend Article 5 to let Congress amend the constitution without involving the states, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the states. You could imagine a process of amendments that gradually eat away at these restrictions, but that's getting pretty far into the speculative

      – divibisan
      7 hours ago
















    Couldn't Article 5 be amended though, in theory?

    – Time4Tea
    7 hours ago





    Couldn't Article 5 be amended though, in theory?

    – Time4Tea
    7 hours ago













    Yes, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the normal process. So, sure, you could amend Article 5 to let Congress amend the constitution without involving the states, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the states. You could imagine a process of amendments that gradually eat away at these restrictions, but that's getting pretty far into the speculative

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago





    Yes, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the normal process. So, sure, you could amend Article 5 to let Congress amend the constitution without involving the states, but that amendment would have to be ratified by the states. You could imagine a process of amendments that gradually eat away at these restrictions, but that's getting pretty far into the speculative

    – divibisan
    7 hours ago













    2















    Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer
    all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress
    amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also
    removing it's own power.




    No.



    Congress can proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution, but it can't adopt amendments to the U.S. Constitution without approval from state legislatures. So, because Congress can't amend the Constitution, the answer is no.



    Furthermore, Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides that:




    no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage
    in the Senate




    via a Constitutional Amendment. And, I do not believe that any fair reading of the U.S. Constitution would find that abolishing the U.S. Senate entirely would not violate this provision.



    Since this is beyond the scope of a permitted constitutional amendment, the only way to secure your proposed change would be to violate the law and the constitution in some sort of coup or revolution (bloodless or otherwise) and to establish a new regime, much as the United States did when it extra-legally declared its independence from the British Monarch.



    Congress also cannot pass a law that would do this because the non-delegation doctrine (a separation of powers concept that is part of U.S. Constitutional law) provides that a law that does not provide an "intelligible principle" to govern how it should be carried out is unconstitutional and void.






    share|improve this answer



























      2















      Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer
      all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress
      amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also
      removing it's own power.




      No.



      Congress can proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution, but it can't adopt amendments to the U.S. Constitution without approval from state legislatures. So, because Congress can't amend the Constitution, the answer is no.



      Furthermore, Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides that:




      no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage
      in the Senate




      via a Constitutional Amendment. And, I do not believe that any fair reading of the U.S. Constitution would find that abolishing the U.S. Senate entirely would not violate this provision.



      Since this is beyond the scope of a permitted constitutional amendment, the only way to secure your proposed change would be to violate the law and the constitution in some sort of coup or revolution (bloodless or otherwise) and to establish a new regime, much as the United States did when it extra-legally declared its independence from the British Monarch.



      Congress also cannot pass a law that would do this because the non-delegation doctrine (a separation of powers concept that is part of U.S. Constitutional law) provides that a law that does not provide an "intelligible principle" to govern how it should be carried out is unconstitutional and void.






      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2








        Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer
        all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress
        amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also
        removing it's own power.




        No.



        Congress can proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution, but it can't adopt amendments to the U.S. Constitution without approval from state legislatures. So, because Congress can't amend the Constitution, the answer is no.



        Furthermore, Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides that:




        no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage
        in the Senate




        via a Constitutional Amendment. And, I do not believe that any fair reading of the U.S. Constitution would find that abolishing the U.S. Senate entirely would not violate this provision.



        Since this is beyond the scope of a permitted constitutional amendment, the only way to secure your proposed change would be to violate the law and the constitution in some sort of coup or revolution (bloodless or otherwise) and to establish a new regime, much as the United States did when it extra-legally declared its independence from the British Monarch.



        Congress also cannot pass a law that would do this because the non-delegation doctrine (a separation of powers concept that is part of U.S. Constitutional law) provides that a law that does not provide an "intelligible principle" to govern how it should be carried out is unconstitutional and void.






        share|improve this answer














        Hypothetically, could the U.S. Congress abolish itself and transfer
        all power to the President? I'm thinking of a scenario where Congress
        amends the Constitution and gives all power the President, while also
        removing it's own power.




        No.



        Congress can proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution, but it can't adopt amendments to the U.S. Constitution without approval from state legislatures. So, because Congress can't amend the Constitution, the answer is no.



        Furthermore, Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides that:




        no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage
        in the Senate




        via a Constitutional Amendment. And, I do not believe that any fair reading of the U.S. Constitution would find that abolishing the U.S. Senate entirely would not violate this provision.



        Since this is beyond the scope of a permitted constitutional amendment, the only way to secure your proposed change would be to violate the law and the constitution in some sort of coup or revolution (bloodless or otherwise) and to establish a new regime, much as the United States did when it extra-legally declared its independence from the British Monarch.



        Congress also cannot pass a law that would do this because the non-delegation doctrine (a separation of powers concept that is part of U.S. Constitutional law) provides that a law that does not provide an "intelligible principle" to govern how it should be carried out is unconstitutional and void.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 5 hours ago









        ohwillekeohwilleke

        23.2k3 gold badges56 silver badges99 bronze badges




        23.2k3 gold badges56 silver badges99 bronze badges




















            Ramon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ramon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ramon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Ramon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42328%2fcould-the-u-s-congress-abolish-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367