How to make a pipe-divided tuple?Emulate a “tuple” data structure when the syntax for creating a tuple is predefined and cannot be alteredHow to use a Pipe (|) with indices like an IntegralHow to make pipe to grow with both sides?Underbraces in Matrix Divided in BlocksDesigning a new tuple of Algebra OperatorsDefine macro for sequence/list/tuple macrosDivided differences tableEmbedding a simple tikz diagram within a tuple equation
I won a car in a poker game. How is that taxed in Canada?
How should Thaumaturgy's "three times as loud as normal" be interpreted?
Round away from zero
Why does the UK Prime Minister need the permission of Parliament to call a general election?
These roommates throw strange parties
Why is Sojdlg123aljg a common password?
What is the purpose of the rotating plate in front of the lock?
French equivalent of "my cup of tea"
Temporarily simulate being offline programmatically
Why are UK MPs allowed to not vote (but it counts as a no)?
In apex, how to replace the value in the string
Golfball Dimples on spaceships (and planes)?
Old sci fi book, addictive soft drinks
"syntax error near unexpected token" after editing .bashrc
Do 643,000 Americans go bankrupt every year due to medical bills?
How to calculate the power level of a Commander deck?
Looking for the comic book where Spider-Man was [mistakenly] addressed as Super-Man
Need help figure out a Fibonacci related math trick
Entering the US with dual citizenship but US passport is long expired?
Did the Byzantines ever attempt to move their capital to Rome?
Connect the wires without setting off the bomb
Phrase request for "work in" in the context of gyms
Was Rosie the Riveter sourced from a Michelangelo painting?
Sinning and G-d's will, what's wrong with this logic?
How to make a pipe-divided tuple?
Emulate a “tuple” data structure when the syntax for creating a tuple is predefined and cannot be alteredHow to use a Pipe (|) with indices like an IntegralHow to make pipe to grow with both sides?Underbraces in Matrix Divided in BlocksDesigning a new tuple of Algebra OperatorsDefine macro for sequence/list/tuple macrosDivided differences tableEmbedding a simple tikz diagram within a tuple equation
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm trying to write a macro, tup
that will effectively expand this:
tup b
to this:
leftlangle a ~middle|~ b ~middle|~ ... ~middle|~ z rightrangle
I tried the following, but it only puts down the first separator and then stops.
documentclass[preview]standalone
newcommandbrak[1]ensuremathleftlangle#1rightrangle
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
begingroup%
@tempswafalse%
def@sep~middle%
edef@tempa#1%
expandafterbrakexpandafterexpandafter@tuploop@temparelax%
endgroup%
def@tuploop#1|#2relax%
if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi#1
begingroup
ifxrelax#2relax
renewcommandnextendgroup%
else
renewcommandnextendgroup@tuploop#2relax%
fi
next
makeatother
begindocument
$tupb$
enddocument
However, if I change the definition of @sep
to def@sep~
then it "works" and puts the pipe characters in between
I believe middle
might be expanding too early, but I'm not sure what to do. How can I get this to work?
math-mode macros
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm trying to write a macro, tup
that will effectively expand this:
tup b
to this:
leftlangle a ~middle|~ b ~middle|~ ... ~middle|~ z rightrangle
I tried the following, but it only puts down the first separator and then stops.
documentclass[preview]standalone
newcommandbrak[1]ensuremathleftlangle#1rightrangle
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
begingroup%
@tempswafalse%
def@sep~middle%
edef@tempa#1%
expandafterbrakexpandafterexpandafter@tuploop@temparelax%
endgroup%
def@tuploop#1|#2relax%
if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi#1
begingroup
ifxrelax#2relax
renewcommandnextendgroup%
else
renewcommandnextendgroup@tuploop#2relax%
fi
next
makeatother
begindocument
$tupb$
enddocument
However, if I change the definition of @sep
to def@sep~
then it "works" and puts the pipe characters in between
I believe middle
might be expanding too early, but I'm not sure what to do. How can I get this to work?
math-mode macros
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm trying to write a macro, tup
that will effectively expand this:
tup b
to this:
leftlangle a ~middle|~ b ~middle|~ ... ~middle|~ z rightrangle
I tried the following, but it only puts down the first separator and then stops.
documentclass[preview]standalone
newcommandbrak[1]ensuremathleftlangle#1rightrangle
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
begingroup%
@tempswafalse%
def@sep~middle%
edef@tempa#1%
expandafterbrakexpandafterexpandafter@tuploop@temparelax%
endgroup%
def@tuploop#1|#2relax%
if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi#1
begingroup
ifxrelax#2relax
renewcommandnextendgroup%
else
renewcommandnextendgroup@tuploop#2relax%
fi
next
makeatother
begindocument
$tupb$
enddocument
However, if I change the definition of @sep
to def@sep~
then it "works" and puts the pipe characters in between
I believe middle
might be expanding too early, but I'm not sure what to do. How can I get this to work?
math-mode macros
New contributor
I'm trying to write a macro, tup
that will effectively expand this:
tup b
to this:
leftlangle a ~middle|~ b ~middle|~ ... ~middle|~ z rightrangle
I tried the following, but it only puts down the first separator and then stops.
documentclass[preview]standalone
newcommandbrak[1]ensuremathleftlangle#1rightrangle
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
begingroup%
@tempswafalse%
def@sep~middle%
edef@tempa#1%
expandafterbrakexpandafterexpandafter@tuploop@temparelax%
endgroup%
def@tuploop#1|#2relax%
if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi#1
begingroup
ifxrelax#2relax
renewcommandnextendgroup%
else
renewcommandnextendgroup@tuploop#2relax%
fi
next
makeatother
begindocument
$tupb$
enddocument
However, if I change the definition of @sep
to def@sep~
then it "works" and puts the pipe characters in between
I believe middle
might be expanding too early, but I'm not sure what to do. How can I get this to work?
math-mode macros
math-mode macros
New contributor
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
Alex Reinking
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
Alex ReinkingAlex Reinking
1185 bronze badges
1185 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
I don't think you need a loop:
documentclassarticle
begingroup
lccode`~=`|
lowercaseendgroup
deftup#1="8000leftlangle#1rightrangle
begindocument
[
tup b + tupa
]
enddocument
Do you mind explaining how this works a little bit? It seems very cool, but I don't know how I would have ever come up with it.
– Alex Reinking
6 hours ago
@AlexReinking it just gives|
an active definition that expands to;middlevert;
so you don't need any looping. The definition uses mathcode"8000
(math active) so it is only locally special within that argument and other uses of|
not inside the argument are not affected.
– David Carlisle
6 hours ago
add a comment |
As a general rule, I recommend to avoid left
and right
whenever possible.
Here's an implementation with a syntax similar to commands defined with DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
.
The unadorned command uses normal size; in the optional argument big
, Big
, bigg
or Bigg
can appear. The *
means using automatic sizing.
Spaces in the mandatory argument are ignored, so tupb
is the same as tup c
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagexparse
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommandtupsom
IfBooleanTF#1
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl leftlangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl ;
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rightrangle
IfNoValueTF#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl mathopen#2langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl mathclose#2rangle
__reinking_tup:n #3
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_open_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_close_tl
seq_new:N l__reinking_tup_items_seq
cs_new_protected:Nn __reinking_tup:n
seq_set_split:Nnn l__reinking_tup_items_seq #1
l__reinking_tup_open_tl
seq_use:NV l__reinking_tup_items_seq l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
l__reinking_tup_close_tl
cs_generate_variant:Nn seq_use:Nn NV
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$tupa$
quad
$tup[big]a$
quad
$tup[Big]a$
quad
$tup*dots$
enddocument
A package-free version, which indiscriminately uses left
, middle
and right
. The items are absorbed one at a time and appended to a list, then the list is executed.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
def@tup@list%
@tup#1
def@tup#1|%
ifx@tup#1relax
expandafter@firstoftwo
else
expandafter@secondoftwo
fi
leftlangle@tup@listrightrangle%
ifx@tup@list@empty@tup@append#1else@tup@append;#1fi@tup%
def@tup@append#1%
expandafterdefexpandafter@tup@listexpandafter@tup@list#1%
makeatother
begindocument
$tupa$
$tupa$
enddocument
This way there's no problem with groups implicitly formed by left
, middle
and right
.
Unfortunately, the publishing system I'm submitting to does not have xparse whitelisted.
– Alex Reinking
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking Too bad. Do you really needleft
,middle
andright
?
– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking I added a package-free version.
– egreg
7 hours ago
Perhapsifx@tup#1
in case one usestupaa
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
1
@PhelypeOleinik You're right. I opted forifx@tup#1relax
which also copes with an empty argument.
– egreg
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your command was almost working. If you put more items in tup
, like $tupc$
you'd see this:
it's not the first item which is left out, rather they are grouped in pairs. Your command starts with a leftlangle
, which starts a "math left group" and with the @tempswa
switch set to false. In the first iteration of @tuploop
you do if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
which expands to @tempswatrue
, meaning that no @sep
is inserted now, and @tempswa
is now true. The command then inserts the first item (a
) and proceeds to the next iteration.
On the second iteration, @tempswa
is true and if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
expands to @sep
, which inserts a middle|
(the separator after a
). The middle
primitive will end the "math left group" started by leftlangle
and will start another "math left group". However, when the first group ended, your @tempswa
switch was restored to its value outside the current group, which is false! And now the command inserts b
and goes to the third iteration, but now with @tempswa
set to false once again.
So your command was actually inserting <token>|<token>
and then <token>|<token>
, and so on, due to the end of group triggered by middle
. You could circumvent this with some aftergroup
magic, or simply making a gloabl assignment to the switch:
if@tempswa@sepelseglobal@tempswatruefi
However, as egreg said in the comment, @tempswa
is supposed to be set locally only, so it would be better if you created a newififg@insertsep
and then always used globalg@insertseptrue
and globalg@insertsepfalse
.
And since meanwhile egreg posted a much more elaborate expl3
answer than the one-liner I would post, I'll stop here ;-)
if@tempswa
should only be set locally. A different conditional to be always used globally would be preferable.
– egreg
7 hours ago
@egreg How would I know that withoutg_...
? ;-) Thanks for pointing it out, I added a note in the answer.
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
add a comment |
There seems to be space for one more answer, in which one could mention that all this seems to have been done some long time ago.
documentclassarticle
usepackagebraket
begindocument
[
Braket b + Braketa
]
enddocument
Back then they also needed no loop. ;-)
Well, this is definitely how I will do this whenever I don't have a strict whitelist of packages to adhere to.
– Alex Reinking
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Alex Reinking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507195%2fhow-to-make-a-pipe-divided-tuple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I don't think you need a loop:
documentclassarticle
begingroup
lccode`~=`|
lowercaseendgroup
deftup#1="8000leftlangle#1rightrangle
begindocument
[
tup b + tupa
]
enddocument
Do you mind explaining how this works a little bit? It seems very cool, but I don't know how I would have ever come up with it.
– Alex Reinking
6 hours ago
@AlexReinking it just gives|
an active definition that expands to;middlevert;
so you don't need any looping. The definition uses mathcode"8000
(math active) so it is only locally special within that argument and other uses of|
not inside the argument are not affected.
– David Carlisle
6 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think you need a loop:
documentclassarticle
begingroup
lccode`~=`|
lowercaseendgroup
deftup#1="8000leftlangle#1rightrangle
begindocument
[
tup b + tupa
]
enddocument
Do you mind explaining how this works a little bit? It seems very cool, but I don't know how I would have ever come up with it.
– Alex Reinking
6 hours ago
@AlexReinking it just gives|
an active definition that expands to;middlevert;
so you don't need any looping. The definition uses mathcode"8000
(math active) so it is only locally special within that argument and other uses of|
not inside the argument are not affected.
– David Carlisle
6 hours ago
add a comment |
I don't think you need a loop:
documentclassarticle
begingroup
lccode`~=`|
lowercaseendgroup
deftup#1="8000leftlangle#1rightrangle
begindocument
[
tup b + tupa
]
enddocument
I don't think you need a loop:
documentclassarticle
begingroup
lccode`~=`|
lowercaseendgroup
deftup#1="8000leftlangle#1rightrangle
begindocument
[
tup b + tupa
]
enddocument
answered 7 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
521k44 gold badges1182 silver badges1952 bronze badges
521k44 gold badges1182 silver badges1952 bronze badges
Do you mind explaining how this works a little bit? It seems very cool, but I don't know how I would have ever come up with it.
– Alex Reinking
6 hours ago
@AlexReinking it just gives|
an active definition that expands to;middlevert;
so you don't need any looping. The definition uses mathcode"8000
(math active) so it is only locally special within that argument and other uses of|
not inside the argument are not affected.
– David Carlisle
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Do you mind explaining how this works a little bit? It seems very cool, but I don't know how I would have ever come up with it.
– Alex Reinking
6 hours ago
@AlexReinking it just gives|
an active definition that expands to;middlevert;
so you don't need any looping. The definition uses mathcode"8000
(math active) so it is only locally special within that argument and other uses of|
not inside the argument are not affected.
– David Carlisle
6 hours ago
Do you mind explaining how this works a little bit? It seems very cool, but I don't know how I would have ever come up with it.
– Alex Reinking
6 hours ago
Do you mind explaining how this works a little bit? It seems very cool, but I don't know how I would have ever come up with it.
– Alex Reinking
6 hours ago
@AlexReinking it just gives
|
an active definition that expands to ;middlevert;
so you don't need any looping. The definition uses mathcode "8000
(math active) so it is only locally special within that argument and other uses of |
not inside the argument are not affected.– David Carlisle
6 hours ago
@AlexReinking it just gives
|
an active definition that expands to ;middlevert;
so you don't need any looping. The definition uses mathcode "8000
(math active) so it is only locally special within that argument and other uses of |
not inside the argument are not affected.– David Carlisle
6 hours ago
add a comment |
As a general rule, I recommend to avoid left
and right
whenever possible.
Here's an implementation with a syntax similar to commands defined with DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
.
The unadorned command uses normal size; in the optional argument big
, Big
, bigg
or Bigg
can appear. The *
means using automatic sizing.
Spaces in the mandatory argument are ignored, so tupb
is the same as tup c
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagexparse
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommandtupsom
IfBooleanTF#1
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl leftlangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl ;
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rightrangle
IfNoValueTF#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl mathopen#2langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl mathclose#2rangle
__reinking_tup:n #3
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_open_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_close_tl
seq_new:N l__reinking_tup_items_seq
cs_new_protected:Nn __reinking_tup:n
seq_set_split:Nnn l__reinking_tup_items_seq #1
l__reinking_tup_open_tl
seq_use:NV l__reinking_tup_items_seq l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
l__reinking_tup_close_tl
cs_generate_variant:Nn seq_use:Nn NV
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$tupa$
quad
$tup[big]a$
quad
$tup[Big]a$
quad
$tup*dots$
enddocument
A package-free version, which indiscriminately uses left
, middle
and right
. The items are absorbed one at a time and appended to a list, then the list is executed.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
def@tup@list%
@tup#1
def@tup#1|%
ifx@tup#1relax
expandafter@firstoftwo
else
expandafter@secondoftwo
fi
leftlangle@tup@listrightrangle%
ifx@tup@list@empty@tup@append#1else@tup@append;#1fi@tup%
def@tup@append#1%
expandafterdefexpandafter@tup@listexpandafter@tup@list#1%
makeatother
begindocument
$tupa$
$tupa$
enddocument
This way there's no problem with groups implicitly formed by left
, middle
and right
.
Unfortunately, the publishing system I'm submitting to does not have xparse whitelisted.
– Alex Reinking
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking Too bad. Do you really needleft
,middle
andright
?
– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking I added a package-free version.
– egreg
7 hours ago
Perhapsifx@tup#1
in case one usestupaa
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
1
@PhelypeOleinik You're right. I opted forifx@tup#1relax
which also copes with an empty argument.
– egreg
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
As a general rule, I recommend to avoid left
and right
whenever possible.
Here's an implementation with a syntax similar to commands defined with DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
.
The unadorned command uses normal size; in the optional argument big
, Big
, bigg
or Bigg
can appear. The *
means using automatic sizing.
Spaces in the mandatory argument are ignored, so tupb
is the same as tup c
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagexparse
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommandtupsom
IfBooleanTF#1
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl leftlangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl ;
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rightrangle
IfNoValueTF#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl mathopen#2langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl mathclose#2rangle
__reinking_tup:n #3
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_open_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_close_tl
seq_new:N l__reinking_tup_items_seq
cs_new_protected:Nn __reinking_tup:n
seq_set_split:Nnn l__reinking_tup_items_seq #1
l__reinking_tup_open_tl
seq_use:NV l__reinking_tup_items_seq l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
l__reinking_tup_close_tl
cs_generate_variant:Nn seq_use:Nn NV
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$tupa$
quad
$tup[big]a$
quad
$tup[Big]a$
quad
$tup*dots$
enddocument
A package-free version, which indiscriminately uses left
, middle
and right
. The items are absorbed one at a time and appended to a list, then the list is executed.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
def@tup@list%
@tup#1
def@tup#1|%
ifx@tup#1relax
expandafter@firstoftwo
else
expandafter@secondoftwo
fi
leftlangle@tup@listrightrangle%
ifx@tup@list@empty@tup@append#1else@tup@append;#1fi@tup%
def@tup@append#1%
expandafterdefexpandafter@tup@listexpandafter@tup@list#1%
makeatother
begindocument
$tupa$
$tupa$
enddocument
This way there's no problem with groups implicitly formed by left
, middle
and right
.
Unfortunately, the publishing system I'm submitting to does not have xparse whitelisted.
– Alex Reinking
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking Too bad. Do you really needleft
,middle
andright
?
– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking I added a package-free version.
– egreg
7 hours ago
Perhapsifx@tup#1
in case one usestupaa
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
1
@PhelypeOleinik You're right. I opted forifx@tup#1relax
which also copes with an empty argument.
– egreg
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
As a general rule, I recommend to avoid left
and right
whenever possible.
Here's an implementation with a syntax similar to commands defined with DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
.
The unadorned command uses normal size; in the optional argument big
, Big
, bigg
or Bigg
can appear. The *
means using automatic sizing.
Spaces in the mandatory argument are ignored, so tupb
is the same as tup c
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagexparse
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommandtupsom
IfBooleanTF#1
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl leftlangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl ;
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rightrangle
IfNoValueTF#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl mathopen#2langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl mathclose#2rangle
__reinking_tup:n #3
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_open_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_close_tl
seq_new:N l__reinking_tup_items_seq
cs_new_protected:Nn __reinking_tup:n
seq_set_split:Nnn l__reinking_tup_items_seq #1
l__reinking_tup_open_tl
seq_use:NV l__reinking_tup_items_seq l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
l__reinking_tup_close_tl
cs_generate_variant:Nn seq_use:Nn NV
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$tupa$
quad
$tup[big]a$
quad
$tup[Big]a$
quad
$tup*dots$
enddocument
A package-free version, which indiscriminately uses left
, middle
and right
. The items are absorbed one at a time and appended to a list, then the list is executed.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
def@tup@list%
@tup#1
def@tup#1|%
ifx@tup#1relax
expandafter@firstoftwo
else
expandafter@secondoftwo
fi
leftlangle@tup@listrightrangle%
ifx@tup@list@empty@tup@append#1else@tup@append;#1fi@tup%
def@tup@append#1%
expandafterdefexpandafter@tup@listexpandafter@tup@list#1%
makeatother
begindocument
$tupa$
$tupa$
enddocument
This way there's no problem with groups implicitly formed by left
, middle
and right
.
As a general rule, I recommend to avoid left
and right
whenever possible.
Here's an implementation with a syntax similar to commands defined with DeclarePairedDelimiter
from mathtools
.
The unadorned command uses normal size; in the optional argument big
, Big
, bigg
or Bigg
can appear. The *
means using automatic sizing.
Spaces in the mandatory argument are ignored, so tupb
is the same as tup c
.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagexparse
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommandtupsom
IfBooleanTF#1
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl leftlangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl ;
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rightrangle
IfNoValueTF#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl rangle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_open_tl mathopen#2langle
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_middle_tl mathrel#2
tl_set:Nn l__reinking_tup_close_tl mathclose#2rangle
__reinking_tup:n #3
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_open_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
tl_new:N l__reinking_tup_close_tl
seq_new:N l__reinking_tup_items_seq
cs_new_protected:Nn __reinking_tup:n
seq_set_split:Nnn l__reinking_tup_items_seq #1
l__reinking_tup_open_tl
seq_use:NV l__reinking_tup_items_seq l__reinking_tup_middle_tl
l__reinking_tup_close_tl
cs_generate_variant:Nn seq_use:Nn NV
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$tupa$
quad
$tup[big]a$
quad
$tup[Big]a$
quad
$tup*dots$
enddocument
A package-free version, which indiscriminately uses left
, middle
and right
. The items are absorbed one at a time and appended to a list, then the list is executed.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter
newcommandtup[1]%
def@tup@list%
@tup#1
def@tup#1|%
ifx@tup#1relax
expandafter@firstoftwo
else
expandafter@secondoftwo
fi
leftlangle@tup@listrightrangle%
ifx@tup@list@empty@tup@append#1else@tup@append;#1fi@tup%
def@tup@append#1%
expandafterdefexpandafter@tup@listexpandafter@tup@list#1%
makeatother
begindocument
$tupa$
$tupa$
enddocument
This way there's no problem with groups implicitly formed by left
, middle
and right
.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
egregegreg
767k90 gold badges2001 silver badges3353 bronze badges
767k90 gold badges2001 silver badges3353 bronze badges
Unfortunately, the publishing system I'm submitting to does not have xparse whitelisted.
– Alex Reinking
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking Too bad. Do you really needleft
,middle
andright
?
– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking I added a package-free version.
– egreg
7 hours ago
Perhapsifx@tup#1
in case one usestupaa
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
1
@PhelypeOleinik You're right. I opted forifx@tup#1relax
which also copes with an empty argument.
– egreg
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Unfortunately, the publishing system I'm submitting to does not have xparse whitelisted.
– Alex Reinking
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking Too bad. Do you really needleft
,middle
andright
?
– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking I added a package-free version.
– egreg
7 hours ago
Perhapsifx@tup#1
in case one usestupaa
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
1
@PhelypeOleinik You're right. I opted forifx@tup#1relax
which also copes with an empty argument.
– egreg
6 hours ago
Unfortunately, the publishing system I'm submitting to does not have xparse whitelisted.
– Alex Reinking
7 hours ago
Unfortunately, the publishing system I'm submitting to does not have xparse whitelisted.
– Alex Reinking
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking Too bad. Do you really need
left
, middle
and right
?– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking Too bad. Do you really need
left
, middle
and right
?– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking I added a package-free version.
– egreg
7 hours ago
@AlexReinking I added a package-free version.
– egreg
7 hours ago
Perhaps
ifx@tup#1
in case one uses tupaa
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
Perhaps
ifx@tup#1
in case one uses tupaa
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
1
1
@PhelypeOleinik You're right. I opted for
ifx@tup#1relax
which also copes with an empty argument.– egreg
6 hours ago
@PhelypeOleinik You're right. I opted for
ifx@tup#1relax
which also copes with an empty argument.– egreg
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your command was almost working. If you put more items in tup
, like $tupc$
you'd see this:
it's not the first item which is left out, rather they are grouped in pairs. Your command starts with a leftlangle
, which starts a "math left group" and with the @tempswa
switch set to false. In the first iteration of @tuploop
you do if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
which expands to @tempswatrue
, meaning that no @sep
is inserted now, and @tempswa
is now true. The command then inserts the first item (a
) and proceeds to the next iteration.
On the second iteration, @tempswa
is true and if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
expands to @sep
, which inserts a middle|
(the separator after a
). The middle
primitive will end the "math left group" started by leftlangle
and will start another "math left group". However, when the first group ended, your @tempswa
switch was restored to its value outside the current group, which is false! And now the command inserts b
and goes to the third iteration, but now with @tempswa
set to false once again.
So your command was actually inserting <token>|<token>
and then <token>|<token>
, and so on, due to the end of group triggered by middle
. You could circumvent this with some aftergroup
magic, or simply making a gloabl assignment to the switch:
if@tempswa@sepelseglobal@tempswatruefi
However, as egreg said in the comment, @tempswa
is supposed to be set locally only, so it would be better if you created a newififg@insertsep
and then always used globalg@insertseptrue
and globalg@insertsepfalse
.
And since meanwhile egreg posted a much more elaborate expl3
answer than the one-liner I would post, I'll stop here ;-)
if@tempswa
should only be set locally. A different conditional to be always used globally would be preferable.
– egreg
7 hours ago
@egreg How would I know that withoutg_...
? ;-) Thanks for pointing it out, I added a note in the answer.
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your command was almost working. If you put more items in tup
, like $tupc$
you'd see this:
it's not the first item which is left out, rather they are grouped in pairs. Your command starts with a leftlangle
, which starts a "math left group" and with the @tempswa
switch set to false. In the first iteration of @tuploop
you do if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
which expands to @tempswatrue
, meaning that no @sep
is inserted now, and @tempswa
is now true. The command then inserts the first item (a
) and proceeds to the next iteration.
On the second iteration, @tempswa
is true and if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
expands to @sep
, which inserts a middle|
(the separator after a
). The middle
primitive will end the "math left group" started by leftlangle
and will start another "math left group". However, when the first group ended, your @tempswa
switch was restored to its value outside the current group, which is false! And now the command inserts b
and goes to the third iteration, but now with @tempswa
set to false once again.
So your command was actually inserting <token>|<token>
and then <token>|<token>
, and so on, due to the end of group triggered by middle
. You could circumvent this with some aftergroup
magic, or simply making a gloabl assignment to the switch:
if@tempswa@sepelseglobal@tempswatruefi
However, as egreg said in the comment, @tempswa
is supposed to be set locally only, so it would be better if you created a newififg@insertsep
and then always used globalg@insertseptrue
and globalg@insertsepfalse
.
And since meanwhile egreg posted a much more elaborate expl3
answer than the one-liner I would post, I'll stop here ;-)
if@tempswa
should only be set locally. A different conditional to be always used globally would be preferable.
– egreg
7 hours ago
@egreg How would I know that withoutg_...
? ;-) Thanks for pointing it out, I added a note in the answer.
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your command was almost working. If you put more items in tup
, like $tupc$
you'd see this:
it's not the first item which is left out, rather they are grouped in pairs. Your command starts with a leftlangle
, which starts a "math left group" and with the @tempswa
switch set to false. In the first iteration of @tuploop
you do if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
which expands to @tempswatrue
, meaning that no @sep
is inserted now, and @tempswa
is now true. The command then inserts the first item (a
) and proceeds to the next iteration.
On the second iteration, @tempswa
is true and if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
expands to @sep
, which inserts a middle|
(the separator after a
). The middle
primitive will end the "math left group" started by leftlangle
and will start another "math left group". However, when the first group ended, your @tempswa
switch was restored to its value outside the current group, which is false! And now the command inserts b
and goes to the third iteration, but now with @tempswa
set to false once again.
So your command was actually inserting <token>|<token>
and then <token>|<token>
, and so on, due to the end of group triggered by middle
. You could circumvent this with some aftergroup
magic, or simply making a gloabl assignment to the switch:
if@tempswa@sepelseglobal@tempswatruefi
However, as egreg said in the comment, @tempswa
is supposed to be set locally only, so it would be better if you created a newififg@insertsep
and then always used globalg@insertseptrue
and globalg@insertsepfalse
.
And since meanwhile egreg posted a much more elaborate expl3
answer than the one-liner I would post, I'll stop here ;-)
Your command was almost working. If you put more items in tup
, like $tupc$
you'd see this:
it's not the first item which is left out, rather they are grouped in pairs. Your command starts with a leftlangle
, which starts a "math left group" and with the @tempswa
switch set to false. In the first iteration of @tuploop
you do if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
which expands to @tempswatrue
, meaning that no @sep
is inserted now, and @tempswa
is now true. The command then inserts the first item (a
) and proceeds to the next iteration.
On the second iteration, @tempswa
is true and if@tempswa@sepelse@tempswatruefi
expands to @sep
, which inserts a middle|
(the separator after a
). The middle
primitive will end the "math left group" started by leftlangle
and will start another "math left group". However, when the first group ended, your @tempswa
switch was restored to its value outside the current group, which is false! And now the command inserts b
and goes to the third iteration, but now with @tempswa
set to false once again.
So your command was actually inserting <token>|<token>
and then <token>|<token>
, and so on, due to the end of group triggered by middle
. You could circumvent this with some aftergroup
magic, or simply making a gloabl assignment to the switch:
if@tempswa@sepelseglobal@tempswatruefi
However, as egreg said in the comment, @tempswa
is supposed to be set locally only, so it would be better if you created a newififg@insertsep
and then always used globalg@insertseptrue
and globalg@insertsepfalse
.
And since meanwhile egreg posted a much more elaborate expl3
answer than the one-liner I would post, I'll stop here ;-)
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Phelype OleinikPhelype Oleinik
33.5k7 gold badges56 silver badges112 bronze badges
33.5k7 gold badges56 silver badges112 bronze badges
if@tempswa
should only be set locally. A different conditional to be always used globally would be preferable.
– egreg
7 hours ago
@egreg How would I know that withoutg_...
? ;-) Thanks for pointing it out, I added a note in the answer.
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
add a comment |
if@tempswa
should only be set locally. A different conditional to be always used globally would be preferable.
– egreg
7 hours ago
@egreg How would I know that withoutg_...
? ;-) Thanks for pointing it out, I added a note in the answer.
– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
if@tempswa
should only be set locally. A different conditional to be always used globally would be preferable.– egreg
7 hours ago
if@tempswa
should only be set locally. A different conditional to be always used globally would be preferable.– egreg
7 hours ago
@egreg How would I know that without
g_...
? ;-) Thanks for pointing it out, I added a note in the answer.– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
@egreg How would I know that without
g_...
? ;-) Thanks for pointing it out, I added a note in the answer.– Phelype Oleinik
6 hours ago
add a comment |
There seems to be space for one more answer, in which one could mention that all this seems to have been done some long time ago.
documentclassarticle
usepackagebraket
begindocument
[
Braket b + Braketa
]
enddocument
Back then they also needed no loop. ;-)
Well, this is definitely how I will do this whenever I don't have a strict whitelist of packages to adhere to.
– Alex Reinking
5 hours ago
add a comment |
There seems to be space for one more answer, in which one could mention that all this seems to have been done some long time ago.
documentclassarticle
usepackagebraket
begindocument
[
Braket b + Braketa
]
enddocument
Back then they also needed no loop. ;-)
Well, this is definitely how I will do this whenever I don't have a strict whitelist of packages to adhere to.
– Alex Reinking
5 hours ago
add a comment |
There seems to be space for one more answer, in which one could mention that all this seems to have been done some long time ago.
documentclassarticle
usepackagebraket
begindocument
[
Braket b + Braketa
]
enddocument
Back then they also needed no loop. ;-)
There seems to be space for one more answer, in which one could mention that all this seems to have been done some long time ago.
documentclassarticle
usepackagebraket
begindocument
[
Braket b + Braketa
]
enddocument
Back then they also needed no loop. ;-)
answered 5 hours ago
Schrödinger's catSchrödinger's cat
4,8517 silver badges16 bronze badges
4,8517 silver badges16 bronze badges
Well, this is definitely how I will do this whenever I don't have a strict whitelist of packages to adhere to.
– Alex Reinking
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Well, this is definitely how I will do this whenever I don't have a strict whitelist of packages to adhere to.
– Alex Reinking
5 hours ago
Well, this is definitely how I will do this whenever I don't have a strict whitelist of packages to adhere to.
– Alex Reinking
5 hours ago
Well, this is definitely how I will do this whenever I don't have a strict whitelist of packages to adhere to.
– Alex Reinking
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Alex Reinking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alex Reinking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alex Reinking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alex Reinking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507195%2fhow-to-make-a-pipe-divided-tuple%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown