Why symmetry transformations have to commute with Hamiltonian?Why does the classical Noether charge become the quantum symmetry generator?Why does the $pi$-flux state have time-reversal symmetry?Hermitian conjugate of an antiunitary transformationQuantum non-unitary transformation?Equivalence of symmetry and commuting unitary operatorSymmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsWhy does the Hamiltonian define symmetry/invariance?Why are we only interested in unitary/anti-unitary transformations of the underlying Hilbert space when considering symmetries in quantum mechanics?Interaction picture: why the Hamiltonian describing the dynamic doesn't change with the same law as other observables?Difference on the invariance of operators and their transformations under unitary operators
Where to draw the line between quantum mechanics theory and its interpretation(s)?
Why is my arithmetic with a long long int behaving this way?
Where are the "shires" in the UK?
Why would a military not separate its forces into different branches?
Mug and wireframe entirely disappeared
Hostile Divisor Numbers
Would a small hole in a Faraday cage drastically reduce its effectiveness at blocking interference?
How do I calculate how many of an item I'll have in this inventory system?
Why do these characters still seem to be the same age after the events of Endgame?
Formatting Datetime.now()
Trigonometry substitution issue with sign
Should I simplify my writing in a foreign country?
Will 700 more planes a day fly because of the Heathrow expansion?
Adding command shortcuts to /bin
How to deal with employer who keeps me at work after working hours
Are there terms in German for different skull shapes?
getline() vs. fgets(): Control memory allocation
How can Internet speed be 10 times slower without a router than when using the same connection with a router?
Are pressure-treated posts that have been submerged for a few days ruined?
Can you use "едать" and "игрывать" in the present and future tenses?
Endgame puzzle: How to avoid stalemate and win?
Dangerous workplace travelling
Notation: What does the tilde bellow of the Expectation mean?
Why didn't this character get a funeral at the end of Avengers: Endgame?
Why symmetry transformations have to commute with Hamiltonian?
Why does the classical Noether charge become the quantum symmetry generator?Why does the $pi$-flux state have time-reversal symmetry?Hermitian conjugate of an antiunitary transformationQuantum non-unitary transformation?Equivalence of symmetry and commuting unitary operatorSymmetry transformations on a quantum system; DefinitionsWhy does the Hamiltonian define symmetry/invariance?Why are we only interested in unitary/anti-unitary transformations of the underlying Hilbert space when considering symmetries in quantum mechanics?Interaction picture: why the Hamiltonian describing the dynamic doesn't change with the same law as other observables?Difference on the invariance of operators and their transformations under unitary operators
$begingroup$
Let us consider a unitary or antiunitary operator $hatU$, that associates with each quantum state $| psi rangle$ another state $hatU | psi rangle$. I have read that to $hatU$ be a symmetry transformation it has to keep the Hamiltonian $hatH$ invariant. It means that $hatU^dagger hatH hatU = hatH Rightarrow [hatH,hatU] = 0$. But what does it mean physically?
I believe that a symmetry is a transformation that doesn't change the physics of the system, that is, this doesn't change neither the expection values of the physical observables nor the probabilities, right? So, how is this related to the invariance of the Hamiltonian?
quantum-mechanics symmetry
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us consider a unitary or antiunitary operator $hatU$, that associates with each quantum state $| psi rangle$ another state $hatU | psi rangle$. I have read that to $hatU$ be a symmetry transformation it has to keep the Hamiltonian $hatH$ invariant. It means that $hatU^dagger hatH hatU = hatH Rightarrow [hatH,hatU] = 0$. But what does it mean physically?
I believe that a symmetry is a transformation that doesn't change the physics of the system, that is, this doesn't change neither the expection values of the physical observables nor the probabilities, right? So, how is this related to the invariance of the Hamiltonian?
quantum-mechanics symmetry
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
the symmetry operator acting on a quantum state may take it to a different, orthogonal, energetically degenerate state.
$endgroup$
– AmIAStudent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AmIAStudent That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
$endgroup$
– rob♦
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us consider a unitary or antiunitary operator $hatU$, that associates with each quantum state $| psi rangle$ another state $hatU | psi rangle$. I have read that to $hatU$ be a symmetry transformation it has to keep the Hamiltonian $hatH$ invariant. It means that $hatU^dagger hatH hatU = hatH Rightarrow [hatH,hatU] = 0$. But what does it mean physically?
I believe that a symmetry is a transformation that doesn't change the physics of the system, that is, this doesn't change neither the expection values of the physical observables nor the probabilities, right? So, how is this related to the invariance of the Hamiltonian?
quantum-mechanics symmetry
New contributor
$endgroup$
Let us consider a unitary or antiunitary operator $hatU$, that associates with each quantum state $| psi rangle$ another state $hatU | psi rangle$. I have read that to $hatU$ be a symmetry transformation it has to keep the Hamiltonian $hatH$ invariant. It means that $hatU^dagger hatH hatU = hatH Rightarrow [hatH,hatU] = 0$. But what does it mean physically?
I believe that a symmetry is a transformation that doesn't change the physics of the system, that is, this doesn't change neither the expection values of the physical observables nor the probabilities, right? So, how is this related to the invariance of the Hamiltonian?
quantum-mechanics symmetry
quantum-mechanics symmetry
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Thomas Fritsch
1,668816
1,668816
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
AlfredVAlfredV
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
the symmetry operator acting on a quantum state may take it to a different, orthogonal, energetically degenerate state.
$endgroup$
– AmIAStudent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AmIAStudent That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
$endgroup$
– rob♦
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
the symmetry operator acting on a quantum state may take it to a different, orthogonal, energetically degenerate state.
$endgroup$
– AmIAStudent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AmIAStudent That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
$endgroup$
– rob♦
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
the symmetry operator acting on a quantum state may take it to a different, orthogonal, energetically degenerate state.
$endgroup$
– AmIAStudent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
the symmetry operator acting on a quantum state may take it to a different, orthogonal, energetically degenerate state.
$endgroup$
– AmIAStudent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AmIAStudent That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
$endgroup$
– rob♦
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AmIAStudent That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
$endgroup$
– rob♦
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Sometimes this is claimed without much explanation.
The time evolution operator is given by exponentiating the Hamiltonian:
$$
U(t) = exp(-i that H / hbar ).
$$
For concreteness, when we think about a symmetry operation (what you called $U$) let's think about rotations around the $z$-axis. A rotation by $theta$ degrees is given by
$$
R(theta) = exp(-itheta hat J_z/hbar)
$$
where $hat J_z$ is the angular momentum operator in the $z$-direction.
If our symmetry commutes with time translations, we have
$$
[U(t), R(theta)] = 0 implies U(t) R(theta) = R(theta) U(t).
$$
This means that, for any $|psi rangle$,
$$
U(t) R(theta) |psi rangle = R(theta) U(t) |psi rangle.
$$
In other words, if you rotate the state by $theta$ degrees and then wait $t$ seconds, you will end up with the same state as if you first waited $t$ seconds before rotating $theta$ degrees.
The "commutativity" of these operations is often what physicists mean when they say they have a symmetry.
By differentiating the equation $[U(t), R(theta)] = 0$ by $t$, $theta$, or both, we can see that this statement is actually equivalent to four closely related statements
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: Rotating and then time evolving a state is the same as time evolving and then rotating. (We have a symmetry.)
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar,hat J] = 0$: The angular momentum of a state does not change after time evolution. (Angular momentum is conserved.)
$[hat H, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: The energy of a state does not change if the state is rotated.
$[hat H, hat J] = 0$: If you measure the angular momentum of a state, the probability that the state will have any particular energy afterwards will not change. The reverse is also true. ($hat H$ and $hat J$ can be simultaneously diagonalized.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If an operator doesn't commute with a Hamiltonian, then the eigenstates of that operator are not also eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. In that case, we say that the transformation defined by the operator is not a symmetry of the system.
Here's an example from classical physics. The law that the magnitude and direction of the angular momentum a vector are constant is a consequence of Noether's theorem, where the transformation of interest is changes of orientation in space. Angular momentum is conserved because space doesn't have any preferred direction. But, here on Earth's surface, space does have a preferred direction: it's "down." And so, if you have an isolated object rotating on Earth's surface, its angular momentum is not generally a constant. Instead, the orientation of the rotating object precesses.
If you have some operator which does not commute with the Hamiltonian, you would say that the transformation embodied by that operator is not a symmetry of your system.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Requiring that an unitary operator $U$ doesn't change the transition rates is an empty statement, because it's always true that$$
langle psi | chirangle = langle U psi | Uchirangle = langlepsi | U^dagger U |chirangle,.
$$
On the other hand requiring that it leaves expectations values unchanged is too strong of a constraint. Take for instance a rotationally invariant system. If you rotate with respect to any axis that is not $vecz$, the expectation value
$$
langle psi | hatJ_z | psirangle,,
$$
will change. In particular it flips sign if you rotate by $pi$ around, say, $vecx$.
The short answer to your question is: by definition. But I'll try to explain the motivation.
Symmetries in physics are deeply connected to constants of motion. Every time you have a symmetry in classical dynamics (rotation, translation, $U(1)$, ...) you get a constant of motion (angular momentum, momentum, charge,...). We want to import the same concept to quantum mechanics. And it turns out that the operators play both roles at the same time. They act as generators of a symmetry if you use them on the state and they act as constants of motion if you take their expectation value.
Now let's see why an operator with an expectation value that is constant in time must commute with the Hamiltonian. Call $J$ the generator of the symmetry and $U(theta) = exp(itheta J)$ its associated unitary operator. Our expectation value is
$$
E_psi(t) equiv langle psi | e^i H t / hbar,J, e^-i H t / hbar| psirangle,.
$$
We require the derivative of this to be zero
$$
-ihbarfracmathrmdE_psimathrmdt = langle psi | ,[H, J],|psirangle = 0;;forall;psi in mathscrH,(mboxHilbert space),.
$$
Obviously if you take $psi = chi + phi$ you can prove that $langlechi|[H,J]|phirangle= 0$ so the commutator is zero as an operator. Finally, if $H$ commutes with $J$, then it commutes with any power series in $J^n$ and thus $U(theta)$ as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
AlfredV is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477741%2fwhy-symmetry-transformations-have-to-commute-with-hamiltonian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Sometimes this is claimed without much explanation.
The time evolution operator is given by exponentiating the Hamiltonian:
$$
U(t) = exp(-i that H / hbar ).
$$
For concreteness, when we think about a symmetry operation (what you called $U$) let's think about rotations around the $z$-axis. A rotation by $theta$ degrees is given by
$$
R(theta) = exp(-itheta hat J_z/hbar)
$$
where $hat J_z$ is the angular momentum operator in the $z$-direction.
If our symmetry commutes with time translations, we have
$$
[U(t), R(theta)] = 0 implies U(t) R(theta) = R(theta) U(t).
$$
This means that, for any $|psi rangle$,
$$
U(t) R(theta) |psi rangle = R(theta) U(t) |psi rangle.
$$
In other words, if you rotate the state by $theta$ degrees and then wait $t$ seconds, you will end up with the same state as if you first waited $t$ seconds before rotating $theta$ degrees.
The "commutativity" of these operations is often what physicists mean when they say they have a symmetry.
By differentiating the equation $[U(t), R(theta)] = 0$ by $t$, $theta$, or both, we can see that this statement is actually equivalent to four closely related statements
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: Rotating and then time evolving a state is the same as time evolving and then rotating. (We have a symmetry.)
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar,hat J] = 0$: The angular momentum of a state does not change after time evolution. (Angular momentum is conserved.)
$[hat H, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: The energy of a state does not change if the state is rotated.
$[hat H, hat J] = 0$: If you measure the angular momentum of a state, the probability that the state will have any particular energy afterwards will not change. The reverse is also true. ($hat H$ and $hat J$ can be simultaneously diagonalized.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sometimes this is claimed without much explanation.
The time evolution operator is given by exponentiating the Hamiltonian:
$$
U(t) = exp(-i that H / hbar ).
$$
For concreteness, when we think about a symmetry operation (what you called $U$) let's think about rotations around the $z$-axis. A rotation by $theta$ degrees is given by
$$
R(theta) = exp(-itheta hat J_z/hbar)
$$
where $hat J_z$ is the angular momentum operator in the $z$-direction.
If our symmetry commutes with time translations, we have
$$
[U(t), R(theta)] = 0 implies U(t) R(theta) = R(theta) U(t).
$$
This means that, for any $|psi rangle$,
$$
U(t) R(theta) |psi rangle = R(theta) U(t) |psi rangle.
$$
In other words, if you rotate the state by $theta$ degrees and then wait $t$ seconds, you will end up with the same state as if you first waited $t$ seconds before rotating $theta$ degrees.
The "commutativity" of these operations is often what physicists mean when they say they have a symmetry.
By differentiating the equation $[U(t), R(theta)] = 0$ by $t$, $theta$, or both, we can see that this statement is actually equivalent to four closely related statements
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: Rotating and then time evolving a state is the same as time evolving and then rotating. (We have a symmetry.)
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar,hat J] = 0$: The angular momentum of a state does not change after time evolution. (Angular momentum is conserved.)
$[hat H, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: The energy of a state does not change if the state is rotated.
$[hat H, hat J] = 0$: If you measure the angular momentum of a state, the probability that the state will have any particular energy afterwards will not change. The reverse is also true. ($hat H$ and $hat J$ can be simultaneously diagonalized.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sometimes this is claimed without much explanation.
The time evolution operator is given by exponentiating the Hamiltonian:
$$
U(t) = exp(-i that H / hbar ).
$$
For concreteness, when we think about a symmetry operation (what you called $U$) let's think about rotations around the $z$-axis. A rotation by $theta$ degrees is given by
$$
R(theta) = exp(-itheta hat J_z/hbar)
$$
where $hat J_z$ is the angular momentum operator in the $z$-direction.
If our symmetry commutes with time translations, we have
$$
[U(t), R(theta)] = 0 implies U(t) R(theta) = R(theta) U(t).
$$
This means that, for any $|psi rangle$,
$$
U(t) R(theta) |psi rangle = R(theta) U(t) |psi rangle.
$$
In other words, if you rotate the state by $theta$ degrees and then wait $t$ seconds, you will end up with the same state as if you first waited $t$ seconds before rotating $theta$ degrees.
The "commutativity" of these operations is often what physicists mean when they say they have a symmetry.
By differentiating the equation $[U(t), R(theta)] = 0$ by $t$, $theta$, or both, we can see that this statement is actually equivalent to four closely related statements
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: Rotating and then time evolving a state is the same as time evolving and then rotating. (We have a symmetry.)
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar,hat J] = 0$: The angular momentum of a state does not change after time evolution. (Angular momentum is conserved.)
$[hat H, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: The energy of a state does not change if the state is rotated.
$[hat H, hat J] = 0$: If you measure the angular momentum of a state, the probability that the state will have any particular energy afterwards will not change. The reverse is also true. ($hat H$ and $hat J$ can be simultaneously diagonalized.)
$endgroup$
Sometimes this is claimed without much explanation.
The time evolution operator is given by exponentiating the Hamiltonian:
$$
U(t) = exp(-i that H / hbar ).
$$
For concreteness, when we think about a symmetry operation (what you called $U$) let's think about rotations around the $z$-axis. A rotation by $theta$ degrees is given by
$$
R(theta) = exp(-itheta hat J_z/hbar)
$$
where $hat J_z$ is the angular momentum operator in the $z$-direction.
If our symmetry commutes with time translations, we have
$$
[U(t), R(theta)] = 0 implies U(t) R(theta) = R(theta) U(t).
$$
This means that, for any $|psi rangle$,
$$
U(t) R(theta) |psi rangle = R(theta) U(t) |psi rangle.
$$
In other words, if you rotate the state by $theta$ degrees and then wait $t$ seconds, you will end up with the same state as if you first waited $t$ seconds before rotating $theta$ degrees.
The "commutativity" of these operations is often what physicists mean when they say they have a symmetry.
By differentiating the equation $[U(t), R(theta)] = 0$ by $t$, $theta$, or both, we can see that this statement is actually equivalent to four closely related statements
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: Rotating and then time evolving a state is the same as time evolving and then rotating. (We have a symmetry.)
$[e^-i t hat H/hbar,hat J] = 0$: The angular momentum of a state does not change after time evolution. (Angular momentum is conserved.)
$[hat H, e^- i theta hat J/hbar] = 0$: The energy of a state does not change if the state is rotated.
$[hat H, hat J] = 0$: If you measure the angular momentum of a state, the probability that the state will have any particular energy afterwards will not change. The reverse is also true. ($hat H$ and $hat J$ can be simultaneously diagonalized.)
answered 2 hours ago
user1379857user1379857
2,434829
2,434829
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If an operator doesn't commute with a Hamiltonian, then the eigenstates of that operator are not also eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. In that case, we say that the transformation defined by the operator is not a symmetry of the system.
Here's an example from classical physics. The law that the magnitude and direction of the angular momentum a vector are constant is a consequence of Noether's theorem, where the transformation of interest is changes of orientation in space. Angular momentum is conserved because space doesn't have any preferred direction. But, here on Earth's surface, space does have a preferred direction: it's "down." And so, if you have an isolated object rotating on Earth's surface, its angular momentum is not generally a constant. Instead, the orientation of the rotating object precesses.
If you have some operator which does not commute with the Hamiltonian, you would say that the transformation embodied by that operator is not a symmetry of your system.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If an operator doesn't commute with a Hamiltonian, then the eigenstates of that operator are not also eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. In that case, we say that the transformation defined by the operator is not a symmetry of the system.
Here's an example from classical physics. The law that the magnitude and direction of the angular momentum a vector are constant is a consequence of Noether's theorem, where the transformation of interest is changes of orientation in space. Angular momentum is conserved because space doesn't have any preferred direction. But, here on Earth's surface, space does have a preferred direction: it's "down." And so, if you have an isolated object rotating on Earth's surface, its angular momentum is not generally a constant. Instead, the orientation of the rotating object precesses.
If you have some operator which does not commute with the Hamiltonian, you would say that the transformation embodied by that operator is not a symmetry of your system.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If an operator doesn't commute with a Hamiltonian, then the eigenstates of that operator are not also eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. In that case, we say that the transformation defined by the operator is not a symmetry of the system.
Here's an example from classical physics. The law that the magnitude and direction of the angular momentum a vector are constant is a consequence of Noether's theorem, where the transformation of interest is changes of orientation in space. Angular momentum is conserved because space doesn't have any preferred direction. But, here on Earth's surface, space does have a preferred direction: it's "down." And so, if you have an isolated object rotating on Earth's surface, its angular momentum is not generally a constant. Instead, the orientation of the rotating object precesses.
If you have some operator which does not commute with the Hamiltonian, you would say that the transformation embodied by that operator is not a symmetry of your system.
$endgroup$
If an operator doesn't commute with a Hamiltonian, then the eigenstates of that operator are not also eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. In that case, we say that the transformation defined by the operator is not a symmetry of the system.
Here's an example from classical physics. The law that the magnitude and direction of the angular momentum a vector are constant is a consequence of Noether's theorem, where the transformation of interest is changes of orientation in space. Angular momentum is conserved because space doesn't have any preferred direction. But, here on Earth's surface, space does have a preferred direction: it's "down." And so, if you have an isolated object rotating on Earth's surface, its angular momentum is not generally a constant. Instead, the orientation of the rotating object precesses.
If you have some operator which does not commute with the Hamiltonian, you would say that the transformation embodied by that operator is not a symmetry of your system.
answered 2 hours ago
rob♦rob
42.2k1080175
42.2k1080175
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Requiring that an unitary operator $U$ doesn't change the transition rates is an empty statement, because it's always true that$$
langle psi | chirangle = langle U psi | Uchirangle = langlepsi | U^dagger U |chirangle,.
$$
On the other hand requiring that it leaves expectations values unchanged is too strong of a constraint. Take for instance a rotationally invariant system. If you rotate with respect to any axis that is not $vecz$, the expectation value
$$
langle psi | hatJ_z | psirangle,,
$$
will change. In particular it flips sign if you rotate by $pi$ around, say, $vecx$.
The short answer to your question is: by definition. But I'll try to explain the motivation.
Symmetries in physics are deeply connected to constants of motion. Every time you have a symmetry in classical dynamics (rotation, translation, $U(1)$, ...) you get a constant of motion (angular momentum, momentum, charge,...). We want to import the same concept to quantum mechanics. And it turns out that the operators play both roles at the same time. They act as generators of a symmetry if you use them on the state and they act as constants of motion if you take their expectation value.
Now let's see why an operator with an expectation value that is constant in time must commute with the Hamiltonian. Call $J$ the generator of the symmetry and $U(theta) = exp(itheta J)$ its associated unitary operator. Our expectation value is
$$
E_psi(t) equiv langle psi | e^i H t / hbar,J, e^-i H t / hbar| psirangle,.
$$
We require the derivative of this to be zero
$$
-ihbarfracmathrmdE_psimathrmdt = langle psi | ,[H, J],|psirangle = 0;;forall;psi in mathscrH,(mboxHilbert space),.
$$
Obviously if you take $psi = chi + phi$ you can prove that $langlechi|[H,J]|phirangle= 0$ so the commutator is zero as an operator. Finally, if $H$ commutes with $J$, then it commutes with any power series in $J^n$ and thus $U(theta)$ as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Requiring that an unitary operator $U$ doesn't change the transition rates is an empty statement, because it's always true that$$
langle psi | chirangle = langle U psi | Uchirangle = langlepsi | U^dagger U |chirangle,.
$$
On the other hand requiring that it leaves expectations values unchanged is too strong of a constraint. Take for instance a rotationally invariant system. If you rotate with respect to any axis that is not $vecz$, the expectation value
$$
langle psi | hatJ_z | psirangle,,
$$
will change. In particular it flips sign if you rotate by $pi$ around, say, $vecx$.
The short answer to your question is: by definition. But I'll try to explain the motivation.
Symmetries in physics are deeply connected to constants of motion. Every time you have a symmetry in classical dynamics (rotation, translation, $U(1)$, ...) you get a constant of motion (angular momentum, momentum, charge,...). We want to import the same concept to quantum mechanics. And it turns out that the operators play both roles at the same time. They act as generators of a symmetry if you use them on the state and they act as constants of motion if you take their expectation value.
Now let's see why an operator with an expectation value that is constant in time must commute with the Hamiltonian. Call $J$ the generator of the symmetry and $U(theta) = exp(itheta J)$ its associated unitary operator. Our expectation value is
$$
E_psi(t) equiv langle psi | e^i H t / hbar,J, e^-i H t / hbar| psirangle,.
$$
We require the derivative of this to be zero
$$
-ihbarfracmathrmdE_psimathrmdt = langle psi | ,[H, J],|psirangle = 0;;forall;psi in mathscrH,(mboxHilbert space),.
$$
Obviously if you take $psi = chi + phi$ you can prove that $langlechi|[H,J]|phirangle= 0$ so the commutator is zero as an operator. Finally, if $H$ commutes with $J$, then it commutes with any power series in $J^n$ and thus $U(theta)$ as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Requiring that an unitary operator $U$ doesn't change the transition rates is an empty statement, because it's always true that$$
langle psi | chirangle = langle U psi | Uchirangle = langlepsi | U^dagger U |chirangle,.
$$
On the other hand requiring that it leaves expectations values unchanged is too strong of a constraint. Take for instance a rotationally invariant system. If you rotate with respect to any axis that is not $vecz$, the expectation value
$$
langle psi | hatJ_z | psirangle,,
$$
will change. In particular it flips sign if you rotate by $pi$ around, say, $vecx$.
The short answer to your question is: by definition. But I'll try to explain the motivation.
Symmetries in physics are deeply connected to constants of motion. Every time you have a symmetry in classical dynamics (rotation, translation, $U(1)$, ...) you get a constant of motion (angular momentum, momentum, charge,...). We want to import the same concept to quantum mechanics. And it turns out that the operators play both roles at the same time. They act as generators of a symmetry if you use them on the state and they act as constants of motion if you take their expectation value.
Now let's see why an operator with an expectation value that is constant in time must commute with the Hamiltonian. Call $J$ the generator of the symmetry and $U(theta) = exp(itheta J)$ its associated unitary operator. Our expectation value is
$$
E_psi(t) equiv langle psi | e^i H t / hbar,J, e^-i H t / hbar| psirangle,.
$$
We require the derivative of this to be zero
$$
-ihbarfracmathrmdE_psimathrmdt = langle psi | ,[H, J],|psirangle = 0;;forall;psi in mathscrH,(mboxHilbert space),.
$$
Obviously if you take $psi = chi + phi$ you can prove that $langlechi|[H,J]|phirangle= 0$ so the commutator is zero as an operator. Finally, if $H$ commutes with $J$, then it commutes with any power series in $J^n$ and thus $U(theta)$ as well.
$endgroup$
Requiring that an unitary operator $U$ doesn't change the transition rates is an empty statement, because it's always true that$$
langle psi | chirangle = langle U psi | Uchirangle = langlepsi | U^dagger U |chirangle,.
$$
On the other hand requiring that it leaves expectations values unchanged is too strong of a constraint. Take for instance a rotationally invariant system. If you rotate with respect to any axis that is not $vecz$, the expectation value
$$
langle psi | hatJ_z | psirangle,,
$$
will change. In particular it flips sign if you rotate by $pi$ around, say, $vecx$.
The short answer to your question is: by definition. But I'll try to explain the motivation.
Symmetries in physics are deeply connected to constants of motion. Every time you have a symmetry in classical dynamics (rotation, translation, $U(1)$, ...) you get a constant of motion (angular momentum, momentum, charge,...). We want to import the same concept to quantum mechanics. And it turns out that the operators play both roles at the same time. They act as generators of a symmetry if you use them on the state and they act as constants of motion if you take their expectation value.
Now let's see why an operator with an expectation value that is constant in time must commute with the Hamiltonian. Call $J$ the generator of the symmetry and $U(theta) = exp(itheta J)$ its associated unitary operator. Our expectation value is
$$
E_psi(t) equiv langle psi | e^i H t / hbar,J, e^-i H t / hbar| psirangle,.
$$
We require the derivative of this to be zero
$$
-ihbarfracmathrmdE_psimathrmdt = langle psi | ,[H, J],|psirangle = 0;;forall;psi in mathscrH,(mboxHilbert space),.
$$
Obviously if you take $psi = chi + phi$ you can prove that $langlechi|[H,J]|phirangle= 0$ so the commutator is zero as an operator. Finally, if $H$ commutes with $J$, then it commutes with any power series in $J^n$ and thus $U(theta)$ as well.
answered 29 mins ago
MannyCMannyC
1,4401315
1,4401315
add a comment |
add a comment |
AlfredV is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
AlfredV is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
AlfredV is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
AlfredV is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477741%2fwhy-symmetry-transformations-have-to-commute-with-hamiltonian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
the symmetry operator acting on a quantum state may take it to a different, orthogonal, energetically degenerate state.
$endgroup$
– AmIAStudent
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AmIAStudent That seems like an answer, rather than a comment.
$endgroup$
– rob♦
2 hours ago