When are homomorphisms between Banach algebras contractions?What are the right categories of finite-dimensional Banach spaces?Which Banach algebras are group algebras?Unbounded representations of Banach algebrasGeneralising Gelfand's spectral theoryAlgebraically simple Banach algebrasReference request for translating from Top to C*-algcharacterization of commutative Banach algebrasBanach-Mazur distance between the cube and the octahedroninduced map on state spaces

When are homomorphisms between Banach algebras contractions?


What are the right categories of finite-dimensional Banach spaces?Which Banach algebras are group algebras?Unbounded representations of Banach algebrasGeneralising Gelfand's spectral theoryAlgebraically simple Banach algebrasReference request for translating from Top to C*-algcharacterization of commutative Banach algebrasBanach-Mazur distance between the cube and the octahedroninduced map on state spaces













4














$begingroup$



When are homomorphisms between Banach algebras contractions?




I recall from my student days that there are results which show that a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions (on the algebras). I have tried a literature search but only turned up the fact that it is true for $ast$-homomorphisms between $C^ast$-algebras (Proposition 3.2.2 in Dales et al., “Banach spaces of continuous functions as dual spaces”). Does any forum member have a reference for a definitive account of this theme?



I should add that I know that this not true for ANY pair of algebras, and I know that there are substantial results on classes of algebras for which it IS true. As a non-expert on complete normed algebras, I am looking for some references on the present state of the art.










share|cite|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure what results you are thinking of since there are plenty of automorphisms of $M_2(bf C)$ which send $I_2$ to $I_2$ but have norm strictly greater than 1...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Characters on commutative Banach algebras are contractive, that much is true...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    Again: can you help us to narrow down what classes of algebras were mentioned in the results that you are thinking of? As I said in my answer, either there are some missing conditions on the homomorphisms, or the class of range algebras must be restricted quite heavily.
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    I figured "automatically nonexpansive" would be a good search term, but when I googled it almost all the results were things I have written ... so I guess the term isn't in common use. Googling "automatically contractive" brought up a few other sources but I didn't see anything like a general reference on the subject.
    $endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Oct 16 at 16:28















4














$begingroup$



When are homomorphisms between Banach algebras contractions?




I recall from my student days that there are results which show that a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions (on the algebras). I have tried a literature search but only turned up the fact that it is true for $ast$-homomorphisms between $C^ast$-algebras (Proposition 3.2.2 in Dales et al., “Banach spaces of continuous functions as dual spaces”). Does any forum member have a reference for a definitive account of this theme?



I should add that I know that this not true for ANY pair of algebras, and I know that there are substantial results on classes of algebras for which it IS true. As a non-expert on complete normed algebras, I am looking for some references on the present state of the art.










share|cite|improve this question












$endgroup$










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure what results you are thinking of since there are plenty of automorphisms of $M_2(bf C)$ which send $I_2$ to $I_2$ but have norm strictly greater than 1...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Characters on commutative Banach algebras are contractive, that much is true...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    Again: can you help us to narrow down what classes of algebras were mentioned in the results that you are thinking of? As I said in my answer, either there are some missing conditions on the homomorphisms, or the class of range algebras must be restricted quite heavily.
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    I figured "automatically nonexpansive" would be a good search term, but when I googled it almost all the results were things I have written ... so I guess the term isn't in common use. Googling "automatically contractive" brought up a few other sources but I didn't see anything like a general reference on the subject.
    $endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Oct 16 at 16:28













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$



When are homomorphisms between Banach algebras contractions?




I recall from my student days that there are results which show that a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions (on the algebras). I have tried a literature search but only turned up the fact that it is true for $ast$-homomorphisms between $C^ast$-algebras (Proposition 3.2.2 in Dales et al., “Banach spaces of continuous functions as dual spaces”). Does any forum member have a reference for a definitive account of this theme?



I should add that I know that this not true for ANY pair of algebras, and I know that there are substantial results on classes of algebras for which it IS true. As a non-expert on complete normed algebras, I am looking for some references on the present state of the art.










share|cite|improve this question












$endgroup$





When are homomorphisms between Banach algebras contractions?




I recall from my student days that there are results which show that a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions (on the algebras). I have tried a literature search but only turned up the fact that it is true for $ast$-homomorphisms between $C^ast$-algebras (Proposition 3.2.2 in Dales et al., “Banach spaces of continuous functions as dual spaces”). Does any forum member have a reference for a definitive account of this theme?



I should add that I know that this not true for ANY pair of algebras, and I know that there are substantial results on classes of algebras for which it IS true. As a non-expert on complete normed algebras, I am looking for some references on the present state of the art.







reference-request fa.functional-analysis oa.operator-algebras banach-algebras






share|cite|improve this question
















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 16 at 13:52







user131781

















asked Oct 16 at 6:06









user131781user131781

1,1272 silver badges5 bronze badges




1,1272 silver badges5 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure what results you are thinking of since there are plenty of automorphisms of $M_2(bf C)$ which send $I_2$ to $I_2$ but have norm strictly greater than 1...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Characters on commutative Banach algebras are contractive, that much is true...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    Again: can you help us to narrow down what classes of algebras were mentioned in the results that you are thinking of? As I said in my answer, either there are some missing conditions on the homomorphisms, or the class of range algebras must be restricted quite heavily.
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    I figured "automatically nonexpansive" would be a good search term, but when I googled it almost all the results were things I have written ... so I guess the term isn't in common use. Googling "automatically contractive" brought up a few other sources but I didn't see anything like a general reference on the subject.
    $endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Oct 16 at 16:28












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not sure what results you are thinking of since there are plenty of automorphisms of $M_2(bf C)$ which send $I_2$ to $I_2$ but have norm strictly greater than 1...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:10







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Characters on commutative Banach algebras are contractive, that much is true...
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 7:11










  • $begingroup$
    Again: can you help us to narrow down what classes of algebras were mentioned in the results that you are thinking of? As I said in my answer, either there are some missing conditions on the homomorphisms, or the class of range algebras must be restricted quite heavily.
    $endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Oct 16 at 13:56










  • $begingroup$
    I figured "automatically nonexpansive" would be a good search term, but when I googled it almost all the results were things I have written ... so I guess the term isn't in common use. Googling "automatically contractive" brought up a few other sources but I didn't see anything like a general reference on the subject.
    $endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Oct 16 at 16:28







1




1




$begingroup$
I am not sure what results you are thinking of since there are plenty of automorphisms of $M_2(bf C)$ which send $I_2$ to $I_2$ but have norm strictly greater than 1...
$endgroup$
– Yemon Choi
Oct 16 at 7:10





$begingroup$
I am not sure what results you are thinking of since there are plenty of automorphisms of $M_2(bf C)$ which send $I_2$ to $I_2$ but have norm strictly greater than 1...
$endgroup$
– Yemon Choi
Oct 16 at 7:10





1




1




$begingroup$
Characters on commutative Banach algebras are contractive, that much is true...
$endgroup$
– Yemon Choi
Oct 16 at 7:11




$begingroup$
Characters on commutative Banach algebras are contractive, that much is true...
$endgroup$
– Yemon Choi
Oct 16 at 7:11












$begingroup$
Again: can you help us to narrow down what classes of algebras were mentioned in the results that you are thinking of? As I said in my answer, either there are some missing conditions on the homomorphisms, or the class of range algebras must be restricted quite heavily.
$endgroup$
– Yemon Choi
Oct 16 at 13:56




$begingroup$
Again: can you help us to narrow down what classes of algebras were mentioned in the results that you are thinking of? As I said in my answer, either there are some missing conditions on the homomorphisms, or the class of range algebras must be restricted quite heavily.
$endgroup$
– Yemon Choi
Oct 16 at 13:56












$begingroup$
I figured "automatically nonexpansive" would be a good search term, but when I googled it almost all the results were things I have written ... so I guess the term isn't in common use. Googling "automatically contractive" brought up a few other sources but I didn't see anything like a general reference on the subject.
$endgroup$
– Nik Weaver
Oct 16 at 16:28




$begingroup$
I figured "automatically nonexpansive" would be a good search term, but when I googled it almost all the results were things I have written ... so I guess the term isn't in common use. Googling "automatically contractive" brought up a few other sources but I didn't see anything like a general reference on the subject.
$endgroup$
– Nik Weaver
Oct 16 at 16:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















10
















$begingroup$

About the only positive result that comes to mind is the fact that homomorphisms cannot increase the spectral radius, so that if the range space is a uniform algebra then homomorphisms are necessarily contractive.



In my view and in my experience, at the level of generality considered by this question, the assertion/hope that "a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions" is not backed up by evidence. The fact that the answer is negative even for bijective homomorphisms $bf M_2 to bf M_2$, with both sides carrying the natural $rm C^*$-norm, is one reason to doubt that much can be said in the noncommutative setting, without extra restrictions on the nature of the homomorphism.



(To get such homomorphisms, let
$$ s_t= left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 1 right)$$ and consider the automorphism of $bf M_2$ given by $x mapsto s_t^-1 x s_t$. A simple calculation shows that the norm-1 element
$$p=left(matrix1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 right)$$
satisfies
$$s_t^-1ps_t = left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 0 right)$$ and the latter matrix has norm $ > |t|$.)



One can also find commutative unital Banach algebras with trivial Jacobson radical (and hence for which the spectral radius does at least see every element) such that there are continuous unital endomorphisms of the algebra with norm strictly bigger than $1$. For instance, take $A_+=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution product (a.k.a. the completion of the polynomial ring $bf C[z]$ in the natural $ell^1$-norm). Continuous unital endomorphisms of $A_+$ are uniquely determined by where they send the generating element $delta_1$ (thought of as the variable $z$) and conversely every power-bounded element $ain A_+$ definess a continuous unital endomorphism of $A_+$ which sends $delta_1mapsto a$. It now remains to note that there exist power-bounded elements of $A_+$ which have norm $>1$; see




MR0241980 (39 #3315) Reviewed
D. J. Newman, Homomorphisms of $l_+$. Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 37–46. https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=241980




which provides the example $a= (delta_0+delta_1-delta_2)/sqrt5$ among others.



To my mind, if a property of pairs of Banach algebras ("every continuous homomorphism from $A$ to $B$ is contractive") fails for $A=B=bf M_2$ or $A=B=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution, it is hard to justify a hope or claim that it holds for a wide class of algebras. Being by training a Banach algebraist rather than a $rm C^*$-algebraist, I just don't see why one would expect homomorphisms to be automatically contractive.






share|cite|improve this answer












$endgroup$
















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f343928%2fwhen-are-homomorphisms-between-banach-algebras-contractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown


























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10
















    $begingroup$

    About the only positive result that comes to mind is the fact that homomorphisms cannot increase the spectral radius, so that if the range space is a uniform algebra then homomorphisms are necessarily contractive.



    In my view and in my experience, at the level of generality considered by this question, the assertion/hope that "a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions" is not backed up by evidence. The fact that the answer is negative even for bijective homomorphisms $bf M_2 to bf M_2$, with both sides carrying the natural $rm C^*$-norm, is one reason to doubt that much can be said in the noncommutative setting, without extra restrictions on the nature of the homomorphism.



    (To get such homomorphisms, let
    $$ s_t= left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 1 right)$$ and consider the automorphism of $bf M_2$ given by $x mapsto s_t^-1 x s_t$. A simple calculation shows that the norm-1 element
    $$p=left(matrix1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 right)$$
    satisfies
    $$s_t^-1ps_t = left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 0 right)$$ and the latter matrix has norm $ > |t|$.)



    One can also find commutative unital Banach algebras with trivial Jacobson radical (and hence for which the spectral radius does at least see every element) such that there are continuous unital endomorphisms of the algebra with norm strictly bigger than $1$. For instance, take $A_+=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution product (a.k.a. the completion of the polynomial ring $bf C[z]$ in the natural $ell^1$-norm). Continuous unital endomorphisms of $A_+$ are uniquely determined by where they send the generating element $delta_1$ (thought of as the variable $z$) and conversely every power-bounded element $ain A_+$ definess a continuous unital endomorphism of $A_+$ which sends $delta_1mapsto a$. It now remains to note that there exist power-bounded elements of $A_+$ which have norm $>1$; see




    MR0241980 (39 #3315) Reviewed
    D. J. Newman, Homomorphisms of $l_+$. Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 37–46. https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=241980




    which provides the example $a= (delta_0+delta_1-delta_2)/sqrt5$ among others.



    To my mind, if a property of pairs of Banach algebras ("every continuous homomorphism from $A$ to $B$ is contractive") fails for $A=B=bf M_2$ or $A=B=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution, it is hard to justify a hope or claim that it holds for a wide class of algebras. Being by training a Banach algebraist rather than a $rm C^*$-algebraist, I just don't see why one would expect homomorphisms to be automatically contractive.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $endgroup$



















      10
















      $begingroup$

      About the only positive result that comes to mind is the fact that homomorphisms cannot increase the spectral radius, so that if the range space is a uniform algebra then homomorphisms are necessarily contractive.



      In my view and in my experience, at the level of generality considered by this question, the assertion/hope that "a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions" is not backed up by evidence. The fact that the answer is negative even for bijective homomorphisms $bf M_2 to bf M_2$, with both sides carrying the natural $rm C^*$-norm, is one reason to doubt that much can be said in the noncommutative setting, without extra restrictions on the nature of the homomorphism.



      (To get such homomorphisms, let
      $$ s_t= left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 1 right)$$ and consider the automorphism of $bf M_2$ given by $x mapsto s_t^-1 x s_t$. A simple calculation shows that the norm-1 element
      $$p=left(matrix1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 right)$$
      satisfies
      $$s_t^-1ps_t = left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 0 right)$$ and the latter matrix has norm $ > |t|$.)



      One can also find commutative unital Banach algebras with trivial Jacobson radical (and hence for which the spectral radius does at least see every element) such that there are continuous unital endomorphisms of the algebra with norm strictly bigger than $1$. For instance, take $A_+=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution product (a.k.a. the completion of the polynomial ring $bf C[z]$ in the natural $ell^1$-norm). Continuous unital endomorphisms of $A_+$ are uniquely determined by where they send the generating element $delta_1$ (thought of as the variable $z$) and conversely every power-bounded element $ain A_+$ definess a continuous unital endomorphism of $A_+$ which sends $delta_1mapsto a$. It now remains to note that there exist power-bounded elements of $A_+$ which have norm $>1$; see




      MR0241980 (39 #3315) Reviewed
      D. J. Newman, Homomorphisms of $l_+$. Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 37–46. https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=241980




      which provides the example $a= (delta_0+delta_1-delta_2)/sqrt5$ among others.



      To my mind, if a property of pairs of Banach algebras ("every continuous homomorphism from $A$ to $B$ is contractive") fails for $A=B=bf M_2$ or $A=B=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution, it is hard to justify a hope or claim that it holds for a wide class of algebras. Being by training a Banach algebraist rather than a $rm C^*$-algebraist, I just don't see why one would expect homomorphisms to be automatically contractive.






      share|cite|improve this answer












      $endgroup$

















        10














        10










        10







        $begingroup$

        About the only positive result that comes to mind is the fact that homomorphisms cannot increase the spectral radius, so that if the range space is a uniform algebra then homomorphisms are necessarily contractive.



        In my view and in my experience, at the level of generality considered by this question, the assertion/hope that "a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions" is not backed up by evidence. The fact that the answer is negative even for bijective homomorphisms $bf M_2 to bf M_2$, with both sides carrying the natural $rm C^*$-norm, is one reason to doubt that much can be said in the noncommutative setting, without extra restrictions on the nature of the homomorphism.



        (To get such homomorphisms, let
        $$ s_t= left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 1 right)$$ and consider the automorphism of $bf M_2$ given by $x mapsto s_t^-1 x s_t$. A simple calculation shows that the norm-1 element
        $$p=left(matrix1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 right)$$
        satisfies
        $$s_t^-1ps_t = left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 0 right)$$ and the latter matrix has norm $ > |t|$.)



        One can also find commutative unital Banach algebras with trivial Jacobson radical (and hence for which the spectral radius does at least see every element) such that there are continuous unital endomorphisms of the algebra with norm strictly bigger than $1$. For instance, take $A_+=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution product (a.k.a. the completion of the polynomial ring $bf C[z]$ in the natural $ell^1$-norm). Continuous unital endomorphisms of $A_+$ are uniquely determined by where they send the generating element $delta_1$ (thought of as the variable $z$) and conversely every power-bounded element $ain A_+$ definess a continuous unital endomorphism of $A_+$ which sends $delta_1mapsto a$. It now remains to note that there exist power-bounded elements of $A_+$ which have norm $>1$; see




        MR0241980 (39 #3315) Reviewed
        D. J. Newman, Homomorphisms of $l_+$. Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 37–46. https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=241980




        which provides the example $a= (delta_0+delta_1-delta_2)/sqrt5$ among others.



        To my mind, if a property of pairs of Banach algebras ("every continuous homomorphism from $A$ to $B$ is contractive") fails for $A=B=bf M_2$ or $A=B=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution, it is hard to justify a hope or claim that it holds for a wide class of algebras. Being by training a Banach algebraist rather than a $rm C^*$-algebraist, I just don't see why one would expect homomorphisms to be automatically contractive.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        $endgroup$



        About the only positive result that comes to mind is the fact that homomorphisms cannot increase the spectral radius, so that if the range space is a uniform algebra then homomorphisms are necessarily contractive.



        In my view and in my experience, at the level of generality considered by this question, the assertion/hope that "a positive answer to the above question holds under very general conditions" is not backed up by evidence. The fact that the answer is negative even for bijective homomorphisms $bf M_2 to bf M_2$, with both sides carrying the natural $rm C^*$-norm, is one reason to doubt that much can be said in the noncommutative setting, without extra restrictions on the nature of the homomorphism.



        (To get such homomorphisms, let
        $$ s_t= left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 1 right)$$ and consider the automorphism of $bf M_2$ given by $x mapsto s_t^-1 x s_t$. A simple calculation shows that the norm-1 element
        $$p=left(matrix1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 right)$$
        satisfies
        $$s_t^-1ps_t = left(matrix 1 & t \ 0 & 0 right)$$ and the latter matrix has norm $ > |t|$.)



        One can also find commutative unital Banach algebras with trivial Jacobson radical (and hence for which the spectral radius does at least see every element) such that there are continuous unital endomorphisms of the algebra with norm strictly bigger than $1$. For instance, take $A_+=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution product (a.k.a. the completion of the polynomial ring $bf C[z]$ in the natural $ell^1$-norm). Continuous unital endomorphisms of $A_+$ are uniquely determined by where they send the generating element $delta_1$ (thought of as the variable $z$) and conversely every power-bounded element $ain A_+$ definess a continuous unital endomorphism of $A_+$ which sends $delta_1mapsto a$. It now remains to note that there exist power-bounded elements of $A_+$ which have norm $>1$; see




        MR0241980 (39 #3315) Reviewed
        D. J. Newman, Homomorphisms of $l_+$. Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 37–46. https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=241980




        which provides the example $a= (delta_0+delta_1-delta_2)/sqrt5$ among others.



        To my mind, if a property of pairs of Banach algebras ("every continuous homomorphism from $A$ to $B$ is contractive") fails for $A=B=bf M_2$ or $A=B=ell^1(bf Z_+)$ with convolution, it is hard to justify a hope or claim that it holds for a wide class of algebras. Being by training a Banach algebraist rather than a $rm C^*$-algebraist, I just don't see why one would expect homomorphisms to be automatically contractive.







        share|cite|improve this answer















        share|cite|improve this answer




        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Oct 16 at 14:16

























        answered Oct 16 at 10:33









        Yemon ChoiYemon Choi

        17.6k5 gold badges50 silver badges111 bronze badges




        17.6k5 gold badges50 silver badges111 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f343928%2fwhen-are-homomorphisms-between-banach-algebras-contractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown









            Popular posts from this blog

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            199年 目錄 大件事 到箇年出世嗰人 到箇年死嗰人 節慶、風俗習慣 導覽選單