Employer says they want Quality & Quantity, but only pays bonuses based on the latterHow should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?

Diophantine equation in Laurent polynomials

Basic Accidental Question

Does SQL Server Only Perform Calculations In A SELECT List Once?

How to communicate faster than the system clock

Create virtual block device which writes to /dev/null

When does Scandinavian Mountains Airport open?

reorder matrix rows for tikz matrix

CO₂ level is high enough that it reduces cognitive ability. Isn't that a reason to worry?

What spells can be countered?

What is the source for pushing away the convert three times?

On a naked chicken (no coating,batter) is there any benefit of double frying?

A variation on Caesar

How does sudo handle $HOME differently since 19.10?

What does the 1.-5. notation mean at the top right corner?

How do I play two notes high and low together with a plectrum on guitar?

What are these criss-cross patterns close to Cambridge Airport (UK)?

What's an "add" chord?

Unexpected Code Coverage Reduction

Is there any point in adding more than 6 months' runway in savings instead of investing everything after that?

Which fallacy: "If white privilege exists, why did Elizabeth Warren pretend to be an Indian?"

How to use FDE without needing to share the encryption password

"Ich habe Durst" vs "Ich bin durstig": Which is more common?

Iodine tablet correct use and efficiency

Given an array A[] and a number x, check for pair in A[] with sum as x



Employer says they want Quality & Quantity, but only pays bonuses based on the latter


How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









77

















I work in a company that, like any other company, expects high quality and quantity of the product (service). I am a quality person who meets the production demands. However, many of my colleagues compromise quality for quantity. They produce more units of the product than me, but they clearly lack quality.



This gets unnoticed, as our client does not check the quality of the output regularly. We all, including our manager, know all these facts, and this was discussed in team meetings as well. In the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'.



Here comes my problem. Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output. My teammates get better bonus, as they do more production (the quality point vanishes here), but I get less. More than money, I feel like an under-performer.



How to cope with this situation? My family advises me to lower my quality and increase the output, but I could not! I love my work.






performance-reviews performance benefits







share|improve this question























  • 6





    Could you be a bit more specific about whether that product is physical or software? Is the concept of pre-delivery acceptance tests applicable to that product? Do those quality issues have some observable effect that can be detected in the course of testing? (Like lower performance, unstable behavior, failure to process certain valid input, if we're talking about the software). Can this effect be used to reject those units which do nor meet the set quality criteria, so that those units do not count towards the quantity?

    – Igor G
    Oct 15 at 15:04






  • 1





    You mention that your manager is at least aware of the issue. What have you done, specifically, to point out your concerns? What part in the process does your manager have?

    – dwizum
    Oct 15 at 16:15






  • 4





    Did you talk to your manager? Something along the lines "hey boss, you always tell everyone that you like my work best, but still I get the lowest bonus. I would like to keep the high quality up, but I could really use some extra $$$, do you think there is a way to work that out?" Either you get a proper bonus or not; in the latter case I would (but that is only my personal opinion) work only for the bonus, i.e. go for quantity above everything else, while at the same time looking for a new job.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:12






  • 1





    Probably a duplicate of How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid? The only things you can do here is raise concerns about this (repeatedly), do a better job at explaining what you have contributed to the organisation (as per the linked post, but this may or may not have any effect), compromise on quality to improve quantity or find another job. We can't tell you which option would be best for you.

    – Dukeling
    Oct 16 at 6:33







  • 51





    Have you considered that your management prefer indeed quantity over quality?

    – Cris
    Oct 16 at 6:40

















77

















I work in a company that, like any other company, expects high quality and quantity of the product (service). I am a quality person who meets the production demands. However, many of my colleagues compromise quality for quantity. They produce more units of the product than me, but they clearly lack quality.



This gets unnoticed, as our client does not check the quality of the output regularly. We all, including our manager, know all these facts, and this was discussed in team meetings as well. In the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'.



Here comes my problem. Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output. My teammates get better bonus, as they do more production (the quality point vanishes here), but I get less. More than money, I feel like an under-performer.



How to cope with this situation? My family advises me to lower my quality and increase the output, but I could not! I love my work.






performance-reviews performance benefits







share|improve this question























  • 6





    Could you be a bit more specific about whether that product is physical or software? Is the concept of pre-delivery acceptance tests applicable to that product? Do those quality issues have some observable effect that can be detected in the course of testing? (Like lower performance, unstable behavior, failure to process certain valid input, if we're talking about the software). Can this effect be used to reject those units which do nor meet the set quality criteria, so that those units do not count towards the quantity?

    – Igor G
    Oct 15 at 15:04






  • 1





    You mention that your manager is at least aware of the issue. What have you done, specifically, to point out your concerns? What part in the process does your manager have?

    – dwizum
    Oct 15 at 16:15






  • 4





    Did you talk to your manager? Something along the lines "hey boss, you always tell everyone that you like my work best, but still I get the lowest bonus. I would like to keep the high quality up, but I could really use some extra $$$, do you think there is a way to work that out?" Either you get a proper bonus or not; in the latter case I would (but that is only my personal opinion) work only for the bonus, i.e. go for quantity above everything else, while at the same time looking for a new job.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:12






  • 1





    Probably a duplicate of How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid? The only things you can do here is raise concerns about this (repeatedly), do a better job at explaining what you have contributed to the organisation (as per the linked post, but this may or may not have any effect), compromise on quality to improve quantity or find another job. We can't tell you which option would be best for you.

    – Dukeling
    Oct 16 at 6:33







  • 51





    Have you considered that your management prefer indeed quantity over quality?

    – Cris
    Oct 16 at 6:40













77












77








77


6






I work in a company that, like any other company, expects high quality and quantity of the product (service). I am a quality person who meets the production demands. However, many of my colleagues compromise quality for quantity. They produce more units of the product than me, but they clearly lack quality.



This gets unnoticed, as our client does not check the quality of the output regularly. We all, including our manager, know all these facts, and this was discussed in team meetings as well. In the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'.



Here comes my problem. Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output. My teammates get better bonus, as they do more production (the quality point vanishes here), but I get less. More than money, I feel like an under-performer.



How to cope with this situation? My family advises me to lower my quality and increase the output, but I could not! I love my work.






performance-reviews performance benefits







share|improve this question

















I work in a company that, like any other company, expects high quality and quantity of the product (service). I am a quality person who meets the production demands. However, many of my colleagues compromise quality for quantity. They produce more units of the product than me, but they clearly lack quality.



This gets unnoticed, as our client does not check the quality of the output regularly. We all, including our manager, know all these facts, and this was discussed in team meetings as well. In the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'.



Here comes my problem. Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output. My teammates get better bonus, as they do more production (the quality point vanishes here), but I get less. More than money, I feel like an under-performer.



How to cope with this situation? My family advises me to lower my quality and increase the output, but I could not! I love my work.






performance-reviews performance benefits




performance-reviews performance benefits






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 15 at 16:22









AndreiROM

47.7k24 gold badges116 silver badges183 bronze badges




47.7k24 gold badges116 silver badges183 bronze badges










asked Oct 15 at 14:07









ArunArun

6361 gold badge2 silver badges9 bronze badges




6361 gold badge2 silver badges9 bronze badges










  • 6





    Could you be a bit more specific about whether that product is physical or software? Is the concept of pre-delivery acceptance tests applicable to that product? Do those quality issues have some observable effect that can be detected in the course of testing? (Like lower performance, unstable behavior, failure to process certain valid input, if we're talking about the software). Can this effect be used to reject those units which do nor meet the set quality criteria, so that those units do not count towards the quantity?

    – Igor G
    Oct 15 at 15:04






  • 1





    You mention that your manager is at least aware of the issue. What have you done, specifically, to point out your concerns? What part in the process does your manager have?

    – dwizum
    Oct 15 at 16:15






  • 4





    Did you talk to your manager? Something along the lines "hey boss, you always tell everyone that you like my work best, but still I get the lowest bonus. I would like to keep the high quality up, but I could really use some extra $$$, do you think there is a way to work that out?" Either you get a proper bonus or not; in the latter case I would (but that is only my personal opinion) work only for the bonus, i.e. go for quantity above everything else, while at the same time looking for a new job.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:12






  • 1





    Probably a duplicate of How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid? The only things you can do here is raise concerns about this (repeatedly), do a better job at explaining what you have contributed to the organisation (as per the linked post, but this may or may not have any effect), compromise on quality to improve quantity or find another job. We can't tell you which option would be best for you.

    – Dukeling
    Oct 16 at 6:33







  • 51





    Have you considered that your management prefer indeed quantity over quality?

    – Cris
    Oct 16 at 6:40












  • 6





    Could you be a bit more specific about whether that product is physical or software? Is the concept of pre-delivery acceptance tests applicable to that product? Do those quality issues have some observable effect that can be detected in the course of testing? (Like lower performance, unstable behavior, failure to process certain valid input, if we're talking about the software). Can this effect be used to reject those units which do nor meet the set quality criteria, so that those units do not count towards the quantity?

    – Igor G
    Oct 15 at 15:04






  • 1





    You mention that your manager is at least aware of the issue. What have you done, specifically, to point out your concerns? What part in the process does your manager have?

    – dwizum
    Oct 15 at 16:15






  • 4





    Did you talk to your manager? Something along the lines "hey boss, you always tell everyone that you like my work best, but still I get the lowest bonus. I would like to keep the high quality up, but I could really use some extra $$$, do you think there is a way to work that out?" Either you get a proper bonus or not; in the latter case I would (but that is only my personal opinion) work only for the bonus, i.e. go for quantity above everything else, while at the same time looking for a new job.

    – Dirk
    Oct 16 at 6:12






  • 1





    Probably a duplicate of How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid? The only things you can do here is raise concerns about this (repeatedly), do a better job at explaining what you have contributed to the organisation (as per the linked post, but this may or may not have any effect), compromise on quality to improve quantity or find another job. We can't tell you which option would be best for you.

    – Dukeling
    Oct 16 at 6:33







  • 51





    Have you considered that your management prefer indeed quantity over quality?

    – Cris
    Oct 16 at 6:40







6




6





Could you be a bit more specific about whether that product is physical or software? Is the concept of pre-delivery acceptance tests applicable to that product? Do those quality issues have some observable effect that can be detected in the course of testing? (Like lower performance, unstable behavior, failure to process certain valid input, if we're talking about the software). Can this effect be used to reject those units which do nor meet the set quality criteria, so that those units do not count towards the quantity?

– Igor G
Oct 15 at 15:04





Could you be a bit more specific about whether that product is physical or software? Is the concept of pre-delivery acceptance tests applicable to that product? Do those quality issues have some observable effect that can be detected in the course of testing? (Like lower performance, unstable behavior, failure to process certain valid input, if we're talking about the software). Can this effect be used to reject those units which do nor meet the set quality criteria, so that those units do not count towards the quantity?

– Igor G
Oct 15 at 15:04




1




1





You mention that your manager is at least aware of the issue. What have you done, specifically, to point out your concerns? What part in the process does your manager have?

– dwizum
Oct 15 at 16:15





You mention that your manager is at least aware of the issue. What have you done, specifically, to point out your concerns? What part in the process does your manager have?

– dwizum
Oct 15 at 16:15




4




4





Did you talk to your manager? Something along the lines "hey boss, you always tell everyone that you like my work best, but still I get the lowest bonus. I would like to keep the high quality up, but I could really use some extra $$$, do you think there is a way to work that out?" Either you get a proper bonus or not; in the latter case I would (but that is only my personal opinion) work only for the bonus, i.e. go for quantity above everything else, while at the same time looking for a new job.

– Dirk
Oct 16 at 6:12





Did you talk to your manager? Something along the lines "hey boss, you always tell everyone that you like my work best, but still I get the lowest bonus. I would like to keep the high quality up, but I could really use some extra $$$, do you think there is a way to work that out?" Either you get a proper bonus or not; in the latter case I would (but that is only my personal opinion) work only for the bonus, i.e. go for quantity above everything else, while at the same time looking for a new job.

– Dirk
Oct 16 at 6:12




1




1





Probably a duplicate of How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid? The only things you can do here is raise concerns about this (repeatedly), do a better job at explaining what you have contributed to the organisation (as per the linked post, but this may or may not have any effect), compromise on quality to improve quantity or find another job. We can't tell you which option would be best for you.

– Dukeling
Oct 16 at 6:33






Probably a duplicate of How should I properly approach my boss if I'm feeling underpaid? The only things you can do here is raise concerns about this (repeatedly), do a better job at explaining what you have contributed to the organisation (as per the linked post, but this may or may not have any effect), compromise on quality to improve quantity or find another job. We can't tell you which option would be best for you.

– Dukeling
Oct 16 at 6:33





51




51





Have you considered that your management prefer indeed quantity over quality?

– Cris
Oct 16 at 6:40





Have you considered that your management prefer indeed quantity over quality?

– Cris
Oct 16 at 6:40










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















106


















Based on your statements in the question, I'm going to write the answer(s)




How to cope with this situation?





  • If you want monetary benefits, shift your priority to produce quantity rather than quality. If you can manage to retain same quality as of now, without burning yourself out, that's added benefit - but focus should be on quantity.




    • Reason: You said the lack of quality aspect is known to the manager / superiors, the problems have been discussed in the wide open team meetings and still no observable changes are there in place. This is a clear indication that the priority of quantity is more over the quality to the company. You just do not "fit into" the criteria very well with your choice of quality over quantity, so you got to change your approach.



  • If you want job satisfaction, find a new job where your skills and efforts are actually valued.




    • Reason: Once again, the discussion and the observations made by you makes it pretty clear that the organization is not going to change anytime soon and in the long run, eventually you (or your like-minded engineers) are going to be overrun by the people having focus on quantity. Time to polish your CV and find another job / organization which holds same values / viewpoints as yours. Good luck.






share|improve this answer























  • 4





    +1 People often berate going directly to "quit", but I tend to agree that most of these kinds of questions must include that as a possible option. Companies rarely do anything with anything less than overwhelming feedback. And they fall into this falsehood of "measurable" being the primary test of value. In the end, no one will be able to quantify a very important part of the job so it will never be treated as important when rewarding.

    – John Spiegel
    Oct 15 at 14:59






  • 39





    Whoa there. That's quite the dichotomy: give up on your values or quit!?? ... How about, "get promoted and work on culture change." The OP's manager has already publicly acknowledged the OP's value as a bar raiser. This praise may not have be a direct hint to ask for a promotion, but it's at least good ammunition for that conversation ... ain't it? ... As an added bonus (pun intended), a more senior level team member (or team lead) would probably not be awarded bonuses on the same silly formula. Yeah?

    – svidgen
    Oct 16 at 2:56







  • 13





    @svidgen We don't know that.The mangers in India (That's where OP is, I assume), play many "tricks" to try to keep people "happy". If the manager / organization actually sees the value in the quality, why that does not reflect in the paycheck?

    – Sourav Ghosh
    Oct 16 at 5:04






  • 2





    @svidgen what you suggest is a possibility, indeed. But this answer errs on the side of being practical - either of these will definitely resolve the situation. While a long term strategy of changing the company culture could work, it might also not. In many ways. Perhaps OP is never promoted, or never promoted to where they can make a difference. Perhaps this takes too long and OP gets burned out, frustrated, and stressed in the mean time. Perhaps there cannot be a values shift at all - company oversold its production, so it cannot change focus without breaching contracts.

    – VLAZ
    Oct 16 at 14:10






  • 8





    @svidgen Your suggestion was literally "get promoted and work on culture change." There may very easily be no promotions available. And promotions come with new responsibilities even if they're not management (if they don't add/change responsibility, it's not a promotion). But changing metrics used to calculate bonuses isn't a culture thing, it's a policy change... which will come from management. You can try to change the company, but if the rest of the team doesn't care about quality and your teammates like the cash it brings for easy work... it's an exercise in futility.

    – Delioth
    Oct 16 at 15:08


















67


















"...in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'..."



This is a vital detail that should be the lede in your question and not buried in a comment to an answer. This is the one thing that distinguishes your question from all the other complaints about unappreciated extra effort at work. It is also the one thing that you can use as leverage.



"Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output."



First, you need to find a way to say this in an undeniable way. What evidence do you have that quantity is primary and quality is not used in performance metrics? Compose an articulate argument proving that this is true. Then ask for a private 1-on-1 with your manager and present the conflict between the two positions (1. everyone should be you and 2. everyone is rewarded to not be you) as a problem the company needs to solve.



As always, when reporting a problem, be ready with some suggested solutions. (E.g. whenever someone is called out in a meeting as a paragon, that person automatically gets a 5% bonus. Or, the company should admit to its employees that anything beyond a certain level of quality is counterproductive.)



If your manager is obdurate on this subject, then the next time the manager says in a meeting that everyone should be you, respond by explaining, immediately, in that same meeting, how everyone is rewarded to not be you.






share|improve this answer























  • 3





    This attacks the root of the problem. Fix how the bonus is handled and all employees will get automatically incentivated to increase quality.

    – Enric Naval
    Oct 16 at 10:20






  • 1





    @EnricNaval indeed, the "backend" needs to adjust though, i.e. less quantity & more quality may imply a higher cost => higher prices.

    – CPHPython
    Oct 16 at 11:12






  • 7





    It's possible this will work, but in my experience it's more likely that the manager is not the one deciding bonuses. There are probably literal reports run on units produced minus complaints received = bonus. These reports are probably run by upper management/HR. Manager cares about the product, thus he has different goals.

    – bvoyelr
    Oct 16 at 18:38






  • 1





    @bvoyelr while I agree with your assessment of the likely situation, I would suggest that the solution here would be for the manager to inform HR/upper management that the bonus criteria need to be updated.

    – Stobor
    Oct 18 at 2:13


















19


















Your employer has made clear where their priorities lie and gone so far as to set up incentives to make sure their directives are followed. It is admirable that you take pride in your work, but that isn't what your employer is paying you to do. They want more, not better. In the eyes of your employer, you are an under-performer.



Your choices, thus, are as follows:



  • Continue your current level of work, knowing that this is not what your employer wants you to do. It will go unappreciated and unrewarded, possibly to the point where you are put on a PIP or terminated.

  • Lower your standards to produce more and give your employer what they want. Be rewarded accordingly.

  • Find a different job where your values are more in alignment.

I do not know your industry or what the prospects are for you on any decision. That will be for you to decide.






share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    @SouravGhosh, it's still a choice. Not one I recommend myself, but I don't presume to know OP's priorities. Perhaps pride in his work is more important to him than getting paid.

    – Seth R
    Oct 15 at 14:37






  • 2





    Plus, based on OP's description, nobody has said their work is unacceptable, just not as high on the metrics and hence not as high a bonus.

    – Kaz
    Oct 15 at 14:42






  • 1





    Thank you all. In fact, in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me', but somehow it doesn't translate into performance appraisal. I am paid well, and I am not a money man. But the rating of me being lower than others' bothers me. I am unwilling to trade quality for quantity for the fear of forgetting/losing my skills. I guess it's time to move on.

    – Arun
    Oct 15 at 14:51






  • 7





    @Arun It's not only about money, think of the case in long run, People who prefers quantity over quality will get promoted and eventually will be in a supervisor position, you then, have to abide by the choices made by them to produce quantity. Eventually, you'll end up on the losing side.

    – Sourav Ghosh
    Oct 15 at 14:52







  • 3





    @Arun if you manager is in a position to evaluate your performance based on the whole of your effort and not just quantity, then s/he is paying lipservice to an ideal that s/he doesn't actually support. Of course, your manager might not be in that position and is forced to use evaluation criteria handed down from above, and is sincere in his/her comments; I can't tell you which. Either way, it seems clear that your goals and your employer's are not aligned.

    – asgallant
    Oct 16 at 2:12


















10


















Might not apply, but I think an important aspect is that more "quality" is not inherently better: of course the deliverable will be better in some way if you spend more time on it, but perhaps it will take more time to be deliver, which is not what the client wants.



It depends very much on the product, but since your client doesn't seem too concerned about the quality it receives from the other employees, then maybe client and managers are content with that quality level and as much quantity as possible.



I think the saying "perfection is the enemy of good" applies here: it's good to set high standards for yourself, but in business there are other needs to consider, and it's ok to let the client and the KPIs set the bar.






share|improve this answer


























  • Gold plating comes to mind. It would appear that the "usual" quality all the other colleagues are producing is sufficient to the client... and management is aware of that.

    – Ghanima
    Oct 16 at 17:57











  • It's like the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari. A Ferrari is a much higher-quality car, but takes a lot longer to make. Meanwhile, Ford's quality is perfectly acceptable for the market it serves, and they can churn out a thousand Fiestas in a day to meet demand. There's no point in applying Ferrari-level quality if your job is building Fiestas.

    – Seth R
    Oct 16 at 20:39











  • @SethR and the typical Fiesta owner wouldn't want a car that burns fuel as a Ferrari :) Taken in the software context, the extra features may actually affect the performance and reliability of the product

    – clabacchio
    Oct 17 at 7:52











  • But on the Ford/Ferrari analogy... someone on the production line has been producing Ferraris instead of Fords and management have expressed in the team meetings that they wish more of their people produced Ferraris.

    – seventyeightist
    Oct 18 at 18:08











  • @seventyeightist I can't say for sure what they prefer, but they are giving mixed feedbacks on the topic. Perhaps their target is somewhere in between, but if bonuses are the drivers of that workplace, quantity is what they are more likely to get. Actually, they may not want to ask explicitly to sacrifice quality for quantity.

    – clabacchio
    Oct 22 at 7:40



















8


















Seth R's answer is good. But there is a common industry name for this.



Gold Plating




"In the usual gold plating scenario, a programmer adds features ... because they’re “cool” or fun or seem like they’d be really useful. And sometimes they are — but more often, they’re just wasted effort, at least from the perspective of the person paying the programmer’s salary."




In your case, you're adding extra quality that your manager and the customer have not requested. So from their perspective, you're wasting time on things no one wants.






share|improve this answer


























  • I am familiar with management pushing back against "gold plating". Sometimes they have a good point. However, in my experience, more often than not, they are trading long-term costs for short-term gains. I would not take it as given managers are making an informed choice when they do this.

    – eclipz905
    Oct 17 at 19:01


















0


















There are lot's of good answers to this question, but I want to add a slightly different angle that you might want to consider if you intend to pursue this further.



How do you know the details of your coworkers bonuses / compensation? I see that you are in Chennai; I am not sure the custom for keeping this type of info secret in India, but assuming that such info is not openly disclosed by the employer, you may want to ask yourself how it is you've come to know of this pay disparity. If it's self-reported, do you trust what others are claiming? Is there some way to verify those claims? And if you do bring this up with management, how will you respond if your concern is dismissed?



A lot of the other answers are appeals to fairness, based on the presumption that managers are interested in such things. If you do bring this up, be prepared to respond if your boss denies the issue exists at all.






share|improve this answer


























  • If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses.

    – Stobor
    Oct 18 at 2:17






  • 1





    @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from.

    – Z4-tier
    Oct 18 at 2:29


















-2


















That is typical for products which get traded around the globe through many hands before they land with an end user. It would be totally uneconomic to do quality control along the way, because whoever does it has to pay for it and increase the price, and looses customers.



To return a broken part from the end user all the way back to the producer is terribly uneconomic, so these losses, should a customer return an item, just get priced in along the trade route.



There is nothing you or your company can really do, that is the way our world is running in the 21st century. Its called "globalisation". Most people get a bit richer, many get stinkingly rich, and only they have a chance to really enjoy their riches, because they can still afford to buy quality products, while everybody else has to buy cheap shit.



Sorry for the rant. ;)






share|improve this answer



























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146504%2femployer-says-they-want-quality-quantity-but-only-pays-bonuses-based-on-the-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown





















    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function ()
    $("#show-editor-button").addClass("d-none");
    $("#post-form").removeClass("d-none");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if (useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function (popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    7 Answers
    7






    active

    oldest

    votes








    7 Answers
    7






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    106


















    Based on your statements in the question, I'm going to write the answer(s)




    How to cope with this situation?





    • If you want monetary benefits, shift your priority to produce quantity rather than quality. If you can manage to retain same quality as of now, without burning yourself out, that's added benefit - but focus should be on quantity.




      • Reason: You said the lack of quality aspect is known to the manager / superiors, the problems have been discussed in the wide open team meetings and still no observable changes are there in place. This is a clear indication that the priority of quantity is more over the quality to the company. You just do not "fit into" the criteria very well with your choice of quality over quantity, so you got to change your approach.



    • If you want job satisfaction, find a new job where your skills and efforts are actually valued.




      • Reason: Once again, the discussion and the observations made by you makes it pretty clear that the organization is not going to change anytime soon and in the long run, eventually you (or your like-minded engineers) are going to be overrun by the people having focus on quantity. Time to polish your CV and find another job / organization which holds same values / viewpoints as yours. Good luck.






    share|improve this answer























    • 4





      +1 People often berate going directly to "quit", but I tend to agree that most of these kinds of questions must include that as a possible option. Companies rarely do anything with anything less than overwhelming feedback. And they fall into this falsehood of "measurable" being the primary test of value. In the end, no one will be able to quantify a very important part of the job so it will never be treated as important when rewarding.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 15 at 14:59






    • 39





      Whoa there. That's quite the dichotomy: give up on your values or quit!?? ... How about, "get promoted and work on culture change." The OP's manager has already publicly acknowledged the OP's value as a bar raiser. This praise may not have be a direct hint to ask for a promotion, but it's at least good ammunition for that conversation ... ain't it? ... As an added bonus (pun intended), a more senior level team member (or team lead) would probably not be awarded bonuses on the same silly formula. Yeah?

      – svidgen
      Oct 16 at 2:56







    • 13





      @svidgen We don't know that.The mangers in India (That's where OP is, I assume), play many "tricks" to try to keep people "happy". If the manager / organization actually sees the value in the quality, why that does not reflect in the paycheck?

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 16 at 5:04






    • 2





      @svidgen what you suggest is a possibility, indeed. But this answer errs on the side of being practical - either of these will definitely resolve the situation. While a long term strategy of changing the company culture could work, it might also not. In many ways. Perhaps OP is never promoted, or never promoted to where they can make a difference. Perhaps this takes too long and OP gets burned out, frustrated, and stressed in the mean time. Perhaps there cannot be a values shift at all - company oversold its production, so it cannot change focus without breaching contracts.

      – VLAZ
      Oct 16 at 14:10






    • 8





      @svidgen Your suggestion was literally "get promoted and work on culture change." There may very easily be no promotions available. And promotions come with new responsibilities even if they're not management (if they don't add/change responsibility, it's not a promotion). But changing metrics used to calculate bonuses isn't a culture thing, it's a policy change... which will come from management. You can try to change the company, but if the rest of the team doesn't care about quality and your teammates like the cash it brings for easy work... it's an exercise in futility.

      – Delioth
      Oct 16 at 15:08















    106


















    Based on your statements in the question, I'm going to write the answer(s)




    How to cope with this situation?





    • If you want monetary benefits, shift your priority to produce quantity rather than quality. If you can manage to retain same quality as of now, without burning yourself out, that's added benefit - but focus should be on quantity.




      • Reason: You said the lack of quality aspect is known to the manager / superiors, the problems have been discussed in the wide open team meetings and still no observable changes are there in place. This is a clear indication that the priority of quantity is more over the quality to the company. You just do not "fit into" the criteria very well with your choice of quality over quantity, so you got to change your approach.



    • If you want job satisfaction, find a new job where your skills and efforts are actually valued.




      • Reason: Once again, the discussion and the observations made by you makes it pretty clear that the organization is not going to change anytime soon and in the long run, eventually you (or your like-minded engineers) are going to be overrun by the people having focus on quantity. Time to polish your CV and find another job / organization which holds same values / viewpoints as yours. Good luck.






    share|improve this answer























    • 4





      +1 People often berate going directly to "quit", but I tend to agree that most of these kinds of questions must include that as a possible option. Companies rarely do anything with anything less than overwhelming feedback. And they fall into this falsehood of "measurable" being the primary test of value. In the end, no one will be able to quantify a very important part of the job so it will never be treated as important when rewarding.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 15 at 14:59






    • 39





      Whoa there. That's quite the dichotomy: give up on your values or quit!?? ... How about, "get promoted and work on culture change." The OP's manager has already publicly acknowledged the OP's value as a bar raiser. This praise may not have be a direct hint to ask for a promotion, but it's at least good ammunition for that conversation ... ain't it? ... As an added bonus (pun intended), a more senior level team member (or team lead) would probably not be awarded bonuses on the same silly formula. Yeah?

      – svidgen
      Oct 16 at 2:56







    • 13





      @svidgen We don't know that.The mangers in India (That's where OP is, I assume), play many "tricks" to try to keep people "happy". If the manager / organization actually sees the value in the quality, why that does not reflect in the paycheck?

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 16 at 5:04






    • 2





      @svidgen what you suggest is a possibility, indeed. But this answer errs on the side of being practical - either of these will definitely resolve the situation. While a long term strategy of changing the company culture could work, it might also not. In many ways. Perhaps OP is never promoted, or never promoted to where they can make a difference. Perhaps this takes too long and OP gets burned out, frustrated, and stressed in the mean time. Perhaps there cannot be a values shift at all - company oversold its production, so it cannot change focus without breaching contracts.

      – VLAZ
      Oct 16 at 14:10






    • 8





      @svidgen Your suggestion was literally "get promoted and work on culture change." There may very easily be no promotions available. And promotions come with new responsibilities even if they're not management (if they don't add/change responsibility, it's not a promotion). But changing metrics used to calculate bonuses isn't a culture thing, it's a policy change... which will come from management. You can try to change the company, but if the rest of the team doesn't care about quality and your teammates like the cash it brings for easy work... it's an exercise in futility.

      – Delioth
      Oct 16 at 15:08













    106














    106










    106









    Based on your statements in the question, I'm going to write the answer(s)




    How to cope with this situation?





    • If you want monetary benefits, shift your priority to produce quantity rather than quality. If you can manage to retain same quality as of now, without burning yourself out, that's added benefit - but focus should be on quantity.




      • Reason: You said the lack of quality aspect is known to the manager / superiors, the problems have been discussed in the wide open team meetings and still no observable changes are there in place. This is a clear indication that the priority of quantity is more over the quality to the company. You just do not "fit into" the criteria very well with your choice of quality over quantity, so you got to change your approach.



    • If you want job satisfaction, find a new job where your skills and efforts are actually valued.




      • Reason: Once again, the discussion and the observations made by you makes it pretty clear that the organization is not going to change anytime soon and in the long run, eventually you (or your like-minded engineers) are going to be overrun by the people having focus on quantity. Time to polish your CV and find another job / organization which holds same values / viewpoints as yours. Good luck.






    share|improve this answer
















    Based on your statements in the question, I'm going to write the answer(s)




    How to cope with this situation?





    • If you want monetary benefits, shift your priority to produce quantity rather than quality. If you can manage to retain same quality as of now, without burning yourself out, that's added benefit - but focus should be on quantity.




      • Reason: You said the lack of quality aspect is known to the manager / superiors, the problems have been discussed in the wide open team meetings and still no observable changes are there in place. This is a clear indication that the priority of quantity is more over the quality to the company. You just do not "fit into" the criteria very well with your choice of quality over quantity, so you got to change your approach.



    • If you want job satisfaction, find a new job where your skills and efforts are actually valued.




      • Reason: Once again, the discussion and the observations made by you makes it pretty clear that the organization is not going to change anytime soon and in the long run, eventually you (or your like-minded engineers) are going to be overrun by the people having focus on quantity. Time to polish your CV and find another job / organization which holds same values / viewpoints as yours. Good luck.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited Oct 16 at 4:59

























    answered Oct 15 at 14:10









    Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh

    25.3k24 gold badges117 silver badges141 bronze badges




    25.3k24 gold badges117 silver badges141 bronze badges










    • 4





      +1 People often berate going directly to "quit", but I tend to agree that most of these kinds of questions must include that as a possible option. Companies rarely do anything with anything less than overwhelming feedback. And they fall into this falsehood of "measurable" being the primary test of value. In the end, no one will be able to quantify a very important part of the job so it will never be treated as important when rewarding.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 15 at 14:59






    • 39





      Whoa there. That's quite the dichotomy: give up on your values or quit!?? ... How about, "get promoted and work on culture change." The OP's manager has already publicly acknowledged the OP's value as a bar raiser. This praise may not have be a direct hint to ask for a promotion, but it's at least good ammunition for that conversation ... ain't it? ... As an added bonus (pun intended), a more senior level team member (or team lead) would probably not be awarded bonuses on the same silly formula. Yeah?

      – svidgen
      Oct 16 at 2:56







    • 13





      @svidgen We don't know that.The mangers in India (That's where OP is, I assume), play many "tricks" to try to keep people "happy". If the manager / organization actually sees the value in the quality, why that does not reflect in the paycheck?

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 16 at 5:04






    • 2





      @svidgen what you suggest is a possibility, indeed. But this answer errs on the side of being practical - either of these will definitely resolve the situation. While a long term strategy of changing the company culture could work, it might also not. In many ways. Perhaps OP is never promoted, or never promoted to where they can make a difference. Perhaps this takes too long and OP gets burned out, frustrated, and stressed in the mean time. Perhaps there cannot be a values shift at all - company oversold its production, so it cannot change focus without breaching contracts.

      – VLAZ
      Oct 16 at 14:10






    • 8





      @svidgen Your suggestion was literally "get promoted and work on culture change." There may very easily be no promotions available. And promotions come with new responsibilities even if they're not management (if they don't add/change responsibility, it's not a promotion). But changing metrics used to calculate bonuses isn't a culture thing, it's a policy change... which will come from management. You can try to change the company, but if the rest of the team doesn't care about quality and your teammates like the cash it brings for easy work... it's an exercise in futility.

      – Delioth
      Oct 16 at 15:08












    • 4





      +1 People often berate going directly to "quit", but I tend to agree that most of these kinds of questions must include that as a possible option. Companies rarely do anything with anything less than overwhelming feedback. And they fall into this falsehood of "measurable" being the primary test of value. In the end, no one will be able to quantify a very important part of the job so it will never be treated as important when rewarding.

      – John Spiegel
      Oct 15 at 14:59






    • 39





      Whoa there. That's quite the dichotomy: give up on your values or quit!?? ... How about, "get promoted and work on culture change." The OP's manager has already publicly acknowledged the OP's value as a bar raiser. This praise may not have be a direct hint to ask for a promotion, but it's at least good ammunition for that conversation ... ain't it? ... As an added bonus (pun intended), a more senior level team member (or team lead) would probably not be awarded bonuses on the same silly formula. Yeah?

      – svidgen
      Oct 16 at 2:56







    • 13





      @svidgen We don't know that.The mangers in India (That's where OP is, I assume), play many "tricks" to try to keep people "happy". If the manager / organization actually sees the value in the quality, why that does not reflect in the paycheck?

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 16 at 5:04






    • 2





      @svidgen what you suggest is a possibility, indeed. But this answer errs on the side of being practical - either of these will definitely resolve the situation. While a long term strategy of changing the company culture could work, it might also not. In many ways. Perhaps OP is never promoted, or never promoted to where they can make a difference. Perhaps this takes too long and OP gets burned out, frustrated, and stressed in the mean time. Perhaps there cannot be a values shift at all - company oversold its production, so it cannot change focus without breaching contracts.

      – VLAZ
      Oct 16 at 14:10






    • 8





      @svidgen Your suggestion was literally "get promoted and work on culture change." There may very easily be no promotions available. And promotions come with new responsibilities even if they're not management (if they don't add/change responsibility, it's not a promotion). But changing metrics used to calculate bonuses isn't a culture thing, it's a policy change... which will come from management. You can try to change the company, but if the rest of the team doesn't care about quality and your teammates like the cash it brings for easy work... it's an exercise in futility.

      – Delioth
      Oct 16 at 15:08







    4




    4





    +1 People often berate going directly to "quit", but I tend to agree that most of these kinds of questions must include that as a possible option. Companies rarely do anything with anything less than overwhelming feedback. And they fall into this falsehood of "measurable" being the primary test of value. In the end, no one will be able to quantify a very important part of the job so it will never be treated as important when rewarding.

    – John Spiegel
    Oct 15 at 14:59





    +1 People often berate going directly to "quit", but I tend to agree that most of these kinds of questions must include that as a possible option. Companies rarely do anything with anything less than overwhelming feedback. And they fall into this falsehood of "measurable" being the primary test of value. In the end, no one will be able to quantify a very important part of the job so it will never be treated as important when rewarding.

    – John Spiegel
    Oct 15 at 14:59




    39




    39





    Whoa there. That's quite the dichotomy: give up on your values or quit!?? ... How about, "get promoted and work on culture change." The OP's manager has already publicly acknowledged the OP's value as a bar raiser. This praise may not have be a direct hint to ask for a promotion, but it's at least good ammunition for that conversation ... ain't it? ... As an added bonus (pun intended), a more senior level team member (or team lead) would probably not be awarded bonuses on the same silly formula. Yeah?

    – svidgen
    Oct 16 at 2:56






    Whoa there. That's quite the dichotomy: give up on your values or quit!?? ... How about, "get promoted and work on culture change." The OP's manager has already publicly acknowledged the OP's value as a bar raiser. This praise may not have be a direct hint to ask for a promotion, but it's at least good ammunition for that conversation ... ain't it? ... As an added bonus (pun intended), a more senior level team member (or team lead) would probably not be awarded bonuses on the same silly formula. Yeah?

    – svidgen
    Oct 16 at 2:56





    13




    13





    @svidgen We don't know that.The mangers in India (That's where OP is, I assume), play many "tricks" to try to keep people "happy". If the manager / organization actually sees the value in the quality, why that does not reflect in the paycheck?

    – Sourav Ghosh
    Oct 16 at 5:04





    @svidgen We don't know that.The mangers in India (That's where OP is, I assume), play many "tricks" to try to keep people "happy". If the manager / organization actually sees the value in the quality, why that does not reflect in the paycheck?

    – Sourav Ghosh
    Oct 16 at 5:04




    2




    2





    @svidgen what you suggest is a possibility, indeed. But this answer errs on the side of being practical - either of these will definitely resolve the situation. While a long term strategy of changing the company culture could work, it might also not. In many ways. Perhaps OP is never promoted, or never promoted to where they can make a difference. Perhaps this takes too long and OP gets burned out, frustrated, and stressed in the mean time. Perhaps there cannot be a values shift at all - company oversold its production, so it cannot change focus without breaching contracts.

    – VLAZ
    Oct 16 at 14:10





    @svidgen what you suggest is a possibility, indeed. But this answer errs on the side of being practical - either of these will definitely resolve the situation. While a long term strategy of changing the company culture could work, it might also not. In many ways. Perhaps OP is never promoted, or never promoted to where they can make a difference. Perhaps this takes too long and OP gets burned out, frustrated, and stressed in the mean time. Perhaps there cannot be a values shift at all - company oversold its production, so it cannot change focus without breaching contracts.

    – VLAZ
    Oct 16 at 14:10




    8




    8





    @svidgen Your suggestion was literally "get promoted and work on culture change." There may very easily be no promotions available. And promotions come with new responsibilities even if they're not management (if they don't add/change responsibility, it's not a promotion). But changing metrics used to calculate bonuses isn't a culture thing, it's a policy change... which will come from management. You can try to change the company, but if the rest of the team doesn't care about quality and your teammates like the cash it brings for easy work... it's an exercise in futility.

    – Delioth
    Oct 16 at 15:08





    @svidgen Your suggestion was literally "get promoted and work on culture change." There may very easily be no promotions available. And promotions come with new responsibilities even if they're not management (if they don't add/change responsibility, it's not a promotion). But changing metrics used to calculate bonuses isn't a culture thing, it's a policy change... which will come from management. You can try to change the company, but if the rest of the team doesn't care about quality and your teammates like the cash it brings for easy work... it's an exercise in futility.

    – Delioth
    Oct 16 at 15:08













    67


















    "...in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'..."



    This is a vital detail that should be the lede in your question and not buried in a comment to an answer. This is the one thing that distinguishes your question from all the other complaints about unappreciated extra effort at work. It is also the one thing that you can use as leverage.



    "Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output."



    First, you need to find a way to say this in an undeniable way. What evidence do you have that quantity is primary and quality is not used in performance metrics? Compose an articulate argument proving that this is true. Then ask for a private 1-on-1 with your manager and present the conflict between the two positions (1. everyone should be you and 2. everyone is rewarded to not be you) as a problem the company needs to solve.



    As always, when reporting a problem, be ready with some suggested solutions. (E.g. whenever someone is called out in a meeting as a paragon, that person automatically gets a 5% bonus. Or, the company should admit to its employees that anything beyond a certain level of quality is counterproductive.)



    If your manager is obdurate on this subject, then the next time the manager says in a meeting that everyone should be you, respond by explaining, immediately, in that same meeting, how everyone is rewarded to not be you.






    share|improve this answer























    • 3





      This attacks the root of the problem. Fix how the bonus is handled and all employees will get automatically incentivated to increase quality.

      – Enric Naval
      Oct 16 at 10:20






    • 1





      @EnricNaval indeed, the "backend" needs to adjust though, i.e. less quantity & more quality may imply a higher cost => higher prices.

      – CPHPython
      Oct 16 at 11:12






    • 7





      It's possible this will work, but in my experience it's more likely that the manager is not the one deciding bonuses. There are probably literal reports run on units produced minus complaints received = bonus. These reports are probably run by upper management/HR. Manager cares about the product, thus he has different goals.

      – bvoyelr
      Oct 16 at 18:38






    • 1





      @bvoyelr while I agree with your assessment of the likely situation, I would suggest that the solution here would be for the manager to inform HR/upper management that the bonus criteria need to be updated.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:13















    67


















    "...in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'..."



    This is a vital detail that should be the lede in your question and not buried in a comment to an answer. This is the one thing that distinguishes your question from all the other complaints about unappreciated extra effort at work. It is also the one thing that you can use as leverage.



    "Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output."



    First, you need to find a way to say this in an undeniable way. What evidence do you have that quantity is primary and quality is not used in performance metrics? Compose an articulate argument proving that this is true. Then ask for a private 1-on-1 with your manager and present the conflict between the two positions (1. everyone should be you and 2. everyone is rewarded to not be you) as a problem the company needs to solve.



    As always, when reporting a problem, be ready with some suggested solutions. (E.g. whenever someone is called out in a meeting as a paragon, that person automatically gets a 5% bonus. Or, the company should admit to its employees that anything beyond a certain level of quality is counterproductive.)



    If your manager is obdurate on this subject, then the next time the manager says in a meeting that everyone should be you, respond by explaining, immediately, in that same meeting, how everyone is rewarded to not be you.






    share|improve this answer























    • 3





      This attacks the root of the problem. Fix how the bonus is handled and all employees will get automatically incentivated to increase quality.

      – Enric Naval
      Oct 16 at 10:20






    • 1





      @EnricNaval indeed, the "backend" needs to adjust though, i.e. less quantity & more quality may imply a higher cost => higher prices.

      – CPHPython
      Oct 16 at 11:12






    • 7





      It's possible this will work, but in my experience it's more likely that the manager is not the one deciding bonuses. There are probably literal reports run on units produced minus complaints received = bonus. These reports are probably run by upper management/HR. Manager cares about the product, thus he has different goals.

      – bvoyelr
      Oct 16 at 18:38






    • 1





      @bvoyelr while I agree with your assessment of the likely situation, I would suggest that the solution here would be for the manager to inform HR/upper management that the bonus criteria need to be updated.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:13













    67














    67










    67









    "...in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'..."



    This is a vital detail that should be the lede in your question and not buried in a comment to an answer. This is the one thing that distinguishes your question from all the other complaints about unappreciated extra effort at work. It is also the one thing that you can use as leverage.



    "Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output."



    First, you need to find a way to say this in an undeniable way. What evidence do you have that quantity is primary and quality is not used in performance metrics? Compose an articulate argument proving that this is true. Then ask for a private 1-on-1 with your manager and present the conflict between the two positions (1. everyone should be you and 2. everyone is rewarded to not be you) as a problem the company needs to solve.



    As always, when reporting a problem, be ready with some suggested solutions. (E.g. whenever someone is called out in a meeting as a paragon, that person automatically gets a 5% bonus. Or, the company should admit to its employees that anything beyond a certain level of quality is counterproductive.)



    If your manager is obdurate on this subject, then the next time the manager says in a meeting that everyone should be you, respond by explaining, immediately, in that same meeting, how everyone is rewarded to not be you.






    share|improve this answer
















    "...in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me'..."



    This is a vital detail that should be the lede in your question and not buried in a comment to an answer. This is the one thing that distinguishes your question from all the other complaints about unappreciated extra effort at work. It is also the one thing that you can use as leverage.



    "Our individual performance bonus is calculated based on the quantity of output."



    First, you need to find a way to say this in an undeniable way. What evidence do you have that quantity is primary and quality is not used in performance metrics? Compose an articulate argument proving that this is true. Then ask for a private 1-on-1 with your manager and present the conflict between the two positions (1. everyone should be you and 2. everyone is rewarded to not be you) as a problem the company needs to solve.



    As always, when reporting a problem, be ready with some suggested solutions. (E.g. whenever someone is called out in a meeting as a paragon, that person automatically gets a 5% bonus. Or, the company should admit to its employees that anything beyond a certain level of quality is counterproductive.)



    If your manager is obdurate on this subject, then the next time the manager says in a meeting that everyone should be you, respond by explaining, immediately, in that same meeting, how everyone is rewarded to not be you.







    share|improve this answer















    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer








    edited Oct 15 at 16:03

























    answered Oct 15 at 15:57









    A. I. BreveleriA. I. Breveleri

    10.5k4 gold badges21 silver badges37 bronze badges




    10.5k4 gold badges21 silver badges37 bronze badges










    • 3





      This attacks the root of the problem. Fix how the bonus is handled and all employees will get automatically incentivated to increase quality.

      – Enric Naval
      Oct 16 at 10:20






    • 1





      @EnricNaval indeed, the "backend" needs to adjust though, i.e. less quantity & more quality may imply a higher cost => higher prices.

      – CPHPython
      Oct 16 at 11:12






    • 7





      It's possible this will work, but in my experience it's more likely that the manager is not the one deciding bonuses. There are probably literal reports run on units produced minus complaints received = bonus. These reports are probably run by upper management/HR. Manager cares about the product, thus he has different goals.

      – bvoyelr
      Oct 16 at 18:38






    • 1





      @bvoyelr while I agree with your assessment of the likely situation, I would suggest that the solution here would be for the manager to inform HR/upper management that the bonus criteria need to be updated.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:13












    • 3





      This attacks the root of the problem. Fix how the bonus is handled and all employees will get automatically incentivated to increase quality.

      – Enric Naval
      Oct 16 at 10:20






    • 1





      @EnricNaval indeed, the "backend" needs to adjust though, i.e. less quantity & more quality may imply a higher cost => higher prices.

      – CPHPython
      Oct 16 at 11:12






    • 7





      It's possible this will work, but in my experience it's more likely that the manager is not the one deciding bonuses. There are probably literal reports run on units produced minus complaints received = bonus. These reports are probably run by upper management/HR. Manager cares about the product, thus he has different goals.

      – bvoyelr
      Oct 16 at 18:38






    • 1





      @bvoyelr while I agree with your assessment of the likely situation, I would suggest that the solution here would be for the manager to inform HR/upper management that the bonus criteria need to be updated.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:13







    3




    3





    This attacks the root of the problem. Fix how the bonus is handled and all employees will get automatically incentivated to increase quality.

    – Enric Naval
    Oct 16 at 10:20





    This attacks the root of the problem. Fix how the bonus is handled and all employees will get automatically incentivated to increase quality.

    – Enric Naval
    Oct 16 at 10:20




    1




    1





    @EnricNaval indeed, the "backend" needs to adjust though, i.e. less quantity & more quality may imply a higher cost => higher prices.

    – CPHPython
    Oct 16 at 11:12





    @EnricNaval indeed, the "backend" needs to adjust though, i.e. less quantity & more quality may imply a higher cost => higher prices.

    – CPHPython
    Oct 16 at 11:12




    7




    7





    It's possible this will work, but in my experience it's more likely that the manager is not the one deciding bonuses. There are probably literal reports run on units produced minus complaints received = bonus. These reports are probably run by upper management/HR. Manager cares about the product, thus he has different goals.

    – bvoyelr
    Oct 16 at 18:38





    It's possible this will work, but in my experience it's more likely that the manager is not the one deciding bonuses. There are probably literal reports run on units produced minus complaints received = bonus. These reports are probably run by upper management/HR. Manager cares about the product, thus he has different goals.

    – bvoyelr
    Oct 16 at 18:38




    1




    1





    @bvoyelr while I agree with your assessment of the likely situation, I would suggest that the solution here would be for the manager to inform HR/upper management that the bonus criteria need to be updated.

    – Stobor
    Oct 18 at 2:13





    @bvoyelr while I agree with your assessment of the likely situation, I would suggest that the solution here would be for the manager to inform HR/upper management that the bonus criteria need to be updated.

    – Stobor
    Oct 18 at 2:13











    19


















    Your employer has made clear where their priorities lie and gone so far as to set up incentives to make sure their directives are followed. It is admirable that you take pride in your work, but that isn't what your employer is paying you to do. They want more, not better. In the eyes of your employer, you are an under-performer.



    Your choices, thus, are as follows:



    • Continue your current level of work, knowing that this is not what your employer wants you to do. It will go unappreciated and unrewarded, possibly to the point where you are put on a PIP or terminated.

    • Lower your standards to produce more and give your employer what they want. Be rewarded accordingly.

    • Find a different job where your values are more in alignment.

    I do not know your industry or what the prospects are for you on any decision. That will be for you to decide.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      @SouravGhosh, it's still a choice. Not one I recommend myself, but I don't presume to know OP's priorities. Perhaps pride in his work is more important to him than getting paid.

      – Seth R
      Oct 15 at 14:37






    • 2





      Plus, based on OP's description, nobody has said their work is unacceptable, just not as high on the metrics and hence not as high a bonus.

      – Kaz
      Oct 15 at 14:42






    • 1





      Thank you all. In fact, in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me', but somehow it doesn't translate into performance appraisal. I am paid well, and I am not a money man. But the rating of me being lower than others' bothers me. I am unwilling to trade quality for quantity for the fear of forgetting/losing my skills. I guess it's time to move on.

      – Arun
      Oct 15 at 14:51






    • 7





      @Arun It's not only about money, think of the case in long run, People who prefers quantity over quality will get promoted and eventually will be in a supervisor position, you then, have to abide by the choices made by them to produce quantity. Eventually, you'll end up on the losing side.

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 15 at 14:52







    • 3





      @Arun if you manager is in a position to evaluate your performance based on the whole of your effort and not just quantity, then s/he is paying lipservice to an ideal that s/he doesn't actually support. Of course, your manager might not be in that position and is forced to use evaluation criteria handed down from above, and is sincere in his/her comments; I can't tell you which. Either way, it seems clear that your goals and your employer's are not aligned.

      – asgallant
      Oct 16 at 2:12















    19


















    Your employer has made clear where their priorities lie and gone so far as to set up incentives to make sure their directives are followed. It is admirable that you take pride in your work, but that isn't what your employer is paying you to do. They want more, not better. In the eyes of your employer, you are an under-performer.



    Your choices, thus, are as follows:



    • Continue your current level of work, knowing that this is not what your employer wants you to do. It will go unappreciated and unrewarded, possibly to the point where you are put on a PIP or terminated.

    • Lower your standards to produce more and give your employer what they want. Be rewarded accordingly.

    • Find a different job where your values are more in alignment.

    I do not know your industry or what the prospects are for you on any decision. That will be for you to decide.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 4





      @SouravGhosh, it's still a choice. Not one I recommend myself, but I don't presume to know OP's priorities. Perhaps pride in his work is more important to him than getting paid.

      – Seth R
      Oct 15 at 14:37






    • 2





      Plus, based on OP's description, nobody has said their work is unacceptable, just not as high on the metrics and hence not as high a bonus.

      – Kaz
      Oct 15 at 14:42






    • 1





      Thank you all. In fact, in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me', but somehow it doesn't translate into performance appraisal. I am paid well, and I am not a money man. But the rating of me being lower than others' bothers me. I am unwilling to trade quality for quantity for the fear of forgetting/losing my skills. I guess it's time to move on.

      – Arun
      Oct 15 at 14:51






    • 7





      @Arun It's not only about money, think of the case in long run, People who prefers quantity over quality will get promoted and eventually will be in a supervisor position, you then, have to abide by the choices made by them to produce quantity. Eventually, you'll end up on the losing side.

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 15 at 14:52







    • 3





      @Arun if you manager is in a position to evaluate your performance based on the whole of your effort and not just quantity, then s/he is paying lipservice to an ideal that s/he doesn't actually support. Of course, your manager might not be in that position and is forced to use evaluation criteria handed down from above, and is sincere in his/her comments; I can't tell you which. Either way, it seems clear that your goals and your employer's are not aligned.

      – asgallant
      Oct 16 at 2:12













    19














    19










    19









    Your employer has made clear where their priorities lie and gone so far as to set up incentives to make sure their directives are followed. It is admirable that you take pride in your work, but that isn't what your employer is paying you to do. They want more, not better. In the eyes of your employer, you are an under-performer.



    Your choices, thus, are as follows:



    • Continue your current level of work, knowing that this is not what your employer wants you to do. It will go unappreciated and unrewarded, possibly to the point where you are put on a PIP or terminated.

    • Lower your standards to produce more and give your employer what they want. Be rewarded accordingly.

    • Find a different job where your values are more in alignment.

    I do not know your industry or what the prospects are for you on any decision. That will be for you to decide.






    share|improve this answer














    Your employer has made clear where their priorities lie and gone so far as to set up incentives to make sure their directives are followed. It is admirable that you take pride in your work, but that isn't what your employer is paying you to do. They want more, not better. In the eyes of your employer, you are an under-performer.



    Your choices, thus, are as follows:



    • Continue your current level of work, knowing that this is not what your employer wants you to do. It will go unappreciated and unrewarded, possibly to the point where you are put on a PIP or terminated.

    • Lower your standards to produce more and give your employer what they want. Be rewarded accordingly.

    • Find a different job where your values are more in alignment.

    I do not know your industry or what the prospects are for you on any decision. That will be for you to decide.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Oct 15 at 14:28









    Seth RSeth R

    6,3282 gold badges13 silver badges31 bronze badges




    6,3282 gold badges13 silver badges31 bronze badges










    • 4





      @SouravGhosh, it's still a choice. Not one I recommend myself, but I don't presume to know OP's priorities. Perhaps pride in his work is more important to him than getting paid.

      – Seth R
      Oct 15 at 14:37






    • 2





      Plus, based on OP's description, nobody has said their work is unacceptable, just not as high on the metrics and hence not as high a bonus.

      – Kaz
      Oct 15 at 14:42






    • 1





      Thank you all. In fact, in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me', but somehow it doesn't translate into performance appraisal. I am paid well, and I am not a money man. But the rating of me being lower than others' bothers me. I am unwilling to trade quality for quantity for the fear of forgetting/losing my skills. I guess it's time to move on.

      – Arun
      Oct 15 at 14:51






    • 7





      @Arun It's not only about money, think of the case in long run, People who prefers quantity over quality will get promoted and eventually will be in a supervisor position, you then, have to abide by the choices made by them to produce quantity. Eventually, you'll end up on the losing side.

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 15 at 14:52







    • 3





      @Arun if you manager is in a position to evaluate your performance based on the whole of your effort and not just quantity, then s/he is paying lipservice to an ideal that s/he doesn't actually support. Of course, your manager might not be in that position and is forced to use evaluation criteria handed down from above, and is sincere in his/her comments; I can't tell you which. Either way, it seems clear that your goals and your employer's are not aligned.

      – asgallant
      Oct 16 at 2:12












    • 4





      @SouravGhosh, it's still a choice. Not one I recommend myself, but I don't presume to know OP's priorities. Perhaps pride in his work is more important to him than getting paid.

      – Seth R
      Oct 15 at 14:37






    • 2





      Plus, based on OP's description, nobody has said their work is unacceptable, just not as high on the metrics and hence not as high a bonus.

      – Kaz
      Oct 15 at 14:42






    • 1





      Thank you all. In fact, in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me', but somehow it doesn't translate into performance appraisal. I am paid well, and I am not a money man. But the rating of me being lower than others' bothers me. I am unwilling to trade quality for quantity for the fear of forgetting/losing my skills. I guess it's time to move on.

      – Arun
      Oct 15 at 14:51






    • 7





      @Arun It's not only about money, think of the case in long run, People who prefers quantity over quality will get promoted and eventually will be in a supervisor position, you then, have to abide by the choices made by them to produce quantity. Eventually, you'll end up on the losing side.

      – Sourav Ghosh
      Oct 15 at 14:52







    • 3





      @Arun if you manager is in a position to evaluate your performance based on the whole of your effort and not just quantity, then s/he is paying lipservice to an ideal that s/he doesn't actually support. Of course, your manager might not be in that position and is forced to use evaluation criteria handed down from above, and is sincere in his/her comments; I can't tell you which. Either way, it seems clear that your goals and your employer's are not aligned.

      – asgallant
      Oct 16 at 2:12







    4




    4





    @SouravGhosh, it's still a choice. Not one I recommend myself, but I don't presume to know OP's priorities. Perhaps pride in his work is more important to him than getting paid.

    – Seth R
    Oct 15 at 14:37





    @SouravGhosh, it's still a choice. Not one I recommend myself, but I don't presume to know OP's priorities. Perhaps pride in his work is more important to him than getting paid.

    – Seth R
    Oct 15 at 14:37




    2




    2





    Plus, based on OP's description, nobody has said their work is unacceptable, just not as high on the metrics and hence not as high a bonus.

    – Kaz
    Oct 15 at 14:42





    Plus, based on OP's description, nobody has said their work is unacceptable, just not as high on the metrics and hence not as high a bonus.

    – Kaz
    Oct 15 at 14:42




    1




    1





    Thank you all. In fact, in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me', but somehow it doesn't translate into performance appraisal. I am paid well, and I am not a money man. But the rating of me being lower than others' bothers me. I am unwilling to trade quality for quantity for the fear of forgetting/losing my skills. I guess it's time to move on.

    – Arun
    Oct 15 at 14:51





    Thank you all. In fact, in the meetings, my manager wants everyone to be 'me', but somehow it doesn't translate into performance appraisal. I am paid well, and I am not a money man. But the rating of me being lower than others' bothers me. I am unwilling to trade quality for quantity for the fear of forgetting/losing my skills. I guess it's time to move on.

    – Arun
    Oct 15 at 14:51




    7




    7





    @Arun It's not only about money, think of the case in long run, People who prefers quantity over quality will get promoted and eventually will be in a supervisor position, you then, have to abide by the choices made by them to produce quantity. Eventually, you'll end up on the losing side.

    – Sourav Ghosh
    Oct 15 at 14:52






    @Arun It's not only about money, think of the case in long run, People who prefers quantity over quality will get promoted and eventually will be in a supervisor position, you then, have to abide by the choices made by them to produce quantity. Eventually, you'll end up on the losing side.

    – Sourav Ghosh
    Oct 15 at 14:52





    3




    3





    @Arun if you manager is in a position to evaluate your performance based on the whole of your effort and not just quantity, then s/he is paying lipservice to an ideal that s/he doesn't actually support. Of course, your manager might not be in that position and is forced to use evaluation criteria handed down from above, and is sincere in his/her comments; I can't tell you which. Either way, it seems clear that your goals and your employer's are not aligned.

    – asgallant
    Oct 16 at 2:12





    @Arun if you manager is in a position to evaluate your performance based on the whole of your effort and not just quantity, then s/he is paying lipservice to an ideal that s/he doesn't actually support. Of course, your manager might not be in that position and is forced to use evaluation criteria handed down from above, and is sincere in his/her comments; I can't tell you which. Either way, it seems clear that your goals and your employer's are not aligned.

    – asgallant
    Oct 16 at 2:12











    10


















    Might not apply, but I think an important aspect is that more "quality" is not inherently better: of course the deliverable will be better in some way if you spend more time on it, but perhaps it will take more time to be deliver, which is not what the client wants.



    It depends very much on the product, but since your client doesn't seem too concerned about the quality it receives from the other employees, then maybe client and managers are content with that quality level and as much quantity as possible.



    I think the saying "perfection is the enemy of good" applies here: it's good to set high standards for yourself, but in business there are other needs to consider, and it's ok to let the client and the KPIs set the bar.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Gold plating comes to mind. It would appear that the "usual" quality all the other colleagues are producing is sufficient to the client... and management is aware of that.

      – Ghanima
      Oct 16 at 17:57











    • It's like the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari. A Ferrari is a much higher-quality car, but takes a lot longer to make. Meanwhile, Ford's quality is perfectly acceptable for the market it serves, and they can churn out a thousand Fiestas in a day to meet demand. There's no point in applying Ferrari-level quality if your job is building Fiestas.

      – Seth R
      Oct 16 at 20:39











    • @SethR and the typical Fiesta owner wouldn't want a car that burns fuel as a Ferrari :) Taken in the software context, the extra features may actually affect the performance and reliability of the product

      – clabacchio
      Oct 17 at 7:52











    • But on the Ford/Ferrari analogy... someone on the production line has been producing Ferraris instead of Fords and management have expressed in the team meetings that they wish more of their people produced Ferraris.

      – seventyeightist
      Oct 18 at 18:08











    • @seventyeightist I can't say for sure what they prefer, but they are giving mixed feedbacks on the topic. Perhaps their target is somewhere in between, but if bonuses are the drivers of that workplace, quantity is what they are more likely to get. Actually, they may not want to ask explicitly to sacrifice quality for quantity.

      – clabacchio
      Oct 22 at 7:40
















    10


















    Might not apply, but I think an important aspect is that more "quality" is not inherently better: of course the deliverable will be better in some way if you spend more time on it, but perhaps it will take more time to be deliver, which is not what the client wants.



    It depends very much on the product, but since your client doesn't seem too concerned about the quality it receives from the other employees, then maybe client and managers are content with that quality level and as much quantity as possible.



    I think the saying "perfection is the enemy of good" applies here: it's good to set high standards for yourself, but in business there are other needs to consider, and it's ok to let the client and the KPIs set the bar.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Gold plating comes to mind. It would appear that the "usual" quality all the other colleagues are producing is sufficient to the client... and management is aware of that.

      – Ghanima
      Oct 16 at 17:57











    • It's like the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari. A Ferrari is a much higher-quality car, but takes a lot longer to make. Meanwhile, Ford's quality is perfectly acceptable for the market it serves, and they can churn out a thousand Fiestas in a day to meet demand. There's no point in applying Ferrari-level quality if your job is building Fiestas.

      – Seth R
      Oct 16 at 20:39











    • @SethR and the typical Fiesta owner wouldn't want a car that burns fuel as a Ferrari :) Taken in the software context, the extra features may actually affect the performance and reliability of the product

      – clabacchio
      Oct 17 at 7:52











    • But on the Ford/Ferrari analogy... someone on the production line has been producing Ferraris instead of Fords and management have expressed in the team meetings that they wish more of their people produced Ferraris.

      – seventyeightist
      Oct 18 at 18:08











    • @seventyeightist I can't say for sure what they prefer, but they are giving mixed feedbacks on the topic. Perhaps their target is somewhere in between, but if bonuses are the drivers of that workplace, quantity is what they are more likely to get. Actually, they may not want to ask explicitly to sacrifice quality for quantity.

      – clabacchio
      Oct 22 at 7:40














    10














    10










    10









    Might not apply, but I think an important aspect is that more "quality" is not inherently better: of course the deliverable will be better in some way if you spend more time on it, but perhaps it will take more time to be deliver, which is not what the client wants.



    It depends very much on the product, but since your client doesn't seem too concerned about the quality it receives from the other employees, then maybe client and managers are content with that quality level and as much quantity as possible.



    I think the saying "perfection is the enemy of good" applies here: it's good to set high standards for yourself, but in business there are other needs to consider, and it's ok to let the client and the KPIs set the bar.






    share|improve this answer














    Might not apply, but I think an important aspect is that more "quality" is not inherently better: of course the deliverable will be better in some way if you spend more time on it, but perhaps it will take more time to be deliver, which is not what the client wants.



    It depends very much on the product, but since your client doesn't seem too concerned about the quality it receives from the other employees, then maybe client and managers are content with that quality level and as much quantity as possible.



    I think the saying "perfection is the enemy of good" applies here: it's good to set high standards for yourself, but in business there are other needs to consider, and it's ok to let the client and the KPIs set the bar.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Oct 16 at 8:40









    clabacchioclabacchio

    3231 gold badge2 silver badges6 bronze badges




    3231 gold badge2 silver badges6 bronze badges















    • Gold plating comes to mind. It would appear that the "usual" quality all the other colleagues are producing is sufficient to the client... and management is aware of that.

      – Ghanima
      Oct 16 at 17:57











    • It's like the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari. A Ferrari is a much higher-quality car, but takes a lot longer to make. Meanwhile, Ford's quality is perfectly acceptable for the market it serves, and they can churn out a thousand Fiestas in a day to meet demand. There's no point in applying Ferrari-level quality if your job is building Fiestas.

      – Seth R
      Oct 16 at 20:39











    • @SethR and the typical Fiesta owner wouldn't want a car that burns fuel as a Ferrari :) Taken in the software context, the extra features may actually affect the performance and reliability of the product

      – clabacchio
      Oct 17 at 7:52











    • But on the Ford/Ferrari analogy... someone on the production line has been producing Ferraris instead of Fords and management have expressed in the team meetings that they wish more of their people produced Ferraris.

      – seventyeightist
      Oct 18 at 18:08











    • @seventyeightist I can't say for sure what they prefer, but they are giving mixed feedbacks on the topic. Perhaps their target is somewhere in between, but if bonuses are the drivers of that workplace, quantity is what they are more likely to get. Actually, they may not want to ask explicitly to sacrifice quality for quantity.

      – clabacchio
      Oct 22 at 7:40


















    • Gold plating comes to mind. It would appear that the "usual" quality all the other colleagues are producing is sufficient to the client... and management is aware of that.

      – Ghanima
      Oct 16 at 17:57











    • It's like the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari. A Ferrari is a much higher-quality car, but takes a lot longer to make. Meanwhile, Ford's quality is perfectly acceptable for the market it serves, and they can churn out a thousand Fiestas in a day to meet demand. There's no point in applying Ferrari-level quality if your job is building Fiestas.

      – Seth R
      Oct 16 at 20:39











    • @SethR and the typical Fiesta owner wouldn't want a car that burns fuel as a Ferrari :) Taken in the software context, the extra features may actually affect the performance and reliability of the product

      – clabacchio
      Oct 17 at 7:52











    • But on the Ford/Ferrari analogy... someone on the production line has been producing Ferraris instead of Fords and management have expressed in the team meetings that they wish more of their people produced Ferraris.

      – seventyeightist
      Oct 18 at 18:08











    • @seventyeightist I can't say for sure what they prefer, but they are giving mixed feedbacks on the topic. Perhaps their target is somewhere in between, but if bonuses are the drivers of that workplace, quantity is what they are more likely to get. Actually, they may not want to ask explicitly to sacrifice quality for quantity.

      – clabacchio
      Oct 22 at 7:40

















    Gold plating comes to mind. It would appear that the "usual" quality all the other colleagues are producing is sufficient to the client... and management is aware of that.

    – Ghanima
    Oct 16 at 17:57





    Gold plating comes to mind. It would appear that the "usual" quality all the other colleagues are producing is sufficient to the client... and management is aware of that.

    – Ghanima
    Oct 16 at 17:57













    It's like the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari. A Ferrari is a much higher-quality car, but takes a lot longer to make. Meanwhile, Ford's quality is perfectly acceptable for the market it serves, and they can churn out a thousand Fiestas in a day to meet demand. There's no point in applying Ferrari-level quality if your job is building Fiestas.

    – Seth R
    Oct 16 at 20:39





    It's like the difference between a Ford and a Ferrari. A Ferrari is a much higher-quality car, but takes a lot longer to make. Meanwhile, Ford's quality is perfectly acceptable for the market it serves, and they can churn out a thousand Fiestas in a day to meet demand. There's no point in applying Ferrari-level quality if your job is building Fiestas.

    – Seth R
    Oct 16 at 20:39













    @SethR and the typical Fiesta owner wouldn't want a car that burns fuel as a Ferrari :) Taken in the software context, the extra features may actually affect the performance and reliability of the product

    – clabacchio
    Oct 17 at 7:52





    @SethR and the typical Fiesta owner wouldn't want a car that burns fuel as a Ferrari :) Taken in the software context, the extra features may actually affect the performance and reliability of the product

    – clabacchio
    Oct 17 at 7:52













    But on the Ford/Ferrari analogy... someone on the production line has been producing Ferraris instead of Fords and management have expressed in the team meetings that they wish more of their people produced Ferraris.

    – seventyeightist
    Oct 18 at 18:08





    But on the Ford/Ferrari analogy... someone on the production line has been producing Ferraris instead of Fords and management have expressed in the team meetings that they wish more of their people produced Ferraris.

    – seventyeightist
    Oct 18 at 18:08













    @seventyeightist I can't say for sure what they prefer, but they are giving mixed feedbacks on the topic. Perhaps their target is somewhere in between, but if bonuses are the drivers of that workplace, quantity is what they are more likely to get. Actually, they may not want to ask explicitly to sacrifice quality for quantity.

    – clabacchio
    Oct 22 at 7:40






    @seventyeightist I can't say for sure what they prefer, but they are giving mixed feedbacks on the topic. Perhaps their target is somewhere in between, but if bonuses are the drivers of that workplace, quantity is what they are more likely to get. Actually, they may not want to ask explicitly to sacrifice quality for quantity.

    – clabacchio
    Oct 22 at 7:40












    8


















    Seth R's answer is good. But there is a common industry name for this.



    Gold Plating




    "In the usual gold plating scenario, a programmer adds features ... because they’re “cool” or fun or seem like they’d be really useful. And sometimes they are — but more often, they’re just wasted effort, at least from the perspective of the person paying the programmer’s salary."




    In your case, you're adding extra quality that your manager and the customer have not requested. So from their perspective, you're wasting time on things no one wants.






    share|improve this answer


























    • I am familiar with management pushing back against "gold plating". Sometimes they have a good point. However, in my experience, more often than not, they are trading long-term costs for short-term gains. I would not take it as given managers are making an informed choice when they do this.

      – eclipz905
      Oct 17 at 19:01















    8


















    Seth R's answer is good. But there is a common industry name for this.



    Gold Plating




    "In the usual gold plating scenario, a programmer adds features ... because they’re “cool” or fun or seem like they’d be really useful. And sometimes they are — but more often, they’re just wasted effort, at least from the perspective of the person paying the programmer’s salary."




    In your case, you're adding extra quality that your manager and the customer have not requested. So from their perspective, you're wasting time on things no one wants.






    share|improve this answer


























    • I am familiar with management pushing back against "gold plating". Sometimes they have a good point. However, in my experience, more often than not, they are trading long-term costs for short-term gains. I would not take it as given managers are making an informed choice when they do this.

      – eclipz905
      Oct 17 at 19:01













    8














    8










    8









    Seth R's answer is good. But there is a common industry name for this.



    Gold Plating




    "In the usual gold plating scenario, a programmer adds features ... because they’re “cool” or fun or seem like they’d be really useful. And sometimes they are — but more often, they’re just wasted effort, at least from the perspective of the person paying the programmer’s salary."




    In your case, you're adding extra quality that your manager and the customer have not requested. So from their perspective, you're wasting time on things no one wants.






    share|improve this answer














    Seth R's answer is good. But there is a common industry name for this.



    Gold Plating




    "In the usual gold plating scenario, a programmer adds features ... because they’re “cool” or fun or seem like they’d be really useful. And sometimes they are — but more often, they’re just wasted effort, at least from the perspective of the person paying the programmer’s salary."




    In your case, you're adding extra quality that your manager and the customer have not requested. So from their perspective, you're wasting time on things no one wants.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Oct 16 at 19:52









    LCIIILCIII

    1813 bronze badges




    1813 bronze badges















    • I am familiar with management pushing back against "gold plating". Sometimes they have a good point. However, in my experience, more often than not, they are trading long-term costs for short-term gains. I would not take it as given managers are making an informed choice when they do this.

      – eclipz905
      Oct 17 at 19:01

















    • I am familiar with management pushing back against "gold plating". Sometimes they have a good point. However, in my experience, more often than not, they are trading long-term costs for short-term gains. I would not take it as given managers are making an informed choice when they do this.

      – eclipz905
      Oct 17 at 19:01
















    I am familiar with management pushing back against "gold plating". Sometimes they have a good point. However, in my experience, more often than not, they are trading long-term costs for short-term gains. I would not take it as given managers are making an informed choice when they do this.

    – eclipz905
    Oct 17 at 19:01





    I am familiar with management pushing back against "gold plating". Sometimes they have a good point. However, in my experience, more often than not, they are trading long-term costs for short-term gains. I would not take it as given managers are making an informed choice when they do this.

    – eclipz905
    Oct 17 at 19:01











    0


















    There are lot's of good answers to this question, but I want to add a slightly different angle that you might want to consider if you intend to pursue this further.



    How do you know the details of your coworkers bonuses / compensation? I see that you are in Chennai; I am not sure the custom for keeping this type of info secret in India, but assuming that such info is not openly disclosed by the employer, you may want to ask yourself how it is you've come to know of this pay disparity. If it's self-reported, do you trust what others are claiming? Is there some way to verify those claims? And if you do bring this up with management, how will you respond if your concern is dismissed?



    A lot of the other answers are appeals to fairness, based on the presumption that managers are interested in such things. If you do bring this up, be prepared to respond if your boss denies the issue exists at all.






    share|improve this answer


























    • If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:17






    • 1





      @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from.

      – Z4-tier
      Oct 18 at 2:29















    0


















    There are lot's of good answers to this question, but I want to add a slightly different angle that you might want to consider if you intend to pursue this further.



    How do you know the details of your coworkers bonuses / compensation? I see that you are in Chennai; I am not sure the custom for keeping this type of info secret in India, but assuming that such info is not openly disclosed by the employer, you may want to ask yourself how it is you've come to know of this pay disparity. If it's self-reported, do you trust what others are claiming? Is there some way to verify those claims? And if you do bring this up with management, how will you respond if your concern is dismissed?



    A lot of the other answers are appeals to fairness, based on the presumption that managers are interested in such things. If you do bring this up, be prepared to respond if your boss denies the issue exists at all.






    share|improve this answer


























    • If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:17






    • 1





      @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from.

      – Z4-tier
      Oct 18 at 2:29













    0














    0










    0









    There are lot's of good answers to this question, but I want to add a slightly different angle that you might want to consider if you intend to pursue this further.



    How do you know the details of your coworkers bonuses / compensation? I see that you are in Chennai; I am not sure the custom for keeping this type of info secret in India, but assuming that such info is not openly disclosed by the employer, you may want to ask yourself how it is you've come to know of this pay disparity. If it's self-reported, do you trust what others are claiming? Is there some way to verify those claims? And if you do bring this up with management, how will you respond if your concern is dismissed?



    A lot of the other answers are appeals to fairness, based on the presumption that managers are interested in such things. If you do bring this up, be prepared to respond if your boss denies the issue exists at all.






    share|improve this answer














    There are lot's of good answers to this question, but I want to add a slightly different angle that you might want to consider if you intend to pursue this further.



    How do you know the details of your coworkers bonuses / compensation? I see that you are in Chennai; I am not sure the custom for keeping this type of info secret in India, but assuming that such info is not openly disclosed by the employer, you may want to ask yourself how it is you've come to know of this pay disparity. If it's self-reported, do you trust what others are claiming? Is there some way to verify those claims? And if you do bring this up with management, how will you respond if your concern is dismissed?



    A lot of the other answers are appeals to fairness, based on the presumption that managers are interested in such things. If you do bring this up, be prepared to respond if your boss denies the issue exists at all.







    share|improve this answer













    share|improve this answer




    share|improve this answer










    answered Oct 17 at 15:45









    Z4-tierZ4-tier

    101




    101















    • If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:17






    • 1





      @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from.

      – Z4-tier
      Oct 18 at 2:29

















    • If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses.

      – Stobor
      Oct 18 at 2:17






    • 1





      @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from.

      – Z4-tier
      Oct 18 at 2:29
















    If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses.

    – Stobor
    Oct 18 at 2:17





    If the incentive scheme is public (bonus = $2 per 100 widgets produced) and the performance report is public (Bob produced 4200 widgets this month, Jane produced 5100 widgets), then it is possible to determine other's bonuses.

    – Stobor
    Oct 18 at 2:17




    1




    1





    @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from.

    – Z4-tier
    Oct 18 at 2:29





    @Stobor sure, you are right and I agree. But that scenario is completely hypothetical, and it's not really the crux of this answer. My point is that OP should prepare for what is (in my mind) a very likely direction for this conversation to go: "What? No! That's not true, you are highly compensated! Don't believe such things!" If what you suggest is a viable way for OP to go in armed with facts, then great. If not, he needs to find some factual way to support this claim, because falling back on rumors and gossip will be a very weak position to argue from.

    – Z4-tier
    Oct 18 at 2:29











    -2


















    That is typical for products which get traded around the globe through many hands before they land with an end user. It would be totally uneconomic to do quality control along the way, because whoever does it has to pay for it and increase the price, and looses customers.



    To return a broken part from the end user all the way back to the producer is terribly uneconomic, so these losses, should a customer return an item, just get priced in along the trade route.



    There is nothing you or your company can really do, that is the way our world is running in the 21st century. Its called "globalisation". Most people get a bit richer, many get stinkingly rich, and only they have a chance to really enjoy their riches, because they can still afford to buy quality products, while everybody else has to buy cheap shit.



    Sorry for the rant. ;)






    share|improve this answer






























      -2


















      That is typical for products which get traded around the globe through many hands before they land with an end user. It would be totally uneconomic to do quality control along the way, because whoever does it has to pay for it and increase the price, and looses customers.



      To return a broken part from the end user all the way back to the producer is terribly uneconomic, so these losses, should a customer return an item, just get priced in along the trade route.



      There is nothing you or your company can really do, that is the way our world is running in the 21st century. Its called "globalisation". Most people get a bit richer, many get stinkingly rich, and only they have a chance to really enjoy their riches, because they can still afford to buy quality products, while everybody else has to buy cheap shit.



      Sorry for the rant. ;)






      share|improve this answer




























        -2














        -2










        -2









        That is typical for products which get traded around the globe through many hands before they land with an end user. It would be totally uneconomic to do quality control along the way, because whoever does it has to pay for it and increase the price, and looses customers.



        To return a broken part from the end user all the way back to the producer is terribly uneconomic, so these losses, should a customer return an item, just get priced in along the trade route.



        There is nothing you or your company can really do, that is the way our world is running in the 21st century. Its called "globalisation". Most people get a bit richer, many get stinkingly rich, and only they have a chance to really enjoy their riches, because they can still afford to buy quality products, while everybody else has to buy cheap shit.



        Sorry for the rant. ;)






        share|improve this answer














        That is typical for products which get traded around the globe through many hands before they land with an end user. It would be totally uneconomic to do quality control along the way, because whoever does it has to pay for it and increase the price, and looses customers.



        To return a broken part from the end user all the way back to the producer is terribly uneconomic, so these losses, should a customer return an item, just get priced in along the trade route.



        There is nothing you or your company can really do, that is the way our world is running in the 21st century. Its called "globalisation". Most people get a bit richer, many get stinkingly rich, and only they have a chance to really enjoy their riches, because they can still afford to buy quality products, while everybody else has to buy cheap shit.



        Sorry for the rant. ;)







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered Oct 17 at 19:28









        KarlKarl

        1135 bronze badges




        1135 bronze badges































            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to The Workplace Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146504%2femployer-says-they-want-quality-quantity-but-only-pays-bonuses-based-on-the-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown













            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Image
            Internet forum softwarePHP software Internet communityPHPMySQLdatabase management systemInternet forumCharles WarnerMatt MechamJarvis Entertainment GroupIkonboardInvisionFreeAjaxIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry Invision Community From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Invision Community Developer(s) Invision Power Services Stable release 4.4.6 / August 19, 2019 ; 34 days ago  ( 2019-08-19 ) Platform PHP / MySQL Type Forum software License Proprietary Website invisioncommunity.com Invision Community (previously known as IPS Community Suite ) is primarily an Internet community software produced by Invision Power Services, Inc. It is written in PHP and uses MySQL as a database management system. Invision Power Services sell applications that each can be bought and installed separately in addition to the Suite, the most widely known being the Internet forum software Invision Power Board. Invisi
            Read more

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Image
            Would it be easier to colonise a living world or a dead world? Postal services in Italy - Poste Italiane vs. Friendpost vs. GPS What is /dev/null and why can't I use hx on it? Why are engines with carburetors hard to start in cold weather? How to make a gift without seeming creepy? Without exposing his identity, did Roy help his parents with money so that they can afford to stay in their home? Does the Creighton Method of Natural Family Planning have a failure rate of 3.2% or less? How do I break the broom in Untitled Goose Game? Had there been instances of national states banning harmful imports before the mid-19th C Opium Wars? D&D Monsters and Copyright Is sleeping on the groud in cold weather better than on an air mattress? Transiting through Switzerland by coach with lots of cash quadratic equations on 2 by 2 matrices Always Lubricate Skewers? I pay for a service, but I miss the broadcast Iron-age tools, is there a way to extract heavy metals
            Read more

            Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її

            Image
            ЛаскавецьФлора УкраїниФлора ЄвропиФлора АфрикиФлора АзіїРослини, описані 1753 ОкружковіОднорічнатрав'яниста рослинаАфриціЄвропіАзіїУкраїні Ласкавець круглолистий Матеріал з Вікіпедії — вільної енциклопедії. Перейти до навігації Перейти до пошуку ? Ласкавець круглолистий Біологічна класифікація Домен: Ядерні (Eukaryota) Царство: Зелені рослини (Viridiplantae) Відділ: Вищі рослини (Streptophyta) — Судинні (Tracheophyta) — Покритонасінні (Angiospermae) — Евдикоти (Eudicots) — Айстериди (Asterids) Порядок: Аралієцвіті (Apiales) Родина: Окружкові (Apiaceae) Підродина: Селерові (Apioideae) Триба: Bupleureae Рід: Ласкавець ( Bupleurum ) Вид: Ласкавець круглолистий Біноміальна назва Bupleurum rotundifolium L., 1753 Посилання Вікісховище: Bupleurum rotundifolium Віківиди: Bupleurum rotundifolium EOL: 581711 IPNI: 38361-2 ITIS: 29608 NCBI: 90446 Ласкавець круглолистий [1] [1] [2] ( Bupleurum rotundifolium ) — вид рослин родини Окружкові (Apiaceae)
            Read more