Does the UA Blade Mastery feat stack with itself?Do the Tunnel Fighter UA fighting style and the Polearm Master feat combine to grant indefinite opportunity attacks?Is the Polearm Master Feat compatible with the Two-Weapon Fighting style?Does Tunnel Fighter turn an Opportunity Attack into a non-action?Does it matter which weapon I attack with first when two-weapon fighting?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?If you have the War Caster feat and cast Booming Blade as a reaction, does it count as an opportunity attack for the UA Blade Mastery feat?Can I Two-Weapon fight after Two-Handed-Weapon fighting?Can a Druid cast the Flame Blade spell, then use the blade while Wild Shaped?Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?Can my 2019 UA Artificer hit 4 times in a turn by combining the Arcane Armament feature with the Dual Wielder feat?
Suppose I capture encrypted data that I want to decrypt. Could I use a server farm to decrypt?
Is there a sonic boom when flying nearby?
Why doesn't auto complete work in my shell?
Competitive vs complete and non-competitive vs incomplete marekts
Can I call the airport to see if my boyfriend made it through customs?
What will happen to a ball kept on a frictionless inclined plane?
How to prepend a character to start of each line in 250,000+ line file using a script?
Renting and driving in UK with Left Hand driving licence
What mathematics activities get students physically moving?
Proof of Monotone convergence theorem.
How to deal with an employee who is requesting a demotion?
Plane ticket price went down by 40% two weeks after I booked it. Is there anything I can do to get a refund?
Employer wants me to do something explicitly illegal
Do one quarter of Swedes named 'Ali' have a criminal record?
MS BASIC, access a DIMed variable with no index?
What's the difference between 繁盛 and 隆盛?
I can't understand how probability makes sense
Exactly what color was the text on monochrome terminals with green-on-black and amber-on-black screens?
Why would Earth be long-term unsuitable for an advanced alien species that's already colonized it?
Pointlessly recurse down the alphabet
Why are the norm symbols || not aligned in this situation?
In the Trump Impeachment process what is the legal status of notes?
What is "Chronological Order" in chess?
Combining two plots with separate frame tick styles
Does the UA Blade Mastery feat stack with itself?
Do the Tunnel Fighter UA fighting style and the Polearm Master feat combine to grant indefinite opportunity attacks?Is the Polearm Master Feat compatible with the Two-Weapon Fighting style?Does Tunnel Fighter turn an Opportunity Attack into a non-action?Does it matter which weapon I attack with first when two-weapon fighting?Does Crossbow Expert override the light weapon requirement for Two Weapon Fighting?If you have the War Caster feat and cast Booming Blade as a reaction, does it count as an opportunity attack for the UA Blade Mastery feat?Can I Two-Weapon fight after Two-Handed-Weapon fighting?Can a Druid cast the Flame Blade spell, then use the blade while Wild Shaped?Do I add my ability modifier to the damage of the bonus-action attack granted by the Crossbow Expert feat?Can my 2019 UA Artificer hit 4 times in a turn by combining the Arcane Armament feature with the Dual Wielder feat?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The Blade Mastery feat says this:
You master the shortsword, longsword, scimitar, rapier, and greatsword. You gain the following benefits when using any of them:
- You gain a +1 bonus to attack rolls you make with the weapon.
- On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
- When you make an opportunity attack with the weapon, you have
advantage on the attack roll.
Its second feature says that using your reaction, you can get a +1 bonus to AC. This lasts until you're not holding your weapon. Does this mean that in multiple consecutive rounds you can use your reaction to get a +1 bonus as long as you're holding the weapon, which could (theoretically) allow you to have, for example, +6 to AC after a minute like this? Or can the bonus only apply once, RAW?
dnd-5e feats unearthed-arcana
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The Blade Mastery feat says this:
You master the shortsword, longsword, scimitar, rapier, and greatsword. You gain the following benefits when using any of them:
- You gain a +1 bonus to attack rolls you make with the weapon.
- On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
- When you make an opportunity attack with the weapon, you have
advantage on the attack roll.
Its second feature says that using your reaction, you can get a +1 bonus to AC. This lasts until you're not holding your weapon. Does this mean that in multiple consecutive rounds you can use your reaction to get a +1 bonus as long as you're holding the weapon, which could (theoretically) allow you to have, for example, +6 to AC after a minute like this? Or can the bonus only apply once, RAW?
dnd-5e feats unearthed-arcana
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:15
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
The Blade Mastery feat says this:
You master the shortsword, longsword, scimitar, rapier, and greatsword. You gain the following benefits when using any of them:
- You gain a +1 bonus to attack rolls you make with the weapon.
- On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
- When you make an opportunity attack with the weapon, you have
advantage on the attack roll.
Its second feature says that using your reaction, you can get a +1 bonus to AC. This lasts until you're not holding your weapon. Does this mean that in multiple consecutive rounds you can use your reaction to get a +1 bonus as long as you're holding the weapon, which could (theoretically) allow you to have, for example, +6 to AC after a minute like this? Or can the bonus only apply once, RAW?
dnd-5e feats unearthed-arcana
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
$endgroup$
The Blade Mastery feat says this:
You master the shortsword, longsword, scimitar, rapier, and greatsword. You gain the following benefits when using any of them:
- You gain a +1 bonus to attack rolls you make with the weapon.
- On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
- When you make an opportunity attack with the weapon, you have
advantage on the attack roll.
Its second feature says that using your reaction, you can get a +1 bonus to AC. This lasts until you're not holding your weapon. Does this mean that in multiple consecutive rounds you can use your reaction to get a +1 bonus as long as you're holding the weapon, which could (theoretically) allow you to have, for example, +6 to AC after a minute like this? Or can the bonus only apply once, RAW?
dnd-5e feats unearthed-arcana
dnd-5e feats unearthed-arcana
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
edited Oct 16 at 17:11
mattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
asked Oct 16 at 17:07
KAmberKAmber
2294 bronze badges
2294 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:15
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:15
1
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:15
add a comment
|
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is playtest material, so the wording isn't always as hammered-out as we hope final material is, but... I think you're reading the text wrong. It says:
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
... which you interpret as "the benefit lasts as long as one or the other is true". I can see that. There's another possible interpretation which I believe is the intention: "the benefit ends when one of these things happens". English has an ambiguity around the word "or", leading to both interpretations matching RAW — but personally I think it's pretty clear which is meant. And this is supported by the first part of the description: you're able to assume a parrying stance provided you have a weapon in hand.
One could read this as a requirement only to start such a stance (because it says "assume"), but I think it's pretty obvious that the intent is to require a weapon in hand the whole time.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, I think in most rules, the "or" should be interpreted as if the sentence had the phrase "whichever occurs first" attached to the end of it. Unless, of course, it already has "whichever occurs last" (or similar) appended.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Oct 16 at 20:02
$begingroup$
It depends on your training: if you’ve learned formal logic “or” is inclusive, if you’ve learned law “or” denotes an exclusive choice between alternatives. The second sense is the one being used.
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Oct 16 at 20:51
3
$begingroup$
@DaleM And if you've learned plain English, it can be either and depends on context. Since ostensibly that's what the rules are written in, that's what we're stuck with. :)
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Oct 16 at 20:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, it cannot be stacked.
The second feature explicitly states:
On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
This means as soon as your turn starts the bonus would no longer be in effect, so no, it cannot stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, the +1 AC only last one round.
until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the
weapon.
When either one of those two conditions are true the AC bonus ends. The second part basically is there to answer "do I keep the AC bonus if I get disarmed?", which the answer is no, since the +1 AC bonus is dependent on you parrying with your sword.
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
The +1 will be lost either at the beginning of your next turn or if you are disarmed. So no, this effect does not stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:19
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f157887%2fdoes-the-ua-blade-mastery-feat-stack-with-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is playtest material, so the wording isn't always as hammered-out as we hope final material is, but... I think you're reading the text wrong. It says:
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
... which you interpret as "the benefit lasts as long as one or the other is true". I can see that. There's another possible interpretation which I believe is the intention: "the benefit ends when one of these things happens". English has an ambiguity around the word "or", leading to both interpretations matching RAW — but personally I think it's pretty clear which is meant. And this is supported by the first part of the description: you're able to assume a parrying stance provided you have a weapon in hand.
One could read this as a requirement only to start such a stance (because it says "assume"), but I think it's pretty obvious that the intent is to require a weapon in hand the whole time.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, I think in most rules, the "or" should be interpreted as if the sentence had the phrase "whichever occurs first" attached to the end of it. Unless, of course, it already has "whichever occurs last" (or similar) appended.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Oct 16 at 20:02
$begingroup$
It depends on your training: if you’ve learned formal logic “or” is inclusive, if you’ve learned law “or” denotes an exclusive choice between alternatives. The second sense is the one being used.
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Oct 16 at 20:51
3
$begingroup$
@DaleM And if you've learned plain English, it can be either and depends on context. Since ostensibly that's what the rules are written in, that's what we're stuck with. :)
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Oct 16 at 20:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This is playtest material, so the wording isn't always as hammered-out as we hope final material is, but... I think you're reading the text wrong. It says:
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
... which you interpret as "the benefit lasts as long as one or the other is true". I can see that. There's another possible interpretation which I believe is the intention: "the benefit ends when one of these things happens". English has an ambiguity around the word "or", leading to both interpretations matching RAW — but personally I think it's pretty clear which is meant. And this is supported by the first part of the description: you're able to assume a parrying stance provided you have a weapon in hand.
One could read this as a requirement only to start such a stance (because it says "assume"), but I think it's pretty obvious that the intent is to require a weapon in hand the whole time.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, I think in most rules, the "or" should be interpreted as if the sentence had the phrase "whichever occurs first" attached to the end of it. Unless, of course, it already has "whichever occurs last" (or similar) appended.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Oct 16 at 20:02
$begingroup$
It depends on your training: if you’ve learned formal logic “or” is inclusive, if you’ve learned law “or” denotes an exclusive choice between alternatives. The second sense is the one being used.
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Oct 16 at 20:51
3
$begingroup$
@DaleM And if you've learned plain English, it can be either and depends on context. Since ostensibly that's what the rules are written in, that's what we're stuck with. :)
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Oct 16 at 20:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This is playtest material, so the wording isn't always as hammered-out as we hope final material is, but... I think you're reading the text wrong. It says:
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
... which you interpret as "the benefit lasts as long as one or the other is true". I can see that. There's another possible interpretation which I believe is the intention: "the benefit ends when one of these things happens". English has an ambiguity around the word "or", leading to both interpretations matching RAW — but personally I think it's pretty clear which is meant. And this is supported by the first part of the description: you're able to assume a parrying stance provided you have a weapon in hand.
One could read this as a requirement only to start such a stance (because it says "assume"), but I think it's pretty obvious that the intent is to require a weapon in hand the whole time.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
$endgroup$
This is playtest material, so the wording isn't always as hammered-out as we hope final material is, but... I think you're reading the text wrong. It says:
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
... which you interpret as "the benefit lasts as long as one or the other is true". I can see that. There's another possible interpretation which I believe is the intention: "the benefit ends when one of these things happens". English has an ambiguity around the word "or", leading to both interpretations matching RAW — but personally I think it's pretty clear which is meant. And this is supported by the first part of the description: you're able to assume a parrying stance provided you have a weapon in hand.
One could read this as a requirement only to start such a stance (because it says "assume"), but I think it's pretty obvious that the intent is to require a weapon in hand the whole time.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
edited Oct 16 at 17:30
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
mattdmmattdm
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
24.7k12 gold badges101 silver badges152 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Yes, I think in most rules, the "or" should be interpreted as if the sentence had the phrase "whichever occurs first" attached to the end of it. Unless, of course, it already has "whichever occurs last" (or similar) appended.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Oct 16 at 20:02
$begingroup$
It depends on your training: if you’ve learned formal logic “or” is inclusive, if you’ve learned law “or” denotes an exclusive choice between alternatives. The second sense is the one being used.
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Oct 16 at 20:51
3
$begingroup$
@DaleM And if you've learned plain English, it can be either and depends on context. Since ostensibly that's what the rules are written in, that's what we're stuck with. :)
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Oct 16 at 20:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Yes, I think in most rules, the "or" should be interpreted as if the sentence had the phrase "whichever occurs first" attached to the end of it. Unless, of course, it already has "whichever occurs last" (or similar) appended.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Oct 16 at 20:02
$begingroup$
It depends on your training: if you’ve learned formal logic “or” is inclusive, if you’ve learned law “or” denotes an exclusive choice between alternatives. The second sense is the one being used.
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Oct 16 at 20:51
3
$begingroup$
@DaleM And if you've learned plain English, it can be either and depends on context. Since ostensibly that's what the rules are written in, that's what we're stuck with. :)
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Oct 16 at 20:53
$begingroup$
Yes, I think in most rules, the "or" should be interpreted as if the sentence had the phrase "whichever occurs first" attached to the end of it. Unless, of course, it already has "whichever occurs last" (or similar) appended.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Oct 16 at 20:02
$begingroup$
Yes, I think in most rules, the "or" should be interpreted as if the sentence had the phrase "whichever occurs first" attached to the end of it. Unless, of course, it already has "whichever occurs last" (or similar) appended.
$endgroup$
– cpcodes
Oct 16 at 20:02
$begingroup$
It depends on your training: if you’ve learned formal logic “or” is inclusive, if you’ve learned law “or” denotes an exclusive choice between alternatives. The second sense is the one being used.
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Oct 16 at 20:51
$begingroup$
It depends on your training: if you’ve learned formal logic “or” is inclusive, if you’ve learned law “or” denotes an exclusive choice between alternatives. The second sense is the one being used.
$endgroup$
– Dale M
Oct 16 at 20:51
3
3
$begingroup$
@DaleM And if you've learned plain English, it can be either and depends on context. Since ostensibly that's what the rules are written in, that's what we're stuck with. :)
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Oct 16 at 20:53
$begingroup$
@DaleM And if you've learned plain English, it can be either and depends on context. Since ostensibly that's what the rules are written in, that's what we're stuck with. :)
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Oct 16 at 20:53
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, it cannot be stacked.
The second feature explicitly states:
On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
This means as soon as your turn starts the bonus would no longer be in effect, so no, it cannot stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, it cannot be stacked.
The second feature explicitly states:
On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
This means as soon as your turn starts the bonus would no longer be in effect, so no, it cannot stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, it cannot be stacked.
The second feature explicitly states:
On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
This means as soon as your turn starts the bonus would no longer be in effect, so no, it cannot stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
$endgroup$
No, it cannot be stacked.
The second feature explicitly states:
On your turn, you can use your reaction to assume a parrying stance, provided you have the weapon in hand. Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
This means as soon as your turn starts the bonus would no longer be in effect, so no, it cannot stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:16
RallozarXRallozarX
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
2,3935 silver badges19 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, the +1 AC only last one round.
until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the
weapon.
When either one of those two conditions are true the AC bonus ends. The second part basically is there to answer "do I keep the AC bonus if I get disarmed?", which the answer is no, since the +1 AC bonus is dependent on you parrying with your sword.
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, the +1 AC only last one round.
until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the
weapon.
When either one of those two conditions are true the AC bonus ends. The second part basically is there to answer "do I keep the AC bonus if I get disarmed?", which the answer is no, since the +1 AC bonus is dependent on you parrying with your sword.
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
No, the +1 AC only last one round.
until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the
weapon.
When either one of those two conditions are true the AC bonus ends. The second part basically is there to answer "do I keep the AC bonus if I get disarmed?", which the answer is no, since the +1 AC bonus is dependent on you parrying with your sword.
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
$endgroup$
No, the +1 AC only last one round.
until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the
weapon.
When either one of those two conditions are true the AC bonus ends. The second part basically is there to answer "do I keep the AC bonus if I get disarmed?", which the answer is no, since the +1 AC bonus is dependent on you parrying with your sword.
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:14
DragoonKiteDragoonKite
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
1,0103 silver badges15 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
The +1 will be lost either at the beginning of your next turn or if you are disarmed. So no, this effect does not stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:19
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
The +1 will be lost either at the beginning of your next turn or if you are disarmed. So no, this effect does not stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:19
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
The +1 will be lost either at the beginning of your next turn or if you are disarmed. So no, this effect does not stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
$endgroup$
Doing so grants you a +1 bonus to your AC until the start of your next turn or until you’re not holding the weapon.
The +1 will be lost either at the beginning of your next turn or if you are disarmed. So no, this effect does not stack.
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
answered Oct 16 at 17:15
SobriquetSobriquet
412 bronze badges
412 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:19
add a comment
|
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:19
2
2
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:19
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:19
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f157887%2fdoes-the-ua-blade-mastery-feat-stack-with-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already and see the help center or ask us here in the comments (use @ to ping someone) if you need more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
$endgroup$
– Someone_Evil
Oct 16 at 17:15