should I include offer letter from a different institution in my application for a faculty positionDuring an application/interview should an applicant justify leaving a current faculty position (pre-tenure)?What do I need to include in a tenure-track assistant professor job application cover letter?Should I use fancy paper for non-resume application materials?Updating an application for a faculty positionBacking down from a faculty position. Future career problems?How do I deal with an old reference letter from an advisor for job applications?Letterhead in application letters for tenure-track in computer science in USA?Informal enquiries for faculty positionDo I need to follow traditional cover letter style for applying for an academic position?

What does "T.O." mean?

Would the US government of the 1960’s be able to feasibly recreate a modern laptop?

flalign - aligning terms in two lined equation

Can I say: “The train departs at 16 past every hour“?

Disable memory refresh on Z80

Group Policy application on Domain Controllers

Wood versus marble rolling pin 'performance'

Characteristic scale degrees

Is there evidence for Col. Vindman being a "Never Trumper"?

Body swap, then building it back to health

During a log backup is the data backed up to the start or end of the operation?

Can the Wish spell be used to allow someone to be able to cast all of their spells at will?

Is it worth delving deep outside my field to revise a paper?

Why do gas water heater exhausts have an air gap before the chimney?

/etc/shadow permissions security best practice (000 vs. 600 vs. 640)

Why is the HTTP protocol more susceptible to being intercepted than the BitTorrent protocol?

How likely are you to be injured by falling shot from a game shoot?

How can I prevent side-channel attacks against authentication?

Washing the skin of a dead rat

How does an all-female medieval country maintain itself?

Is there an operator or an easy way to match an expression one or more times with the LIKE operator in SQL?

Dodging a Deathbeam travelling at speed of light

Instant coffee melts like chocolate

Would webs catch fire if Fire Bolt is used on a creature inside of them?



should I include offer letter from a different institution in my application for a faculty position


During an application/interview should an applicant justify leaving a current faculty position (pre-tenure)?What do I need to include in a tenure-track assistant professor job application cover letter?Should I use fancy paper for non-resume application materials?Updating an application for a faculty positionBacking down from a faculty position. Future career problems?How do I deal with an old reference letter from an advisor for job applications?Letterhead in application letters for tenure-track in computer science in USA?Informal enquiries for faculty positionDo I need to follow traditional cover letter style for applying for an academic position?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;









3

















I have a offer letter from a very well-known group in my field for a postdoc position. The proposed starting date would be early next year.
However, I am currently also applying for a faculty (assistant professor) position at a different institution.



Should I mention this offer in my application for the faculty position (on cv or cover letter) and/or include the official offer letter?



update:



there is another sublety for one application. One faculty position I consider requires experience abroad (i.e. not in the same country) of at least 1 year. I only have 6 months but the postdoc offer would be abroad giving me the 1 year total if I take it before starting the faculty position. Should I then mention the offer?



my field is health and medical sciences










share|improve this question




























  • Why? I don't know academia much so I'm curious about what you could gain from this. I would do something like that to negotiate a better salary in industry, but I thought that faculty had fixed salaries, at least at the beginning.

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:01











  • @Elzo I would hope that having an offer letter from this very well known group would increase my chances for the faculty position. Everybody knows this group in my field.

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:03











  • But didn't this group see the same CV you are sending to this different institution? That the group accepted you just tells them "these very smart people liked the attached CV so you should too". Couldn't it even offend them?

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:06






  • 2





    @Elzo this is exactly the question

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:07






  • 1





    Are you going to do the postdoc position? You could always just accept it, and then you're not listing an offer but an actual position (one that you will hold between now and your start date in any other position that you're applying for). Of course, that limits you to definitely doing the postdoc, since if you show up having not done it there could be questions...

    – user3067860
    Oct 15 at 11:47

















3

















I have a offer letter from a very well-known group in my field for a postdoc position. The proposed starting date would be early next year.
However, I am currently also applying for a faculty (assistant professor) position at a different institution.



Should I mention this offer in my application for the faculty position (on cv or cover letter) and/or include the official offer letter?



update:



there is another sublety for one application. One faculty position I consider requires experience abroad (i.e. not in the same country) of at least 1 year. I only have 6 months but the postdoc offer would be abroad giving me the 1 year total if I take it before starting the faculty position. Should I then mention the offer?



my field is health and medical sciences










share|improve this question




























  • Why? I don't know academia much so I'm curious about what you could gain from this. I would do something like that to negotiate a better salary in industry, but I thought that faculty had fixed salaries, at least at the beginning.

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:01











  • @Elzo I would hope that having an offer letter from this very well known group would increase my chances for the faculty position. Everybody knows this group in my field.

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:03











  • But didn't this group see the same CV you are sending to this different institution? That the group accepted you just tells them "these very smart people liked the attached CV so you should too". Couldn't it even offend them?

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:06






  • 2





    @Elzo this is exactly the question

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:07






  • 1





    Are you going to do the postdoc position? You could always just accept it, and then you're not listing an offer but an actual position (one that you will hold between now and your start date in any other position that you're applying for). Of course, that limits you to definitely doing the postdoc, since if you show up having not done it there could be questions...

    – user3067860
    Oct 15 at 11:47













3












3








3








I have a offer letter from a very well-known group in my field for a postdoc position. The proposed starting date would be early next year.
However, I am currently also applying for a faculty (assistant professor) position at a different institution.



Should I mention this offer in my application for the faculty position (on cv or cover letter) and/or include the official offer letter?



update:



there is another sublety for one application. One faculty position I consider requires experience abroad (i.e. not in the same country) of at least 1 year. I only have 6 months but the postdoc offer would be abroad giving me the 1 year total if I take it before starting the faculty position. Should I then mention the offer?



my field is health and medical sciences










share|improve this question

















I have a offer letter from a very well-known group in my field for a postdoc position. The proposed starting date would be early next year.
However, I am currently also applying for a faculty (assistant professor) position at a different institution.



Should I mention this offer in my application for the faculty position (on cv or cover letter) and/or include the official offer letter?



update:



there is another sublety for one application. One faculty position I consider requires experience abroad (i.e. not in the same country) of at least 1 year. I only have 6 months but the postdoc offer would be abroad giving me the 1 year total if I take it before starting the faculty position. Should I then mention the offer?



my field is health and medical sciences







application faculty-application application-cover-letter






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 14 at 18:38







spore234

















asked Oct 14 at 13:56









spore234spore234

3264 silver badges11 bronze badges




3264 silver badges11 bronze badges















  • Why? I don't know academia much so I'm curious about what you could gain from this. I would do something like that to negotiate a better salary in industry, but I thought that faculty had fixed salaries, at least at the beginning.

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:01











  • @Elzo I would hope that having an offer letter from this very well known group would increase my chances for the faculty position. Everybody knows this group in my field.

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:03











  • But didn't this group see the same CV you are sending to this different institution? That the group accepted you just tells them "these very smart people liked the attached CV so you should too". Couldn't it even offend them?

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:06






  • 2





    @Elzo this is exactly the question

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:07






  • 1





    Are you going to do the postdoc position? You could always just accept it, and then you're not listing an offer but an actual position (one that you will hold between now and your start date in any other position that you're applying for). Of course, that limits you to definitely doing the postdoc, since if you show up having not done it there could be questions...

    – user3067860
    Oct 15 at 11:47

















  • Why? I don't know academia much so I'm curious about what you could gain from this. I would do something like that to negotiate a better salary in industry, but I thought that faculty had fixed salaries, at least at the beginning.

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:01











  • @Elzo I would hope that having an offer letter from this very well known group would increase my chances for the faculty position. Everybody knows this group in my field.

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:03











  • But didn't this group see the same CV you are sending to this different institution? That the group accepted you just tells them "these very smart people liked the attached CV so you should too". Couldn't it even offend them?

    – Elzo
    Oct 14 at 14:06






  • 2





    @Elzo this is exactly the question

    – spore234
    Oct 14 at 14:07






  • 1





    Are you going to do the postdoc position? You could always just accept it, and then you're not listing an offer but an actual position (one that you will hold between now and your start date in any other position that you're applying for). Of course, that limits you to definitely doing the postdoc, since if you show up having not done it there could be questions...

    – user3067860
    Oct 15 at 11:47
















Why? I don't know academia much so I'm curious about what you could gain from this. I would do something like that to negotiate a better salary in industry, but I thought that faculty had fixed salaries, at least at the beginning.

– Elzo
Oct 14 at 14:01





Why? I don't know academia much so I'm curious about what you could gain from this. I would do something like that to negotiate a better salary in industry, but I thought that faculty had fixed salaries, at least at the beginning.

– Elzo
Oct 14 at 14:01













@Elzo I would hope that having an offer letter from this very well known group would increase my chances for the faculty position. Everybody knows this group in my field.

– spore234
Oct 14 at 14:03





@Elzo I would hope that having an offer letter from this very well known group would increase my chances for the faculty position. Everybody knows this group in my field.

– spore234
Oct 14 at 14:03













But didn't this group see the same CV you are sending to this different institution? That the group accepted you just tells them "these very smart people liked the attached CV so you should too". Couldn't it even offend them?

– Elzo
Oct 14 at 14:06





But didn't this group see the same CV you are sending to this different institution? That the group accepted you just tells them "these very smart people liked the attached CV so you should too". Couldn't it even offend them?

– Elzo
Oct 14 at 14:06




2




2





@Elzo this is exactly the question

– spore234
Oct 14 at 14:07





@Elzo this is exactly the question

– spore234
Oct 14 at 14:07




1




1





Are you going to do the postdoc position? You could always just accept it, and then you're not listing an offer but an actual position (one that you will hold between now and your start date in any other position that you're applying for). Of course, that limits you to definitely doing the postdoc, since if you show up having not done it there could be questions...

– user3067860
Oct 15 at 11:47





Are you going to do the postdoc position? You could always just accept it, and then you're not listing an offer but an actual position (one that you will hold between now and your start date in any other position that you're applying for). Of course, that limits you to definitely doing the postdoc, since if you show up having not done it there could be questions...

– user3067860
Oct 15 at 11:47










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















27


















I think that it would be unwise to include a copy of an offer in another application.



But whether you inform them of the existence of an offer is a bit more subtle. I doubt that anyone will rush to hire you just because you have another offer. They will evaluate you on other things as usual. So, at best, mentioning the offer initially gets you nothing.



However, later in the process if you need a decision and they are delaying making it, you can let them know that you have a deadline. Whether that helps or hurts is also subtle. Whether it is wise, or not depends on the nature of any relationship you have been able to build with them. In the absence of any relationship, it might hurt more than help. It is easy to just cross you off the list unless they are very interested and have few other interesting applicants.






share|improve this answer

































    17


















    To be blunt and clear, if anyone had done this on any of the previous hiring committees I have been on, we would have rejected them instantly. They would not have even been long-listed, let alone short listed. Having another job offer is not a reason for anyone to hire you. Indeed, it indicated a number of negative things:



    1. You are the sort of person who goes all the way through the process of getting one job but still fishes around for something "better": read, you waste everyone's time

    2. If they do want you, you are likely to try to pull off some sort of bidding war for you, increasing your package etc. That's annoying to everyone.

    3. You are implying that the research group you have a PostDoc offer from is somehow better than the place you are looking for a Faculty Position from. Like some temporary position is as good as a tenure track one. Ouch!

    4. You are lacking in subtlety, diplomacy, and general workplace etiquette.

    Basically, don't do this. It is a very bad idea.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 3





      This actually happened during my first hiring committee experience: An otherwise impressive application has a competing job offer attached to the cover letter. All the senior people in the committee completely ignored the application. When I voiced my support for this candidate, I was given the "are you stupid look".

      – ssquidd
      Oct 14 at 19:09






    • 12





      This is a rather extreme answer. Particularly item 1, which sounds very unreasonable. Really, it is wrong to simultaneously apply to multiple positions and not jump on the first offer that comes along (especially for a postdoc when you were hoping for an assistant professorship) but hope to get additional offers and do whatever you need to to maximize your chances? That’s news to me and everyone I know (but maybe we’re all “that sort of people” you were referring to). What am I missing here, GrotesqueSI?

      – Dan Romik
      Oct 14 at 19:59






    • 3





      (To be clear, I agree that including the other offer letter is a bad idea. Mentioning the offer itself may or may not be a good idea, depending on many specific details as discussed in Buffy’s answer. But the absolutist tone of this answer does not leave a good impression, especially item 1 as I said.)

      – Dan Romik
      Oct 14 at 20:03






    • 2





      You sound like a very sensible person and I generally like your answers a lot. This one seems off the mark. Ruling out candidates for committing a minor social faux pas (even assuming that the action we’re discussing is such a thing; if done correctly it doesn’t have to be) doesn’t sound wise or fair to me, nor does jumping to conclusions about someone’s character based on such tiny amounts of evidence.

      – Dan Romik
      Oct 14 at 20:23






    • 2





      @DanRomik People are generally on their best behaviour when applying for a job. If this is the OP's "best behaviour", it's hardly "jumping to conclusions" to consider how they might behave in "normal" situations, and betting with the odds is usually a good strategy. Recruitment isn't about looking for the ideal candidate (because with limited information you have no way to achieve that). It's about making the lowest-risk decision that someone is good enough.

      – alephzero
      Oct 14 at 22:17



















    -1


















    You do not show a letter addressed to you personally to other people without the sender`s consent.
    Never, unless you get a formal court order to do so.






    share|improve this answer



























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "415"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );














      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138489%2fshould-i-include-offer-letter-from-a-different-institution-in-my-application-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown


























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      27


















      I think that it would be unwise to include a copy of an offer in another application.



      But whether you inform them of the existence of an offer is a bit more subtle. I doubt that anyone will rush to hire you just because you have another offer. They will evaluate you on other things as usual. So, at best, mentioning the offer initially gets you nothing.



      However, later in the process if you need a decision and they are delaying making it, you can let them know that you have a deadline. Whether that helps or hurts is also subtle. Whether it is wise, or not depends on the nature of any relationship you have been able to build with them. In the absence of any relationship, it might hurt more than help. It is easy to just cross you off the list unless they are very interested and have few other interesting applicants.






      share|improve this answer






























        27


















        I think that it would be unwise to include a copy of an offer in another application.



        But whether you inform them of the existence of an offer is a bit more subtle. I doubt that anyone will rush to hire you just because you have another offer. They will evaluate you on other things as usual. So, at best, mentioning the offer initially gets you nothing.



        However, later in the process if you need a decision and they are delaying making it, you can let them know that you have a deadline. Whether that helps or hurts is also subtle. Whether it is wise, or not depends on the nature of any relationship you have been able to build with them. In the absence of any relationship, it might hurt more than help. It is easy to just cross you off the list unless they are very interested and have few other interesting applicants.






        share|improve this answer




























          27














          27










          27









          I think that it would be unwise to include a copy of an offer in another application.



          But whether you inform them of the existence of an offer is a bit more subtle. I doubt that anyone will rush to hire you just because you have another offer. They will evaluate you on other things as usual. So, at best, mentioning the offer initially gets you nothing.



          However, later in the process if you need a decision and they are delaying making it, you can let them know that you have a deadline. Whether that helps or hurts is also subtle. Whether it is wise, or not depends on the nature of any relationship you have been able to build with them. In the absence of any relationship, it might hurt more than help. It is easy to just cross you off the list unless they are very interested and have few other interesting applicants.






          share|improve this answer














          I think that it would be unwise to include a copy of an offer in another application.



          But whether you inform them of the existence of an offer is a bit more subtle. I doubt that anyone will rush to hire you just because you have another offer. They will evaluate you on other things as usual. So, at best, mentioning the offer initially gets you nothing.



          However, later in the process if you need a decision and they are delaying making it, you can let them know that you have a deadline. Whether that helps or hurts is also subtle. Whether it is wise, or not depends on the nature of any relationship you have been able to build with them. In the absence of any relationship, it might hurt more than help. It is easy to just cross you off the list unless they are very interested and have few other interesting applicants.







          share|improve this answer













          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer










          answered Oct 14 at 15:03









          BuffyBuffy

          91.8k23 gold badges283 silver badges394 bronze badges




          91.8k23 gold badges283 silver badges394 bronze badges


























              17


















              To be blunt and clear, if anyone had done this on any of the previous hiring committees I have been on, we would have rejected them instantly. They would not have even been long-listed, let alone short listed. Having another job offer is not a reason for anyone to hire you. Indeed, it indicated a number of negative things:



              1. You are the sort of person who goes all the way through the process of getting one job but still fishes around for something "better": read, you waste everyone's time

              2. If they do want you, you are likely to try to pull off some sort of bidding war for you, increasing your package etc. That's annoying to everyone.

              3. You are implying that the research group you have a PostDoc offer from is somehow better than the place you are looking for a Faculty Position from. Like some temporary position is as good as a tenure track one. Ouch!

              4. You are lacking in subtlety, diplomacy, and general workplace etiquette.

              Basically, don't do this. It is a very bad idea.






              share|improve this answer





















              • 3





                This actually happened during my first hiring committee experience: An otherwise impressive application has a competing job offer attached to the cover letter. All the senior people in the committee completely ignored the application. When I voiced my support for this candidate, I was given the "are you stupid look".

                – ssquidd
                Oct 14 at 19:09






              • 12





                This is a rather extreme answer. Particularly item 1, which sounds very unreasonable. Really, it is wrong to simultaneously apply to multiple positions and not jump on the first offer that comes along (especially for a postdoc when you were hoping for an assistant professorship) but hope to get additional offers and do whatever you need to to maximize your chances? That’s news to me and everyone I know (but maybe we’re all “that sort of people” you were referring to). What am I missing here, GrotesqueSI?

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 19:59






              • 3





                (To be clear, I agree that including the other offer letter is a bad idea. Mentioning the offer itself may or may not be a good idea, depending on many specific details as discussed in Buffy’s answer. But the absolutist tone of this answer does not leave a good impression, especially item 1 as I said.)

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:03






              • 2





                You sound like a very sensible person and I generally like your answers a lot. This one seems off the mark. Ruling out candidates for committing a minor social faux pas (even assuming that the action we’re discussing is such a thing; if done correctly it doesn’t have to be) doesn’t sound wise or fair to me, nor does jumping to conclusions about someone’s character based on such tiny amounts of evidence.

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:23






              • 2





                @DanRomik People are generally on their best behaviour when applying for a job. If this is the OP's "best behaviour", it's hardly "jumping to conclusions" to consider how they might behave in "normal" situations, and betting with the odds is usually a good strategy. Recruitment isn't about looking for the ideal candidate (because with limited information you have no way to achieve that). It's about making the lowest-risk decision that someone is good enough.

                – alephzero
                Oct 14 at 22:17
















              17


















              To be blunt and clear, if anyone had done this on any of the previous hiring committees I have been on, we would have rejected them instantly. They would not have even been long-listed, let alone short listed. Having another job offer is not a reason for anyone to hire you. Indeed, it indicated a number of negative things:



              1. You are the sort of person who goes all the way through the process of getting one job but still fishes around for something "better": read, you waste everyone's time

              2. If they do want you, you are likely to try to pull off some sort of bidding war for you, increasing your package etc. That's annoying to everyone.

              3. You are implying that the research group you have a PostDoc offer from is somehow better than the place you are looking for a Faculty Position from. Like some temporary position is as good as a tenure track one. Ouch!

              4. You are lacking in subtlety, diplomacy, and general workplace etiquette.

              Basically, don't do this. It is a very bad idea.






              share|improve this answer





















              • 3





                This actually happened during my first hiring committee experience: An otherwise impressive application has a competing job offer attached to the cover letter. All the senior people in the committee completely ignored the application. When I voiced my support for this candidate, I was given the "are you stupid look".

                – ssquidd
                Oct 14 at 19:09






              • 12





                This is a rather extreme answer. Particularly item 1, which sounds very unreasonable. Really, it is wrong to simultaneously apply to multiple positions and not jump on the first offer that comes along (especially for a postdoc when you were hoping for an assistant professorship) but hope to get additional offers and do whatever you need to to maximize your chances? That’s news to me and everyone I know (but maybe we’re all “that sort of people” you were referring to). What am I missing here, GrotesqueSI?

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 19:59






              • 3





                (To be clear, I agree that including the other offer letter is a bad idea. Mentioning the offer itself may or may not be a good idea, depending on many specific details as discussed in Buffy’s answer. But the absolutist tone of this answer does not leave a good impression, especially item 1 as I said.)

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:03






              • 2





                You sound like a very sensible person and I generally like your answers a lot. This one seems off the mark. Ruling out candidates for committing a minor social faux pas (even assuming that the action we’re discussing is such a thing; if done correctly it doesn’t have to be) doesn’t sound wise or fair to me, nor does jumping to conclusions about someone’s character based on such tiny amounts of evidence.

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:23






              • 2





                @DanRomik People are generally on their best behaviour when applying for a job. If this is the OP's "best behaviour", it's hardly "jumping to conclusions" to consider how they might behave in "normal" situations, and betting with the odds is usually a good strategy. Recruitment isn't about looking for the ideal candidate (because with limited information you have no way to achieve that). It's about making the lowest-risk decision that someone is good enough.

                – alephzero
                Oct 14 at 22:17














              17














              17










              17









              To be blunt and clear, if anyone had done this on any of the previous hiring committees I have been on, we would have rejected them instantly. They would not have even been long-listed, let alone short listed. Having another job offer is not a reason for anyone to hire you. Indeed, it indicated a number of negative things:



              1. You are the sort of person who goes all the way through the process of getting one job but still fishes around for something "better": read, you waste everyone's time

              2. If they do want you, you are likely to try to pull off some sort of bidding war for you, increasing your package etc. That's annoying to everyone.

              3. You are implying that the research group you have a PostDoc offer from is somehow better than the place you are looking for a Faculty Position from. Like some temporary position is as good as a tenure track one. Ouch!

              4. You are lacking in subtlety, diplomacy, and general workplace etiquette.

              Basically, don't do this. It is a very bad idea.






              share|improve this answer














              To be blunt and clear, if anyone had done this on any of the previous hiring committees I have been on, we would have rejected them instantly. They would not have even been long-listed, let alone short listed. Having another job offer is not a reason for anyone to hire you. Indeed, it indicated a number of negative things:



              1. You are the sort of person who goes all the way through the process of getting one job but still fishes around for something "better": read, you waste everyone's time

              2. If they do want you, you are likely to try to pull off some sort of bidding war for you, increasing your package etc. That's annoying to everyone.

              3. You are implying that the research group you have a PostDoc offer from is somehow better than the place you are looking for a Faculty Position from. Like some temporary position is as good as a tenure track one. Ouch!

              4. You are lacking in subtlety, diplomacy, and general workplace etiquette.

              Basically, don't do this. It is a very bad idea.







              share|improve this answer













              share|improve this answer




              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 14 at 18:15









              GrotesqueSIGrotesqueSI

              3,4456 silver badges30 bronze badges




              3,4456 silver badges30 bronze badges










              • 3





                This actually happened during my first hiring committee experience: An otherwise impressive application has a competing job offer attached to the cover letter. All the senior people in the committee completely ignored the application. When I voiced my support for this candidate, I was given the "are you stupid look".

                – ssquidd
                Oct 14 at 19:09






              • 12





                This is a rather extreme answer. Particularly item 1, which sounds very unreasonable. Really, it is wrong to simultaneously apply to multiple positions and not jump on the first offer that comes along (especially for a postdoc when you were hoping for an assistant professorship) but hope to get additional offers and do whatever you need to to maximize your chances? That’s news to me and everyone I know (but maybe we’re all “that sort of people” you were referring to). What am I missing here, GrotesqueSI?

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 19:59






              • 3





                (To be clear, I agree that including the other offer letter is a bad idea. Mentioning the offer itself may or may not be a good idea, depending on many specific details as discussed in Buffy’s answer. But the absolutist tone of this answer does not leave a good impression, especially item 1 as I said.)

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:03






              • 2





                You sound like a very sensible person and I generally like your answers a lot. This one seems off the mark. Ruling out candidates for committing a minor social faux pas (even assuming that the action we’re discussing is such a thing; if done correctly it doesn’t have to be) doesn’t sound wise or fair to me, nor does jumping to conclusions about someone’s character based on such tiny amounts of evidence.

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:23






              • 2





                @DanRomik People are generally on their best behaviour when applying for a job. If this is the OP's "best behaviour", it's hardly "jumping to conclusions" to consider how they might behave in "normal" situations, and betting with the odds is usually a good strategy. Recruitment isn't about looking for the ideal candidate (because with limited information you have no way to achieve that). It's about making the lowest-risk decision that someone is good enough.

                – alephzero
                Oct 14 at 22:17













              • 3





                This actually happened during my first hiring committee experience: An otherwise impressive application has a competing job offer attached to the cover letter. All the senior people in the committee completely ignored the application. When I voiced my support for this candidate, I was given the "are you stupid look".

                – ssquidd
                Oct 14 at 19:09






              • 12





                This is a rather extreme answer. Particularly item 1, which sounds very unreasonable. Really, it is wrong to simultaneously apply to multiple positions and not jump on the first offer that comes along (especially for a postdoc when you were hoping for an assistant professorship) but hope to get additional offers and do whatever you need to to maximize your chances? That’s news to me and everyone I know (but maybe we’re all “that sort of people” you were referring to). What am I missing here, GrotesqueSI?

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 19:59






              • 3





                (To be clear, I agree that including the other offer letter is a bad idea. Mentioning the offer itself may or may not be a good idea, depending on many specific details as discussed in Buffy’s answer. But the absolutist tone of this answer does not leave a good impression, especially item 1 as I said.)

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:03






              • 2





                You sound like a very sensible person and I generally like your answers a lot. This one seems off the mark. Ruling out candidates for committing a minor social faux pas (even assuming that the action we’re discussing is such a thing; if done correctly it doesn’t have to be) doesn’t sound wise or fair to me, nor does jumping to conclusions about someone’s character based on such tiny amounts of evidence.

                – Dan Romik
                Oct 14 at 20:23






              • 2





                @DanRomik People are generally on their best behaviour when applying for a job. If this is the OP's "best behaviour", it's hardly "jumping to conclusions" to consider how they might behave in "normal" situations, and betting with the odds is usually a good strategy. Recruitment isn't about looking for the ideal candidate (because with limited information you have no way to achieve that). It's about making the lowest-risk decision that someone is good enough.

                – alephzero
                Oct 14 at 22:17








              3




              3





              This actually happened during my first hiring committee experience: An otherwise impressive application has a competing job offer attached to the cover letter. All the senior people in the committee completely ignored the application. When I voiced my support for this candidate, I was given the "are you stupid look".

              – ssquidd
              Oct 14 at 19:09





              This actually happened during my first hiring committee experience: An otherwise impressive application has a competing job offer attached to the cover letter. All the senior people in the committee completely ignored the application. When I voiced my support for this candidate, I was given the "are you stupid look".

              – ssquidd
              Oct 14 at 19:09




              12




              12





              This is a rather extreme answer. Particularly item 1, which sounds very unreasonable. Really, it is wrong to simultaneously apply to multiple positions and not jump on the first offer that comes along (especially for a postdoc when you were hoping for an assistant professorship) but hope to get additional offers and do whatever you need to to maximize your chances? That’s news to me and everyone I know (but maybe we’re all “that sort of people” you were referring to). What am I missing here, GrotesqueSI?

              – Dan Romik
              Oct 14 at 19:59





              This is a rather extreme answer. Particularly item 1, which sounds very unreasonable. Really, it is wrong to simultaneously apply to multiple positions and not jump on the first offer that comes along (especially for a postdoc when you were hoping for an assistant professorship) but hope to get additional offers and do whatever you need to to maximize your chances? That’s news to me and everyone I know (but maybe we’re all “that sort of people” you were referring to). What am I missing here, GrotesqueSI?

              – Dan Romik
              Oct 14 at 19:59




              3




              3





              (To be clear, I agree that including the other offer letter is a bad idea. Mentioning the offer itself may or may not be a good idea, depending on many specific details as discussed in Buffy’s answer. But the absolutist tone of this answer does not leave a good impression, especially item 1 as I said.)

              – Dan Romik
              Oct 14 at 20:03





              (To be clear, I agree that including the other offer letter is a bad idea. Mentioning the offer itself may or may not be a good idea, depending on many specific details as discussed in Buffy’s answer. But the absolutist tone of this answer does not leave a good impression, especially item 1 as I said.)

              – Dan Romik
              Oct 14 at 20:03




              2




              2





              You sound like a very sensible person and I generally like your answers a lot. This one seems off the mark. Ruling out candidates for committing a minor social faux pas (even assuming that the action we’re discussing is such a thing; if done correctly it doesn’t have to be) doesn’t sound wise or fair to me, nor does jumping to conclusions about someone’s character based on such tiny amounts of evidence.

              – Dan Romik
              Oct 14 at 20:23





              You sound like a very sensible person and I generally like your answers a lot. This one seems off the mark. Ruling out candidates for committing a minor social faux pas (even assuming that the action we’re discussing is such a thing; if done correctly it doesn’t have to be) doesn’t sound wise or fair to me, nor does jumping to conclusions about someone’s character based on such tiny amounts of evidence.

              – Dan Romik
              Oct 14 at 20:23




              2




              2





              @DanRomik People are generally on their best behaviour when applying for a job. If this is the OP's "best behaviour", it's hardly "jumping to conclusions" to consider how they might behave in "normal" situations, and betting with the odds is usually a good strategy. Recruitment isn't about looking for the ideal candidate (because with limited information you have no way to achieve that). It's about making the lowest-risk decision that someone is good enough.

              – alephzero
              Oct 14 at 22:17






              @DanRomik People are generally on their best behaviour when applying for a job. If this is the OP's "best behaviour", it's hardly "jumping to conclusions" to consider how they might behave in "normal" situations, and betting with the odds is usually a good strategy. Recruitment isn't about looking for the ideal candidate (because with limited information you have no way to achieve that). It's about making the lowest-risk decision that someone is good enough.

              – alephzero
              Oct 14 at 22:17












              -1


















              You do not show a letter addressed to you personally to other people without the sender`s consent.
              Never, unless you get a formal court order to do so.






              share|improve this answer






























                -1


















                You do not show a letter addressed to you personally to other people without the sender`s consent.
                Never, unless you get a formal court order to do so.






                share|improve this answer




























                  -1














                  -1










                  -1









                  You do not show a letter addressed to you personally to other people without the sender`s consent.
                  Never, unless you get a formal court order to do so.






                  share|improve this answer














                  You do not show a letter addressed to you personally to other people without the sender`s consent.
                  Never, unless you get a formal court order to do so.







                  share|improve this answer













                  share|improve this answer




                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Oct 17 at 23:23









                  KarlKarl

                  1,3935 silver badges14 bronze badges




                  1,3935 silver badges14 bronze badges































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138489%2fshould-i-include-offer-letter-from-a-different-institution-in-my-application-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown









                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Ласкавець круглолистий Зміст Опис | Поширення | Галерея | Примітки | Посилання | Навігаційне меню58171138361-22960890446Bupleurum rotundifoliumEuro+Med PlantbasePlants of the World Online — Kew ScienceGermplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN)Ласкавецькн. VI : Літери Ком — Левиправивши або дописавши її