Masyu keep making those 3D puzzles?Can you solve this masyu puzzle?A Total Masyu puzzleMasyu jigsaw puzzleMasyu puzzles with many circlesI'm Bad at Naming Things, so Just Try to Solve this Patterned Masyu Puzzle!IBaNTsJTtStPMP! #2Brain-breaking 3D masyuVolcanic 3D masyuMixed-breeds are puzzles too!Double feature: Russian desman
"bees" -> "hive" in 5 letter changes or fewer
How would a young girl/boy (about 14) who never gets old survive in the 16th century?
Left a meeting without apparent reason. What to do?
Order of the products of two order-2 elements in a finite group
Why did quill pens persist until the early 19th century despite the capacity to make metal dip pens?
Reviewer wants me to do massive amount of work, the result would be a different article. Should I tell that to the editor?
Write a bot to play Grid Game
What is this aluminum plate that started rattling inside my Ksyrium rims?
Implementing simplified Jaipur board game
What are the applications of the Mean Value Theorem?
Why are Poisson regression coefficients biased?
draw table with tikz matrix line shift a little bit
Why do some PCBs have the courtyard in the silkscreen layer?
How to initiate a conversation with a person who recently had transition but you were not in touch with them?
What are the practical differences between the exposure settings my camera picked for me in auto mode and my own choices?
Why combine commands on a single line in a Bash script?
Are there any real life instances of aircraft aborting a landing to avoid a vehicle?
Should I correct a mistake on an arXiv manuscript, that I found while refereeing it?
Asking an academic for a cursory look at a paper
Used to Stop a Fight?
Is it possible to build an escalator without iron, with 16th century technology?
Why does Thorin tell Bilbo that he has "keen eyes"?
Is it likely that my lack of post-secondary education is holding my resume back?
What are the benefits of linearization?
Masyu keep making those 3D puzzles?
Can you solve this masyu puzzle?A Total Masyu puzzleMasyu jigsaw puzzleMasyu puzzles with many circlesI'm Bad at Naming Things, so Just Try to Solve this Patterned Masyu Puzzle!IBaNTsJTtStPMP! #2Brain-breaking 3D masyuVolcanic 3D masyuMixed-breeds are puzzles too!Double feature: Russian desman
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty
margin-bottom:0;
.everyonelovesstackoverflowposition:absolute;height:1px;width:1px;opacity:0;top:0;left:0;pointer-events:none;
$begingroup$
This is a three-dimensional Masyu puzzle. The five squares depict the layers of a $5times5times5$ cube. The goal is to make a single loop in 3D space which fulfills the following properties:
- The line passes through centres of cells and makes 90-degree turns only.
- The line cannot cross itself or branch off in multiple directions.
- The line passes through every white and black circle.
- When passing through a white circle, the line must go straight through the circled cell and make a turn directly before or after that cell (or both).
- When passing through a black circle, the line must make a turn in the circled cell and continue straight through at least one cell on both sides.
Note: Feel free to use any notation you feel the most comfortable with, as long as it's properly explained. My way is to use diagonal lines to show movement between layers.
grid-deduction three-dimensional masyu
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This is a three-dimensional Masyu puzzle. The five squares depict the layers of a $5times5times5$ cube. The goal is to make a single loop in 3D space which fulfills the following properties:
- The line passes through centres of cells and makes 90-degree turns only.
- The line cannot cross itself or branch off in multiple directions.
- The line passes through every white and black circle.
- When passing through a white circle, the line must go straight through the circled cell and make a turn directly before or after that cell (or both).
- When passing through a black circle, the line must make a turn in the circled cell and continue straight through at least one cell on both sides.
Note: Feel free to use any notation you feel the most comfortable with, as long as it's properly explained. My way is to use diagonal lines to show movement between layers.
grid-deduction three-dimensional masyu
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
May I suggest "through" rather than "for" in the last bullet point? I think that makes it harder to misinterpret.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 13:02
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Edited. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
A ray-traced solution would be awesome.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Mathias
Oct 14 at 13:09
$begingroup$
I've experimented a little with ray-tracing and it's less good than you'd think. Unless you also have the ability to spin things around in 3D etc., it's hard to see what's going on.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 15:23
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This is a three-dimensional Masyu puzzle. The five squares depict the layers of a $5times5times5$ cube. The goal is to make a single loop in 3D space which fulfills the following properties:
- The line passes through centres of cells and makes 90-degree turns only.
- The line cannot cross itself or branch off in multiple directions.
- The line passes through every white and black circle.
- When passing through a white circle, the line must go straight through the circled cell and make a turn directly before or after that cell (or both).
- When passing through a black circle, the line must make a turn in the circled cell and continue straight through at least one cell on both sides.
Note: Feel free to use any notation you feel the most comfortable with, as long as it's properly explained. My way is to use diagonal lines to show movement between layers.
grid-deduction three-dimensional masyu
$endgroup$
This is a three-dimensional Masyu puzzle. The five squares depict the layers of a $5times5times5$ cube. The goal is to make a single loop in 3D space which fulfills the following properties:
- The line passes through centres of cells and makes 90-degree turns only.
- The line cannot cross itself or branch off in multiple directions.
- The line passes through every white and black circle.
- When passing through a white circle, the line must go straight through the circled cell and make a turn directly before or after that cell (or both).
- When passing through a black circle, the line must make a turn in the circled cell and continue straight through at least one cell on both sides.
Note: Feel free to use any notation you feel the most comfortable with, as long as it's properly explained. My way is to use diagonal lines to show movement between layers.
grid-deduction three-dimensional masyu
grid-deduction three-dimensional masyu
edited Oct 14 at 13:02
jafe
asked Oct 14 at 12:28
jafejafe
37k6 gold badges102 silver badges366 bronze badges
37k6 gold badges102 silver badges366 bronze badges
$begingroup$
May I suggest "through" rather than "for" in the last bullet point? I think that makes it harder to misinterpret.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 13:02
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Edited. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
A ray-traced solution would be awesome.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Mathias
Oct 14 at 13:09
$begingroup$
I've experimented a little with ray-tracing and it's less good than you'd think. Unless you also have the ability to spin things around in 3D etc., it's hard to see what's going on.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 15:23
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
May I suggest "through" rather than "for" in the last bullet point? I think that makes it harder to misinterpret.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 13:02
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Edited. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
A ray-traced solution would be awesome.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Mathias
Oct 14 at 13:09
$begingroup$
I've experimented a little with ray-tracing and it's less good than you'd think. Unless you also have the ability to spin things around in 3D etc., it's hard to see what's going on.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 15:23
$begingroup$
May I suggest "through" rather than "for" in the last bullet point? I think that makes it harder to misinterpret.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 13:02
$begingroup$
May I suggest "through" rather than "for" in the last bullet point? I think that makes it harder to misinterpret.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 13:02
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Edited. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 13:03
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Edited. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 13:03
1
1
$begingroup$
A ray-traced solution would be awesome.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Mathias
Oct 14 at 13:09
$begingroup$
A ray-traced solution would be awesome.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Mathias
Oct 14 at 13:09
$begingroup$
I've experimented a little with ray-tracing and it's less good than you'd think. Unless you also have the ability to spin things around in 3D etc., it's hard to see what's going on.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 15:23
$begingroup$
I've experimented a little with ray-tracing and it's less good than you'd think. Unless you also have the ability to spin things around in 3D etc., it's hard to see what's going on.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 15:23
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Solved! I use X, Y, and Z as axes to describe my logic.
White circles along edges have only one possibility:
Then the line through white circles in the bottom right of #2 must be in Z; if they were in Y, the black circle in (5,4) of #1 would be X and Y, leaving the white circle in (4,5) of #1 with nowhere to go. This forces a turn in (5,5) of #4, which means that (5,5) of #5 does not turn Z. A few other simple deductions later:
The black circle in (2,1) of #1 can't be Y and Z, as then the white circle in (2,2) of #2 would have nowhere to go. It also can't be X and Y, as then there would be a Y line through (2,2) of #2, which would have nowhere to go from (2,1) of #2. Thus it's X and Z.
The black circle in (1,3) of #3 only has two legal directions left. This forces (1,1) of #5. We then note that the white circle in (2,3) of #2 must be in X. A few more simple deductions:
A line in Z from the black circle in (2,4) of #5 would end up stranded, so that black dot is in X and Y. The line must turn in (1,5) of #2 - it's gone through two white circles. A colour-coded image at this point, showing the paths so we don't get separate loops:
The most obvious deduction at this point is that (5,4) of #3 can't go down. That swiftly brings us to our conclusion!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Looks correct. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 15:24
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f90173%2fmasyu-keep-making-those-3d-puzzles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Solved! I use X, Y, and Z as axes to describe my logic.
White circles along edges have only one possibility:
Then the line through white circles in the bottom right of #2 must be in Z; if they were in Y, the black circle in (5,4) of #1 would be X and Y, leaving the white circle in (4,5) of #1 with nowhere to go. This forces a turn in (5,5) of #4, which means that (5,5) of #5 does not turn Z. A few other simple deductions later:
The black circle in (2,1) of #1 can't be Y and Z, as then the white circle in (2,2) of #2 would have nowhere to go. It also can't be X and Y, as then there would be a Y line through (2,2) of #2, which would have nowhere to go from (2,1) of #2. Thus it's X and Z.
The black circle in (1,3) of #3 only has two legal directions left. This forces (1,1) of #5. We then note that the white circle in (2,3) of #2 must be in X. A few more simple deductions:
A line in Z from the black circle in (2,4) of #5 would end up stranded, so that black dot is in X and Y. The line must turn in (1,5) of #2 - it's gone through two white circles. A colour-coded image at this point, showing the paths so we don't get separate loops:
The most obvious deduction at this point is that (5,4) of #3 can't go down. That swiftly brings us to our conclusion!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Looks correct. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 15:24
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Solved! I use X, Y, and Z as axes to describe my logic.
White circles along edges have only one possibility:
Then the line through white circles in the bottom right of #2 must be in Z; if they were in Y, the black circle in (5,4) of #1 would be X and Y, leaving the white circle in (4,5) of #1 with nowhere to go. This forces a turn in (5,5) of #4, which means that (5,5) of #5 does not turn Z. A few other simple deductions later:
The black circle in (2,1) of #1 can't be Y and Z, as then the white circle in (2,2) of #2 would have nowhere to go. It also can't be X and Y, as then there would be a Y line through (2,2) of #2, which would have nowhere to go from (2,1) of #2. Thus it's X and Z.
The black circle in (1,3) of #3 only has two legal directions left. This forces (1,1) of #5. We then note that the white circle in (2,3) of #2 must be in X. A few more simple deductions:
A line in Z from the black circle in (2,4) of #5 would end up stranded, so that black dot is in X and Y. The line must turn in (1,5) of #2 - it's gone through two white circles. A colour-coded image at this point, showing the paths so we don't get separate loops:
The most obvious deduction at this point is that (5,4) of #3 can't go down. That swiftly brings us to our conclusion!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Looks correct. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 15:24
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Solved! I use X, Y, and Z as axes to describe my logic.
White circles along edges have only one possibility:
Then the line through white circles in the bottom right of #2 must be in Z; if they were in Y, the black circle in (5,4) of #1 would be X and Y, leaving the white circle in (4,5) of #1 with nowhere to go. This forces a turn in (5,5) of #4, which means that (5,5) of #5 does not turn Z. A few other simple deductions later:
The black circle in (2,1) of #1 can't be Y and Z, as then the white circle in (2,2) of #2 would have nowhere to go. It also can't be X and Y, as then there would be a Y line through (2,2) of #2, which would have nowhere to go from (2,1) of #2. Thus it's X and Z.
The black circle in (1,3) of #3 only has two legal directions left. This forces (1,1) of #5. We then note that the white circle in (2,3) of #2 must be in X. A few more simple deductions:
A line in Z from the black circle in (2,4) of #5 would end up stranded, so that black dot is in X and Y. The line must turn in (1,5) of #2 - it's gone through two white circles. A colour-coded image at this point, showing the paths so we don't get separate loops:
The most obvious deduction at this point is that (5,4) of #3 can't go down. That swiftly brings us to our conclusion!
$endgroup$
Solved! I use X, Y, and Z as axes to describe my logic.
White circles along edges have only one possibility:
Then the line through white circles in the bottom right of #2 must be in Z; if they were in Y, the black circle in (5,4) of #1 would be X and Y, leaving the white circle in (4,5) of #1 with nowhere to go. This forces a turn in (5,5) of #4, which means that (5,5) of #5 does not turn Z. A few other simple deductions later:
The black circle in (2,1) of #1 can't be Y and Z, as then the white circle in (2,2) of #2 would have nowhere to go. It also can't be X and Y, as then there would be a Y line through (2,2) of #2, which would have nowhere to go from (2,1) of #2. Thus it's X and Z.
The black circle in (1,3) of #3 only has two legal directions left. This forces (1,1) of #5. We then note that the white circle in (2,3) of #2 must be in X. A few more simple deductions:
A line in Z from the black circle in (2,4) of #5 would end up stranded, so that black dot is in X and Y. The line must turn in (1,5) of #2 - it's gone through two white circles. A colour-coded image at this point, showing the paths so we don't get separate loops:
The most obvious deduction at this point is that (5,4) of #3 can't go down. That swiftly brings us to our conclusion!
answered Oct 14 at 14:08
SpitemasterSpitemaster
4231 silver badge8 bronze badges
4231 silver badge8 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Looks correct. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 15:24
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Looks correct. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Looks correct. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 15:24
$begingroup$
Looks correct. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 15:24
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f90173%2fmasyu-keep-making-those-3d-puzzles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
May I suggest "through" rather than "for" in the last bullet point? I think that makes it harder to misinterpret.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 13:02
$begingroup$
@GarethMcCaughan Edited. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– jafe
Oct 14 at 13:03
1
$begingroup$
A ray-traced solution would be awesome.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Mathias
Oct 14 at 13:09
$begingroup$
I've experimented a little with ray-tracing and it's less good than you'd think. Unless you also have the ability to spin things around in 3D etc., it's hard to see what's going on.
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
Oct 14 at 15:23