Weird behaviour when using querySelectorWhen are you supposed to use escape instead of encodeURI / encodeURIComponent?When to use double or single quotes in JavaScript?How to execute a JavaScript function when I have its name as a stringChange the selected value of a drop-down list with jQueryWhat is the purpose of the var keyword and when should I use it (or omit it)?How to decide when to use Node.js?What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the 'Wat' talk for CodeMash 2012?Get current applied style with JSRunning JavaScript function to gives “Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token }”Accessing elements from HTML in JavaScript

How to create a consistent feel for character names in a fantasy setting?

How can I add custom success page

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

What to wear for invited talk in Canada

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Does bootstrapped regression allow for inference?

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

"My colleague's body is amazing"

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

aging parents with no investments

What does "enim et" mean?

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?

Piano - What is the notation for a double stop where both notes in the double stop are different lengths?

LWC and complex parameters

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

Ideas for 3rd eye abilities



Weird behaviour when using querySelector


When are you supposed to use escape instead of encodeURI / encodeURIComponent?When to use double or single quotes in JavaScript?How to execute a JavaScript function when I have its name as a stringChange the selected value of a drop-down list with jQueryWhat is the purpose of the var keyword and when should I use it (or omit it)?How to decide when to use Node.js?What is the explanation for these bizarre JavaScript behaviours mentioned in the 'Wat' talk for CodeMash 2012?Get current applied style with JSRunning JavaScript function to gives “Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token }”Accessing elements from HTML in JavaScript






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








22















As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

<div>
<div>
<div id="test">
<div>
<div>
This is content
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>





As you can see, the first few results is the same.
This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?










share|improve this question






























    22















    As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



    However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






    const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
    console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

    <div>
    <div>
    <div id="test">
    <div>
    <div>
    This is content
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>





    As you can see, the first few results is the same.
    This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?










    share|improve this question


























      22












      22








      22


      2






      As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



      However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>





      As you can see, the first few results is the same.
      This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?










      share|improve this question
















      As my understanding, when using element.querySelector(), the query should be start on particular element.



      However, when I run using code below, it keep selected the first DIV tag in particular element.






      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>





      As you can see, the first few results is the same.
      This this a bug? Or it will query from start of the document?






      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>





      const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div').innerHTML);
      console.log(rootDiv.querySelector('div > div > div > div > div').innerHTML);

      <div>
      <div>
      <div id="test">
      <div>
      <div>
      This is content
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>
      </div>






      javascript






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 16 hours ago









      Abana Clara

      1,6651020




      1,6651020










      asked 17 hours ago









      Joey ChongJoey Chong

      1,0371016




      1,0371016






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          22














          What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



          So:



          someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


          is like



          [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
          .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


          A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






          const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
          alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
          alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
          alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

          <div>
          <div>
          <div id="test">
          <div>
          <div>
          This is content
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>





          :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Neat trick! Thanks!

            – Tico
            17 hours ago











          • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

            – Joey Chong
            17 hours ago












          • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

            – Cristian Traìna
            17 hours ago











          • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

            – Cristian Traìna
            17 hours ago












          • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

            – Falco
            14 hours ago


















          5














          The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



          Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



          The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



          If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



          const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, 
          NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
          acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
          );
          return walker.nextNode();





          const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
          console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

          function querySelector(element, selector)
          const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
          NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,

          acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
          );
          return walker.nextNode();
          ;

          <div>
          <div>
          <div id="test">
          <div>
          <div>
          This is content
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>
          </div>





          With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



          You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






          const div = document.createElement('div');
          div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

          console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
          console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





          In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






          share|improve this answer























          • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

            – Falco
            11 hours ago


















          1














          The query selector div > div > div only means:



          Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



          And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



          The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568211%2fweird-behaviour-when-using-queryselector%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            22














            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              17 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              17 hours ago












            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago












            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              14 hours ago















            22














            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              17 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              17 hours ago












            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago












            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              14 hours ago













            22












            22








            22







            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            share|improve this answer















            What querySelector does is it finds an element somewhere in the document that matches the CSS selector passed, and then checks that the found element is a descendant of the element you called querySelector on. It doesn't start at the element it was called on and search downwards - rather, it always starts at the document level, looks for elements that match the selector, and checks that the element is also a descendant of the calling context element. It's a bit unintuitive.



            So:



            someElement.querySelector(selectorStr)


            is like



            [...document.querySelectorAll(selectorStr)]
            .find(elm => someElement.contains(elm));


            A possible solution is to use :scope to indicate that you want the selection to start at the rootDiv, rather than at document:






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            :scope is supported in all modern browsers but Edge.






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div').innerHTML);
            alert(rootDiv.querySelector(':scope > div > div > div').innerHTML);

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 17 hours ago

























            answered 17 hours ago









            CertainPerformanceCertainPerformance

            98.3k165989




            98.3k165989












            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              17 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              17 hours ago












            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago












            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              14 hours ago

















            • Neat trick! Thanks!

              – Tico
              17 hours ago











            • :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

              – Joey Chong
              17 hours ago












            • :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago











            • Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

              – Cristian Traìna
              17 hours ago












            • Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

              – Falco
              14 hours ago
















            Neat trick! Thanks!

            – Tico
            17 hours ago





            Neat trick! Thanks!

            – Tico
            17 hours ago













            :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

            – Joey Chong
            17 hours ago






            :scope is not supported by all but most of the major browsers. Anyways, thank for explanation and this should be the answer. Thanks.

            – Joey Chong
            17 hours ago














            :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

            – Cristian Traìna
            17 hours ago





            :scope doesn't work with IE and Edge, I think it's important to point this out

            – Cristian Traìna
            17 hours ago













            Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

            – Cristian Traìna
            17 hours ago






            Here is the browser compatibility table - we have to resist just few months more since Edge is implementing Chromium engine :P

            – Cristian Traìna
            17 hours ago














            Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

            – Falco
            14 hours ago





            Do you have any sources for the browser engine actually working this way ? - The query would have the same result, if the engine would start with the first div and check if it matches the query selector...

            – Falco
            14 hours ago













            5














            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, 
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector)
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,

            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();
            ;

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            share|improve this answer























            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              11 hours ago















            5














            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, 
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector)
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,

            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();
            ;

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            share|improve this answer























            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              11 hours ago













            5












            5








            5







            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, 
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector)
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,

            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();
            ;

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            share|improve this answer













            The currently accepted answer somehow provides a valid logical explanation as to what happens, but they are factually wrong.



            Element.querySelector triggers the match a selector against tree algorithm, which goes from the root element and checks if its descendants do match the selector.



            The selector itself is absolute, it doesn't have any knowledge of a Document and doesn't even require that your Element be appended to any. And apart from the :scope attribute, it doesn't either care with which root you called the querySelector method.



            If we wanted to rewrite it ourselves, it would be more like



            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element, 
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,
            acceptNode: (node) => return node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector)
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,

            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();
            ;

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            With the big difference that this implementation doesn't support the special :scope selector.



            You may think it's the same going from the document or going from the root element, but not only will it make a difference in terms of performances, it will also allow for using this method while the element is not appended to any document.






            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            In the same way, matching elements in the Shadow-DOM would not be possible if we only had Document.querySelector.






            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector)
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,

            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();
            ;

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            const rootDiv = document.getElementById('test');
            console.log(querySelector(rootDiv, 'div>div').innerHTML);

            function querySelector(element, selector)
            const walker = document.createTreeWalker(element,
            NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,

            acceptNode: (node) => node.matches(selector) && NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT
            );
            return walker.nextNode();
            ;

            <div>
            <div>
            <div id="test">
            <div>
            <div>
            This is content
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>
            </div>





            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null





            const div = document.createElement('div');
            div.insertAdjacentHTML('beforeend', '<div id="test"><div class="bar"></div></div>')

            console.log(div.querySelector('div>.bar')); // found
            console.log(document.querySelector('div>.bar')); // null






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 12 hours ago









            KaiidoKaiido

            45.5k467108




            45.5k467108












            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              11 hours ago

















            • Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

              – Falco
              11 hours ago
















            Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

            – Falco
            11 hours ago





            Goood explanaition - especially the bit about Nodes not part of the document. This represents more clearly what the browser engine actually does.

            – Falco
            11 hours ago











            1














            The query selector div > div > div only means:



            Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



            And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



            The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






            share|improve this answer



























              1














              The query selector div > div > div only means:



              Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



              And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



              The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






              share|improve this answer

























                1












                1








                1







                The query selector div > div > div only means:



                Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



                And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



                The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.






                share|improve this answer













                The query selector div > div > div only means:



                Find a div which has a parent and a granparent which are both also a div.



                And if you start with the first child of test and check the selector, it is true. And this is the reason why only your last query selects the innermost div, since it has the first predicate (find a div with a great-great-grandparent-div) which is not fulfilled by the first child of test.



                The query-selector will only test descendants, but it will evaluate the expression in scope of the whole document. Just imagine a selector like checking properties of an element - even if you only view the child element, it is still the child of its parent.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 13 hours ago









                FalcoFalco

                2,8521620




                2,8521620



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55568211%2fweird-behaviour-when-using-queryselector%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                    Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                    Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367