What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?What is most time-efficient way to track portfolio asset allocation?Dollar-cost averaging: How often should one use it? What criteria to use when choosing stocks to apply it to?Stock Trade Transaction Fee - at what point is it worth itLump Sum Investing vs. Dollar Cost Averaging (as a Long Term Investor)Can you have a positive return with a balance below cost basis?Does dollar cost averaging apply when moving investments between fund families?Dollar cost averaging - Should I still do it if I have a large pile of cash now?

Airline power sockets shut down when I plug my computer in. How can I avoid that?

Locked room poison mystery!

Units of measurement, especially length, when body parts vary in size among races

Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?

Is this bar slide trick shown on Cheers real or a visual effect?

How can I find files in directories listed in a file?

What allows us to use imaginary numbers?

How do figure out how powerful I am, when my abilities far exceed my knowledge?

What are the advantages of this gold finger shape?

When did Bilbo and Frodo learn that Gandalf was a Maia?

A man in the desert is bitten by a skeletal animal, its skull gets stuck on his arm

Will some rockets really collapse under their own weight?

How to programatically get all linked items for a given Sitecore item?

Scam? Phone call from "Department of Social Security" asking me to call back

What is the proper name for a circle with a line through it?

Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?

Solving pricing problem heuristically in column generation algorithm for VRP

A+ rating still unsecure by Google Chrome's opinion

Suspension compromise for urban use

Heyawake: An Introductory Puzzle

Why does this Jet Provost strikemaster have a textured leading edge?

Who is the controller of a Pacifism enchanting my creature?

What is the most difficult concept to grasp in Calculus 1?

How to measure if Scrum Master is making a difference and when to give up



What should I do with the stock I own if I anticipate there will be a recession?


What is most time-efficient way to track portfolio asset allocation?Dollar-cost averaging: How often should one use it? What criteria to use when choosing stocks to apply it to?Stock Trade Transaction Fee - at what point is it worth itLump Sum Investing vs. Dollar Cost Averaging (as a Long Term Investor)Can you have a positive return with a balance below cost basis?Does dollar cost averaging apply when moving investments between fund families?Dollar cost averaging - Should I still do it if I have a large pile of cash now?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I want to preface this with saying I am not asking if there will be a recession because I recognize that this is impossible to answer. I am asking if I feel there will be a recession, what should I do with the stock I own?



I recognize this answer might be different for different kind of stocks, so I am specifically asking for mutual funds/ETFs that basically follow the health of the US stock market that I know for certain would be negatively affected by a recession.



I am usually inclined to ignore day-to-day movements of lets say, FXAIX as I don't follow it stringently enough to accurately day trade because I just dollar cost average each month (buying the same value of stock, taking advantage of buying more partial shares if the price drops).



This approach doesn't involve selling really, so I don't normally sell shares. My question is: is this a bad idea? If I anticipate a recession, should I sell the stock I have and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?










share|improve this question


























  • How old are you? What is the purpose of this stock?

    – RonJohn
    11 hours ago











  • @RonJohn I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years

    – KingG0at
    10 hours ago

















2















I want to preface this with saying I am not asking if there will be a recession because I recognize that this is impossible to answer. I am asking if I feel there will be a recession, what should I do with the stock I own?



I recognize this answer might be different for different kind of stocks, so I am specifically asking for mutual funds/ETFs that basically follow the health of the US stock market that I know for certain would be negatively affected by a recession.



I am usually inclined to ignore day-to-day movements of lets say, FXAIX as I don't follow it stringently enough to accurately day trade because I just dollar cost average each month (buying the same value of stock, taking advantage of buying more partial shares if the price drops).



This approach doesn't involve selling really, so I don't normally sell shares. My question is: is this a bad idea? If I anticipate a recession, should I sell the stock I have and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?










share|improve this question


























  • How old are you? What is the purpose of this stock?

    – RonJohn
    11 hours ago











  • @RonJohn I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years

    – KingG0at
    10 hours ago













2












2








2


1






I want to preface this with saying I am not asking if there will be a recession because I recognize that this is impossible to answer. I am asking if I feel there will be a recession, what should I do with the stock I own?



I recognize this answer might be different for different kind of stocks, so I am specifically asking for mutual funds/ETFs that basically follow the health of the US stock market that I know for certain would be negatively affected by a recession.



I am usually inclined to ignore day-to-day movements of lets say, FXAIX as I don't follow it stringently enough to accurately day trade because I just dollar cost average each month (buying the same value of stock, taking advantage of buying more partial shares if the price drops).



This approach doesn't involve selling really, so I don't normally sell shares. My question is: is this a bad idea? If I anticipate a recession, should I sell the stock I have and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?










share|improve this question
















I want to preface this with saying I am not asking if there will be a recession because I recognize that this is impossible to answer. I am asking if I feel there will be a recession, what should I do with the stock I own?



I recognize this answer might be different for different kind of stocks, so I am specifically asking for mutual funds/ETFs that basically follow the health of the US stock market that I know for certain would be negatively affected by a recession.



I am usually inclined to ignore day-to-day movements of lets say, FXAIX as I don't follow it stringently enough to accurately day trade because I just dollar cost average each month (buying the same value of stock, taking advantage of buying more partial shares if the price drops).



This approach doesn't involve selling really, so I don't normally sell shares. My question is: is this a bad idea? If I anticipate a recession, should I sell the stock I have and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?







stocks mutual-funds stock-markets dollar-cost-averaging recession






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago









Bob Baerker

25.5k3 gold badges38 silver badges65 bronze badges




25.5k3 gold badges38 silver badges65 bronze badges










asked 12 hours ago









KingG0atKingG0at

2711 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges




2711 gold badge2 silver badges7 bronze badges















  • How old are you? What is the purpose of this stock?

    – RonJohn
    11 hours ago











  • @RonJohn I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years

    – KingG0at
    10 hours ago

















  • How old are you? What is the purpose of this stock?

    – RonJohn
    11 hours ago











  • @RonJohn I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years

    – KingG0at
    10 hours ago
















How old are you? What is the purpose of this stock?

– RonJohn
11 hours ago





How old are you? What is the purpose of this stock?

– RonJohn
11 hours ago













@RonJohn I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years

– KingG0at
10 hours ago





@RonJohn I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years

– KingG0at
10 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6















If I anticipate a recession should I sell the stock I have,




That's market timing.




and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?




If you're investing for the long term, then the whole point of DCA -- the very definition -- is to keep on investing the same dollar amount no matter what the market does.



HOWEVER...



Your risk tolerance, goals and the time frame must be taken into consideration.



Putting 100% of your investments in a volatile fund like FXAIX is only considered a Good Idea if you're young and saving for the very long term.



Us older people have a lower risk tolerance and put more money in bonds and stocks with lower volatility.



Bottom line: balance your portfolio based upon your goals (and the plan you devise base on those goals), not upon your fears.






share|improve this answer

























  • I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years.

    – KingG0at
    10 hours ago











  • At 24 you are too young for retirement. Take the risk!

    – JonH
    2 hours ago











  • @JonH 20 years from now he'll only be 44. Unless his goal is FIRE, then he's thinking of some other use for the money.

    – RonJohn
    52 mins ago


















3














The answer to this question depends heavily on your ability to accurately predict a recession.



Hypothetically speaking, if you were 100% accurate with your prediction, the obvious choice would be to sell your stocks. You would avoid all of the downside, which would allow you to invest your money elsewhere and/or maximize your reentry when the market turns bullish again.



In reality, you can't make any stock market predication with 100% accuracy, so you need to decide whether or not timing the market is something you want to attempt. You'll want to consider your risk exposure, investment timeframe, and alternative investments.



Take the 2008 recession as an example. The market dropped nearly 60% from October 2007 highs down to February 2009 lows. As of today, the market is roughly 80% higher than the October highs and over 300% higher than the February 2009 lows. This provides a couple key insights:



  1. If you could've predicted the recession, you would have protected yourself from 60% downside.

  2. If you predicted the recession and the reversal off lows, your returns would be over 200% higher than if you had simply held through the recession.

  3. Long-term, both strategies (holding and selling) yielded profits.

The last consideration is what happens if your prediction is completely inaccurate. If you sell prematurely, you are limiting your upside. People have been talking about bear markets non-stop since 2010 and they've all been wrong so far. These predictions, if acted on, would've severely limited investor returns over the past decade.



Of course, if you expect a recession, you can hedge risk without being "all out." For example:



  1. Sell a portion of your stocks or a piece of your positions in certain stocks (i.e. 500 shares of a 1000 share position)

  2. Set tighter stops (or trailing stops) to limit your downside.





share|improve this answer
































    1














    If the market (and your stock) are going to drop significantly, it's a great idea to stop your DCA program. It's an even better idea to sell your stock.



    If you sell your stock, you're going to pay taxes on the gain unless it's a sheltered account. That's not a bad thing if the market drops ~50% as it did in 2000 and 2008.



    OTOH, if you sell your stock and it's just a small market correction, perhaps you pay some taxes and you definitely miss out to the upside until you realize that you were wrong and go back in.



    So effectively, you are asking us to tell you what's going to happen in the future so that we can answer your question: "Is this a bad idea?" No one knows that answer in advance. So you just have to pick your poison. Ride it out or protect your portfolio value.



    There are ways to hedge your position so that the market makes the decision for you but such hedging is beyond the scope of this limited space.






    share|improve this answer
































      1














      Remember the golden rule: Buy low, sell high.



      The reason everyone is afraid to give you the obvious advice is that they're afraid you won't do that. And on average, they're right as rain.



      What typically happens at this stage in the investment cycle (depression expected, but before its onset) is that people see a price fall in the TV news, and panic. They say "oh noes, this is the beginning of a recession, it's all down from here", and they bail out. And of course, the next day, the market goes back up and marches upward for another month, while they put nose-marks on the candy store's glass window. We don't want you to do that.



      On the other hand, if you really, really study market cycles, and you know exactly what the curves and indicators look like for the past 20 recessions, and you know all about the false indicators too... And you look at the market on a particularly high day and go "now's the time" and sell... That's more the way to do that thing.



      Then, you better know when to step back in, and that's a lot easier - everytime the TV news shows pictures of brokers jumping out of windows and Mad Max driving down Wall Street, buy.



      This is called "Wall Street having a 2-for-1 sale".



      It's still "timing the market", which is considered bad. But keep in mind it's considered bad for a reason; it is highly speculative, and brokers don't want to be sued by their clients for guessing wrong, a viewpoint always taken in 20/20 hindsight. To avoid that liability they created that old chestnut "don't try to time the market".



      Obviously, your friends who lost it all in the 2008 recession bailed out after the drop, but failed to buy back in at the bottom because they feared it would only go lower and lower forever, and were emotionally put off by the volatility: they became afraid of the market. They broke both rules: buy low, and sell high.






      share|improve this answer

























      • You're forgetting two other important factors: although selling low is bad, there is always a possibility - which is much higher during a recession - that stock you own will lose all value (if the company goes bankrupt). In that case you'd wish you sold it low! Second, I suspect most people who failed to buy back in at the bottom didn't just lose their confidence in the market - they simply lost all money they could invest in the market.

        – Denis
        2 hours ago




















      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6















      If I anticipate a recession should I sell the stock I have,




      That's market timing.




      and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?




      If you're investing for the long term, then the whole point of DCA -- the very definition -- is to keep on investing the same dollar amount no matter what the market does.



      HOWEVER...



      Your risk tolerance, goals and the time frame must be taken into consideration.



      Putting 100% of your investments in a volatile fund like FXAIX is only considered a Good Idea if you're young and saving for the very long term.



      Us older people have a lower risk tolerance and put more money in bonds and stocks with lower volatility.



      Bottom line: balance your portfolio based upon your goals (and the plan you devise base on those goals), not upon your fears.






      share|improve this answer

























      • I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years.

        – KingG0at
        10 hours ago











      • At 24 you are too young for retirement. Take the risk!

        – JonH
        2 hours ago











      • @JonH 20 years from now he'll only be 44. Unless his goal is FIRE, then he's thinking of some other use for the money.

        – RonJohn
        52 mins ago















      6















      If I anticipate a recession should I sell the stock I have,




      That's market timing.




      and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?




      If you're investing for the long term, then the whole point of DCA -- the very definition -- is to keep on investing the same dollar amount no matter what the market does.



      HOWEVER...



      Your risk tolerance, goals and the time frame must be taken into consideration.



      Putting 100% of your investments in a volatile fund like FXAIX is only considered a Good Idea if you're young and saving for the very long term.



      Us older people have a lower risk tolerance and put more money in bonds and stocks with lower volatility.



      Bottom line: balance your portfolio based upon your goals (and the plan you devise base on those goals), not upon your fears.






      share|improve this answer

























      • I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years.

        – KingG0at
        10 hours ago











      • At 24 you are too young for retirement. Take the risk!

        – JonH
        2 hours ago











      • @JonH 20 years from now he'll only be 44. Unless his goal is FIRE, then he's thinking of some other use for the money.

        – RonJohn
        52 mins ago













      6












      6








      6








      If I anticipate a recession should I sell the stock I have,




      That's market timing.




      and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?




      If you're investing for the long term, then the whole point of DCA -- the very definition -- is to keep on investing the same dollar amount no matter what the market does.



      HOWEVER...



      Your risk tolerance, goals and the time frame must be taken into consideration.



      Putting 100% of your investments in a volatile fund like FXAIX is only considered a Good Idea if you're young and saving for the very long term.



      Us older people have a lower risk tolerance and put more money in bonds and stocks with lower volatility.



      Bottom line: balance your portfolio based upon your goals (and the plan you devise base on those goals), not upon your fears.






      share|improve this answer














      If I anticipate a recession should I sell the stock I have,




      That's market timing.




      and then wait for everything to bottom out and then resume dollar-cost-averaging? Or should I just proceed as normal?




      If you're investing for the long term, then the whole point of DCA -- the very definition -- is to keep on investing the same dollar amount no matter what the market does.



      HOWEVER...



      Your risk tolerance, goals and the time frame must be taken into consideration.



      Putting 100% of your investments in a volatile fund like FXAIX is only considered a Good Idea if you're young and saving for the very long term.



      Us older people have a lower risk tolerance and put more money in bonds and stocks with lower volatility.



      Bottom line: balance your portfolio based upon your goals (and the plan you devise base on those goals), not upon your fears.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 11 hours ago









      RonJohnRonJohn

      19.8k6 gold badges39 silver badges77 bronze badges




      19.8k6 gold badges39 silver badges77 bronze badges















      • I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years.

        – KingG0at
        10 hours ago











      • At 24 you are too young for retirement. Take the risk!

        – JonH
        2 hours ago











      • @JonH 20 years from now he'll only be 44. Unless his goal is FIRE, then he's thinking of some other use for the money.

        – RonJohn
        52 mins ago

















      • I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years.

        – KingG0at
        10 hours ago











      • At 24 you are too young for retirement. Take the risk!

        – JonH
        2 hours ago











      • @JonH 20 years from now he'll only be 44. Unless his goal is FIRE, then he's thinking of some other use for the money.

        – RonJohn
        52 mins ago
















      I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years.

      – KingG0at
      10 hours ago





      I am 24 years old. I plan to be saving this money for at least 20 years.

      – KingG0at
      10 hours ago













      At 24 you are too young for retirement. Take the risk!

      – JonH
      2 hours ago





      At 24 you are too young for retirement. Take the risk!

      – JonH
      2 hours ago













      @JonH 20 years from now he'll only be 44. Unless his goal is FIRE, then he's thinking of some other use for the money.

      – RonJohn
      52 mins ago





      @JonH 20 years from now he'll only be 44. Unless his goal is FIRE, then he's thinking of some other use for the money.

      – RonJohn
      52 mins ago













      3














      The answer to this question depends heavily on your ability to accurately predict a recession.



      Hypothetically speaking, if you were 100% accurate with your prediction, the obvious choice would be to sell your stocks. You would avoid all of the downside, which would allow you to invest your money elsewhere and/or maximize your reentry when the market turns bullish again.



      In reality, you can't make any stock market predication with 100% accuracy, so you need to decide whether or not timing the market is something you want to attempt. You'll want to consider your risk exposure, investment timeframe, and alternative investments.



      Take the 2008 recession as an example. The market dropped nearly 60% from October 2007 highs down to February 2009 lows. As of today, the market is roughly 80% higher than the October highs and over 300% higher than the February 2009 lows. This provides a couple key insights:



      1. If you could've predicted the recession, you would have protected yourself from 60% downside.

      2. If you predicted the recession and the reversal off lows, your returns would be over 200% higher than if you had simply held through the recession.

      3. Long-term, both strategies (holding and selling) yielded profits.

      The last consideration is what happens if your prediction is completely inaccurate. If you sell prematurely, you are limiting your upside. People have been talking about bear markets non-stop since 2010 and they've all been wrong so far. These predictions, if acted on, would've severely limited investor returns over the past decade.



      Of course, if you expect a recession, you can hedge risk without being "all out." For example:



      1. Sell a portion of your stocks or a piece of your positions in certain stocks (i.e. 500 shares of a 1000 share position)

      2. Set tighter stops (or trailing stops) to limit your downside.





      share|improve this answer





























        3














        The answer to this question depends heavily on your ability to accurately predict a recession.



        Hypothetically speaking, if you were 100% accurate with your prediction, the obvious choice would be to sell your stocks. You would avoid all of the downside, which would allow you to invest your money elsewhere and/or maximize your reentry when the market turns bullish again.



        In reality, you can't make any stock market predication with 100% accuracy, so you need to decide whether or not timing the market is something you want to attempt. You'll want to consider your risk exposure, investment timeframe, and alternative investments.



        Take the 2008 recession as an example. The market dropped nearly 60% from October 2007 highs down to February 2009 lows. As of today, the market is roughly 80% higher than the October highs and over 300% higher than the February 2009 lows. This provides a couple key insights:



        1. If you could've predicted the recession, you would have protected yourself from 60% downside.

        2. If you predicted the recession and the reversal off lows, your returns would be over 200% higher than if you had simply held through the recession.

        3. Long-term, both strategies (holding and selling) yielded profits.

        The last consideration is what happens if your prediction is completely inaccurate. If you sell prematurely, you are limiting your upside. People have been talking about bear markets non-stop since 2010 and they've all been wrong so far. These predictions, if acted on, would've severely limited investor returns over the past decade.



        Of course, if you expect a recession, you can hedge risk without being "all out." For example:



        1. Sell a portion of your stocks or a piece of your positions in certain stocks (i.e. 500 shares of a 1000 share position)

        2. Set tighter stops (or trailing stops) to limit your downside.





        share|improve this answer



























          3












          3








          3







          The answer to this question depends heavily on your ability to accurately predict a recession.



          Hypothetically speaking, if you were 100% accurate with your prediction, the obvious choice would be to sell your stocks. You would avoid all of the downside, which would allow you to invest your money elsewhere and/or maximize your reentry when the market turns bullish again.



          In reality, you can't make any stock market predication with 100% accuracy, so you need to decide whether or not timing the market is something you want to attempt. You'll want to consider your risk exposure, investment timeframe, and alternative investments.



          Take the 2008 recession as an example. The market dropped nearly 60% from October 2007 highs down to February 2009 lows. As of today, the market is roughly 80% higher than the October highs and over 300% higher than the February 2009 lows. This provides a couple key insights:



          1. If you could've predicted the recession, you would have protected yourself from 60% downside.

          2. If you predicted the recession and the reversal off lows, your returns would be over 200% higher than if you had simply held through the recession.

          3. Long-term, both strategies (holding and selling) yielded profits.

          The last consideration is what happens if your prediction is completely inaccurate. If you sell prematurely, you are limiting your upside. People have been talking about bear markets non-stop since 2010 and they've all been wrong so far. These predictions, if acted on, would've severely limited investor returns over the past decade.



          Of course, if you expect a recession, you can hedge risk without being "all out." For example:



          1. Sell a portion of your stocks or a piece of your positions in certain stocks (i.e. 500 shares of a 1000 share position)

          2. Set tighter stops (or trailing stops) to limit your downside.





          share|improve this answer













          The answer to this question depends heavily on your ability to accurately predict a recession.



          Hypothetically speaking, if you were 100% accurate with your prediction, the obvious choice would be to sell your stocks. You would avoid all of the downside, which would allow you to invest your money elsewhere and/or maximize your reentry when the market turns bullish again.



          In reality, you can't make any stock market predication with 100% accuracy, so you need to decide whether or not timing the market is something you want to attempt. You'll want to consider your risk exposure, investment timeframe, and alternative investments.



          Take the 2008 recession as an example. The market dropped nearly 60% from October 2007 highs down to February 2009 lows. As of today, the market is roughly 80% higher than the October highs and over 300% higher than the February 2009 lows. This provides a couple key insights:



          1. If you could've predicted the recession, you would have protected yourself from 60% downside.

          2. If you predicted the recession and the reversal off lows, your returns would be over 200% higher than if you had simply held through the recession.

          3. Long-term, both strategies (holding and selling) yielded profits.

          The last consideration is what happens if your prediction is completely inaccurate. If you sell prematurely, you are limiting your upside. People have been talking about bear markets non-stop since 2010 and they've all been wrong so far. These predictions, if acted on, would've severely limited investor returns over the past decade.



          Of course, if you expect a recession, you can hedge risk without being "all out." For example:



          1. Sell a portion of your stocks or a piece of your positions in certain stocks (i.e. 500 shares of a 1000 share position)

          2. Set tighter stops (or trailing stops) to limit your downside.






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 11 hours ago









          daytraderdaytrader

          6661 silver badge6 bronze badges




          6661 silver badge6 bronze badges
























              1














              If the market (and your stock) are going to drop significantly, it's a great idea to stop your DCA program. It's an even better idea to sell your stock.



              If you sell your stock, you're going to pay taxes on the gain unless it's a sheltered account. That's not a bad thing if the market drops ~50% as it did in 2000 and 2008.



              OTOH, if you sell your stock and it's just a small market correction, perhaps you pay some taxes and you definitely miss out to the upside until you realize that you were wrong and go back in.



              So effectively, you are asking us to tell you what's going to happen in the future so that we can answer your question: "Is this a bad idea?" No one knows that answer in advance. So you just have to pick your poison. Ride it out or protect your portfolio value.



              There are ways to hedge your position so that the market makes the decision for you but such hedging is beyond the scope of this limited space.






              share|improve this answer





























                1














                If the market (and your stock) are going to drop significantly, it's a great idea to stop your DCA program. It's an even better idea to sell your stock.



                If you sell your stock, you're going to pay taxes on the gain unless it's a sheltered account. That's not a bad thing if the market drops ~50% as it did in 2000 and 2008.



                OTOH, if you sell your stock and it's just a small market correction, perhaps you pay some taxes and you definitely miss out to the upside until you realize that you were wrong and go back in.



                So effectively, you are asking us to tell you what's going to happen in the future so that we can answer your question: "Is this a bad idea?" No one knows that answer in advance. So you just have to pick your poison. Ride it out or protect your portfolio value.



                There are ways to hedge your position so that the market makes the decision for you but such hedging is beyond the scope of this limited space.






                share|improve this answer



























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  If the market (and your stock) are going to drop significantly, it's a great idea to stop your DCA program. It's an even better idea to sell your stock.



                  If you sell your stock, you're going to pay taxes on the gain unless it's a sheltered account. That's not a bad thing if the market drops ~50% as it did in 2000 and 2008.



                  OTOH, if you sell your stock and it's just a small market correction, perhaps you pay some taxes and you definitely miss out to the upside until you realize that you were wrong and go back in.



                  So effectively, you are asking us to tell you what's going to happen in the future so that we can answer your question: "Is this a bad idea?" No one knows that answer in advance. So you just have to pick your poison. Ride it out or protect your portfolio value.



                  There are ways to hedge your position so that the market makes the decision for you but such hedging is beyond the scope of this limited space.






                  share|improve this answer













                  If the market (and your stock) are going to drop significantly, it's a great idea to stop your DCA program. It's an even better idea to sell your stock.



                  If you sell your stock, you're going to pay taxes on the gain unless it's a sheltered account. That's not a bad thing if the market drops ~50% as it did in 2000 and 2008.



                  OTOH, if you sell your stock and it's just a small market correction, perhaps you pay some taxes and you definitely miss out to the upside until you realize that you were wrong and go back in.



                  So effectively, you are asking us to tell you what's going to happen in the future so that we can answer your question: "Is this a bad idea?" No one knows that answer in advance. So you just have to pick your poison. Ride it out or protect your portfolio value.



                  There are ways to hedge your position so that the market makes the decision for you but such hedging is beyond the scope of this limited space.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 10 hours ago









                  Bob BaerkerBob Baerker

                  25.5k3 gold badges38 silver badges65 bronze badges




                  25.5k3 gold badges38 silver badges65 bronze badges
























                      1














                      Remember the golden rule: Buy low, sell high.



                      The reason everyone is afraid to give you the obvious advice is that they're afraid you won't do that. And on average, they're right as rain.



                      What typically happens at this stage in the investment cycle (depression expected, but before its onset) is that people see a price fall in the TV news, and panic. They say "oh noes, this is the beginning of a recession, it's all down from here", and they bail out. And of course, the next day, the market goes back up and marches upward for another month, while they put nose-marks on the candy store's glass window. We don't want you to do that.



                      On the other hand, if you really, really study market cycles, and you know exactly what the curves and indicators look like for the past 20 recessions, and you know all about the false indicators too... And you look at the market on a particularly high day and go "now's the time" and sell... That's more the way to do that thing.



                      Then, you better know when to step back in, and that's a lot easier - everytime the TV news shows pictures of brokers jumping out of windows and Mad Max driving down Wall Street, buy.



                      This is called "Wall Street having a 2-for-1 sale".



                      It's still "timing the market", which is considered bad. But keep in mind it's considered bad for a reason; it is highly speculative, and brokers don't want to be sued by their clients for guessing wrong, a viewpoint always taken in 20/20 hindsight. To avoid that liability they created that old chestnut "don't try to time the market".



                      Obviously, your friends who lost it all in the 2008 recession bailed out after the drop, but failed to buy back in at the bottom because they feared it would only go lower and lower forever, and were emotionally put off by the volatility: they became afraid of the market. They broke both rules: buy low, and sell high.






                      share|improve this answer

























                      • You're forgetting two other important factors: although selling low is bad, there is always a possibility - which is much higher during a recession - that stock you own will lose all value (if the company goes bankrupt). In that case you'd wish you sold it low! Second, I suspect most people who failed to buy back in at the bottom didn't just lose their confidence in the market - they simply lost all money they could invest in the market.

                        – Denis
                        2 hours ago















                      1














                      Remember the golden rule: Buy low, sell high.



                      The reason everyone is afraid to give you the obvious advice is that they're afraid you won't do that. And on average, they're right as rain.



                      What typically happens at this stage in the investment cycle (depression expected, but before its onset) is that people see a price fall in the TV news, and panic. They say "oh noes, this is the beginning of a recession, it's all down from here", and they bail out. And of course, the next day, the market goes back up and marches upward for another month, while they put nose-marks on the candy store's glass window. We don't want you to do that.



                      On the other hand, if you really, really study market cycles, and you know exactly what the curves and indicators look like for the past 20 recessions, and you know all about the false indicators too... And you look at the market on a particularly high day and go "now's the time" and sell... That's more the way to do that thing.



                      Then, you better know when to step back in, and that's a lot easier - everytime the TV news shows pictures of brokers jumping out of windows and Mad Max driving down Wall Street, buy.



                      This is called "Wall Street having a 2-for-1 sale".



                      It's still "timing the market", which is considered bad. But keep in mind it's considered bad for a reason; it is highly speculative, and brokers don't want to be sued by their clients for guessing wrong, a viewpoint always taken in 20/20 hindsight. To avoid that liability they created that old chestnut "don't try to time the market".



                      Obviously, your friends who lost it all in the 2008 recession bailed out after the drop, but failed to buy back in at the bottom because they feared it would only go lower and lower forever, and were emotionally put off by the volatility: they became afraid of the market. They broke both rules: buy low, and sell high.






                      share|improve this answer

























                      • You're forgetting two other important factors: although selling low is bad, there is always a possibility - which is much higher during a recession - that stock you own will lose all value (if the company goes bankrupt). In that case you'd wish you sold it low! Second, I suspect most people who failed to buy back in at the bottom didn't just lose their confidence in the market - they simply lost all money they could invest in the market.

                        – Denis
                        2 hours ago













                      1












                      1








                      1







                      Remember the golden rule: Buy low, sell high.



                      The reason everyone is afraid to give you the obvious advice is that they're afraid you won't do that. And on average, they're right as rain.



                      What typically happens at this stage in the investment cycle (depression expected, but before its onset) is that people see a price fall in the TV news, and panic. They say "oh noes, this is the beginning of a recession, it's all down from here", and they bail out. And of course, the next day, the market goes back up and marches upward for another month, while they put nose-marks on the candy store's glass window. We don't want you to do that.



                      On the other hand, if you really, really study market cycles, and you know exactly what the curves and indicators look like for the past 20 recessions, and you know all about the false indicators too... And you look at the market on a particularly high day and go "now's the time" and sell... That's more the way to do that thing.



                      Then, you better know when to step back in, and that's a lot easier - everytime the TV news shows pictures of brokers jumping out of windows and Mad Max driving down Wall Street, buy.



                      This is called "Wall Street having a 2-for-1 sale".



                      It's still "timing the market", which is considered bad. But keep in mind it's considered bad for a reason; it is highly speculative, and brokers don't want to be sued by their clients for guessing wrong, a viewpoint always taken in 20/20 hindsight. To avoid that liability they created that old chestnut "don't try to time the market".



                      Obviously, your friends who lost it all in the 2008 recession bailed out after the drop, but failed to buy back in at the bottom because they feared it would only go lower and lower forever, and were emotionally put off by the volatility: they became afraid of the market. They broke both rules: buy low, and sell high.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Remember the golden rule: Buy low, sell high.



                      The reason everyone is afraid to give you the obvious advice is that they're afraid you won't do that. And on average, they're right as rain.



                      What typically happens at this stage in the investment cycle (depression expected, but before its onset) is that people see a price fall in the TV news, and panic. They say "oh noes, this is the beginning of a recession, it's all down from here", and they bail out. And of course, the next day, the market goes back up and marches upward for another month, while they put nose-marks on the candy store's glass window. We don't want you to do that.



                      On the other hand, if you really, really study market cycles, and you know exactly what the curves and indicators look like for the past 20 recessions, and you know all about the false indicators too... And you look at the market on a particularly high day and go "now's the time" and sell... That's more the way to do that thing.



                      Then, you better know when to step back in, and that's a lot easier - everytime the TV news shows pictures of brokers jumping out of windows and Mad Max driving down Wall Street, buy.



                      This is called "Wall Street having a 2-for-1 sale".



                      It's still "timing the market", which is considered bad. But keep in mind it's considered bad for a reason; it is highly speculative, and brokers don't want to be sued by their clients for guessing wrong, a viewpoint always taken in 20/20 hindsight. To avoid that liability they created that old chestnut "don't try to time the market".



                      Obviously, your friends who lost it all in the 2008 recession bailed out after the drop, but failed to buy back in at the bottom because they feared it would only go lower and lower forever, and were emotionally put off by the volatility: they became afraid of the market. They broke both rules: buy low, and sell high.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 3 hours ago









                      HarperHarper

                      30.3k6 gold badges47 silver badges101 bronze badges




                      30.3k6 gold badges47 silver badges101 bronze badges















                      • You're forgetting two other important factors: although selling low is bad, there is always a possibility - which is much higher during a recession - that stock you own will lose all value (if the company goes bankrupt). In that case you'd wish you sold it low! Second, I suspect most people who failed to buy back in at the bottom didn't just lose their confidence in the market - they simply lost all money they could invest in the market.

                        – Denis
                        2 hours ago

















                      • You're forgetting two other important factors: although selling low is bad, there is always a possibility - which is much higher during a recession - that stock you own will lose all value (if the company goes bankrupt). In that case you'd wish you sold it low! Second, I suspect most people who failed to buy back in at the bottom didn't just lose their confidence in the market - they simply lost all money they could invest in the market.

                        – Denis
                        2 hours ago
















                      You're forgetting two other important factors: although selling low is bad, there is always a possibility - which is much higher during a recession - that stock you own will lose all value (if the company goes bankrupt). In that case you'd wish you sold it low! Second, I suspect most people who failed to buy back in at the bottom didn't just lose their confidence in the market - they simply lost all money they could invest in the market.

                      – Denis
                      2 hours ago





                      You're forgetting two other important factors: although selling low is bad, there is always a possibility - which is much higher during a recession - that stock you own will lose all value (if the company goes bankrupt). In that case you'd wish you sold it low! Second, I suspect most people who failed to buy back in at the bottom didn't just lose their confidence in the market - they simply lost all money they could invest in the market.

                      – Denis
                      2 hours ago



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

                      Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

                      Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367