What if a restaurant suddenly cannot accept credit cards, and the customer has no cash?How to prove I live in a specific address?Can I pay someone to end a relationship?When can “exact change” policies be enforced?Is it legal for a restaurant to not accept cash?I don't like the payment methods offered by my landlord. Do I still have to pay rent?Are there any Social Security loopholes I can use to justify my inability to pay rent to my parents?Can I get prosecuted in the US for buying and using a stolen gift card?Do legal tender laws prevent “no cash” restaurants?Does the government have to accept cash for taxes?Legal liability for theft of credit card information left in my care with no contract?

Suspension compromise for urban use

Why do my bicycle brakes get worse and feel more 'squishy" over time?

Souce that you can't you tell your wife not to lend to others?

Nirvana is the ground layer underneath them all

What is the most difficult concept to grasp in Calculus 1?

Can anybody tell me who this Pokemon is?

Heyawake: An Introductory Puzzle

What was the intention with the Commodore 128?

Graphs for which a calculus student can reasonably compute the arclength

How do I call a 6-digit Australian phone number with a US-based mobile phone?

Sum Square Difference, which way is more Pythonic?

How to measure if Scrum Master is making a difference and when to give up

Why won't the Republicans use a superdelegate system like the DNC in their nomination process?

What is the opposite of "hunger level"?

What is the prop for Thor's hammer (Mjölnir) made of?

Weird resistor with dots around it

Why does Japan use the same type of AC power outlet as the US?

Sums of binomial coefficients weighted by incomplete gamma

Number in overlapping range

Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?

What is the proper name for a circle with a line through it?

Why aren't rainbows blurred-out into nothing after they are produced?

Escape Velocity - Won't the orbital path just become larger with higher initial velocity?

Some pads on a PCB are marked in clusters and I can't understand which one is which



What if a restaurant suddenly cannot accept credit cards, and the customer has no cash?


How to prove I live in a specific address?Can I pay someone to end a relationship?When can “exact change” policies be enforced?Is it legal for a restaurant to not accept cash?I don't like the payment methods offered by my landlord. Do I still have to pay rent?Are there any Social Security loopholes I can use to justify my inability to pay rent to my parents?Can I get prosecuted in the US for buying and using a stolen gift card?Do legal tender laws prevent “no cash” restaurants?Does the government have to accept cash for taxes?Legal liability for theft of credit card information left in my care with no contract?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8















If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?



Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.










share|improve this question



















  • 8





    Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.

    – animuson
    9 hours ago











  • McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.

    – mark b
    8 hours ago











  • @markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.

    – animuson
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?

    – Vality
    2 hours ago











  • What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.

    – Jesse_b
    2 hours ago

















8















If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?



Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.










share|improve this question



















  • 8





    Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.

    – animuson
    9 hours ago











  • McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.

    – mark b
    8 hours ago











  • @markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.

    – animuson
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?

    – Vality
    2 hours ago











  • What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.

    – Jesse_b
    2 hours ago













8












8








8


1






If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?



Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.










share|improve this question














If a restaurant normally accepts credit cards, and a customer eats a meal there, then tries to pay with his valid credit card, and the cashier says the credit card system is down and they can only accept cash today, and the customer has no cash, and no easy way to get cash, can the customer legally leave without ever paying? Does the restaurant have a simple and legal way to enforce the debt?



Assume the restaurant displays signs that they accept credit cards, and gives no prior notice to the contrary. Also assume the restaurant's bank has just severed its relationship with the restaurant, so credit card payments in any form are not viable.







united-states debt






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 10 hours ago









FlanManFlanMan

1523 bronze badges




1523 bronze badges










  • 8





    Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.

    – animuson
    9 hours ago











  • McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.

    – mark b
    8 hours ago











  • @markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.

    – animuson
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?

    – Vality
    2 hours ago











  • What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.

    – Jesse_b
    2 hours ago












  • 8





    Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.

    – animuson
    9 hours ago











  • McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.

    – mark b
    8 hours ago











  • @markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.

    – animuson
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?

    – Vality
    2 hours ago











  • What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.

    – Jesse_b
    2 hours ago







8




8





Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.

– animuson
9 hours ago





Restaurants (and pretty much any service that depends on payment after services rendered) have paper credit card receipts that they can fill out and manually process later in the event their card systems go down. I've never encountered a restaurant that didn't have this procedure, and would be incredibly surprised to find one that legitimately said they could only accept cash right now. I just experienced this at Applebee's a couple weeks ago.

– animuson
9 hours ago













McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.

– mark b
8 hours ago





McDonalds regularly has 'cash only' times where they only accept cash at the drive through's late at night.

– mark b
8 hours ago













@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.

– animuson
8 hours ago






@markb But you pay for your food before the food is ever given at a place like that. There's no damage to the business if you just walk away, nor is there any debt. All that happens is they lose a customer that didn't have cash.

– animuson
8 hours ago





1




1





@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?

– Vality
2 hours ago





@markb Ive not seen this at any McDonalds ive been to. I semi regularly buy food there late at night while driving and have never once used (or even had on me for that matter) cash. Which country and area is this?

– Vality
2 hours ago













What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.

– Jesse_b
2 hours ago





What @animuson said even though you have specifically added the bank relationship clause as an unrealistic part of your question. Prior to high speed internet being readily available everywhere (not that long ago) all credit card payments were done well after the fact. They just take a copy of your credit card (one of those machines that has the big slide thing) and would process the payment at a later time. Anyone accepting credit cards can still do this.

– Jesse_b
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11














There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.



Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.



The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.



The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.



Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.






share|improve this answer
































    1














    Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.



    The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.



    From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.



    However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.



    One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 7





      The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.

      – David
      8 hours ago







    • 1





      @David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).

      – mongo
      7 hours ago






    • 1





      @David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?

      – mongo
      7 hours ago






    • 4





      Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.

      – David
      7 hours ago














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "617"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43764%2fwhat-if-a-restaurant-suddenly-cannot-accept-credit-cards-and-the-customer-has-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11














    There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.



    Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.



    The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.



    The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.



    Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.






    share|improve this answer





























      11














      There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.



      Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.



      The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.



      The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.



      Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.






      share|improve this answer



























        11












        11








        11







        There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.



        Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.



        The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.



        The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.



        Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.






        share|improve this answer













        There is no intention to commit theft, so there is no criminal act on the part of the customer.



        Even if there was a criminal act, the ability of the restaurant to detain the cusomer (citizen's arrest) is very limited in most jurisdictions.



        The restaurant can ask the customer for his name and address, but there is no legal obligation on the customer to provide this. Refusal to do so, however, might be evidence of intention to avoid paying and at that point the restaurant might call the police.



        The customer can leave, and the restaurant can pursue the debt through the civil courts if they have means to do so - they may have CCTV of the customer and his car registration which can be traced.



        Petrol stations, where people often fill up and then realise they can't pay, usually have established "promise to pay" procedures where they take the customer's details and the customer has 48 hours to pay before police or civil enforcement action is taken.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 10 hours ago









        OwainOwain

        5681 silver badge6 bronze badges




        5681 silver badge6 bronze badges


























            1














            Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.



            The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.



            From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.



            However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.



            One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 7





              The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.

              – David
              8 hours ago







            • 1





              @David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 4





              Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.

              – David
              7 hours ago
















            1














            Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.



            The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.



            From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.



            However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.



            One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 7





              The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.

              – David
              8 hours ago







            • 1





              @David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 4





              Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.

              – David
              7 hours ago














            1












            1








            1







            Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.



            The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.



            From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.



            However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.



            One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.






            share|improve this answer













            Time to negotiate. I had this happen with a $46 tab. I told the manager that I had $21, and that the server should get a tip before the bill was paid. I also offered to take their address and send a check.



            The manager accepted the $21 and agreed that the server would get $8 of it first. Possibly less risk for them than relying on me to send a check.



            From a legal standpoint, they changed the payment terms mid-stream, after I sat down and ordered (contracted) and demanded payment in a specie which I did not expect. In retrospect, I thought that I should not have offered all the cash I had, and it left me in a different town, without an ATM card, and a full day ahead of me. I have not studied it recently, but signs like "no coins" and "no bills over $20" place limitations on how one can pay, and may not be legal. A place doing rather high volume of business should have change for bills over a $20 but they put the signs up after getting a large number of counterfeit bills at a festival.



            However in the scenario presented, finding out that no credit cards are accepted after contracting for food seems like one which requires some flexibility.



            One could walk away, but if the establishment wants to call the police, I would hang around to make your statement to the police, and explain to them that there is no intent to not pay (therefore not criminal, but rather civil). They will most likely make notes and not detain you further.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 10 hours ago









            mongomongo

            2961 silver badge8 bronze badges




            2961 silver badge8 bronze badges










            • 7





              The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.

              – David
              8 hours ago







            • 1





              @David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 4





              Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.

              – David
              7 hours ago













            • 7





              The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.

              – David
              8 hours ago







            • 1





              @David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 1





              @David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?

              – mongo
              7 hours ago






            • 4





              Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.

              – David
              7 hours ago








            7




            7





            The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.

            – David
            8 hours ago






            The musing about restrictions on payment methods being illegal is incorrect. Businesses are required to accept legal tender for settlement of existing debts. They are absolutely permitted to restrict methods of payment as part of the negotiation of the transaction - if you do not like the required payment method, you are free to not enter into the contract. Many businesses nowadays do not accept cash at all, and this is perfectly compliant with the law.

            – David
            8 hours ago





            1




            1





            @David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).

            – mongo
            7 hours ago





            @David, the problem comes in, as the OP stated, when one finds out about a change in terms after the contract (order and service).

            – mongo
            7 hours ago




            1




            1





            @David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?

            – mongo
            7 hours ago





            @David, your statement appears to be self contradictory in "required to accept legal tender" and "restrict methods of payment." Normally coins and banknotes are considered legal tender, and credit cards, debit cards and similar and electronic forms are not. Legal tender laws normally define what must be accepted to satisfy a debt. If cash must be accepted, and a business does not accept cash, AND informs you after a debt is established, that would be an interesting case. Do you have a case cite on that?

            – mongo
            7 hours ago




            4




            4





            Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.

            – David
            7 hours ago






            Indeed, which is why I was explicit that I was addressing only your incorrect side musing, not the original situation. My statement only appears contradictory if you quote the first half of the sentence I wrote out of the important context provided by the latter half. You will find less apparent contradictions in life if you stop quoting people out of context. If nobody has ever explained the importance of context to you before, let this serve to do so.

            – David
            7 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43764%2fwhat-if-a-restaurant-suddenly-cannot-accept-credit-cards-and-the-customer-has-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367