Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?Are there any Utah, USA laws about landlords providing fire extinguishers or other fire suppression?Who is responsible for an intra-hospital ambulance?Can a US President give police a “kill order”?Is it ever legal for a company to instruct employees not to call 911?Can an apartment release my package without approval, warning, or notification?How is a USA marriage dissolved if neither spouse is resident in the USA?Does a citizen have to open the door to UK police if they do not give a reason?Can apartment management terminate leases over a rule tenants never signed?Possible legal steps for psychological damage caused by a companyIs a police car parked perpendicular to the road (with flashing lights) sufficient by itself to legally establish road closure to all traffic?

Connect neutrals together in 3-gang box (load side) with 3x 3-way switches?

Filtering fine silt/mud from water (not necessarily bacteria etc.)

Is it rude to tell recruiters I would only change jobs for a better salary?

How would you write do the dialogues of two characters talking in a chat room?

Why is the collector feedback bias popular in electret-mic preamp circuits?

Is this more than a packing puzzle?

Teferi's Time Twist on creature with +1/+1 counter

How to make "plastic" sounding distored guitar

Do native speakers use ZVE or CPU?

Will it hurt my career to work as a graphic designer in a startup for beauty and skin care?

Why hasn't the U.S. government paid war reparations to any country it attacked?

Nested-Loop-Join: How many comparisons and how many pages-accesses?

Is this a plot hole in the Lost Mine of Phandelver adventure?

I do not have power to all my breakers

why run a service as a system user?

What is the German equivalent of 干物女 (dried fish woman)?

Absconding a company after 1st day of joining

How long do Apple retain notifications to be pushed to iOS devices until they expire?

Why does ffmpeg choose 10+20+20ms instead of an even 16ms for 60fps gifs?

Hot object in a vacuum

Won 50K! Now what should I do with it

What impact would a dragon the size of Asia have on the environment?

What is this old "lemon-squeezer" shaped pan

Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?



Can a Resident Assistant Be Told to Ignore a Lawful Order?


Are there any Utah, USA laws about landlords providing fire extinguishers or other fire suppression?Who is responsible for an intra-hospital ambulance?Can a US President give police a “kill order”?Is it ever legal for a company to instruct employees not to call 911?Can an apartment release my package without approval, warning, or notification?How is a USA marriage dissolved if neither spouse is resident in the USA?Does a citizen have to open the door to UK police if they do not give a reason?Can apartment management terminate leases over a rule tenants never signed?Possible legal steps for psychological damage caused by a companyIs a police car parked perpendicular to the road (with flashing lights) sufficient by itself to legally establish road closure to all traffic?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.



A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.



Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).



The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.



Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.



Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.



Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2





    Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.

    – BlueDogRanch
    9 hours ago







  • 1





    Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.

    – Dale M
    8 hours ago











  • It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.

    – Chris Brace
    11 mins ago


















4















Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.



A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.



Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).



The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.



Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.



Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.



Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 2





    Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.

    – BlueDogRanch
    9 hours ago







  • 1





    Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.

    – Dale M
    8 hours ago











  • It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.

    – Chris Brace
    11 mins ago














4












4








4


1






Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.



A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.



Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).



The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.



Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.



Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.



Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Today I have an interesting question involving Police, Fire, and university administration.



A little bit of background: for the past few years, my University has been involved in a small, awkward cold war with local emergency responders over expectations on live-in Residential Assistants during emergency situations. Specifically, the biggest flashpoints are fire alarms and wellness checks on residents.



Within the dorms, we have been told that both Campus Police and Local Fire Departments have been provided keys to all rooms in case an emergency (fire or safety) is reported. We have also been told that we are, under no circumstances, to assist Police or Fire with entering a room (to which we have keys as Resident Assistants, for lockouts and the like).



The heads of the Residential Services Office insist that this is to protect the department in the case of a privacy complaint on behalf of a resident who we let police into the room of, and to avoid ordering (by policy) RAs back into a potentially dangerous building under alarm.



Police and fire, meanwhile, never seem to have the keys. Thus, for the safety of the building or the ill resident, they will order us to open up the door for them.



Which brings us to the issue: Police/fire wants us to open a door, and gives us what I believe is a lawful order do so. Meanwhile, Residence Life wants us to call up to our supervisor and follow a whole procedure, directly countermanding the orders of the officer or firefighter on scene.



Must I open the door, legally speaking? And is my department's policy of refusal illegal/unenforceable?







united-states police ohio emergencies






share|improve this question









New contributor



Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 55 secs ago







Chris Brace













New contributor



Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 9 hours ago









Chris BraceChris Brace

232 bronze badges




232 bronze badges




New contributor



Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Chris Brace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 2





    Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.

    – BlueDogRanch
    9 hours ago







  • 1





    Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.

    – Dale M
    8 hours ago











  • It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.

    – Chris Brace
    11 mins ago













  • 2





    Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.

    – BlueDogRanch
    9 hours ago







  • 1





    Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.

    – Dale M
    8 hours ago











  • It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.

    – Chris Brace
    11 mins ago








2




2





Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.

– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago






Public university? It's obviously something that needs to be clarified by your university's legal counsel (with them talking to the city police/fire) and stipulated in writing and in your RA work contract. Talk to the legal counsel; they will be part of the overall U administration, at the same admin level as the president, provost, etc.

– BlueDogRanch
9 hours ago





1




1





Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.

– Dale M
8 hours ago





Police and fire fighters have boots - that’s a universal key.

– Dale M
8 hours ago













It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.

– Chris Brace
11 mins ago






It's a private university, but I agree, I think the department heads need to talk to legal. And @DaleM, we've actually had them use that key a few times on a few doors, hence the more recent urgency of these discussions.

– Chris Brace
11 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not




Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.




If you do,




misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.




You also cannot




Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind




"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.



In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.



The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when




the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety




etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).






share|improve this answer























  • This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.

    – Chris Brace
    2 mins ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42930%2fcan-a-resident-assistant-be-told-to-ignore-a-lawful-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not




Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.




If you do,




misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.




You also cannot




Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind




"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.



In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.



The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when




the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety




etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).






share|improve this answer























  • This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.

    – Chris Brace
    2 mins ago
















5














There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not




Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.




If you do,




misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.




You also cannot




Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind




"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.



In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.



The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when




the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety




etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).






share|improve this answer























  • This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.

    – Chris Brace
    2 mins ago














5












5








5







There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not




Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.




If you do,




misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.




You also cannot




Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind




"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.



In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.



The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when




the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety




etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).






share|improve this answer













There is a state law that requires you to obey the police: ORC 2917.13, which says you may not




Fail to obey the lawful order of any law enforcement officer engaged
in the law enforcement officer's duties at the scene of or in
connection with a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind.




If you do,




misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If a
violation of this section creates a risk of physical harm to persons
or property, misconduct at an emergency is a misdemeanor of the first
degree.




You also cannot




Hamper the lawful operations of any law enforcement officer,
firefighter, rescuer, medical person, emergency medical services
person, or other authorized person, engaged in the person's duties at
the scene of a fire, accident, disaster, riot, or emergency of any
kind




"Hamper" is not defined statutorily, but the plain meaning of "hamper" is not the same as "fail to assist". We have not established that the order is lawful, however, which is crucial. The police cannot just freely search a residence without permission. If they have permission from the occupant, they can search and seize. If they have probable cause to believe that a crime exists and the circumstances make a warrant impractical, they can search and seize. I don't know what you mean by "wellness check", but that seems plainly to be unlawful entry. However, if the resident calls 911 and reports that he is having an issue, that is sufficient consent for entry.



In the case of a fire alarm, the fire code authorizes a fire department official in charge of an actual emergency response incident to order the evacuation of a building, and occupants are required to comply. If we suppose that the smoke detector in a room has gone off, the fire department is authorized to inspect for fire, and there is a provision under the law about failure to obey a lawful command (to open the door so that they can look for fire). Problem: you cannot know whether the order is lawful. The officer doesn't decide what is lawful, the courts do (after the fact), and typically a command is found to be lawful unless it is clearly unlawful.



The order from your supervisor is not "enforceable" in the sense that you can be arrested and imprisoned or fined for disobeying the boss. However, there is a potential club they can use against you, namely firing you for disobeying the order. Normally, you can be fired for wearing the wrong shirt. But there are laws about employers doing illegal things, such as ORC 4113.52, which provides recourse when




the employee reasonably believes that the violation is a criminal
offense that is likely to cause an imminent risk of physical harm to
persons or a hazard to public health or safety




etc. In which case you report this to the supervisor, they have 24 hours after getting the report to correct the situation, and after that you would report the situation to the county prosecutor. (Read all of the details in the linked law, don't just skip steps: this is an executive summary). Having done this, you are protected from being fired, demoted. reassigned etc. The employer will be strongly motivated to not incur the penalties for violating the whistle blower statute. Additionally, you can sue the employer if they fire you for refusing to violate the law (termination in violation of public policy).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









user6726user6726

65.9k4 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges




65.9k4 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges












  • This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.

    – Chris Brace
    2 mins ago


















  • This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.

    – Chris Brace
    2 mins ago

















This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.

– Chris Brace
2 mins ago






This is an excellent summary of the relevant law, and confirms several of my (admittedly non-legal) suspicions. To clarify, a wellness check is where another resident has called the police, and indicated they believe the resident is an imminent harm to themselves. A rare, but dangerous situation. And just knowing that the order is legally suspect should hopefully encourage some change - this policy regarding fire alarms has been on the ropes for awhile, and I think with the proper legal challenge, it will quickly fall away.

– Chris Brace
2 mins ago











Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Chris Brace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42930%2fcan-a-resident-assistant-be-told-to-ignore-a-lawful-order%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367