Does this Wild Magic result affect the sorcerer or just other creatures?If a paladin becomes Large, at what point does the paladin's aura originate?Does the Holy Nimbus emanate actual sunlight?Can a Symbol spell affect the same creature more than once?What happens if I can't see a space within 10 feet for the purposes of Blink?Does hurling the flame from Produce Flame cost another action?Does Wild Magic continue if I am unconscious/dead?Would continually decreasing your height with Wild Magic Surges eventually make you vanish from existence?Can Wild Magic Surges restore hit points and spell slots to a Simulacrum of a Wild Magic Sorcerer?Does the Maddening Darkness spell affect creatures in its radius if they have 9th-level magical light illuminating it?Does the spell Wall of Fire shed light?If a sorcerer casts Sickening Radiance with the Careful Spell metamagic option, does he have to spend a sorcery point every round?

Helping ease my back pain when I'm studying 13 hours everyday, even weekends

How is hair tissue mineral analysis performed?

Would it be a copyright violation if I made a character’s full name refer to a song?

What size of powerbank will I need to power a phone and DSLR for 2 weeks?

Why don't countries like Japan just print more money?

Is a single radon-daughter atom in air a solid?

Who are the remaining King/Queenslayers?

Why does the Saturn V have standalone inter-stage rings?

How much will studying magic in an academy cost?

Can humans ever directly see a few photons at a time? Can a human see a single photon?

What's the difference between a deep fryer and a chip pan?

Why do even high-end cameras often still include normal (non-cross-type) AF sensors?

Can you find x?

"How can you guarantee that you won't change/quit job after just couple of months?" How to respond?

What exactly is the 'online' in OLAP and OLTP?

Can White Castle?

Inaccessible base class despite friendship

Should developer taking test phones home or put in office?

What is the origin of Scooby-Doo's name?

What is the legal status of travelling with methadone in your carry-on?

How to draw this center trajectory of rolling ball?

Cut the gold chain

Can there be an UN resolution to remove a country from the UNSC?

How to remove this component from PCB



Does this Wild Magic result affect the sorcerer or just other creatures?


If a paladin becomes Large, at what point does the paladin's aura originate?Does the Holy Nimbus emanate actual sunlight?Can a Symbol spell affect the same creature more than once?What happens if I can't see a space within 10 feet for the purposes of Blink?Does hurling the flame from Produce Flame cost another action?Does Wild Magic continue if I am unconscious/dead?Would continually decreasing your height with Wild Magic Surges eventually make you vanish from existence?Can Wild Magic Surges restore hit points and spell slots to a Simulacrum of a Wild Magic Sorcerer?Does the Maddening Darkness spell affect creatures in its radius if they have 9th-level magical light illuminating it?Does the spell Wall of Fire shed light?If a sorcerer casts Sickening Radiance with the Careful Spell metamagic option, does he have to spend a sorcery point every round?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8












$begingroup$


A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago


















8












$begingroup$


A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$


A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?







dnd-5e class-feature sorcerer wild-magic






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









RykaraRykara

8,4572765




8,4572765







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
$endgroup$
– findusl
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
$endgroup$
– findusl
7 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
@NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
$endgroup$
– Bagahnoodles
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
@NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
$endgroup$
– Bagahnoodles
6 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

Most likely only other creatures



This is similar to Aura effects in that:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



But it's awful wording



Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$

Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
the end of its next turn.




She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
the sphere’s area of effect.




A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
to piercing damage for the next minute.




You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
casts a spell.



89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
attack or cast a spell.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150228%2fdoes-this-wild-magic-result-affect-the-sorcerer-or-just-other-creatures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11












    $begingroup$

    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago















    11












    $begingroup$

    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago













    11












    11








    11





    $begingroup$

    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    NautArchNautArch

    69.7k11269467




    69.7k11269467











    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago













    2












    $begingroup$

    Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




    75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
    Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
    the end of its next turn.




    She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



    For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




    You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
    from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
    that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
    the sphere’s area of effect.




    A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




    95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
    to piercing damage for the next minute.




    You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



    Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




    69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
    next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
    casts a spell.



    89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
    time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
    attack or cast a spell.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




      75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
      Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
      the end of its next turn.




      She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



      For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




      You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
      from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
      that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
      the sphere’s area of effect.




      A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




      95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
      to piercing damage for the next minute.




      You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



      Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




      69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
      next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
      casts a spell.



      89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
      time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
      attack or cast a spell.







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




        75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
        Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
        the end of its next turn.




        She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



        For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




        You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
        from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
        that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
        the sphere’s area of effect.




        A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




        95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
        to piercing damage for the next minute.




        You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



        Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




        69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
        next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
        casts a spell.



        89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
        time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
        attack or cast a spell.







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




        75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
        Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
        the end of its next turn.




        She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



        For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




        You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
        from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
        that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
        the sphere’s area of effect.




        A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




        95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
        to piercing damage for the next minute.




        You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



        Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




        69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
        next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
        casts a spell.



        89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
        time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
        attack or cast a spell.








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 5 hours ago

























        answered 7 hours ago









        AkixkisuAkixkisu

        4,90321852




        4,90321852



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150228%2fdoes-this-wild-magic-result-affect-the-sorcerer-or-just-other-creatures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Invision Community Contents History See also References External links Navigation menuProprietaryinvisioncommunity.comIPS Community ForumsIPS Community Forumsthis blog entry"License Changes, IP.Board 3.4, and the Future""Interview -- Matt Mecham of Ibforums""CEO Invision Power Board, Matt Mecham Is a Liar, Thief!"IPB License Explanation 1.3, 1.3.1, 2.0, and 2.1ArchivedSecurity Fixes, Updates And Enhancements For IPB 1.3.1Archived"New Demo Accounts - Invision Power Services"the original"New Default Skin"the original"Invision Power Board 3.0.0 and Applications Released"the original"Archived copy"the original"Perpetual licenses being done away with""Release Notes - Invision Power Services""Introducing: IPS Community Suite 4!"Invision Community Release Notes

            Canceling a color specificationRandomly assigning color to Graphics3D objects?Default color for Filling in Mathematica 9Coloring specific elements of sets with a prime modified order in an array plotHow to pick a color differing significantly from the colors already in a given color list?Detection of the text colorColor numbers based on their valueCan color schemes for use with ColorData include opacity specification?My dynamic color schemes

            Tom Holland Mục lục Đầu đời và giáo dục | Sự nghiệp | Cuộc sống cá nhân | Phim tham gia | Giải thưởng và đề cử | Chú thích | Liên kết ngoài | Trình đơn chuyển hướngProfile“Person Details for Thomas Stanley Holland, "England and Wales Birth Registration Index, 1837-2008" — FamilySearch.org”"Meet Tom Holland... the 16-year-old star of The Impossible""Schoolboy actor Tom Holland finds himself in Oscar contention for role in tsunami drama"“Naomi Watts on the Prince William and Harry's reaction to her film about the late Princess Diana”lưu trữ"Holland and Pflueger Are West End's Two New 'Billy Elliots'""I'm so envious of my son, the movie star! British writer Dominic Holland's spent 20 years trying to crack Hollywood - but he's been beaten to it by a very unlikely rival"“Richard and Margaret Povey of Jersey, Channel Islands, UK: Information about Thomas Stanley Holland”"Tom Holland to play Billy Elliot""New Billy Elliot leaving the garage"Billy Elliot the Musical - Tom Holland - Billy"A Tale of four Billys: Tom Holland""The Feel Good Factor""Thames Christian College schoolboys join Myleene Klass for The Feelgood Factor""Government launches £600,000 arts bursaries pilot""BILLY's Chapman, Holland, Gardner & Jackson-Keen Visit Prime Minister""Elton John 'blown away' by Billy Elliot fifth birthday" (video with John's interview and fragments of Holland's performance)"First News interviews Arrietty's Tom Holland"“33rd Critics' Circle Film Awards winners”“National Board of Review Current Awards”Bản gốc"Ron Howard Whaling Tale 'In The Heart Of The Sea' Casts Tom Holland"“'Spider-Man' Finds Tom Holland to Star as New Web-Slinger”lưu trữ“Captain America: Civil War (2016)”“Film Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’”lưu trữ“‘Captain America: Civil War’ review: Choose your own avenger”lưu trữ“The Lost City of Z reviews”“Sony Pictures and Marvel Studios Find Their 'Spider-Man' Star and Director”“‘Mary Magdalene’, ‘Current War’ & ‘Wind River’ Get 2017 Release Dates From Weinstein”“Lionsgate Unleashing Daisy Ridley & Tom Holland Starrer ‘Chaos Walking’ In Cannes”“PTA's 'Master' Leads Chicago Film Critics Nominations, UPDATED: Houston and Indiana Critics Nominations”“Nominaciones Goya 2013 Telecinco Cinema – ENG”“Jameson Empire Film Awards: Martin Freeman wins best actor for performance in The Hobbit”“34th Annual Young Artist Awards”Bản gốc“Teen Choice Awards 2016—Captain America: Civil War Leads Second Wave of Nominations”“BAFTA Film Award Nominations: ‘La La Land’ Leads Race”“Saturn Awards Nominations 2017: 'Rogue One,' 'Walking Dead' Lead”Tom HollandTom HollandTom HollandTom Hollandmedia.gettyimages.comWorldCat Identities300279794no20130442900000 0004 0355 42791085670554170004732cb16706349t(data)XX5557367